The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 12 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
80 Days 表现出色 .
Neobookings 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 .
基于 HTR 上 12 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 0 | 12 |
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 数字营销机构 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) | — | #13 3 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #14 6 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | — | #10 3 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #22 0 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #15 6 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #14 7 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | — | #19 1 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 | — | #10 3 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 欧洲 | — | #17 2 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #21 0 条评价 |
Choosing the right digital marketing partner for your hotel can significantly influence your online visibility, guest engagement, and revenue. Both 80 Days and Neobookings aim to serve the hospitality sector, but they tackle different problems: 80 Days is a niche marketing agency specializing in luxury hotels, while Neobookings offers an all-in-one digital marketing service with a broader reach. Which one aligns better with your hotel’s goals?
Your decision hinges on whether you prioritize specialized luxury marketing expertise or a more comprehensive, data-driven approach that fits various hotel types. Do you want a boutique agency with deep luxury market knowledge or a versatile platform with extensive integrations? Let’s compare.
80 Days, despite its strong branding as a luxury travel marketing agency, has a zero rating and no recent reviews, which indicates a lack of recent user feedback and possible limited current support. In contrast, Neobookings boasts 12 recent reviews, a near-perfect Net Promoter Score (9.92/10), and a 5/5 ease of use and support rating, making it the more transparent and actively supported option.
While 80 Days claims expertise in luxury marketing, the absence of recent reviews and a lack of tangible features or client testimonials make it hard to verify its current effectiveness. Conversely, Neobookings provides a suite of tools with high user satisfaction and proven support, which is critical when evaluating a marketing partner.
Given the more recent and plentiful reviews, Neobookings’ reputation and customer satisfaction hold more weight. Are you comfortable working with a silent or less transparent provider, or do you prefer a well-supported platform with clearer evidence of ongoing success?
If your hotel needs a digital marketing service with proven support, extensive integrations, and tangible recent reviews, go with Neobookings. Its platform is rated 5/5 for ease of use, customer support, and value, with 12 recent reviews emphasizing its intuitive interface and strategic results.
However, if you’re a luxury hotel seeking specialized marketing advice tailored to high-end clientele, 80 Days could be appealing. But remember, it lacks recent reviews and a current active presence, making it a riskier choice. For most hotels, especially those seeking reliable, data-driven marketing, Neobookings offers a more assured path.
In summary, for active support, proven customer satisfaction, and broad integration, Neobookings outperforms 80 Days. If your focus is purely luxury market positioning and you have confidence in an agency’s reputation, 80 Days might still be worth considering, though evidence is limited.
Neobookings scores a perfect 5/5 on ease of use and onboarding, with reviews praising its intuitive interface, straightforward configuration, and attentive support team. Reviewers highlight their ease in customizing marketing campaigns and integrating with other systems, making daily management smoother.
In contrast, 80 Days has a zero score across all usability metrics, with no recent reviews to assess its current interface or onboarding process. This suggests a lack of recent testing or user feedback, which could imply outdated or unsupported software.
Edge: Neobookings.
Neobookings offers a rich set of features, including over 20 verified integrations with platforms like Hotelchamp, SiteMinder, Stripe, and Oracle Hospitality. Its platform supports real-time data monitoring, AI-generated guest review summaries, and targeted marketing recommendations, making it a comprehensive marketing toolkit.
80 Days, by comparison, claims to be a creative and digital marketing agency but provides no specific features, tools, or platform details publicly. Its lack of transparency about functionalities and the absence of a feature list place it at a disadvantage.
Edge: Neobookings.
Neobookings scores a perfect 5/5 for customer support and onboarding, with reviews describing their team as attentive, friendly, and quick to resolve incidents. Clients appreciate the personalized support, transparent communication, and ongoing improvements.
80 Days, however, has no recent reviews or ratings, leaving its support quality uncertain. The absence of current customer feedback suggests that support and responsiveness are unverified or potentially lacking.
Edge: Neobookings.
Neobookings boasts 20 verified integrations, including industry-standard partners like Hotelchamp, SiteMinder, Stripe, and Oracle Hospitality. These integrations enable better data flow, booking management, and marketing automation.
