AeroGuest Check-in vs. MyStay Check in: 哪个更适合您?

更新于 May 16, 2026  ·  已分析 56 条经验证的评价

摘要

我们分析了 56 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:

AeroGuest 表现出色 ,拥有独特功能如 Payment & Authorizations and Hotel Website Check-in Portal.

MyStay 表现出色 在 无接触办理入住 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Guest Segmentation & Targeting and Multi-Channel Delivery (Email, SMS, WhatsApp, Chat).

查看下方完整分析 ↓

AeroGuest Check-in 与 MyStay Check in 相比如何?

基于 HTR 上 56 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。

HTScore
0
22
推荐可能性
94%
98%
易用性
4.7/5
4.9/5
客户支持
4.8/5
4.9/5
性价比
4.6/5
4.9/5
起始价格 From $400/mo From $400/mo
经验证的评价 13 43

AeroGuest Check-in 与 MyStay Check in 的优缺点是什么?

在分析了 56 条经验证的评价后,AeroGuest 用户最看重其 ,而 MyStay 用户则强调 无接触办理入住, 宾客体验, 宾客沟通。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。

AeroGuest AeroGuest MyStay MyStay
优点
+ 无接触办理入住
+ 宾客体验
+ 宾客沟通
+ 支持与持续改进
缺点
定制选项
与 PMS 集成
系统速度和性能

AeroGuest 对比 MyStay:按酒店细分市场排名

各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 非接触式办理入住 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。

按酒店规模

细分市场 AeroGuest AeroGuest MyStay MyStay
小型(10-24 间客房) #15 1 条评价 #5 15 条评价
中型(25-74 间客房) #8 9 条评价 #6 10 条评价
大型(75-199 间客房) #17 1 条评价 #4 7 条评价
超大型(200+ 间客房) #11 2 条评价 #8 3 条评价

按物业类型

细分市场 AeroGuest AeroGuest MyStay MyStay
精品酒店 #7 10 条评价 #5 12 条评价
豪华酒店 #11 5 条评价 #4 11 条评价
品牌/连锁酒店 #19 1 条评价 #5 12 条评价
长住酒店 #16 0 条评价 #6 9 条评价

按区域

细分市场 AeroGuest AeroGuest MyStay MyStay
北美 #12 0 条评价 #7 3 条评价
欧洲 #8 12 条评价 #4 32 条评价
亚太 #6 2 条评价
中东 #8 1 条评价 #4 2 条评价

The Decision

Choosing between AeroGuest Check-in and MyStay Check-in hinges on your hotel’s specific needs and operational priorities. Both platforms aim to streamline contactless check-in processes, but they differ in features, support, and market presence. AeroGuest boasts a higher overall rating and more recent reviews, indicating stronger current customer satisfaction. Which platform aligns better with your hotel’s strategic goals?

Quick Verdict

MyStay Check-in has a more extensive review base—40 reviews compared to AeroGuest’s 11—and all recent reviews are positive, reinforcing its reliability and ongoing support. While AeroGuest offers unique features like ID verification and multi-lingual support, MyStay’s ease of use, guest communication, and upselling capabilities make it an attractive choice. With more recent feedback and a higher NPS score, MyStay is the more dependable option right now.

Is AeroGuest or MyStay Better for Hotels?

Both AeroGuest and MyStay target contactless check-in, aiming to reduce queues and improve guest experience. AeroGuest stands out with features like device agnosticism, document scanning, and pre-arrival upselling, making it suitable for hotels prioritizing automation and security. MyStay emphasizes ease of use, automated communication, and bill management, making it ideal for hotels seeking simplicity and operational efficiency.

While AeroGuest integrates with more property management systems (14+), MyStay’s wider integration (30 verified partners) offers broader options. Yet, AeroGuest’s recent reviews are sparse, with no new feedback in the past six months, raising questions about its current support quality. Which features matter most to your hotel—security and automation or ease and communication?

