The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 31 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
LCR Systems 表现出色 .
Shiji Group 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Sales Reporting and Employee Reporting and Management.
基于 HTR 上 31 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $600/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 0 | 31 |
在分析了 31 条经验证的评价后,LCR Systems 用户最看重其 ,而 Shiji Group 用户则强调 用户友好性, 运营效率, 系统集成。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
| LCR Systems |
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
用户友好性
▾
|
|
|
+
运营效率
▾
|
|
|
+
系统集成
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
系统速度和性能
▾
|
|
|
−
综合报告
▾
|
|
|
−
本地化需求
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店POS系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 | LCR Systems |
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) | — | #7 1 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #4 14 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #4 14 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #6 2 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 | LCR Systems |
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #4 10 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #5 22 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #5 19 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 | — | #6 1 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 | LCR Systems |
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #5 8 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #5 6 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | — | #4 6 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | — | #3 7 条评价 |
Choosing the right POS system is vital for your hotel's operational efficiency, guest satisfaction, and revenue management. Apollo EPOS by LCR Systems and Shiji Infrasys POS are two solutions that aim to streamline your restaurant, bar, or F&B outlets' transactions and management. While Apollo EPOS offers limited review data and features, Shiji Infrasys POS stands out with its extensive capabilities, broad hotel segment adoption, and recent positive feedback. Which of these platforms truly aligns with your hotel’s needs?
Both products address core hospitality POS requirements—transaction processing, inventory management, and staff oversight—but they approach these from different angles. Apollo EPOS appears to be a less documented, niche system with no recent reviews or clear feature set, whereas Shiji Infrasys POS is a comprehensive, cloud-based platform trusted by major hotel brands. Does your hotel need a proven, feature-rich platform, or is a more limited solution sufficient? Let’s explore further.
Apollo EPOS is purportedly designed to optimize sales transactions and inventory management, but it currently lacks recent reviews, ratings, or detailed features. Shiji Infrasys POS, on the other hand, boasts 29 reviews, a 4.66/5 ease-of-use rating, and a NPS score of 9.03, indicating strong user satisfaction. The recent validation through reviews makes Shiji the more reliable choice for hoteliers seeking proven performance.
While Apollo EPOS claims to streamline operational workflows, the absence of recent user feedback raises questions about its ongoing support, stability, or feature updates. Conversely, Shiji Infrasys has established a reputation for stability, extensive integration, and support, making it a safer option for hotels aiming to reduce errors and increase efficiency. Are you comfortable investing in a less-reviewed platform, or do you prefer a solution with recent, positive user validation?
If your hotel needs a full-featured, cloud-based POS that integrates easily with property management and offers advanced F&B management, Shiji Infrasys POS is the clear choice. Its broad feature set, 64 verified integrations, and extensive hotel brand adoption make it suitable for large, multi-property operations.
If your team prioritizes simplicity or has very specific needs that Apollo EPOS claims to meet—yet lacks recent reviews or detailed feature info—you might consider Apollo. However, given the lack of current data, Shiji’s proven track record, and recent positive feedback, the safer bet is Shiji Infrasys POS for complex or expanding hotel operations.
Shiji Infrasys scores a 4.66/5 for ease of use, backed by recent reviews praising its intuitive interface, swift onboarding, and staff adoption. Users highlight that staff find it user-friendly, with prompt support available for onboarding and troubleshooting. Review quotes emphasize that staff can learn the system quickly, reducing training time.
Apollo EPOS provides no recent review data or user ratings, making it difficult to assess its usability. Its lack of documented user experience or onboarding feedback suggests it may not match the user-friendly reputation of Shiji. Based on available data, Edge: Shiji Infrasys POS.
Shiji Infrasys POS offers a comprehensive suite of 23 features, including cloud-based operations, inventory and sales reporting, customer management, mobile analytics, digital menus, self-service ordering, and PCI compliance. These features cater to multi-outlet F&B management and data-driven decision-making, with many functionalities absent in Apollo.
Apollo EPOS, with no documented features or integrations, cannot compete with Shiji’s extensive offerings. Its limited feature set, combined with the lack of recent validation, makes Shiji the clear leader in capabilities. Edge: Shiji Infrasys POS.
Shiji Infrasys scores a 4.52/5 for customer support, with reviews highlighting fast response times, effective solutions, and ongoing support—many emphasize the availability of 24/7 assistance. Review quotes mention prompt, helpful service that reduces stress and operational downtime.
