The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 41 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Angelfish 表现出色 .
HotelRunner 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Mobile optimized/responsive and Automated reporting.
基于 HTR 上 41 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $100/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 0 | 41 |
在分析了 41 条经验证的评价后,Angelfish 用户最看重其 ,而 HotelRunner 用户则强调 客户支持, 易于使用, 渠道管理。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
|
|
+
易于使用
▾
|
|
|
+
渠道管理
▾
|
|
|
+
与 OTA 集成
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
预订引擎
▾
|
|
|
−
报告功能
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 预订引擎 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #19 16 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #29 9 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | — | #31 0 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #25 1 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #18 22 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #28 9 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | — | #31 3 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 | — | #33 1 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | — | #26 1 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #22 12 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #20 3 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | — | #1 16 条评价 |
Choosing between Angelfish Software by Angelfish and the Booking Engine by HotelRunner hinges on your hotel’s specific needs and priorities. Both products aim to streamline booking processes, but they approach this goal differently. Angelfish is a niche analytics platform that emphasizes website performance and user behavior, whereas HotelRunner offers a comprehensive booking engine with extensive channel management and marketing tools. Your decision should focus on what your hotel most needs to improve: analytics and website insights or booking and distribution capabilities.
While Angelfish excels in data analysis and website optimization, it lacks a booking engine altogether. HotelRunner, with its 40+ features and more recent, higher-rated reviews, provides a more complete solution for direct bookings and channel integration. Would you prefer a specialized analytics tool or an all-in-one booking platform? That choice determines which product fits your hotel best.
Angelfish is designed for businesses prioritizing website analytics and user behavior insights, helping you optimize your online presence. However, it does not include a booking engine or channel management features, limiting its utility for direct booking growth. HotelRunner, by contrast, focuses on capturing bookings directly through your website while managing multiple channels effortlessly.
HotelRunner’s 40+ features, including multi-currency, multi-lingual capabilities, and extensive third-party integrations, make it more suitable for hotels seeking to expand their online reach and boost occupancy. If your hotel needs detailed website analytics, Angelfish might be appealing, but if your goal is to drive bookings and streamline distribution, HotelRunner is the clear winner.
HotelRunner scores a 4.73/5 for ease of use based on recent reviews, with users praising its intuitive interface, straightforward setup, and helpful onboarding support. Its platform is designed for hoteliers with varying levels of technical expertise, and many mention the quick learning curve and responsive customer support.
Angelfish, in contrast, scores 0/5, with no recent reviews or ratings available, indicating limited feedback on usability. Its complex and specialized analytics interface might be overwhelming if your team is seeking a simple, user-friendly solution.
Edge: HotelRunner.
HotelRunner offers over 40 features, including mobile responsiveness, multi-currency, multi-lingual support, automated reporting, pre- and post-stay emails, special offers, gift vouchers, booking abandonment recapture, and integrations with major OTAs like Expedia, Airbnb, and Agoda. Its extensive feature set supports all facets of booking management, online marketing, and guest engagement.
Angelfish provides no features beyond its core analytics, focusing solely on log analysis and website performance insights. While its detailed data processing is highly regarded, it lacks the operational features critical for managing bookings and distribution.
Edge: HotelRunner.
HotelRunner has consistently high support ratings at 4.8/5, with recent reviews emphasizing quick, helpful responses via multiple channels, including WhatsApp. Users often mention that support staff resolve issues promptly, contributing to a smooth experience.
There are no recent reviews or ratings for Angelfish, which indicates a lack of accessible support or community feedback. Given the importance of reliable support in booking systems, HotelRunner’s proven responsiveness makes it the safer choice.
Edge: HotelRunner.
HotelRunner integrates with 17 verified partners, including major OTAs, payment gateways, and channel management solutions such as Protel, Oracle Hospitality, Airbnb, Expedia, and Agoda. These integrations facilitate broad distribution and operational efficiency.
Angelfish, with only 3 verified partners, has limited integration options, mostly focused on log analysis tools like HiJiffy and SiteMinder. Its narrow integration scope constrains its ability to connect with other hotel systems or marketing channels.
Edge: HotelRunner.
HotelRunner’s 40+ recent reviews average 4.5/5, with high marks across ease of use, support, and feature set. Hoteliers in diverse segments, including boutique hotels and city center properties, praise its ability to increase bookings and simplify operations.
Angelfish has no reviews or recent feedback, making it impossible to gauge user satisfaction. Its niche focus on analytics appeals to specialized users but does not provide a broad usability or support reputation.
Edge: HotelRunner.
Angelfish’s pricing is not publicly disclosed or clearly listed, suggesting a customized or enterprise-level fee. HotelRunner charges a flat fee of $100/month, with no trial or freemium options.
Given the transparent pricing, HotelRunner allows for easier budget planning, whereas Angelfish’s costs remain uncertain and may only be suitable for larger organizations with tailored pricing arrangements.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Angelfish Software provides deep website analytics for hotels focused on digital performance, but it lacks booking and management features. Its niche appeal suits hotels with strong technical teams aiming to optimize their website traffic and user journey, rather than those looking to grow direct bookings.
HotelRunner’s booking engine shines in increasing online reservations, simplifying distribution, and offering a broad feature set. Its high user ratings and recent reviews make it the most recommended choice for hotels wanting a full suite of tools to attract and retain guests.
If your hotel needs a comprehensive booking and distribution platform, HotelRunner is the clear choice. It combines ease of use, extensive integrations, and high customer satisfaction to support your growth.
Choose Angelfish if:
Choose HotelRunner if:
In summary, HotelRunner offers a more complete solution for modern hoteliers looking to grow their direct reservations and streamline operations, making it the more suitable choice for most hotels today.
预订引擎 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $100/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Angelfish Software 和 Booking Engine by HotelRunner 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 入住前电子邮件 | ||
| 入住后电子邮件 | ||
| 关税 | ||
| 合并库存 | ||
| 移动优化/响应式 | ||
| 自动报告 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 28 项功能存在差异。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
客户支持因其响应迅速和高效而受到赞誉。用户对通过各种沟通渠道(包括 WhatsApp)提供的及时帮助表示赞赏。
该平台以其用户友好的界面和易于导航而闻名,使得具有不同技术专长的酒店经营者可以轻松进行设置和管理。
用户称赞 Hotelrunner 拥有强大的渠道管理功能,可与众多 OTA 无缝同步。这可消除重复预订并简化库存管理。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
集成预订引擎因推动直接预订和允许定制套餐而备受好评。许多用户欣赏创建 OTA 列表的便捷性,这有助于提高入住率和收入。
用户强调需要更加强大和可定制的报告工具来帮助制定利率策略决策,这反映了未来改进的一个关键领域。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Angelfish Software 和 Booking Engine by HotelRunner 共享许多核心 Booking Engine 功能,但各有独特的能力。Angelfish Software 提供 3 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Booking Engine by HotelRunner 提供 17 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Booking Engine by HotelRunner 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Angelfish Software:否。Booking Engine by HotelRunner:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Booking Engine 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Angelfish 的 HT Score 为 0,HotelRunner 的为 74。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问