The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 46 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Aiosell Technologies 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) and Guest Communication (SMS Messaging).
Lodgable 表现出色 .
基于 HTR 上 46 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $100/mo | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 46 | 0 |
在分析了 46 条经验证的评价后,Aiosell Technologies 用户最看重其 seamless integration and usability, 支持和客户服务, channel management,而 Lodgable 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
Lodgable |
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
Seamless Integration and Usability
▾
|
|
|
+
支持和客户服务
▾
|
|
|
+
Channel Management
▾
|
|
|
+
自动化和效率
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
改进空间
▾
|
|
|
−
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
−
报告和可定制性
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
Lodgable |
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #23 23 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #40 5 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | #49 0 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #40 0 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
Lodgable |
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #32 9 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #28 9 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | #32 3 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 | #30 4 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
Lodgable |
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | #34 2 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 | #45 0 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 ▾ | #8 29 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #10 3 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Aiosell and Lodgable hinges on your hotel’s operational needs and growth objectives. Both aim to streamline property management, but Aiosell’s comprehensive suite targets larger, multi-property operations, while Lodgable caters primarily to vacation rental hosts. The key question is which system aligns best with your current scale and future plans?
Aiosell offers a full-featured PMS with extensive automation, integrations, and support, whereas Lodgable provides a straightforward rental management solution. Do you need a robust enterprise platform or a simplified rental-centric system?
Aiosell’s core strength is its integration of 49 features spanning property management, revenue optimization, and automation, designed for hotels seeking an all-in-one solution. Lodgable, by contrast, lacks an extensive feature list and is primarily tailored for individual vacation rental owners managing fewer properties.
While Aiosell boasts a high customer satisfaction score with 39 reviews and recent feedback showing 6 reviews in the last six months, Lodgable has none available, making it impossible to assess current user experiences. With a 4.74/5 ease-of-use rating and 4.72/5 for support, Aiosell’s platform is continuously refined based on active user feedback, unlike Lodgable’s unverified support quality.
If your hotel demands a mature, feature-rich PMS with proven support and active development, Aiosell is the clear winner. Conversely, if your property is a small, standalone vacation rental with basic needs, Lodgable’s simplicity might suffice, but the lack of recent reviews diminishes its credibility.
If your hotel needs a scalable, all-encompassing property management system, go with Aiosell. It’s ideal for hotels seeking automation, integrated channel management, and detailed reporting, especially if you operate across multiple regions or property types.
If your focus is on managing a handful of vacation rentals with straightforward booking needs, Lodgable may seem appealing; however, the lack of recent reviews and detailed feature data makes it less reliable. Aiosell’s extensive integrations, including STAAH, SiteMinder, and Oracle Hospitality, support complex operations, unlike Lodgable’s limited, unverified integrations.
For hotels aiming to optimize revenue, automate tasks, and grow their property portfolio, Aiosell is the superior choice. Lodgable might be suitable for solo hosts or small-scale rental owners but isn’t recommended for larger or multi-property hotels.
Aiosell excels with a user interface rated at 4.74/5 and onboarding rated at 4.78/5, based on recent reviews. Users praise its intuitive navigation, mobile app, and minimal training requirements, making staff adoption smoother. Its accessibility and friendly design are frequently highlighted, with reviewers stating it’s "very easy to operate" even for non-technical users.
Lodgable, lacking detailed ratings and recent reviews, cannot be confidently assessed for ease of use. Its interface appears simple, but without current feedback or a comprehensive user experience report, reliability remains uncertain.
Edge: Aiosell.
Aiosell offers an impressive suite of 49 features, including direct billing, automated night audit, multi-currency, guest CRM, booking engine, channel management, digital registration, automated reminders, integrated payment processing, and revenue management. These features support complex hotel operations, automation, and revenue optimization.
Lodgable provides basic vacation rental management tools but does not list any specific features, making it difficult to compare directly. With no verified features, it’s impossible to match Aiosell’s comprehensive capabilities.
Edge: Aiosell.
Aiosell’s customer support scores 4.72/5, with reviewers describing their team as "responsive" and "quick to resolve issues." Its onboarding process is rated at 4.78/5, reflecting a strong focus on customer success, and recent reviews indicate consistent support quality.
