The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
在分析了 298 条经验证的评价后,SHR Group 用户最看重其 主动客户管理, 网站设计, 报告和分析,而 Blastness 用户则强调 网站管理和设计, 收益管理系统, 收益顾问。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
主动客户管理
▾
|
+
网站管理和设计
▾
|
|
+
网站设计
▾
|
+
收益管理系统
▾
|
|
+
报告和分析
▾
|
+
收益顾问
▾
|
|
+
数字营销
▾
|
+
渠道经理
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
代金券系统
▾
|
−
可定制的报告
▾
|
|
−
模板限制
▾
|
−
无缝集成
▾
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 网站设计 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #9 30 条评价 | #8 20 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #1 208 条评价 | #8 13 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #6 13 条评价 | #23 0 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #14 1 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #4 115 条评价 | #8 15 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #2 163 条评价 | #8 13 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #2 84 条评价 | #11 3 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #4 16 条评价 | #9 3 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #11 8 条评价 | #23 0 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #2 244 条评价 | #6 36 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #6 5 条评价 | #15 0 条评价 |
Choosing between SHR Group's Website Design and Blastness’s Website Design hinges on what your hotel needs most. SHR Group offers a broad, data-driven approach with extensive integration, while Blastness emphasizes flexible, customized websites with a strong focus on revenue management and guest experience. Both solutions aim to improve your digital presence, but their core strengths differ significantly. So, which aligns better with your hotel’s goals?
Both SHR Group and Blastness provide website design solutions tailored for hotels, but they approach the problem differently. SHR Group’s platform leans heavily on its proven track record, with a high overall rating of 4.87/5 backed by 169 reviews, mostly recent—making it a more reliable choice based on current user feedback. Blastness, with only 36 reviews and a 0/5 overall rating, has a smaller sample size and less recent feedback, which weakens confidence in its current quality.
While SHR Group emphasizes creating websites that reflect your specific brand and customer behaviors, Blastness focuses on providing customizable templates and a flexible content management system (CMS). SHR Group’s solutions are more suited for hotels seeking a proven, data-backed partner, whereas Blastness appeals to those wanting more control and quick deployment. Are you prioritizing a partner with a strong reputation or a flexible, DIY-style platform?
If your hotel needs a tried-and-true digital partner with a high client satisfaction rate, go with SHR Group. Its comprehensive solution combines data-driven website design, advanced analytics, and a suite of integrations, making it ideal for hotels looking for stability, proven results, and extensive ecosystem compatibility.
If your hotel requires a flexible, fully customizable website with a focus on revenue management and direct bookings, Blastness is a better fit. It offers a broad range of design options, a CMS that allows hotel teams to manage content independently, and a suite of tools aimed at boosting online visibility and conversions.
For luxury or boutique hotels that value personalized design and strategic consulting, SHR Group’s high ratings and extensive case studies make it a more compelling choice. Meanwhile, properties aiming for rapid deployment and control over website content, especially those with in-house teams, might prefer Blastness’s modular, customizable approach.
SHR Group’s platform scores 4.69/5 in ease of use, with a user-friendly interface praised for its integration capabilities, but some clients find onboarding complex, especially when navigating the CMS’s image upload and page setup features. Its comprehensive features can present a learning curve, particularly for smaller hotels with limited technical staff.
Blastness scores slightly higher at 4.81/5, with users highlighting its intuitive interface, simple content management, and quick setup times. Clients appreciate the flexibility of choosing pre-designed templates or custom websites, which can be managed independently without steep training.
Edge: Blastness.
SHR Group offers 13 shared features, including advanced analytics, integrated booking engines, and a wide array of third-party integrations. Unique features include ADA compliance, which can be crucial for accessibility standards, and a focus on marketing tools that help optimize the guest journey.
Blastness provides 16 features—more than SHR—including Storefront/Voucher functionality, Review Widgets, and Google AMP markup, which can enhance mobile performance and online reputation. Its Revenue Management System (RMS) is a core offering, helping hotels optimize pricing and availability strategies in real-time.
Given the number of unique features, Blastness edges out SHR Group in feature variety, especially in digital marketing and performance enhancements. However, SHR Group’s special focus on accessibility and marketing integrations is also noteworthy.
Edge: Blastness.
Both platforms receive near-perfect ratings for support, with SHR Group at 4.85/5 and Blastness at 4.86/5. Customers praise SHR Group’s dedicated account management and proactive support, with quotes like “Avvio has been our digital partner for over 8 years”—highlighting its long-term commitment.
Blastness’s support is similarly lauded, with clients describing their team as "always available and ready to help." Users also appreciate the guidance from their revenue consultants, especially in strategic pricing and online visibility.
Edge: Blastness.
SHR Group boasts 81 verified integrations, including major systems like Oracle Hospitality, Mews, and IDeaS, providing broad compatibility with PMS, revenue management, and marketing tools. Only five are shared with Blastness, which has 15 verified integrations, mainly in revenue management and channel distribution.
Blastness’s integrations tend to focus more on marketing and revenue optimization, with notable partnerships like hotelcube and Vertical Booking. SHR Group’s extensive ecosystem makes it more suitable for hotels seeking a unified, connected platform across multiple systems.
Edge: SHR Group.
Hoteliers rate SHR Group significantly higher, with an overall score of 4.87/5 and a review count of 169—far surpassing Blastness’s 36 reviews. Recent reviews affirm SHR Group’s consistency, with clients praising its ROI, ease of integration, and customer service.
Blastness’s reviews are less recent and less numerous, which diminishes confidence in current user sentiment. For hotels seeking proven satisfaction and reliability, SHR Group’s higher ratings make it the clear choice.