Apollo EPOS provides no recent support ratings or customer feedback, which makes it difficult to judge support quality. Given the positive recent feedback for Shiji, including fast support and stability, it has the edge in customer service. Edge: Shiji Infrasys POS.
Shiji Infrasys integrates with 64 verified partners, including industry leaders like SiteMinder, Revinate, IDeaS, Duetto, and Amadeus. This extensive network allows seamless connectivity with property management systems, revenue management, guest insights, and payment platforms.
Apollo EPOS has no verified integrations listed or reported, limiting its appeal for hotels seeking a unified system. The breadth of Shiji’s integrations significantly enhances operational efficiency and data management. Edge: Shiji Infrasys POS.
Shiji Infrasys POS has accumulated 29 recent reviews with a 4.66/5 ease-of-use score and a 9.03/10 NPS score, indicating high hotel satisfaction. Hotels across various segments, especially luxury and branded properties, praise its stability, functionality, and support.
Apollo EPOS, with no recent reviews or ratings, cannot be reliably rated by hoteliers. The recent positive feedback for Shiji makes it the preferred choice for hotels prioritizing user satisfaction and reliability. Edge: Shiji Infrasys POS.
Shiji Infrasys POS charges a base price of $600.00, with no mention of ongoing monthly fees or implementation costs. Pricing details for Apollo EPOS are not available, which complicates direct comparison.
Given the transparency of Shiji’s pricing and the lack of info on Apollo, Shiji offers better clarity on investment. For budget-conscious hotels that want a proven, scalable solution, Shiji’s straightforward pricing is advantageous.
Apollo might suit very niche operators or those testing POS solutions, but the lack of recent validation limits its recommendation.
Not ideal if your hotel has minimal F&B operations or prefers a standalone, less complex system without extensive integrations.
The core difference lies in their validation and feature sets. Shiji Infrasys has demonstrated its value through recent reviews, a high user satisfaction score, and a comprehensive feature suite, making it suitable for most hotel types.
Choose Apollo EPOS only if your hotel has niche, very specific needs and is prepared to operate with limited recent data. For most hotels, especially those seeking reliability and scalability, Shiji Infrasys POS is the clear winner.
In summary:
Ultimately, Shiji's recent validation and comprehensive offering make it the safest investment for hotels aiming to modernize and grow.
酒店POS系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
| LCR Systems |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $600/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Apollo EPOS 和 Shiji Infrasys POS 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 | LCR Systems |
|
|---|---|---|
| 员工报告和管理 | ||
| 基于云 | ||
| 库存管理 | ||
| 用户管理 | ||
| 菜单绩效报告 | ||
| 销售报告 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 11 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 4 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"All the big players don't offer the level of API connectivity we need, but Shiji does. From the early stages of our design process, we were confident that Shiji could provide us wi..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"We reduced check-in time by over 80%, from up to eight minutes to just about one minute with the new system."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
客户发现石基的POS和PMS系统界面友好,减少了培训时间,并简化了新用户的使用。其直观的界面深受员工欢迎,能够轻松管理各种任务。
石基因其菜单和桌位管理等功能而备受赞誉,这些功能简化了点餐流程,减少了错误,最终提升了日常运营效率。该系统因提升团队效率和顾客满意度而备受赞誉。
评论者称赞石基将POS系统与PMS系统无缝集成,通过连接会计、预订和库存等各项功能,简化了运营。这种集成有助于精准追踪数据,提升运营效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
虽然许多人对该系统表示赞赏,但也有一些人反映,该系统在高峰使用期间存在卡顿和性能下降的问题,这表明需要进行优化。这会影响结账流程等任务,并影响整体满意... 虽然许多人对该系统表示赞赏,但也有一些人反映,该系统在高峰使用期间存在卡顿和性能下降的问题,这表明需要进行优化。这会影响结账流程等任务,并影响整体满意度。
石基以其强大的报告功能而备受赞誉,能够帮助酒店提取详细的报告,从而辅助决策。然而,部分酒店希望获得更多定制选项,以便进行更深入的分析。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Apollo EPOS 和 Shiji Infrasys POS 共享许多核心 Hotel POS Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Apollo EPOS 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Shiji Infrasys POS 提供 65 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Shiji Infrasys POS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Apollo EPOS:否。Shiji Infrasys POS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel POS Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。LCR Systems 的 HT Score 为 0,Shiji Group 的为 79。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您的房产情况量身定制的推荐方案