The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 40 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Angelfish 表现出色 .
Vertical Booking 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 .
基于 HTR 上 40 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 0 | 40 |
在分析了 40 条经验证的评价后,Angelfish 用户最看重其 ,而 Vertical Booking 用户则强调 客户服务, 渠道管理, 易于使用。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
客户服务
▾
|
|
|
+
渠道管理
▾
|
|
|
+
易于使用
▾
|
|
|
+
集成和连接
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
定制
▾
|
|
|
−
同步问题
▾
|
|
|
−
数据库搜索功能
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 预订引擎 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #23 11 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #28 14 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #18 7 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #28 1 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #22 20 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #25 15 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #30 6 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #20 5 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #12 23 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #27 7 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #28 1 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | — | #8 8 条评价 |
Choosing a booking engine for your hotel is a critical decision that directly impacts your revenue, guest satisfaction, and operational efficiency. Both Angelfish Software and Vertical Booking aim to solve these core issues, but they approach them very differently. Angelfish focuses on analytics and data-driven insights, while Vertical Booking emphasizes conversion rates and multi-channel management. Given that your hotel’s priorities are often tied to direct booking performance and user experience, which platform aligns better with your goals?
Both products serve the same fundamental purpose—streamlining your booking process. Yet, they diverge significantly in maturity, regional presence, feature depth, and user feedback. Are you looking for a solution rooted in advanced analytics or one optimized for high conversion and multi-channel control?
Angelfish Software is designed for hotels that want deep insights into their website traffic, user behavior, and operational analytics. However, it lacks a dedicated booking engine, meaning it primarily supports digital marketing and website performance strategies rather than direct booking processes.
Vertical Booking, by contrast, offers a full reservation management platform with a focus on increasing direct bookings through its customizable booking engine and integrated CRS. It is used extensively in multiple regions and has a proven track record of boosting booking conversion rates, especially for hotels prioritizing online reservations.
The key distinction? Angelfish’s analytics are suited for digital teams optimizing website traffic, while Vertical Booking’s tools support revenue teams aiming to convert visitors into direct bookers. Does your hotel need data insights or a dedicated booking solution?
If your hotel needs a direct booking engine capable of multi-channel management with customizable options, go with Vertical Booking. It’s ideal for properties that rely heavily on online reservations and want an intuitive system with robust integrations.
If your team primarily seeks detailed web analytics, user behavior insights, and performance tracking rather than booking management, Angelfish is less suitable. Given the review data, Vertical Booking’s 37 recent reviews with a 4.64/5 rating and NPS score of 9.16/5 suggest a more consistent, recent user satisfaction.
For hotels aiming to increase direct bookings while maintaining control over multiple channels, Vertical Booking is the clear choice. Conversely, if your focus is on website optimization and visitor analytics, Angelfish might be more aligned—though it’s not a booking engine.
Vertical Booking’s user interface boasts a 4.49/5 ease-of-use rating, with many reviews praising its intuitive design and straightforward navigation. Its onboarding process is rated 4.44/5, reflecting a generally smooth setup experience, supported by responsive support.
Angelfish, on the other hand, scores a 0/5 in ease of use, with no recent reviews, indicating a lack of recent user feedback or possibly minimal adoption. Its interface is not designed for direct booking management, making it unsuitable for staff who need quick, operational tools.
Edge: Vertical Booking.
Vertical Booking offers a broad suite of features, including channel management, rate optimization, and a customizable booking engine—totaling 69 verified integrations, unmatched by Angelfish’s 3 partner options. Its capabilities include dynamic packaging, upselling tools, and multi-channel synchronization, which are absent from Angelfish.
Angelfish’s main strength lies in its analytics, but it does not provide a dedicated booking engine or the extensive operational features available in Vertical Booking. With more verified integrations and feature-rich options, Vertical Booking clearly has the edge.
Edge: Vertical Booking.
Vertical Booking’s reviews highlight highly responsive support, with an average customer support rating of 4.57/5. Users appreciate the quick response times and helpful service, with some praising the local presence of support teams and their dedication.
Angelfish’s support ratings are unavailable, and given the lack of recent reviews, confidence in ongoing support is limited. The absence of recent user feedback suggests that Vertical Booking’s support is more reliable and well-regarded.
Edge: Vertical Booking.
Vertical Booking boasts 69 verified integrations, including prominent partners like SiteMinder, RateBoard, and WebRezPro, offering extensive connectivity across OTAs, PMS, and other hotel systems. Angelfish’s integrations are limited to three verified partners, such as HiJiffy and Pitchup.com.
