The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 272 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
SHR Group 表现出色 在 主动客户管理 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (4.8/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Mobile Optimized/Responsive.
Gourmet Marketing 表现出色 在 ease of use and ROI 方面 .
基于 HTR 上 272 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $900/mo | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 262 | 10 |
在分析了 272 条经验证的评价后,SHR Group 用户最看重其 主动客户管理, 网站设计, 报告和分析,而 Gourmet Marketing 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
主动客户管理
▾
|
|
|
+
网站设计
▾
|
|
|
+
报告和分析
▾
|
|
|
+
数字营销
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
代金券系统
▾
|
|
|
−
模板限制
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 网站设计 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #9 30 条评价 | #23 2 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #1 208 条评价 | #19 5 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #6 13 条评价 | #11 3 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #14 1 条评价 | #16 0 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #4 115 条评价 | #17 6 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #2 163 条评价 | #16 5 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #2 84 条评价 | #24 1 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #4 16 条评价 | #8 7 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #11 8 条评价 | #9 9 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #2 244 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 ▾ | #6 5 条评价 | — |
You’re evaluating two website design solutions tailored for hotels: SHR Website Design by SHR Group and Gourmet Marketing’s Custom Websites. Both aim to elevate your hotel’s online presence, but they approach this goal differently. SHR Group offers a comprehensive, data-driven platform with a focus on technical features and integrations, while Gourmet Marketing emphasizes bespoke design and digital marketing strategy. With limited recent reviews for Gourmet Marketing, the choice hinges on your specific needs and priorities.
Are you looking for a platform with extensive features and proven results, or a customized website built with a marketing-first mindset? Let’s compare these options directly.
SHR Group’s platform is built to serve hotels seeking a scalable, feature-rich website solution that integrates well within a broader digital ecosystem. It boasts over 169 reviews, with a 4.87/5 overall rating, reflecting strong satisfaction among hoteliers who value functionality and data insights. Conversely, Gourmet Marketing has only 10 reviews and a 0/5 overall rating, indicating limited recent feedback and a lack of quantifiable data backing its claims.
Both products focus on improving your hotel’s digital footprint, but SHR’s score and review count suggest it’s the more trusted option today. Gourmet’s absence of recent reviews makes it harder to gauge its current effectiveness. Given this, which solution aligns better with your hotel’s growth and technology needs?
If your hotel needs a technically robust, feature-packed website with a focus on integrations, security, and operational tools, SHR is the clear choice. It’s particularly suitable for properties that want to harness advanced functionalities like ADA compliance, multi-lingual support, customizable themes, and extensive partner integrations—all backed by a proven track record.
On the other hand, if your team’s priority is a visually stunning, marketing-oriented website that emphasizes design, user engagement, and SEO, Gourmet Marketing’s bespoke approach may seem appealing. However, with no recent reviews or measurable performance data, it’s a riskier option for properties that rely on proven results and ongoing support.
SHR’s ease of use is rated 4.69/5, with clients praising its intuitive interface and straightforward onboarding process. Reviewers mention that while some features, like the CMS, could be more user-friendly, overall, users find the platform manageable, especially with provided support. SHR’s onboarding process is rated 4.66/5, indicating a smooth initial experience for most hotels.
Gourmet Marketing scores a perfect 5/5 for ease of use, but its lack of recent reviews makes this rating less meaningful today. Without current user feedback, it’s difficult to determine if its bespoke websites are as simple for your staff to manage as SHR’s more standardized platform.
Edge: SHR Website Design.
SHR offers 14 exclusive features, including ADA compliance, SSL security, Google Analytics, mobile responsiveness, customizable attractions maps, website personalization, social media integrations, and SEO plugins. These features cater to hotels seeking a highly functional, scalable website capable of supporting complex needs.
Gourmet Marketing’s platform does not list specific features, instead emphasizing bespoke design and digital strategy. While visually appealing websites and SEO are important, without detailed feature offerings, SHR’s feature set provides a more tangible advantage for hotels wanting technical control and operational tools.
Edge: SHR Website Design.
SHR’s customer support scores 4.85/5, with clients describing their support team as responsive, knowledgeable, and proactive. Review quotes highlight the availability of key account personnel who assist in maximizing ROI and addressing issues promptly.
Gourmet Marketing also scores a perfect 5/5, but the lack of recent reviews or detailed feedback means we cannot confirm if its support remains as exceptional today. Given SHR’s extensive review base and recent positive feedback, SHR’s support infrastructure is clearly more established and reliable.
Edge: SHR Website Design.