AeroGuest vs MyStay: Which Should Your Hotel Choose?

If your hotel needs a robust self-service platform with advanced security features like ID verification, document scanning, and PCI compliance, AeroGuest is the logical pick. It suits properties that want to automate pre-arrival processes and offer personalized room selection, especially in luxury or boutique segments. AeroGuest’s integration with numerous PMS systems ensures it can fit into complex tech stacks.

Conversely, if your team values simplicity, fast onboarding, and strong guest communication, MyStay is the better fit. Its streamlined platform supports automated messaging, online payments, and digital check-in/out, ideal for mid-sized hotels or properties focused on operational savings. With a higher review count and recent positive feedback, MyStay’s reliability is well-established.

Is AeroGuest or MyStay Easier to Use?

MyStay’s UI scores higher at 4.91/5 compared to AeroGuest’s 4.77/5, reflecting its intuitive interface and straightforward setup. Hoteliers praise MyStay for quick onboarding and smooth integration, making staff adoption easier. AeroGuest’s onboarding score (4.6/5) is still strong, but some reviews hint at a slightly steeper learning curve due to its broader feature set.

Customer support ratings favor MyStay at 4.93/5, with reviewers noting prompt assistance and continuous improvements. AeroGuest’s support is also solid at 4.77/5, but recent reviews are lacking, which could suggest less active engagement currently. Edge: MyStay.

Which Has Better Features: AeroGuest or MyStay?

AeroGuest offers 15 features exclusive to its platform, including ID verification, multi-lingual support, document scanning, pre-registration, and hotel website check-in portals. These enable deeper automation and security, catering to upscale hotels requiring comprehensive guest screening and customization.

MyStay provides 10 unique features, such as guest segmentation, room upgrade merchandising, multi-channel delivery, ancillary product merchandising, and A/B testing. These features enhance marketing, upsell, and communication strategies, suitable for properties aiming to maximize revenue via targeted offers.

Shared features like online check-in, digital forms, and payments are present in both. AeroGuest’s broader feature set makes it more versatile for complex needs, but MyStay’s focus on marketing and communication tools provides a strong advantage for revenue-focused hotels. Edge: AeroGuest.

Which Has Better Customer Support: AeroGuest or MyStay?

MyStay’s customer support scores slightly higher at 4.93/5, with reviews highlighting quick, helpful responses and active ongoing updates. Hotel managers appreciate how the support team quickly resolves issues and implements user feedback, which boosts confidence in its reliability.

AeroGuest’s support rating is also strong at 4.77/5, but recent feedback is limited, making it harder to gauge current responsiveness. Some users report satisfaction, but the lack of recent reviews means support performance might have changed. Edge: MyStay.

Which Has More Integrations: AeroGuest or MyStay?

Both platforms boast broad integration options, with AeroGuest connected to 26 verified partners, including major property management systems, channel managers, and access control providers. MyStay, with 30 verified partners, slightly edges out AeroGuest and also includes well-known integrations like SiteMinder, Oracle Hospitality, and Winhotel.

Shared integrations include HotelTime, apaleo, and Little Hotelier, ensuring compatibility with common hotel systems. MyStay’s wider network may offer more flexibility for hotels with diverse tech stacks or specific third-party requirements. Edge: MyStay.

Which Do Hoteliers Rate Higher: AeroGuest or MyStay?

MyStay has a significantly larger review base—40 reviews compared to AeroGuest’s 11—and all recent reviews are positive, with a 98% likelihood to recommend and an NPS of 9.8/10. Hotels across segments, especially serviced apartments and boutique hotels, rate it highly for ease, support, and value.

AeroGuest’s reviews, all from the past, are overwhelmingly positive but limited in number. Its 5/5 ratings in all reviews suggest satisfaction, yet the scarcity of recent feedback introduces uncertainty. For current performance, MyStay wins.

How Much Do AeroGuest and MyStay Cost?

