The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 71 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Angelfish 表现出色 .
GuestCentric 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 independent 类型的物业 (4.8/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Pre-stay emails and Post-stay emails.
基于 HTR 上 71 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $600/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 0 | 71 |
在分析了 71 条经验证的评价后,Angelfish 用户最看重其 ,而 GuestCentric 用户则强调 客户服务, 预订引擎效率, 营销工具和报告。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
客户服务
▾
|
|
|
+
预订引擎效率
▾
|
|
|
+
营销工具和报告
▾
|
|
|
+
用户培训和知识库
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
可定制性
▾
|
|
|
−
库存和费率管理
▾
|
|
|
−
促销灵活性
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 预订引擎 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #12 28 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #16 24 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | — | #28 0 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #13 3 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #12 37 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #14 21 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #17 12 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #6 15 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #11 13 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #10 53 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #29 0 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #22 0 条评价 |
Choosing a booking engine is critical for your hotel's direct revenue and operational efficiency. Both Angelfish Software by Angelfish and GuestCentric aim to improve your online booking capabilities, but they address different needs and offer contrasting features. Angelfish focuses on detailed web analytics, while GuestCentric emphasizes a comprehensive, customizable booking platform. How do these differences impact your hotel’s growth potential?
Angelfish Software is tailored for hotels seeking deep insights into their website performance through log analysis, helping you optimize your digital presence. However, its lack of a traditional booking engine means it doesn't directly support reservations or guest interactions. GuestCentric, by contrast, provides a full-fledged booking platform with features designed to convert visitors into guests, making it more suitable if your goal is to increase direct bookings.
While Angelfish may help your team understand visitor behavior and website issues, GuestCentric offers an integrated booking engine that facilitates immediate reservations. Do you need analytics to refine your marketing or a booking system to drive conversions? The choice hinges on your primary challenge.
If your hotel needs a proven, user-friendly booking engine to directly increase reservations and revenue, go with GuestCentric. Its 62 reviews and 4.78/5 rating, along with a 92% likelihood to recommend, demonstrate strong hotelier confidence and recent positive feedback.
If your team requires detailed server log analytics to improve website usability or digital marketing strategies, Angelfish's zero recent reviews and a 0/5 score make it less viable. For operational growth through data-driven insights, Angelfish isn’t the best choice.
GuestCentric's platform scores 4.55/5 for ease of use, with hoteliers praising its intuitive interface and streamlined booking process. Reviewers highlight its simple navigation, customizable content, and quick onboarding, with many noting how it helps staff adopt the system effortlessly.
Angelfish's interface receives a 0/5 rating, with no recent reviews or user feedback to assess usability. Given its focus on log analysis rather than user experience, it isn’t designed for straightforward hotel staff adoption.
Edge: GuestCentric.
GuestCentric offers 23 features, including pre-and post-stay emails, automated reporting, pooled inventory, special offers, multi-currency options, and loyalty integrations—features that directly support hotel revenue and guest engagement. Meanwhile, Angelfish provides no features tailored to reservations or guest experience, focusing solely on web analytics.
With a broader feature set that enhances marketing, promotions, and guest management, GuestCentric clearly outperforms Angelfish in functional richness and hotel-centric tools. Its capabilities are aligned with increasing direct bookings and revenue.
Edge: GuestCentric.
GuestCentric scores 4.76/5 for support, with hoteliers praising its quick, helpful responses and dedicated staff. Review quotes emphasize the team’s proactive approach in resolving issues and guiding users through complex features.
Angelfish’s support rating is zero due to no recent reviews, making it impossible to judge support quality or responsiveness. While Angelfish may offer technical support, the lack of recent feedback diminishes confidence.
Edge: GuestCentric.
GuestCentric integrates with 44 verified partners, including common ones like SiteMinder and HiJiffy, plus specialized solutions like Omnibees and yieldPlanet. These integrations facilitate seamless connection with PMS, Channel Managers, and marketing tools, streamlining your operations.