Lodgable offers no available support ratings or recent reviews, making it impossible to evaluate their support quality. Without verified feedback, confidence in Lodgable’s customer service remains low.
Edge: Aiosell.
Aiosell integrates with 12 verified partners, including notable industry players like SiteMinder, Oracle Hospitality, and Hotelogix, enabling seamless connectivity across distribution, PMS, and revenue systems. These integrations streamline operations and reduce manual work for hotels managing multiple platforms.
Lodgable has no verified integrations listed, limiting its ability to connect with third-party systems and potentially restricting scalability. The absence of integrations suggests it’s more suitable for simple, isolated management needs.
Edge: Aiosell.
Aiosell’s reviews, totaling 39 and recent, demonstrate high satisfaction, with a 97% likelihood to recommend, especially among hotels of various segments like limited service, B&Bs, and resorts. Its recent ratings reflect continuous improvements and active customer engagement.
Lodgable’s lack of reviews prevents any reliable assessment of user satisfaction. Without recent feedback, it’s impossible to determine how highly hotels rate Lodgable.
Edge: Aiosell.
Aiosell charges a flat, transparent monthly fee of $100, with no implementation or hidden charges, making pricing predictable and accessible. Lodgable’s pricing details are unavailable, which raises concerns about transparency and total cost of ownership.
Given the clarity of Aiosell’s pricing and its feature-rich offering, it provides better value compared to Lodgable’s opaque pricing model.
Edge: Aiosell.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Aiosell’s core advantage is its extensive, integrated feature set backed by recent, positive reviews. It suits hotels looking for an all-in-one, scalable solution that automates operations, enhances revenue, and simplifies multi-property management.
If your hotel requires a reliable, well-supported platform with proven integrations and active user feedback, choose Aiosell. Its high review count and recent positive ratings make it the more trustworthy choice.
Lodgable might appeal to individual vacation rental hosts with minimal management needs. However, with no recent reviews or verified features, it’s difficult to recommend it for hotels seeking growth or advanced management capabilities.
In summary, for hotels serious about operational efficiency, revenue growth, and support, Aiosell is the clear leader. Lodgable may serve small, simple rental operations but lacks the credibility and features to support larger, more complex properties.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
Lodgable | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $100/mo | — |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Aiosell - Property Management System 和 Lodgable 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
Lodgable |
|---|---|---|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 直接计费 | ||
| 自动夜间审计 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 37 项功能存在差异。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Many users highlight Aiosell’s ability to seamlessly integrate various hotel management components such as PMS, channel manager, and booking engine in... Many users highlight Aiosell’s ability to seamlessly integrate various hotel management components such as PMS, channel manager, and booking engine into one platform. This integration facilitates efficient management, saves time, and enhances control over hotel operations.
Aiosell 的支持团队经常被称赞为响应迅速、解决问题高效。这种可靠的支持确保了操作的顺畅,并在需要时提供帮助,从而为用户带来了积极的体验。
Users have found Aiosell's channel management to effectively keep OTA inventory and rates in sync, minimizing risks of overbooking. Its real-time data... Users have found Aiosell's channel management to effectively keep OTA inventory and rates in sync, minimizing risks of overbooking. Its real-time data synchronization across platforms optimizes occupancy and offers streamlined channel management.
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
虽然 Aiosell 总体上受到好评,但用户指出了潜在的增长领域,例如提供更灵活的集成选项、改进移动应用程序体验以及提供更高级的错误修复和定制。
Though reports are generally considered easy to generate, some reviews point out areas for enhancement like deeper analytics, consistency, and accurac... Though reports are generally considered easy to generate, some reviews point out areas for enhancement like deeper analytics, consistency, and accuracy. Detailed reporting could aid in strategic decision-making by providing better insights.
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Aiosell - Property Management System 和 Lodgable 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Aiosell - Property Management System 提供 12 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Lodgable 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Aiosell - Property Management System 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Aiosell - Property Management System:否。Lodgable:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Aiosell Technologies 的 HT Score 为 78,Lodgable 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问