The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 | Acigroup |
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #15 54 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #23 23 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #20 8 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #18 2 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 | Acigroup |
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #19 41 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #16 38 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #19 21 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #10 18 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 | Acigroup |
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #15 39 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #6 142 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #33 2 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #29 1 条评价 |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is critical for your hotel's operational success and guest satisfaction. Both Acigrup PMS and eviivo Suite™ aim to streamline hotel management, but their offerings diverge significantly. Acigrup’s platform has no recent reviews, a low rating, and lacks customer feedback, whereas eviivo boasts a high user rating, extensive recent reviews, and a broad feature set. Which platform aligns better with your hotel’s needs?
While Acigrup appears to be an under-the-radar option with limited market presence, eviivo has a proven track record across multiple regions with thousands of users. Are you ready to prioritize a well-supported, feature-rich solution?
Both products address core PMS functions like reservations, check-ins, billing, and housekeeping. However, eviivo offers a comprehensive, cloud-based platform built to serve properties of all sizes, with over 191 recent reviews highlighting its ease of use and strong support. Acigrup’s platform, with zero reviews and no recent feedback, remains untested in the current market and appears to lack features compared to eviivo’s extensive suite.
eviivo’s platform is designed for diverse property types, from small B&Bs to large resorts, and offers integrations with major OTAs, unlike Acigrup, which has no verified partners. Given the gap in market presence and reviews, is it worth risking your operational efficiency on an unproven solution?
If your hotel needs a cloud-based system that supports multiple channels, guest communication, automated tasks, and has a proven track record, go with eviivo. It’s suitable for independents, vacation rentals, B&Bs, and small hotels seeking robust features and reliable support.
If you’re a small operation with minimal requirements, or if budget constraints prohibit a $700+ monthly investment, Acigrup might seem appealing—though its lack of recent reviews and features makes it a risky choice. For most hotels, eviivo’s proven performance clearly outweighs Acigrup’s untested offering.
eviivo’s user rating of 4.43/5 and recent reviews emphasize its intuitive interface, fast onboarding, and positive staff adoption. Users frequently highlight its mobile app and straightforward management tools, making daily operations smoother.
In contrast, Acigrup has no publicly available user ratings or recent feedback, leaving its ease of use unverified. Given eviivo’s proven usability and support, it’s clear which platform offers a better user experience.
Edge: eviivo.
eviivo provides 51 features, including a channel manager, revenue management, payment processing, booking engine, guest CRM, email marketing, online check-in/out, automation, and mobile app—features critical for modern hospitality management. Acigrup, with no unique features listed, does not demonstrate the breadth or depth of eviivo’s capabilities.
eviivo’s feature set enables your staff to automate tasks, manage multiple channels, and communicate with guests effectively. Acigrup’s lack of verified features makes it unsuitable for comprehensive management needs.
Edge: eviivo.
eviivo’s support ratings are high at 4.42/5, with recent reviews praising its responsiveness and onboarding assistance. Many users describe eviivo support as responsive, helpful, and key to their success.
Acigrup has no recent reviews or support ratings, making it impossible to gauge its customer service quality. Given the importance of reliable support, eviivo clearly leads here.
Edge: eviivo.
eviivo boasts 32 verified integrations, including major OTAs like Expedia, Booking.com, and TripAdvisor, plus property service partners. Acigrup offers no verified integrations, limiting its connectivity with third-party tools.
This extensive integration network allows eviivo to centralize operations and expand distribution channels easily. Acigrup’s lack of verified partners is a significant drawback.
Edge: eviivo.
With 191 recent reviews, eviivo receives a 4.43/5 rating, and a 95% likelihood to recommend, predominantly from small hotels, vacation rentals, and inns. The reviews highlight ease of use, automation, and support as key strengths.
Acigrup has no recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to determine user satisfaction. Based on quantifiable data, eviivo has the clear advantage.
Edge: eviivo.
Acigrup does not disclose pricing, suggesting it may operate on a custom or enterprise basis. eviivo’s pricing starts at $700/month, with no trial or freemium options, positioning it as a premium solution.
Given the extensive feature set and regional coverage, eviivo’s pricing aligns with its value proposition, though it may be a significant investment for small properties.
The core difference is that eviivo is a proven, feature-rich platform with extensive recent reviews and a global presence. Acigrup remains largely untested, with no recent reviews or visible market traction, making it a risky choice for most hotels.
If your hotel needs a dependable, scalable PMS with strong support and integrations, eviivo is the clear winner. Acigrup might suit very small, budget-conscious operations in specific regions, but its lack of recent validation makes it an unlikely investment for growth-oriented hoteliers.
In summary, go with eviivo if you want a trusted, comprehensive solution that can support your property today and scale for tomorrow. Choose Acigrup only if your operations are very limited, and you are willing to accept the risks of an unreviewed platform.
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Because of the automation from the eviivo Suite, it saves me a huge amount of time. This time I can use on growing the business; working on the business instead of in the business...."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Auf eviivo könnte ich heut gar nicht mehr drauf verzichten. Das Hotel ohne dieses Programm zu führen, scheint mir fast unmöglich, weil die Zeit, die ich jetzt erspart habe, die ich..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Aujourd’hui on a la possibilité de gérer l’ensemble de notre parc, que ce soit la tarification, le calendrier, la communication en un seul clic pour gérer plus de 50 appartements,..."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Eviivo 的客户支持因其响应速度和效率而备受赞誉。Guetif 先生、Joseph 和 Xavier 等支持人员提供了卓越的帮助,这在用户入职阶段以及出现问题时至关重要,从而... Eviivo 的客户支持因其响应速度和效率而备受赞誉。Guetif 先生、Joseph 和 Xavier 等支持人员提供了卓越的帮助,这在用户入职阶段以及出现问题时至关重要,从而提升了整体用户体验。
该平台在入职流程中提供专业知识,帮助酒店无缝集成系统。该指导确保信息集成的一致性和PMS功能的最佳利用,从而提高物业管理效率。
Eviivo 因其高效的技术而备受认可,它使用户能够更快、更少地完成任务。这减少了停机时间并改善了运营工作流程,确保了酒店管理的流畅体验。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
一些用户建议进行改进,特别是扩展移动应用程序开发等功能以及更具体的日常使用技巧,以进一步优化业务运营并利用平台的功能。
虽然用户总体上感到满意,但仍要求提供更多定制选项,包括网络和移动应用程序增强功能,以进一步满足特定的运营需求并提供额外的价值。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Acigrup PMS 和 eviivo Suite™ PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Acigrup PMS 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 eviivo Suite™ PMS 提供 32 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。eviivo Suite™ PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.5/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Acigrup PMS:否。eviivo Suite™ PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Acigroup 的 HT Score 为 0,eviivo 的为 87。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问