80 Days has only one verified partner, offering minimal integration options. This limits its ability to connect with other systems and adapt to your existing tech stack.
Edge: Neobookings.
Since 80 Days has no recent reviews, it’s impossible to gauge user satisfaction. Neobookings, with 12 recent reviews, has a high 9.92/10 NPS score, with hoteliers praising its ease of use, strategic support, and tangible results.
Hotels across segments—luxury, boutique, or mid-size chains—rated Neobookings highly, emphasizing its support in growing direct bookings and simplifying marketing efforts. The recent review activity makes Neobookings the clear leader in user satisfaction.
Edge: Neobookings.
Both products do not publicly share pricing details, suggesting custom quotes based on hotel size and needs. Given the lack of transparency, it’s best to contact them directly for tailored proposals.
However, Neobookings positions itself as offering high ROI, with a focus on profitability and results, which may justify higher investment. 80 Days’ lack of detailed pricing and recent activity makes cost comparison difficult.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Neobookings and 80 Days serve different purposes: one is a digital marketing platform, the other a niche agency. 80 Days claims expertise in luxury marketing but lacks recent validation, making it a risky choice for most hoteliers.
If your hotel needs a proven, easy-to-use digital marketing platform with high support and strong recent reviews, Neobookings is the safer, more confident pick. It offers tangible integrations, satisfied hoteliers, and consistent support—key factors for your team’s success.
Conversely, if you’re a luxury hotel that values bespoke services and deep sector expertise, and you’re willing to accept the risks, 80 Days might align with your goals. Just be aware that the lack of recent activity or reviews could pose challenges.
For most hotels prioritizing reliability, support, and measurable results, Neobookings offers a clear advantage. It’s the product you can depend on to grow your market presence and bookings today.
数字营销机构 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|---|
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
Website Development
|
|
|
| WordPress 开发 | ||
| 自定义内容管理系统 | ||
| 平面设计 | ||
| 互动内容 | ||
| 文案 | ||
| 转化率优化 | ||
| 标签管理和跟踪配置 | ||
| Web开发 | ||
| 网页设计 | ||
|
▾
SEO & Content
|
|
|
| 互动内容 | ||
| 内容审核 | ||
| SEO内容策略 | ||
| 文案 | ||
| 搜索引擎优化 | ||
|
▾
付费搜索和数字广告
|
|
|
| 社交媒体广告 | ||
| 影响者营销 | ||
| 文案 | ||
| 第三方广告购买 | ||
| 元搜索营销 | ||
| 每次点击付费 | ||
|
▾
E-commerce
|
|
|
| 电子商务咨询 | ||
| 转化率优化 | ||
| 标签管理和跟踪配置 | ||
|
▾
Reporting & Analytics
|
|
|
| 标签管理和跟踪配置 | ||
| 数据分析和报告 | ||
|
▾
Email Marketing
|
|
|
| 营销自动化 | ||
| 电子邮件营销 | ||
|
▾
Consulting Services
|
|
|
| 电子商务咨询 | ||
| 收益管理(服务/咨询) | ||
| 内容审核 | ||
| 文案 | ||
|
▾
Social Media Management
|
|
|
| 社交媒体摄影 | ||
| 社交媒体分析 | ||
| 声誉与社区管理 | ||
| 平面设计 | ||
| 社交媒体管理 | ||
| 社交媒体广告 | ||
| 影响者营销 |
我们分析了 1 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Neobookings really cares about our business, and their 360 solutions are very convenient for us since we don't have to deal with many different people/vendors for the various servi..."
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。80 Days 和 Neobookings Digital Marketing Strategies 共享许多核心 Digital Marketing Agencies 功能,但各有独特的能力。80 Days 提供 1 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Neobookings Digital Marketing Strategies 提供 20 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Neobookings Digital Marketing Strategies 在易用性方面领先,评分为 5.0/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
80 Days:否。Neobookings Digital Marketing Strategies:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Digital Marketing Agencies 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。80 Days 的 HT Score 为 0,Neobookings 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您的房产情况量身定制的推荐方案