The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #46 5 条评价 | #31 21 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) | — | #49 3 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #56 2 条评价 | #30 18 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #60 1 条评价 | #39 5 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | #55 1 条评价 | #49 2 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 | #47 1 条评价 | #37 2 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | — | #32 4 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #33 5 条评价 | #14 39 条评价 |
Choosing between Acomos by Acomos and Redforts by Redforts hinges on your hotel’s specific operational needs and priorities. Both systems aim to streamline hotel management but diverge significantly in user experience, features, and market presence. While Acomos has been around since 1996 and offers a more traditional approach, Redforts, with its recent surge in reviews, presents a more modern, integrated solution. So, which platform is better suited for your hotel’s future?
Acomos and Redforts both address the core challenge of managing reservations, guest data, and operational workflows, but they do so with different emphases. Acomos simplifies daily tasks with features like automated night audits and guest CRM, focusing on small to medium hotels that value straightforward solutions. Conversely, Redforts combines PMS, booking engine, channel management, and revenue tools into one interface, catering more to properties seeking an all-in-one platform.
What makes the choice tricky is their differing market presence: Acomos has only 5 reviews—none recent—yet it maintains a moderate 3.1/5 overall rating, reflecting a mixed user experience. Redforts, with 40 reviews, boasts a 4.68/5 ease of use and a 4.53/5 customer support rating, with recent feedback confirming its current relevance. Does your hotel prioritize a well-established, simple system or a highly-rated, modern platform?
Ultimately, Acomos’s older reputation is marred by a very negative recent review citing system bugs and poor support, which raises concerns about ongoing reliability. Redforts’s recent reviews indicate consistent satisfaction, especially in ease of use and support, making it a more attractive option in today’s market. Are you prepared to choose a platform with limited recent data, or one with a growing, more recent positive reputation?
If your hotel needs a straightforward, easy-to-learn system primarily for reservation management and guest data, Acomos could suffice. Its core features like guest profiles and basic booking management suit small hotels or inns with minimal integration needs. On the other hand, if you require an all-in-one solution that combines PMS, channel management, online check-in, and revenue tools, Redforts is the better choice—especially if automation and integrations are priorities.
Hotels that value long-standing, simple software with a focus on basic operations should lean toward Acomos, despite limited recent reviews and a recent poor customer service experience. Conversely, teams seeking a modern, well-supported system with a broad feature set and extensive integrations should opt for Redforts, which has a significantly higher review count and recent positive feedback.
In summary, choose Acomos for simplicity and familiarity, but lean toward Redforts if your hotel benefits from a modern, integrated management platform with proven recent support.
Acomos offers a user-friendly interface rated 3.5/5, with reviews praising its ease of learning and straightforward workflows. However, onboarding is rated only 2.63/5, indicating that new users might face some initial hurdles. Staff adoption may take time due to its dated interface, and the lack of recent reviews leaves uncertainty about ongoing usability.
Redforts, on the other hand, scores a high 4.68/5 for ease of use, with recent reviews emphasizing its intuitive, modern design. The onboarding process is rated 4.32/5, reflecting a smoother transition and quicker staff adoption. Overall, Redforts’s current usability and onboarding experience are more reliable.
Edge: Redforts.
Acomos offers 5 unique features, including guest CRM, ancillary revenue tracking, guest profiles, automated night audits, and integrated payment terminals—features tailored for operational efficiency. These are valuable tools for small hotels focusing on guest management and basic automation.
Redforts boasts 26 features exclusive to its platform, including transactional emails, multi-lingual support, online check-in, guest messaging, house-keeping mobile apps, real-time status updates, rate management, PCI and GDPR compliance, and task management. Its broader feature set supports comprehensive property management, automation, and guest engagement.
Edge: Redforts.
Acomos’s customer support is rated 3.3/5, with reviews indicating inconsistent responsiveness and a recent review criticizing staff attitude and system bugs. One reviewer expressed frustration over unresolved issues and poor communication, raising questions about ongoing support quality.
Redforts significantly outperforms with a 4.53/5 support rating, and recent reviews describe their customer service as friendly, quick to respond, and effective. Multiple users highlight continuous improvement and attentive support, which instills confidence in ongoing assistance.
Edge: Redforts.
Acomos integrates with two verified partners—GuestCentric and SiteMinder—both well-known in hotel marketing and distribution. However, it lacks broader integrations, which might limit automation and connectivity for larger properties.
Redforts also offers two verified integrations, but it stands out with a suite of additional modules like POS systems, ID scanners, and self-check-in kiosks. Its flexible modules support a wide variety of peripherals, making it more adaptable to different operational needs.
Edge: Redforts.
Acomos’s total review count is just 5, with a mixed overall rating of 3.1/5. Recent reviews are nonexistent, and the last feedback highlights significant issues, including bugs and poor customer service, which drag down overall perception.
Redforts, with 40 reviews and a recent score of 4.68/5 for ease of use and 4.53/5 for support, is clearly favored among hoteliers. Its recent reviews consistently praise its usability, support, and feature set.
Edge: Redforts.
Acomos does not publicly disclose its pricing, and it does not offer a trial or transparent subscription plan, making it difficult to evaluate value upfront. Its lack of clear pricing could be a barrier for smaller hotels or those on tight budgets.
Redforts charges a flat $500 monthly fee, with no mention of additional implementation costs or trial options. Its transparent pricing and modular approach provide clarity and predictability for your budgeting.
Edge: Redforts.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
In essence, Acomos is a traditional property management system suitable for small hotels and inns that need minimal automation and simplicity. Its long history gives it familiarity, but recent reviews reveal significant issues, making it less appealing in today’s digital environment.
Redforts offers a modern, integrated platform with a broad feature set, excellent recent reviews, and superior support. It caters well to properties seeking automation, guest engagement, and seamless operations, making it the more reliable choice for most hotels today.
If your focus is on proven recent performance, ease of use, and ongoing support, Redforts is the clear leader. For smaller, less complex properties comfortable with limited features and potential legacy issues, Acomos might still serve, but caution is advised given its recent negative feedback.
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
许多用户都喜欢 Redforts 的直观设计,它简化了培训并减少了人为错误。这简化了日常操作,让员工可以腾出时间处理其他任务。
该系统擅长管理预订、防止超额预订以及与多个平台集成。预订引擎和渠道管理的定制也是一大优势。
细心、响应迅速的客户服务经常受到称赞。用户提到个性化沟通和快速解决问题,为整体体验带来积极影响。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Redforts 可与预订引擎、渠道管理器和其他平台高效集成,提供无缝管理体验。此功能简化了不同系统和平台之间的协调。
虽然其功能受到称赞,但一些评论提到,界面似乎已经过时,可以通过现代化来增强视觉吸引力和效率。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Acomos 和 Redforts 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Acomos 提供 2 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Redforts 提供 2 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Redforts 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 3.5/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Acomos:否。Redforts:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Acomos 的 HT Score 为 0,Redforts 的为 73。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问