The broader, more diverse integration ecosystem of Vertical Booking ensures smoother data flow, fewer manual processes, and better automation. This makes it a more adaptable platform for hotels with complex multi-channel needs.
Edge: Vertical Booking.
Vertical Booking has accumulated 37 recent reviews with an average rating of 4.64/5, indicating strong satisfaction across hotel segments, including resorts, boutique hotels, and city center properties. Hotels consistently praise its ease of use, support, and ability to drive bookings.
Angelfish has no recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to gauge current user satisfaction. The lack of recent feedback and ratings favors Vertical Booking as the more trusted and proven platform.
Edge: Vertical Booking.
Both platforms do not publicly disclose explicit pricing models or fees. Typically, these solutions involve custom quotes based on hotel size, number of properties, or integration needs, so your team should request tailored proposals.
Given the absence of detailed pricing, focus on the value provided—Vertical Booking’s proven ROI and extensive features suggest it offers a more tangible return on investment.
Vertical Booking offers a mature, feature-rich platform with a track record of high guest satisfaction, extensive integrations, and a strong regional presence. It is best suited for hotels that focus on direct bookings, multi-channel management, and revenue optimization.
Angelfish, by contrast, is a niche solution geared toward web analytics rather than booking management. Its lack of recent reviews and limited features make it less suitable for hotels needing operational booking tools or high user adoption.
If your hotel’s priority is enhancing reservation conversions and operational control, Vertical Booking is the clear pick. If your focus is on detailed website traffic insights without the need for a booking engine, Angelfish could complement your digital marketing efforts but isn’t a standalone booking solution.
In conclusion, for hotels ready to improve revenue through direct reservations and streamline multi-channel operations, Vertical Booking’s platform delivers proven results and extensive support. Angelfish remains a specialized analytics tool with limited practical application for booking management. Based on recent reviews and feature sets, Vertical Booking should be your preferred choice.
预订引擎 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|---|
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
虽然客户服务因其响应能力和以解决方案为导向的方法而广受好评,但一些评论指出,在解决时间和响应准确性等方面还有改进空间。总体而言,用户认为支持团队友好且... 虽然客户服务因其响应能力和以解决方案为导向的方法而广受好评,但一些评论指出,在解决时间和响应准确性等方面还有改进空间。总体而言,用户认为支持团队友好且乐于助人。
Vertical Booking 的渠道管理功能广受好评,它允许酒店经营者通过一个平台控制多个在线销售渠道,从而减少混乱并节省时间。用户还赞赏它能够平衡不同渠道的价格... Vertical Booking 的渠道管理功能广受好评,它允许酒店经营者通过一个平台控制多个在线销售渠道,从而减少混乱并节省时间。用户还赞赏它能够平衡不同渠道的价格并轻松管理优惠价格。
许多评论都提到了 Vertical Booking 系统的易用性和直观性。酒店经营者认为界面非常友好,并且喜欢在一个平台上拥有所有功能。然而,一些人认为在某些技术领域需... 许多评论都提到了 Vertical Booking 系统的易用性和直观性。酒店经营者认为界面非常友好,并且喜欢在一个平台上拥有所有功能。然而,一些人认为在某些技术领域需要更好的文档和更直观的设计。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户对 Vertical Booking 的预订引擎和渠道管理器中的自定义选项非常满意,这些选项使他们能够根据自己的特定需求定制解决方案。但是,一些评论表明,需要更强大... 用户对 Vertical Booking 的预订引擎和渠道管理器中的自定义选项非常满意,这些选项使他们能够根据自己的特定需求定制解决方案。但是,一些评论表明,需要更强大的设计自定义选项和用户更改界面元素(如颜色和字体)的权限。
一些评论指出,Vertical Booking 的渠道管理器与其 PMS 之间存在同步延迟,影响了房源和价格的实时更新。建议加快同步速度以提高整体效率。
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Angelfish Software 和 Vertical Booking (Booking Engine) 共享许多核心 Booking Engine 功能,但各有独特的能力。Angelfish Software 提供 3 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Vertical Booking (Booking Engine) 提供 69 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Vertical Booking (Booking Engine) 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.5/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Angelfish Software:否。Vertical Booking (Booking Engine):否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Booking Engine 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Angelfish 的 HT Score 为 0,Vertical Booking 的为 17。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问