The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 网站设计 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #9 30 条评价 | #16 4 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #1 208 条评价 | #21 5 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #6 13 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #14 1 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #4 115 条评价 | #21 5 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #2 163 条评价 | #20 3 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #2 84 条评价 | #21 2 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #4 16 条评价 | #14 1 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #11 8 条评价 | #22 0 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #2 244 条评价 | #10 9 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #6 5 条评价 | — |
When choosing a website design platform for your hotel, your primary goal is to find a solution that combines ease of use, robust features, and proven results. Both SHR Website Design by SHR Group and Porter offer viable options, but they differ significantly in scope, market presence, and user feedback. While Porter touts a simpler, more streamlined approach, SHR Group provides a comprehensive, data-driven service with a larger customer base and more recent reviews.
Your decision hinges on whether you need a broad suite of functionalities backed by extensive support and proven success stories, or a sleek, easy-to-manage website that emphasizes direct bookings and visual appeal.
Shr Group’s website design service is a highly rated, data-rich solution trusted by 169 hotels across multiple continents, with an overall rating of 4.87/5 and an impressive 96% likelihood to recommend. Its reviews highlight a strong understanding of hotel operations, impactful design, and advanced marketing tools, with recent feedback emphasizing ongoing support and measurable ROI.
Porter, in contrast, has only 10 reviews and a 0/5 rating, with no recent feedback. While users praise its ease of use and attractive templates, the limited number of reviews and absence of recent data make it a less reliable choice for hotels seeking proven performance and ongoing support.
Given the review count and recent activity, SHR Group has a more current and reliable reputation. Are you willing to forgo proven results for a simpler, less documented platform?
If your hotel needs a website with tailored design, advanced marketing tools, and a track record of increasing revenue, SHR Group is the clear choice. Its features include ADA compliance, website personalization, a drag-and-drop builder, and more—delivering a full suite of customization options that cater to diverse hotel types and sizes.
If your priority is a straightforward, visually appealing website that offers direct booking benefits with minimal fuss, Porter might appeal. Its focus on promoting direct reservations through attractive templates and seamless connectivity makes it suitable for hotels wanting a quick upgrade without extensive customization or advanced features.
However, if you seek a solution with extensive support, proven ROI, and ongoing innovation, SHR Group's larger review base and recent activity make it the stronger option.
SHR Group’s platform enjoys a 4.69/5 ease of use rating, with praise for its intuitive design and straightforward onboarding. Its reviews mention a manageable learning curve, though some users note initial setup can be complex due to its extensive features.
Porter scores slightly higher at 4.9/5, with reviewers emphasizing its simplicity, clean CMS, and quick setup. Users find Porter’s templates and editing tools intuitive, enabling hotels to keep content fresh and relevant with minimal training.
Edge: Porter.
SHR Group offers 10 shared features, plus four exclusive ones like ADA compliance, booking engine, website personalization, and a drag-and-drop page builder—filling gaps that Porter doesn’t cover. Its features support a highly customizable, functional, and accessible website that integrates marketing tools and advanced analytics.
Porter provides five unique features such as storefront/voucher functionality, review and conversion widgets, and a blog post composer—adding value for hotels seeking a marketing-oriented site. Its core advantage is promoting direct reservations with attractive templates and SEO tools.
Edge: SHR Group.
SHR Group’s support scores 4.85/5, with clients praising its responsiveness, proactive client management, and detailed reporting. Users describe the support team as knowledgeable and invested in their success, though some note a somewhat complex onboarding process.
Porter’s customer support is rated 5/5, with reviews emphasizing quick, friendly, and effective communication. Clients appreciate the personalized attention and ease of getting help, even if the platform’s scope is less extensive.
Edge: Porter.
SHR Group boasts 81 verified partners, including major players like SiteMinder, Mews, Revinate, and Profitroom, offering extensive connectivity for your hotel’s systems and marketing tools. Its broad integration network ensures a seamless back-end experience.
Porter has only 7 verified partners, with key integrations like Bookboost and RoomRaccoon. While suitable for hotels requiring basic connectivity, it’s less comprehensive for those with complex systems.
Edge: SHR Group.
SHR Group’s reviews are substantial and recent, with a 4.87/5 rating from 169 hotels, including many boutique and city center properties. Hoteliers praise its ROI, marketing tools, and ongoing support, with specific mentions of increased revenue and direct bookings.
Porter, with only 10 reviews and no recent feedback, does not have enough data to establish a clear rating. The limited reviews and lack of updates make SHR Group the more trusted choice among hoteliers.
Edge: SHR Group.
SHR Group’s pricing starts at $900 per month, with no implementation or setup fees, offering a clear value proposition for hotels seeking comprehensive services. Its pricing model is straightforward, reflecting its extensive feature set.
Porter does not publicly disclose pricing details, making it difficult to compare costs directly. Its focus on templates and basic functionalities suggests a potentially lower price point but also fewer advanced features.
In essence, SHR Group stands out as a comprehensive, highly-rated platform with a proven track record of boosting revenue and integrating with many partners. Its extensive feature set and recent reviews support its suitability for hotels seeking a tailored, performance-driven website.
Porter offers a simpler, visually appealing solution focused on promoting direct reservations with minimal fuss. It’s suitable for hotels that want a quick upgrade and are less concerned with advanced marketing tools or integration complexity.
For hotels aiming for measurable growth, extensive support, and flexible customization, SHR Group is the clear choice. If ease of use and quick deployment are your priority, Porter could meet your needs—though its limited review data suggests less proven performance at this stage.
我们分析了 3 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"Our results and KPIs from booking engine to digital reinforce the effectiveness of our partnership and SHR Group's exceptional technology."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
客户对敬业的客户管理团队积极主动、响应迅速的支持表示赞赏。客户经理通常被描述为知识渊博、致力于客户成功,并随时提供见解和建议以推动业务增长。
SRH Group 因其现代、视觉冲击力强且用户友好的网站设计而备受赞誉,这些设计增强了客人的预订体验。客户指出,这些设计大大提高了可见度和转化率。然而,一些客... SRH Group 因其现代、视觉冲击力强且用户友好的网站设计而备受赞誉,这些设计增强了客人的预订体验。客户指出,这些设计大大提高了可见度和转化率。然而,一些客户表示需要更灵活的定制和更快的周转时间。
SRH Group 提供的广泛而深入的报告功能一直受到好评,它提供了清晰的绩效趋势洞察和可操作数据,帮助酒店经营者做出明智的决策。用户发现这些报告对于战略调整和... SRH Group 提供的广泛而深入的报告功能一直受到好评,它提供了清晰的绩效趋势洞察和可操作数据,帮助酒店经营者做出明智的决策。用户发现这些报告对于战略调整和绩效跟踪至关重要。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
SRH Group 实施的优惠券系统收到的评价褒贬不一。虽然评价认为该系统可以增加收入,但一些用户也指出了可以改进的地方,包括更简单的优惠券管理和部分兑换。
虽然 SRH Group 的模板通常因其视觉吸引力而受到称赞,但一些用户发现它们具有限制性,并希望有更多的定制选项来更好地反映其独特的品牌形象。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。SHR Website Design 和 Porter - Premium Hotel Websites 共享许多核心 Website Design 功能,但各有独特的能力。SHR Website Design 提供 81 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Porter - Premium Hotel Websites 提供 7 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Porter - Premium Hotel Websites 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 4.7/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
SHR Website Design:否。Porter - Premium Hotel Websites:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Website Design 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。SHR Group 的 HT Score 为 43,Porter 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问