The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 38 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Angelfish 表现出色 .
Neobookings 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Mobile optimized/responsive and Post-stay emails.
基于 HTR 上 38 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $500/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 0 | 38 |
在分析了 38 条经验证的评价后,Angelfish 用户最看重其 ,而 Neobookings 用户则强调 支持和专业精神, 持续改进, 预订引擎。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
支持和专业精神
▾
|
|
|
+
持续改进
▾
|
|
|
+
预订引擎
▾
|
|
|
+
定制和灵活性
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
可用性问题
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 预订引擎 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #24 9 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #24 17 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #16 6 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #24 1 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #26 14 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #30 10 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | — | #32 4 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #18 7 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #16 14 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #35 0 条评价 |
Choosing between Angelfish Software and Neobookings hinges on your hotel's specific needs and priorities as a booking engine. Both address your core goal of increasing direct bookings and streamlining operations, but they diverge in features, support, and market presence. While Angelfish offers a niche analytics focus, Neobookings emphasizes a full-suite, easy-to-use platform with extensive integrations. Which aligns better with your hotel's strategic direction?
Angelfish Software is designed primarily for companies that want detailed web analytics and log analysis. Its strength lies in converting server log data into actionable insights, helping your team optimize digital strategies. Neobookings, on the other hand, offers a comprehensive booking platform with a focus on increasing direct bookings through an all-in-one system, including channel management, payments, and marketing tools.
The key difference is that Angelfish's core is analytics, not direct booking management—it's best for data-driven decision-making. Neobookings provides a more complete operational ecosystem, making it easier to manage bookings, marketing, and payments from a single platform. Do you need granular website insights or an integrated booking system?
If your hotel needs a robust, user-friendly booking engine with extensive integrations and digital marketing support, go with Neobookings. Its more recent reviews, higher user ratings, and 37 reviews in the last 6 months provide stronger confidence. If your focus is on analyzing website performance and traffic patterns to refine your digital presence, Angelfish's log analysis might seem appealing, but with zero reviews and a lack of recent feedback, its viability is questionable.
For hotels seeking a proven, highly-rated platform that boosts direct bookings and offers ongoing support, Neobookings is the clear choice. Conversely, if your hotel requires detailed web analytics for strategic insights, Angelfish might be worth exploring, though its lack of recent feedback weakens its case.
Neobookings scores an impressive 4.85 out of 5 in ease of use, bolstered by positive reviews emphasizing its user-friendly interface and straightforward management tools. Customers praise its intuitive CMS, digital campaign tools, and support team’s responsiveness, with some mentioning how it simplifies complex processes.
Angelfish, however, scores 0 out of 5, reflecting a lack of any recent reviews or user feedback. Its interface and usability are unverified, and the absence of recent customer experiences makes it impossible to assess its ease of use. Given the current data, edge: Neobookings.
Neobookings offers a comprehensive set of 36 features, including mobile responsiveness, multi-lingual support, multi-currency options, loyalty integration, and advanced marketing tools like A/B testing and Google Hotel Ads. These features directly support your hotel’s capacity to attract and convert guests.
Angelfish provides no additional features or functionality beyond its core analytics platform, which is not tailored for booking management or marketing. With its extensive feature set, Neobookings clearly outpaces Angelfish. Edge: Neobookings.
Neobookings boasts a perfect 5 out of 5 customer support rating, with recent reviews highlighting the professionalism, responsiveness, and personalized assistance from their support team. Customers describe their support as highly effective, often mentioning how it contributes to their platform success.
In contrast, Angelfish has no recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to determine support quality. Its lack of recent feedback suggests limited current support engagement. Given the data, edge: Neobookings.
Neobookings connects with 20 verified partners, including major channel managers, payment providers, and digital marketing platforms. Its integrations with Stripe, Oracle Hospitality, and Quinta provide flexibility and expandability.
Angelfish, with only three verified partners, has a much narrower integration scope. Shared partners like SiteMinder and HiJiffy are limited compared to Neobookings’ broader ecosystem. Edge: Neobookings.
Neobookings’ recent reviews, totaling 37 with high satisfaction scores, reflect a 98% likelihood of recommendation. Its users span various hotel segments, including luxury and boutique properties, who praise its effectiveness and support.
Angelfish has no recent reviews or ratings, leaving its user satisfaction unverified. The absence of recent feedback diminishes confidence in its current performance. Clearly, Neobookings leads in hotel ratings. Edge: Neobookings.
Angelfish offers no publicly available pricing details, suggesting a customized or undisclosed model. In contrast, Neobookings charges a flat $500 monthly fee, with no setup or implementation costs listed, making its pricing transparent.
Given the transparency and consistency, Neobookings provides more predictable budgeting. Angelfish’s lack of pricing details makes comparison difficult, but the absence of recent reviews suggests limited ongoing value. Edge: Neobookings.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Neobookings emerges as the stronger choice for most hoteliers, especially those focused on increasing direct bookings, expanding marketing reach, and relying on robust integrations. Its recent surge in reviews, high ratings, and comprehensive feature set position it as the more dependable, well-supported solution.
Angelfish, while potentially valuable for analytics specialists, currently offers no recent feedback or user validation, limiting its appeal. It may serve niche needs for data-driven teams, but for the majority of hoteliers, Neobookings provides a clearer path to success.
If you want a straightforward, feature-rich booking platform with strong support, go with Neobookings. If detailed web analytics and server log analysis are your priority, and your team has the expertise to interpret complex data, Angelfish might be worth exploring—though its current lack of recent reviews is a concern.
预订引擎 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $500/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Angelfish Software 和 Neobookings 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 人工智能优化 | ||
| 多房间和多费率计划预订 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 特别优惠和折扣 | ||
| 移动优化/响应式 | ||
| 转化率报告 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 24 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 2 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Neobookings really cares about our business, and their 360 solutions are very convenient for us since we don't have to deal with many different people/vendors for the various servi..."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
用户多次称赞 Neobookings 的专业和敬业支持团队,指出他们的可用性、响应能力和及时解决问题的能力。这大大提高了用户体验和对产品的信任度。
持续改进是其主要优势。Neobookings 的频繁更新和对产品改进的承诺确保了该解决方案在酒店运营中保持竞争力和有效性。
用户强调 Neobookings 预订引擎功能强大、用途广泛且直观的特性。它有助于增加直接预订量并简化管理,并提到其显著的销售增长和积极的用户体验。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
一些用户指出了 CMS 和其他功能中的可用性问题,建议增强用户界面和附加功能(如全面的忠诚度计划和更容易的自动化)将会有所帮助。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Angelfish Software 和 Neobookings 共享许多核心 Booking Engine 功能,但各有独特的能力。Angelfish Software 提供 3 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Neobookings 提供 20 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Neobookings 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Angelfish Software:否。Neobookings:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Booking Engine 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Angelfish 的 HT Score 为 0,Neobookings 的为 75。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问