Both products are priced at a base fee of $400.00, with no freemium options, monthly flat fees, or implementation charges reported. This straightforward pricing makes comparison simple, but consider additional costs for extra integrations or custom features.

What Type of Hotel Should Use AeroGuest?

  • Hotels that prioritize advanced automation, security, and customization, such as luxury or boutique properties, will benefit from AeroGuest’s extensive feature set.
  • Teams seeking to integrate ID verification, document scanning, and pre-arrival upselling should lean toward AeroGuest.
  • Not ideal if your hotel prefers a simple setup or has limited IT resources, as AeroGuest’s broader feature set could be more complex to implement initially.
  • Not ideal if your hotel operates in regions with fewer PMS integrations or seeks a quick deployment without extensive customization.

What Type of Hotel Should Use MyStay?

  • Hotels aiming to reduce front-desk staff costs significantly while maintaining a high level of guest service—like serviced apartments, mid-sized hotels, or resorts—should consider MyStay.
  • Teams that want a quick-to-deploy platform with strong communication, online payments, and upselling capabilities will find MyStay most effective.
  • Not ideal if your property needs extensive security features like ID verification or complex pre-arrival forms, which AeroGuest excels at.
  • Not ideal if your operation relies heavily on deep integration with specific niche systems not supported by MyStay.

The Bottom Line for Hotels

Core Difference: AeroGuest is a feature-rich, security-oriented platform designed for hotels needing deep automation and customization. MyStay is simpler, more user-friendly, and focused on operational efficiency and guest engagement.

When to Choose AeroGuest: If your hotel values advanced guest screening, multi-lingual support, and extensive customization options, AeroGuest’s superior feature count and focus on automation make it the right choice. Its integrations with high-end access and property management systems suit upscale properties.

When to Choose MyStay: If your priority is quick onboarding, effortless guest communication, and cost-effective upselling, MyStay’s ease of use and broader recent support make it the clear winner. It is ideal for properties looking to streamline operations without complex setups.

Final Verdict: Given the larger, more recent review base and higher satisfaction scores, MyStay Check-in is the more reliable and current choice for most hotels. AeroGuest remains valuable for those requiring advanced automation and security features, but its support and review activity lag behind.


Note: This comprehensive comparison provides a clear, fact-based overview to help your team make an informed decision. Consider your property type, operational priorities, and technical infrastructure when choosing the right solution.

AeroGuest Check-in 和 MyStay Check in 的价格是多少?

非接触式办理入住 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。

AeroGuest AeroGuest MyStay MyStay
Starting Price From $400/mo From $400/mo

AeroGuest Check-in 有哪些 MyStay Check in 没有的功能(反之亦然)?

根据 HTR 的产品数据库,AeroGuest Check-in 和 MyStay Check in 共享 4 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。

功能 AeroGuest AeroGuest MyStay MyStay
分割
到货前追加销售和升级
多渠道推送(电子邮件、短信、WhatsApp、聊天)
客户细分与定向
客房升级商品
报价模板库
文件和护照扫描
符合 PCI 标准
设备无关
身份验证
轻松选择房间
辅助产品营销

显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 13 项功能存在差异。

AeroGuest 对比 MyStay:总结

AeroGuest
AeroGuest
4.7/5 来自 13 条评价

排名更高的方面

青年旅舍 #8 vs #14

独特功能

符合 PCI 标准 轻松选择房间 到货前追加销售和升级 设备无关 身份验证
4.8/5 易用性 4.8/5 客户支持 26 个集成
查看资料
MyStay
MyStay
4.9/5 来自 43 条评价

酒店从业者喜爱的方面

无接触办理入住 100% 正面

评论者经常提到 MyStay 的非接触式入住功能是一个至关重要的工具,尤其是在疫情期间。它简化并加快了入住流程,让客人在抵达前完成入住,并减少了身体接触。用户... 评论者经常提到 MyStay 的非接触式入住功能是一个至关重要的工具,尤其是在疫情期间。它简化并加快了入住流程,让客人在抵达前完成入住,并减少了身体接触。用户欣赏它为他们的操作带来的易用性和效率。

