The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 45 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Matterport 表现出色 .
FirstView 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Virtual Tours and 360 Video.
基于 HTR 上 45 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 0 | 45 |
在分析了 45 条经验证的评价后,Matterport 用户最看重其 ,而 FirstView 用户则强调 团队的专业精神和同理心, 用户体验, 3d 虚拟游览和图表。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
团队的专业精神和同理心
▾
|
|
|
+
用户体验
▾
|
|
|
+
3D 虚拟游览和图表
▾
|
|
|
+
营销和销售工具
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
技术改进
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 3D 虚拟游览 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) | — | #2 2 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #2 16 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #5 0 条评价 | #2 12 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | — | #2 15 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #2 24 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #5 0 条评价 | #2 22 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #2 21 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 | #4 0 条评价 | #2 1 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #2 9 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #1 28 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #2 0 条评价 |
Both Matterport and FirstView aim to help your hotel showcase spaces virtually, but they approach this goal differently. Matterport focuses solely on 3D walkthroughs and immersive media, while FirstView combines high-quality virtual tours with additional multimedia features like drone footage and interactive hotspots. Your choice hinges on whether you need a straightforward 3D walkthrough solution or a more versatile, content-rich virtual presentation.
Given the recent reviews and larger user base, FirstView’s platform is more actively used and supported. Are you prepared to prioritize ease of use and feature variety, or are you seeking a specialized 3D space visualization tool?
Both products enable virtual tours, but their focus diverges significantly. Matterport is known for its immersive 3D walkthroughs, using camera technology to create detailed virtual models of spaces, making it ideal for industries like real estate or property management. FirstView, on the other hand, offers a suite of content options, including 360 video, drone footage, and interactive hotspots, making it more suitable for hotels that want to create engaging, multimedia-rich marketing content.
Matterport’s approach is highly technical, often requiring specialized equipment, and its reviews reflect limited recent feedback, resulting in less confidence in current support and innovation. FirstView, with over 44 recent reviews and an average rating of 5/5, shows active improvement and user satisfaction, especially in hospitality contexts. Which type of virtual presentation aligns better with your hotel’s marketing and guest engagement goals?
If your hotel needs a comprehensive visual content platform to boost marketing and guest engagement, FirstView is the clear choice. With a 5/5 overall rating based on 44 reviews and superior ease of use rated at 4.7/5, FirstView’s platform is favored for its high-quality visuals, multiple content types, and dedicated support. Its ability to incorporate drone footage, videos, and interactive elements makes it ideal for hotels seeking a broad multimedia toolkit.
Conversely, if your primary goal is creating detailed, virtual reality-style walkthroughs, and your team has the technical capacity for equipment setup, Matterport might seem appealing. However, the lack of recent reviews and a lack of verified integrations or active regional presence make FirstView the more reliable choice for most hoteliers today. For most hotels aiming to increase bookings and showcase spaces vividly, FirstView is the better fit.
FirstView’s user interface has received a rating of 4.7/5, and users praise its intuitive platform that minimizes technical hurdles. Clients mention that the tool is easy to operate, with straightforward content sharing via links and a smooth onboarding process rated at 4.69/5. Support from the FirstView team is highly personalized, with a review score of 4.91/5, emphasizing their attentive assistance.
Matterport, with a rating of 0/5, has no recent reviews or user feedback, indicating little current data on ease of use or onboarding. Based on available information, FirstView clearly offers a more accessible experience for your team. Edge: FirstView.
Matterport offers no additional features beyond its core 3D walkthroughs, relying solely on immersive space visualization. FirstView, however, provides five distinct features: virtual tours, 360 video, drone footage, interactive hotspots, and diagramming & floorplanning, giving your hotel a richer array of visual content.
These added features allow for more engaging guest experiences and versatile marketing assets, making FirstView’s platform more adaptable for different marketing strategies. If broad multimedia content is a priority, FirstView’s feature set offers a decisive advantage. Edge: FirstView.
FirstView’s customer support is highly rated at 4.91/5, with reviews highlighting dedicated, professional assistance throughout project execution. Clients consistently praise the team’s attentiveness, making support a key factor in successful implementation.
