The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 46 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Aiosell Technologies 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) and Guest Communication (SMS Messaging).
Passepartout 表现出色 .
基于 HTR 上 46 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $100/mo | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 46 | 0 |
在分析了 46 条经验证的评价后,Aiosell Technologies 用户最看重其 seamless integration and usability, 支持和客户服务, channel management,而 Passepartout 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
Passepartout |
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
Seamless Integration and Usability
▾
|
|
|
+
支持和客户服务
▾
|
|
|
+
Channel Management
▾
|
|
|
+
自动化和效率
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
改进空间
▾
|
|
|
−
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
−
报告和可定制性
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
Passepartout |
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #23 23 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #40 5 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | #49 0 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #40 0 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
Passepartout |
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #32 9 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #28 9 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | #32 3 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 | #30 4 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
Passepartout |
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | #34 2 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 | #45 0 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 ▾ | #8 29 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #10 3 条评价 | — |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) for your hotel hinges on understanding what each product offers and how well they meet your specific needs. Aiosell, with its extensive review base and recent positive feedback, provides a comprehensive, user-friendly solution tailored for hotels seeking automation, integrations, and real-time management. Passepartout, while offering a full management platform, lacks recent reviews and a broader user base, making it harder to gauge its current performance.
Both products aim to streamline operations, but Aiosell's recent reviews, high ratings, and feature depth position it as the more reliable choice. Are you ready to explore which system aligns best with your hotel's scale and requirements?
Aiosell offers a PMS designed for hotels that want an all-in-one, easy-to-use platform with automation and integration capabilities. Passepartout claims to be a comprehensive property management solution but lacks recent reviews and proven customer satisfaction data.
While Aiosell has a 78.00/100 HT score based on 39 reviews, Passepartout has no available ratings or reviews in the last six months, indicating less recent user feedback. The data shows that Aiosell’s recent reviews consistently praise its intuitive interface and automation features, suggesting it’s a more dependable solution.
Do you want a product with proven, current performance backed by active user feedback, or are you willing to consider an unreviewed option?
If your hotel prioritizes ease of use, automation, and strong customer support, Aiosell is the clear pick. Its high ratings across usability, onboarding, and support, coupled with 39 recent reviews, demonstrate a proven track record.
If your team values a full management system that might include property-specific features beyond hospitality—though unverified by recent reviews—Passepartout could be considered. However, without recent feedback, its effectiveness remains uncertain.
For hotels looking to minimize operational friction and maximize automation, Aiosell’s recent positive reviews and feature set make it the better choice. Conversely, if you need a solution tailored for property portfolios with a focus beyond hospitality, Passepartout’s offerings may warrant further investigation.
Aiosell’s user interface scores a 4.74/5, based on recent reviews praising its simplicity, accessibility, and quick onboarding—many users mention it’s "very intuitive" and "easy to navigate." Support and onboarding are rated at 4.78/5, with reviewers citing fast response times and helpful guidance.
Passepartout, lacking recent review data, offers no current user feedback on usability or onboarding experiences. Without this, assessing its ease of adoption is impossible, but the absence of recent ratings suggests limited recent engagement.
Edge: Aiosell.
Aiosell’s platform includes 49 unique features—ranging from direct billing, revenue reports, automated night audits, multi-currency support, and real-time status updates, to integrated ID scanners and automated space optimization. These capabilities cover typical hotel needs and some advanced automation, emphasizing a comprehensive management experience.
Passepartout offers no detailed feature list or proven differentiation. Its lack of available feature data and recent reviews makes it difficult to determine whether it provides comparable or superior functionalities.
Edge: Aiosell.
Aiosell’s customer support scores 4.72/5, with reviewers emphasizing its responsiveness and quick problem resolution. The platform’s support team is described as "usually responding within an hour," which contributes to smoother daily operations.