Angelfish only connects with 3 verified partners, including SiteMinder and Pitchup.com, limiting its integration capacity. For hotels relying on diverse systems, GuestCentric’s extensive ecosystem is a clear advantage.
Edge: GuestCentric.
GuestCentric’s reviews are recent, totaling 62, with an overall rating of 4.78/5 and a 92% recommendation rate. Hotels across various segments, especially independent and boutique hotels, rate it highly for usability and value.
Angelfish has no recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to assess hotel satisfaction. Given the data, GuestCentric clearly holds a stronger reputation among hoteliers.
Edge: GuestCentric.
Angelfish does not disclose pricing or offer a free trial, suggesting it may not be a traditional SaaS product with straightforward costs. GuestCentric charges approximately $600 per month, with no mention of setup or hidden fees, positioning it as a predictable investment.
Considering the extensive features and support, GuestCentric’s pricing is justified for hotels seeking a comprehensive booking engine. Angelfish’s unclear pricing implies it may not be intended for typical hotel operators.
Hotels that:
Not ideal if:
Hotels that:
Not ideal if:
GuestCentric is designed to improve direct bookings through a flexible, feature-packed booking engine and integrated marketing tools. Its high recent review count and 4.78/5 rating, along with a 92% recommendation rate, make it a proven choice for hoteliers looking for growth.
Angelfish offers specialized web analytics focused on server log data, helping your team understand digital behavior. However, its lack of recent reviews, features, and support ratings suggest it’s more suited for digital teams rather than operational hotel staff.
If your primary goal is to increase reservations and manage a guest-focused online presence, GuestCentric is the recommended choice. For hotels wanting deep web analytics to inform broader marketing strategies, Angelfish might be relevant but less practical without recent positive feedback.
In summary: For most hotels focused on revenue growth, GuestCentric’s comprehensive booking and marketing suite offers tangible advantages. Angelfish’s niche web analytics may benefit highly technical teams but doesn’t match the hotel-centric features or recent positive reviews of GuestCentric.
预订引擎 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $600/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Angelfish Software 和 GuestCentric (Booking Engine) 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 入住前电子邮件 | ||
| 入住后电子邮件 | ||
| 关税 | ||
| 合并库存 | ||
| 特别优惠和折扣 | ||
| 自动报告 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 11 项功能存在差异。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
GuestCentric 的支持团队以快速而有用的响应而著称。酒店经营者强调员工的专业精神和奉献精神,他们随时准备协助解决问题并提供战略建议。
GuestCentric 的预订引擎因其速度快、可靠性高和用户友好界面而广受好评。用户注意到直接预订量显著增加,客人的导航也更加方便。该引擎还具有即时促销更新和可... GuestCentric 的预订引擎因其速度快、可靠性高和用户友好界面而广受好评。用户注意到直接预订量显著增加,客人的导航也更加方便。该引擎还具有即时促销更新和可定制选项,可满足酒店的需求。
GuestCentric 提供一系列营销工具,包括 SEO 和数字营销服务,有助于提高知名度和直接预订量。报告和分析工具也因提供绩效洞察而广受好评。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
该平台具有高度的可定制性,可根据酒店需求进行独特设置,例如附加服务、最低入住时间和灵活的促销优惠。这有助于酒店优化其产品并简化预订流程。
尽管 GuestCentric 的系统包含高级价格和库存管理功能,但一些用户发现更新价格和管理库存有点麻烦。建议包括更直观的界面和与现有系统更好地集成。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Angelfish Software 和 GuestCentric (Booking Engine) 共享许多核心 Booking Engine 功能,但各有独特的能力。Angelfish Software 提供 3 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 GuestCentric (Booking Engine) 提供 44 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。GuestCentric (Booking Engine) 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Angelfish Software:否。GuestCentric (Booking Engine):否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Booking Engine 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Angelfish 的 HT Score 为 0,GuestCentric 的为 20。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问