The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 43 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Septeo Hospitality 表现出色 ,拥有独特功能如 Ancillary revenue tracking and Integrated Payment Terminal & Card Reader.
Redforts 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Mobile App and Guest App.
基于 HTR 上 43 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $500/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 0 | 43 |
在分析了 43 条经验证的评价后,Septeo Hospitality 用户最看重其 ,而 Redforts 用户则强调 易于使用且直观的系统, 预订管理, 客户服务。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
易于使用且直观的系统
▾
|
|
|
+
预订管理
▾
|
|
|
+
客户服务
▾
|
|
|
+
持续改进和创新
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
集成功能
▾
|
|
|
−
界面和设计改进
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #31 21 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) | — | #49 3 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #30 18 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #39 5 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | — | #49 2 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 | — | #37 2 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | — | #32 4 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #14 39 条评价 |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) can fundamentally shape your hotel’s operations, guest experience, and profitability. Both ASTERIO by Septeo Hospitality and Redforts aim to streamline management but approach this goal differently. ASTERIO, with no recent reviews or ratings, remains obscure, while Redforts boasts over 40 reviews, recent feedback, and a high NPS score—making it the clearer choice for hoteliers seeking proven performance.
Your decision hinges on which features and support levels align with your hotel’s needs, budget, and growth plans. Is a comprehensive, flexible system essential, or do you prioritize ease of use and rapid deployment? Let’s compare these two solutions closely.
ASTERIO markets itself as a multi-activity management platform designed for a broad array of services—accommodation, food, wellness, shops, and activities. However, it has no publicly available reviews, ratings, or recent user feedback, leaving its real-world performance uncertain.
Redforts, by contrast, has accumulated over 40 recent reviews, with a 4.68/5 ease of use rating and a 4.53/5 customer support rating. Users frequently praise its intuitive interface, quick onboarding, and ability to simplify daily operations—though some note interface modernization could improve visual appeal.
Given the absence of recent data on ASTERIO, Redforts clearly demonstrates its effectiveness through current customer feedback. Are you willing to rely on an unreviewed solution, or do you prefer a product with proven, recent user satisfaction?
If your hotel needs a straightforward, reliable, and highly rated PMS with a focus on ease of use and customer support, go with Redforts. Its reviews highlight a user-friendly experience, a dedicated support team, and a suite of features tailored for small to mid-sized properties, including hostels, B&Bs, and boutique hotels.
If, however, your hotel requires a platform with extensive management capabilities across diverse services (spa, wellness, activities), and you are prepared to evaluate an unreviewed product, ASTERIO might appeal. Yet, with no recent reviews or user ratings, its actual suitability remains unverified.
In summary, for a hotel valuing current, high-rated support and ease of use, Redforts is the clear choice. For experimental or large-scale multi-activity management, ASTERIO could be considered, but with caution due to limited recent data.
Redforts excels in usability, earning a 4.68/5 rating based on recent reviews from diverse users. Its intuitive interface, quick onboarding process, and positive staff feedback underscore its user-friendliness.
ASTERIO, on the other hand, has no publicly available ease of use ratings or recent reviews, making it impossible to assess its user experience. Its complex multi-activity scope suggests a steeper learning curve, especially without current user feedback.
Edge: Redforts.
ASTERIO offers unique modules like Spa & Wellness, Automated Night Audit, and Rules-Based Room Assignments—features absent in Redforts. These are valuable for hotels with diverse operations seeking specialized management tools.
Redforts provides features that ASTERIO lacks, including a Mobile App, Guest App, Automated Reminders, and ID & Passport Scanner. It also supports online check-in, online payment, and task management, making daily operations more automated and efficient.
With 38 common features, Redforts surpasses ASTERIO’s unique offerings in practical, daily-use functionalities. The decision depends on whether your hotel needs niche modules or streamlined automation.
Edge: Redforts.
Redforts receives a 4.53/5 customer support rating, with recent reviews highlighting its quick response times and friendly service. Users appreciate the personal attention, especially with onboarding and ongoing assistance.