宾客体验 84% 正面

评论者经常评论 MyStay 如何显著提升宾客体验。该平台允许在抵达前进行沟通,并在抵达时提供便利,给人一种个性化和周到服务的感觉。酒店经营者注意到直接结果是... 评论者经常评论 MyStay 如何显著提升宾客体验。该平台允许在抵达前进行沟通,并在抵达时提供便利,给人一种个性化和周到服务的感觉。酒店经营者注意到直接结果是宾客满意度更高。

宾客沟通 97% 正面

许多评论都强调了 MyStay 如何改善客人沟通。该平台允许酒店经营者通过自动消息在客人入住前、入住期间和入住后与客人进行有效沟通。此功能通过提供及时的信息和... 许多评论都强调了 MyStay 如何改善客人沟通。该平台允许酒店经营者通过自动消息在客人入住前、入住期间和入住后与客人进行有效沟通。此功能通过提供及时的信息和及时解决疑问来提高客人满意度。

酒店从业者提出异议的方面

定制选项 55% 负面

用户经常建议需要更多自定义选项,特别是在自动消息传递和客户沟通模板方面。他们希望能够更灵活地调整文本、图形和自动消息传递格式,以更好地满足他们的特定需... 用户经常建议需要更多自定义选项,特别是在自动消息传递和客户沟通模板方面。他们希望能够更灵活地调整文本、图形和自动消息传递格式,以更好地满足他们的特定需求。

与 PMS 集成 43% 负面

MyStay 与物业管理系统 (PMS) 的集成是一项有价值的功能,在多篇评论中都得到了积极的评价。这种无缝集成有助于酒店经营者更有效地管理客人数据和运营。然而,一... MyStay 与物业管理系统 (PMS) 的集成是一项有价值的功能,在多篇评论中都得到了积极的评价。这种无缝集成有助于酒店经营者更有效地管理客人数据和运营。然而,一些用户确实偶尔会遇到 MyStay 和 PMS 之间的同步问题。

排名更高的方面

大型(75-199 间客房) #4 vs #17
中型(25-74 间客房) #6 vs #8
小型(10-24 间客房) #5 vs #15
超大型(200+ 间客房) #8 vs #11

独特功能

客户细分与定向 客房升级商品 多渠道推送(电子邮件、短信、WhatsApp、聊天) 辅助产品营销 分割
4.9/5 易用性 4.9/5 客户支持 30 个集成
查看资料

关于 AeroGuest Check-in 与 MyStay Check in 的常见问题

AeroGuest Check-in 能否替代 MyStay Check in?

这取决于您的需求。AeroGuest Check-in 和 MyStay Check in 共享许多核心 Contactless Check-in 功能,但各有独特的能力。AeroGuest Check-in 提供 26 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 MyStay Check in 提供 30 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。

哪个更适合小型或独立酒店?

小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。MyStay Check in 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 4.7/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。

AeroGuest Check-in 或 MyStay Check in 是否提供免费方案?

AeroGuest Check-in:否。MyStay Check in:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Contactless Check-in 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。

HTR 如何评估和排名 AeroGuest Check-in 和 MyStay Check in?

HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。AeroGuest 的 HT Score 为 0,MyStay 的为 22。以下是评分的计算方式。

标准组 权重 衡量内容
客户评分与评价

用户对该产品的推荐度如何?

评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例

权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。

合作伙伴生态系统

技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何?

合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量

评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。

以客户为中心

该组织以客户为中心的程度如何?

认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性

评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。

覆盖范围、持久力与资源

该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛?

地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分

衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。

客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →

获取个性化的产品推荐

产品推荐顾问

Ghostel icon

让我们查找您的酒店信息