Edge: SHR Group.
SHR Group charges a clear base price of $900 per month, with no freemium, implementation, or hidden fees. Pricing details for Blastness are not publicly listed, suggesting a customized quote based on services selected.
While SHR Group’s transparent pricing simplifies budgeting, Blastness’s flexible model may appeal to hotels seeking specific services but could be less predictable in total costs.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
In summary, SHR Group’s website design offers a high-rated, well-established platform with a focus on integration, accessibility, and data-driven design. Its extensive ecosystem and proven track record make it ideal for hotels seeking stability, proven ROI, and comprehensive support.
Blastness excels in providing flexible, customizable websites, with a strong emphasis on revenue management and digital marketing. Its intuitive CMS and design options suit properties wanting quick deployment, independent control, and targeted online visibility.
If your hotel values a platform with extensive integrations, proven success, and long-term support, SHR Group is the clear choice. Conversely, if speed, customization, and management autonomy are your priorities, Blastness offers a compelling alternative.
Based on current reviews, the higher overall rating, and the recent user feedback, SHR Group’s Website Design clearly stands out as the stronger option for most hotels. Its broad ecosystem, proven results, and dedicated support make it a safer investment for properties aiming for growth and stability.
Blastness’s flexible, easy-to-manage platform is appealing for hotels that prioritize quick deployment and content control, but its limited reviews and less recent feedback weaken its case.
For hoteliers seeking reliability, proven performance, and extensive integration options, SHR Group is the recommended choice. If your hotel is smaller, more hands-on, and needs rapid, customizable websites, Blastness can be a suitable, though less tested, alternative.
我们分析了 4 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"Our results and KPIs from booking engine to digital reinforce the effectiveness of our partnership and SHR Group's exceptional technology."
"The constant evolution of tools such as Business Intelligence and RMS, which my team and I use on a daily basis, has led to very interesting results."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
客户对敬业的客户管理团队积极主动、响应迅速的支持表示赞赏。客户经理通常被描述为知识渊博、致力于客户成功,并随时提供见解和建议以推动业务增长。
SRH Group 因其现代、视觉冲击力强且用户友好的网站设计而备受赞誉,这些设计增强了客人的预订体验。客户指出,这些设计大大提高了可见度和转化率。然而,一些客... SRH Group 因其现代、视觉冲击力强且用户友好的网站设计而备受赞誉,这些设计增强了客人的预订体验。客户指出,这些设计大大提高了可见度和转化率。然而,一些客户表示需要更灵活的定制和更快的周转时间。
SRH Group 提供的广泛而深入的报告功能一直受到好评,它提供了清晰的绩效趋势洞察和可操作数据,帮助酒店经营者做出明智的决策。用户发现这些报告对于战略调整和... SRH Group 提供的广泛而深入的报告功能一直受到好评,它提供了清晰的绩效趋势洞察和可操作数据,帮助酒店经营者做出明智的决策。用户发现这些报告对于战略调整和绩效跟踪至关重要。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
SRH Group 实施的优惠券系统收到的评价褒贬不一。虽然评价认为该系统可以增加收入,但一些用户也指出了可以改进的地方,包括更简单的优惠券管理和部分兑换。
虽然 SRH Group 的模板通常因其视觉吸引力而受到称赞,但一些用户发现它们具有限制性,并希望有更多的定制选项来更好地反映其独特的品牌形象。
排名更高的方面
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Blastness 因开发引人入胜的酒店网站而备受赞誉,这些网站提升了转化率和直接预订量。他们针对桌面和移动平台进行了设计优化,并结合有效的数字营销策略,提升了... Blastness 因开发引人入胜的酒店网站而备受赞誉,这些网站提升了转化率和直接预订量。他们针对桌面和移动平台进行了设计优化,并结合有效的数字营销策略,提升了酒店在线曝光度,吸引了更多直接预订,并降低了佣金支出。
Blastness 收益管理系统 (RMS) 因其精简定价策略和提升收益的能力而脱颖而出。用户欣赏其直观的设计,它简化了复杂的流程并快速响应市场变化。然而,预测工具仍... Blastness 收益管理系统 (RMS) 因其精简定价策略和提升收益的能力而脱颖而出。用户欣赏其直观的设计,它简化了复杂的流程并快速响应市场变化。然而,预测工具仍有提升空间,可以通过集成高级分析功能来更好地制定战略定价决策。
Blastness 的收益顾问因其专业知识和量身定制的战略指导而备受赞誉。他们帮助酒店优化入住率和收益表现,并因此备受赞誉。他们积极主动且富有洞察力的建议始终被... Blastness 的收益顾问因其专业知识和量身定制的战略指导而备受赞誉。他们帮助酒店优化入住率和收益表现,并因此备受赞誉。他们积极主动且富有洞察力的建议始终被用户视为宝贵的资源。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
虽然用户认为现有的报告功能很有帮助,但需要更精细、更可定制的选项。增强的报告功能将提供对特定数据点的更深入洞察,进一步完善策略并发现增长机会。
用户表示希望进一步与其他重要的酒店管理平台(例如PMS和宾客管理系统)进行整合。他们相信,更深入的整合将提升运营效率,并提供更全面的宾客获取策略。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。SHR Website Design 和 Blastness Website Design 共享许多核心 Website Design 功能,但各有独特的能力。SHR Website Design 提供 81 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Blastness Website Design 提供 15 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Blastness Website Design 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 4.7/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
SHR Website Design:否。Blastness Website Design:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Website Design 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。SHR Group 的 HT Score 为 43,Blastness 的为 80。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问