The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 预订引擎 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #9 68 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #8 86 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #6 32 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #17 3 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #10 71 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #10 56 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #9 38 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #11 16 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | — | #40 1 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #7 139 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | — | #8 43 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | — | #26 5 条评价 |
Choosing the right booking engine can significantly impact your hotel's revenue, customer experience, and operational efficiency. Both Angelfish Software and D-Edge aim to serve this purpose, but their approaches and strengths differ. Angelfish focuses on detailed web analytics for digital insights, while D-Edge emphasizes direct booking optimization with rich features. Your decision hinges on whether your priority is deep website analytics or a comprehensive booking platform.
Angelfish's lack of recent reviews and a total review count of zero make its current value uncertain. In contrast, D-Edge boasts 184 recent reviews and a 4.65/5 overall rating, positioning it as the more validated choice for hoteliers today. Will you prioritize a proven, well-reviewed booking engine or explore a niche analytics solution?
If your hotel needs a robust web analytics platform to understand visitor behavior, Angelfish offers real-time insights into website performance. However, since Angelfish has no recent reviews or user feedback, its actual effectiveness remains untested in the current market. D-Edge, with 184 recent reviews and a high 4.65/5 rating, clearly demonstrates its ability to deliver a user-friendly booking engine that boosts direct reservations.
Both products aim to streamline operations, but D-Edge’s extensive feature set—including rate management, channel integration, and marketing tools—makes it more practical for hotels seeking immediate revenue growth. Do you prefer a platform with proven market presence and comprehensive booking features or an analytics tool with limited recent validation?
For hotels focusing on increasing direct bookings and revenue, D-Edge is the clear winner. Its platform is designed to turn your website into a high-yield sales channel, supported by tools like Rate Screener, geo-pricing, and targeted campaigns. If your hotel needs detailed analytics on website traffic and user behavior, Angelfish might seem appealing, but the lack of recent reviews diminishes confidence in its current performance.
Hotels that want an all-in-one booking solution with multi-currency, multi-lingual options, and extensive integration should lean toward D-Edge. Conversely, if your team is primarily looking to improve website usability and analytics, Angelfish could be relevant—though, again, recent user feedback is absent. Which core need drives your decision: revenue-focused booking tools or web analytics?
D-Edge’s UI is rated 4.6/5 based on recent reviews, praised for its intuitiveness and ease of managing complex functionalities. Support and onboarding scores are similarly high at 4.49/5, with users highlighting prompt assistance and straightforward setup. Conversely, Angelfish’s UI and onboarding ratings are not available, and no recent reviews exist to judge ease of use.
Given the positive feedback, D-Edge’s platform is likely more accessible for your team, especially if non-technical staff will manage the system. Edge: D-Edge.
D-Edge offers 34 unique features, including mobile responsiveness, pooled inventory, PCI compliance, gift vouchers, multi-lingual and multi-currency support, loyalty integrations, social media bookings, and advanced marketing tools. Angelfish provides no listed features, indicating it’s primarily a web analytics solution, not a booking engine.
For a hotel seeking a comprehensive booking engine, D-Edge’s extensive feature set clearly surpasses Angelfish. If you need advanced marketing, multi-channel management, and flexible rate plans, D-Edge is the logical choice. Edge: D-Edge.
D-Edge’s customer support is rated 4.57/5, with users describing their support team as responsive and professional. They appreciate quick solutions and helpful onboarding, although some note occasional delays. Angelfish’s support ratings are unavailable, and with no recent reviews, confidence in support quality is lacking.
Given D-Edge’s recent positive feedback, its support team is better positioned to assist your hotel when issues arise. Edge: D-Edge.
D-Edge integrates with 115 verified partners, including major OTAs and PMS systems, and shares two with Angelfish (such as SiteMinder). Angelfish’s limited integration set (only three verified partners) restricts its connectivity options, which could hamper your operational efficiency.
For seamless distribution and channel management, D-Edge’s extensive integration network is advantageous. Edge: D-Edge.
With a 4.65/5 overall rating based on 184 recent reviews, D-Edge is highly reviewed across hotel segments, including boutique, city center, and resort hotels. Angelfish, with no recent reviews and a score of 0, cannot be compared on satisfaction.
D-Edge’s strong ratings and recent customer feedback make it the preferred choice for hoteliers seeking a trusted, proven solution. Edge: D-Edge.
Angelfish does not list pricing details, suggesting it may be free or customized without public rates. D-Edge’s base price starts at $400 per month, with no free tier or trial, indicating a significant investment.
Given D-Edge’s transparent pricing model and proven value, your hotel can evaluate ROI more confidently. Without clear pricing, Angelfish’s cost advantage remains uncertain.
Since Angelfish lacks recent validation and booking functionalities, it’s best suited for hotels looking to enhance their digital marketing insights rather than direct revenue channels.
Not ideal if your hotel has minimal online sales focus or prefers a simple, analytics-only solution. D-Edge is best for hotels looking to optimize their digital booking operations.
D-Edge stands out as the more established, highly-rated booking engine with a broad feature set and extensive integrations. Its recent reviews and high satisfaction scores make it a reliable choice for hotels seeking immediate revenue impact.
Angelfish, while potentially useful for digital analytics, offers no recent validation or proven booking features. Unless your team’s primary goal is detailed website data, D-Edge provides a clearer path to boosting bookings and operational efficiency.
If your hotel needs a trusted, feature-rich booking platform with proven support and integrations, choose D-Edge. If you only seek web analytics to improve online performance and are comfortable with unverified recent feedback, Angelfish could be considered—but caution is advised.
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
虽然客户支持因其响应速度和专业性而受到普遍称赞,但一些评论提到解决问题时存在延迟。用户建议需要更及时地响应并扩大支持团队以迅速处理查询。
该平台的直观界面和用户友好设计被反复强调为主要优点。用户发现,即使功能复杂,导航和管理也十分方便,即使是不懂技术的员工也能轻松上手。
D-Edge 的价格管理工具(例如 Rate Screener 和 Little Yielder)因其易用性和优化定价策略的能力而广受好评。这些工具可帮助酒店经营者防止超额预订,并根据市... D-Edge 的价格管理工具(例如 Rate Screener 和 Little Yielder)因其易用性和优化定价策略的能力而广受好评。这些工具可帮助酒店经营者防止超额预订,并根据市场情况实时调整价格。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
一些用户报告了 D-Edge 与所连接 OTA 之间的同步问题,导致价格和可用性出现差异。这偶尔会导致超额预订并需要手动调整,这凸显了提高同步可靠性的必要性。
用户对 D-Edge 的用户友好界面表示赞赏,但也指出需要更大程度地自主调整设置,例如费率计划和频道映射。允许更多用户控制可以减少对变更支持的依赖。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Angelfish Software 和 D-EDGE - Booking Engine 共享许多核心 Booking Engine 功能,但各有独特的能力。Angelfish Software 提供 3 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 D-EDGE - Booking Engine 提供 115 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。D-EDGE - Booking Engine 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Angelfish Software:否。D-EDGE - Booking Engine:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Booking Engine 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Angelfish 的 HT Score 为 0,D-Edge 的为 34。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问