There are no recent reviews or ratings for ASTERIO, making its support quality impossible to evaluate. Given the importance of reliable support in hotel management, this is a significant gap.
Edge: Redforts.
ASTERIO integrates with 13 verified partners, including SiteMinder, Experience Hotel, and Qualitelis, supporting a broad ecosystem of booking, channel management, and guest experience tools.
Redforts offers only 2 verified integrations—WuBook and Mr Winston—but with a focus on core PMS and channel management. While fewer, these integrations are well-rated, and Redforts’ platform is praised for simplifying platform communication.
If your hotel relies on diverse third-party systems, ASTERIO’s broader integration footprint might be advantageous. Otherwise, Redforts’ simpler setup is often sufficient.
Edge: ASTERIO.
With no recent reviews or ratings, ASTERIO’s user satisfaction remains unknown. Conversely, Redforts boasts a 4.68/5 ease of use score, a 4.53/5 customer support score, and a 9.5/10 NPS based on 40 reviews, with recent feedback confirming high satisfaction.
Redforts is favored across hotel segments like B&Bs, boutique hotels, and hostels, with reviewers describing it as practical, intuitive, and supportive of daily operations.
Given the current data, Redforts clearly holds the higher, more reliable reputation for user satisfaction.
Edge: Redforts.
ASTERIO’s pricing is unavailable; it may require custom quotes or have a bespoke pricing model, typical for complex, multi-activity platforms.
Redforts charges a base price of $500.00, with no ongoing subscription or implementation fees. This straightforward pricing, combined with its features and recent positive reviews, makes it accessible for small to mid-sized hotels.
If predictable costs are a priority, Redforts offers clarity that ASTERIO cannot.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
ASTERIO presents itself as a broad, multi-activity management system with specialized modules designed for complex, diversified operations. Its suitability is unverified due to the lack of recent reviews, and it may be best suited for large properties with comprehensive service offerings.
Redforts stands out as a highly-rated, user-friendly PMS favored by small and mid-sized hotels, hostels, and boutique properties. Its recent reviews, high satisfaction scores, and affordable pricing make it the safer, more practical choice for most hoteliers today.
If your hotel values proven, current user feedback and ease of use, Redforts is the recommended option. Choose ASTERIO only if you need multi-activity management and are willing to accept the risks of limited recent validation.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $500/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,ASTERIO (by Septeo Hospitality) 和 Redforts 共享 38 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 在线 24/7 支持 | ||
| 在线结帐 | ||
| 基于规则的房间分配 | ||
| 家政移动应用程序 | ||
| 水疗和健康模块 | ||
| 移动应用 | ||
| 自动夜间审计 | ||
| 自动提醒 | ||
| 访客应用 | ||
| 辅助收入跟踪 | ||
| 集成支付终端和读卡器 | ||
| 集成身份证和护照扫描仪 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 2 项功能存在差异。
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
许多用户都喜欢 Redforts 的直观设计,它简化了培训并减少了人为错误。这简化了日常操作,让员工可以腾出时间处理其他任务。
该系统擅长管理预订、防止超额预订以及与多个平台集成。预订引擎和渠道管理的定制也是一大优势。
细心、响应迅速的客户服务经常受到称赞。用户提到个性化沟通和快速解决问题,为整体体验带来积极影响。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Redforts 可与预订引擎、渠道管理器和其他平台高效集成,提供无缝管理体验。此功能简化了不同系统和平台之间的协调。
虽然其功能受到称赞,但一些评论提到,界面似乎已经过时,可以通过现代化来增强视觉吸引力和效率。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。ASTERIO (by Septeo Hospitality) 和 Redforts 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。ASTERIO (by Septeo Hospitality) 提供 13 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Redforts 提供 2 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Redforts 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
ASTERIO (by Septeo Hospitality):否。Redforts:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Septeo Hospitality 的 HT Score 为 0,Redforts 的为 73。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问