Passepartout’s support ratings and reviews are unavailable or unverified, making it impossible to compare support quality. Given the importance of reliable support for operational continuity, Aiosell’s recent positive feedback clearly favors it.
Edge: Aiosell.
Aiosell integrates with 12 verified partners, including major industry players like SiteMinder, Hotelogix, and Oracle Hospitality. This extensive partner network allows your hotel to connect with multiple OTAs, revenue tools, and payment systems.
Passepartout has no verified integrations listed, limiting its connectivity options. Without integration capabilities, managing distribution and automation becomes more cumbersome.
Edge: Aiosell.
With 39 recent reviews, Aiosell maintains a 97% likelihood to recommend, and hotel segments such as boutique hotels, inns, and resorts rate it highly. Its recent review scores highlight ease of use, automation, and support as key strengths.
Passepartout has no recent review data or ratings, making it impossible to assess user satisfaction or property-specific feedback.
Edge: Aiosell.
Aiosell’s pricing is transparent at $100/month, with no trial, implementation fees, or hidden costs. Passepartout’s pricing details are unavailable, and no free trial or pricing model is provided in the source material.
Given the transparent and affordable pricing, Aiosell offers clear value for hotels seeking predictable costs. The absence of pricing info for Passepartout complicates direct comparison.
Edge: Aiosell.
Not ideal if your hotel requires a highly niche or specialized management system outside the core PMS functions.
Not ideal if you prioritize hotel-specific features, recent user feedback, or extensive automation capabilities.
Aiosell and Passepartout serve different user needs, but Aiosell’s recent reviews and feature depth make it the clear leader for hotels. Its high ratings, active user feedback, and broad integration support ensure your team can operate efficiently and confidently.
For hotels seeking a reliable, easy-to-use PMS that actively evolves based on user feedback, Aiosell is the better option. Passepartout might appeal to property portfolios or landlords looking for a management system with less emphasis on recent user validation, but without current reviews, its reliability remains unverified.
If your hotel values proven performance, automation, and strong support, choose Aiosell. If your focus is on property management outside traditional hotel operations and you’re comfortable with unverified vendor claims, Passepartout could be worth further exploration.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
Passepartout | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $100/mo | — |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Aiosell - Property Management System 和 Passepartout 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
Passepartout |
|---|---|---|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 直接计费 | ||
| 自动夜间审计 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 37 项功能存在差异。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Many users highlight Aiosell’s ability to seamlessly integrate various hotel management components such as PMS, channel manager, and booking engine in... Many users highlight Aiosell’s ability to seamlessly integrate various hotel management components such as PMS, channel manager, and booking engine into one platform. This integration facilitates efficient management, saves time, and enhances control over hotel operations.
Aiosell 的支持团队经常被称赞为响应迅速、解决问题高效。这种可靠的支持确保了操作的顺畅,并在需要时提供帮助,从而为用户带来了积极的体验。
Users have found Aiosell's channel management to effectively keep OTA inventory and rates in sync, minimizing risks of overbooking. Its real-time data... Users have found Aiosell's channel management to effectively keep OTA inventory and rates in sync, minimizing risks of overbooking. Its real-time data synchronization across platforms optimizes occupancy and offers streamlined channel management.
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
虽然 Aiosell 总体上受到好评,但用户指出了潜在的增长领域,例如提供更灵活的集成选项、改进移动应用程序体验以及提供更高级的错误修复和定制。
Though reports are generally considered easy to generate, some reviews point out areas for enhancement like deeper analytics, consistency, and accurac... Though reports are generally considered easy to generate, some reviews point out areas for enhancement like deeper analytics, consistency, and accuracy. Detailed reporting could aid in strategic decision-making by providing better insights.
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Aiosell - Property Management System 和 Passepartout 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Aiosell - Property Management System 提供 12 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Passepartout 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Aiosell - Property Management System 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Aiosell - Property Management System:否。Passepartout:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Aiosell Technologies 的 HT Score 为 78,Passepartout 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问