Matterport, with no recent reviews or ratings, provides no current data on support quality. Given the importance of onboarding and ongoing assistance, FirstView’s demonstrated support edge makes it the more reliable option. Edge: FirstView.
FirstView boasts one verified integration, offering a connection within its ecosystem, while Matterport has no verified integrations listed. Both platforms are somewhat isolated, but FirstView’s existing partnership indicates a potential for extending functionality.
If seamless integration with other hotel management or marketing tools is essential, FirstView’s existing setup and active presence in multiple regions suggest a slightly more adaptable approach. Edge: FirstView.
With 44 recent reviews and an overall rating of 5/5, FirstView clearly outperforms Matterport, which has no recent reviews or ratings. Hoteliers across various segments—particularly in luxury, branded, and resort categories—rate FirstView highly, citing ease of use, visual quality, and support as key strengths.
Matterport’s lack of feedback makes it impossible to gauge current user satisfaction, but the absence of recent reviews indicates it’s less actively supported or adopted. For hoteliers seeking peer-validated success, FirstView is the preferred choice. Edge: FirstView.
Both products do not publicly disclose specific pricing models, and no free tiers or trials are available. Typically, costs for such platforms vary depending on features, scale, and regional factors, but precise figures are unavailable for direct comparison.
Given the lack of transparent pricing, your decision should consider the value and support offered, which favors FirstView based on user satisfaction and feature set.
Hotels that:
Not ideal if:
Matterport suits niche applications more than typical hotel marketing.
Hotels that:
Not ideal if:
FirstView is ideal for hotels focused on marketing, sales, and guest experience.
The core difference between Matterport and FirstView is that Matterport specializes solely in 3D walkthroughs, while FirstView offers a broader multimedia content suite. If your hotel needs immersive, high-quality virtual tours for marketing or operational purposes, FirstView’s diverse features and active support make it the superior choice.
Choose Matterport if you require precise, VR-ready 3D models for real estate or design scenarios and have the technical resources to deploy them. For most hoteliers aiming to increase bookings, improve guest experience, and streamline marketing efforts, FirstView’s platform provides more value and confidence.
In summary, for hotels seeking a user-friendly, feature-rich virtual tour solution with proven satisfaction and ongoing support, FirstView stands out. If your focus is highly specialized VR modeling, and your team can handle complex setups, Matterport remains a niche option—yet its recent lack of reviews makes it a less compelling choice today.
3D 虚拟游览 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|---|
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Matterport (3D Walkthroughs) 和 FirstView 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 360度视频 | ||
| 互动热点 | ||
| 无人机镜头 | ||
| 绘图和平面图 | ||
| 虚拟旅游 |
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
几篇评论都称赞了 FirstView 团队的专业素养和同理心。他们积极参与流程,注重细节,并具有合作精神,为各个项目带来了令人满意的结果。
客户发现 FirstView 易于使用且直观,其用户友好界面只需进行少量调整。该工具的效率和通过链接共享内容的便捷性对于房产展示和虚拟现场检查特别有帮助。
用户对 FirstView 的高品质 3D 虚拟游览非常满意,该游览提供了沉浸式的详细物业视图,包括公共区域、房间和活动空间。这些游览被视为营销和销售团队的宝贵工具... 用户对 FirstView 的高品质 3D 虚拟游览非常满意,该游览提供了沉浸式的详细物业视图,包括公共区域、房间和活动空间。这些游览被视为营销和销售团队的宝贵工具,可增强客户参与度并提供物业的真实预览。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户认为有些技术方面可以改进。这些包括虚拟游览中的移动、离线模式或精简版的潜力,以及对最终内容编辑的更多控制。此外,一些用户提到需要改进虚拟现实。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Matterport (3D Walkthroughs) 和 FirstView 共享许多核心 3D Virtual Tours 功能,但各有独特的能力。Matterport (3D Walkthroughs) 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 FirstView 提供 1 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。FirstView 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Matterport (3D Walkthroughs):否。FirstView:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 3D Virtual Tours 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Matterport 的 HT Score 为 0,FirstView 的为 86。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问