SHR boasts 81 verified partners, including critical integrations like Criton, Priority Software, and PMS systems like Visual Matrix and OpenHotel. Shared integrations with Gourmet Marketing include Triptease, The Hotels Network, and Revinate, but SHR’s broader ecosystem offers more options for connectivity.
Gourmet Marketing has only 4 verified partners, limiting its integration potential. For hotels that rely on multiple third-party systems or want flexibility in choosing tools, SHR’s extensive partner network is a decisive advantage.
Edge: SHR Website Design.
SHR’s reviews are recent, with a 4.87/5 rating based on 169 reviews, and a 96% likelihood to recommend. Hotels across various segments—city center, boutique, and branded properties—appreciate its ROI, ease of use, and support.
Gourmet Marketing’s reviews are outdated, with no recent data to support its effectiveness. Its 0/5 rating and limited feedback suggest it’s not currently a reliable choice for hoteliers seeking proven performance.
Edge: SHR Website Design.
SHR’s pricing starts at $900 per month, with no implementation or hidden fees. Its clear, subscription-based model makes budgeting straightforward.
Gourmet Marketing does not list specific prices, likely due to its custom, project-based approach. This lack of transparency makes it harder to compare value directly but can lead to unpredictable costs for your hotel.
Not ideal if you have a very limited budget or prefer a purely aesthetic website without advanced operational features.
Not ideal if you need a feature-rich, highly integrated website or rely on proven, recent performance metrics.
The core difference lies in focus: SHR offers a technically robust, feature-rich platform with proven results and extensive integrations, while Gourmet Marketing provides bespoke website design centered on visual appeal and marketing strategy.
If your hotel values operational control, measurable performance, and reliable support backed by a large review base, SHR is the clear choice. Its features, integrations, and recent reviews make it the more dependable option for hotels looking to grow their online presence efficiently.
Choose SHR if you want a scalable, data-backed website platform with a broad ecosystem. Opt for Gourmet Marketing only if your hotel’s priority is a custom-designed site with a marketing-first approach, and you’re comfortable with less transparency on recent performance metrics.
In summary: For most hotels today, SHR’s extensive reviews, proven capabilities, and feature set position it as the better choice. Gourmet Marketing’s limited recent feedback and lack of detailed features make it a less certain investment at this stage.
网站设计 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $900/mo | — |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,SHR Website Design 和 Gourmet Marketing Custom Websites 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 可定制的景点地图 | ||
| 安全协议 (SSL/HTTPS) | ||
| 移动优化/响应式 | ||
| 符合 ADA 标准 | ||
| 谷歌分析连接 | ||
| 预订引擎 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 2 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 3 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"Our results and KPIs from booking engine to digital reinforce the effectiveness of our partnership and SHR Group's exceptional technology."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
客户对敬业的客户管理团队积极主动、响应迅速的支持表示赞赏。客户经理通常被描述为知识渊博、致力于客户成功,并随时提供见解和建议以推动业务增长。
SRH Group 因其现代、视觉冲击力强且用户友好的网站设计而备受赞誉,这些设计增强了客人的预订体验。客户指出,这些设计大大提高了可见度和转化率。然而,一些客... SRH Group 因其现代、视觉冲击力强且用户友好的网站设计而备受赞誉,这些设计增强了客人的预订体验。客户指出,这些设计大大提高了可见度和转化率。然而,一些客户表示需要更灵活的定制和更快的周转时间。
SRH Group 提供的广泛而深入的报告功能一直受到好评,它提供了清晰的绩效趋势洞察和可操作数据,帮助酒店经营者做出明智的决策。用户发现这些报告对于战略调整和... SRH Group 提供的广泛而深入的报告功能一直受到好评,它提供了清晰的绩效趋势洞察和可操作数据,帮助酒店经营者做出明智的决策。用户发现这些报告对于战略调整和绩效跟踪至关重要。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
SRH Group 实施的优惠券系统收到的评价褒贬不一。虽然评价认为该系统可以增加收入,但一些用户也指出了可以改进的地方,包括更简单的优惠券管理和部分兑换。
虽然 SRH Group 的模板通常因其视觉吸引力而受到称赞,但一些用户发现它们具有限制性,并希望有更多的定制选项来更好地反映其独特的品牌形象。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。SHR Website Design 和 Gourmet Marketing Custom Websites 共享许多核心 Website Design 功能,但各有独特的能力。SHR Website Design 提供 81 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Gourmet Marketing Custom Websites 提供 4 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Gourmet Marketing Custom Websites 在易用性方面领先,评分为 5.0/5 对比 4.7/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
SHR Website Design:否。Gourmet Marketing Custom Websites:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Website Design 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。SHR Group 的 HT Score 为 43,Gourmet Marketing 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问