The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 268 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
SHR Group 表现出色 在 主动客户管理 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (4.8/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Mobile Optimized/Responsive.
Travel Media Group 表现出色 在 ease of use and onboarding 方面 .
基于 HTR 上 268 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $900/mo | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 262 | 6 |
在分析了 268 条经验证的评价后,SHR Group 用户最看重其 主动客户管理, 网站设计, 报告和分析,而 Travel Media Group 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
主动客户管理
▾
|
|
|
+
网站设计
▾
|
|
|
+
报告和分析
▾
|
|
|
+
数字营销
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
代金券系统
▾
|
|
|
−
模板限制
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 网站设计 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #9 30 条评价 | #28 1 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #1 208 条评价 | #25 3 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #6 13 条评价 | #20 1 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #14 1 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #4 115 条评价 | #27 3 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #2 163 条评价 | #26 2 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #2 84 条评价 | #20 3 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #4 16 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #11 8 条评价 | #14 6 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #2 244 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 ▾ | #6 5 条评价 | — |
When choosing between SHR Website Design by SHR Group and Travel Media Group’s Responsive Websites, you're evaluating two solutions aimed at elevating your hotel's online presence. Both products address the same core problem: creating engaging, functional websites that drive bookings and showcase your property. However, SHR Group offers a broader suite of integrated features and more extensive customization options, while Travel Media Group emphasizes simplicity, ongoing content updates, and a strong focus on mobile responsiveness.
Your team needs to consider whether you prioritize advanced functionalities and regional reach or streamlined site management and cost-effective updates. Which product aligns best with your goals?
SHR’s platform is a sophisticated web solution with 14 unique features, including ADA compliance, Google Analytics, multi-lingual support, and a drag-and-drop builder, all aimed at providing a tailored, engaging guest experience. Travel Media Group, however, centers on creating mobile-friendly, visually compelling vanity websites that are easy to update and maintain, with no set-up fees or charges for changes.
While SHR’s offering is feature-rich and designed for multi-regional, multi-segment hotel businesses, Travel Media Group excels at providing straightforward, cost-effective websites ideal for small to mid-sized properties seeking simplicity. Both serve different hotel profiles: SHR for hotels wanting extensive customization, and Travel Media for those prioritizing ease and ongoing content control.
If your hotel requires a fully customizable website with advanced integrations, extensive features, and regional scalability, SHR Group is your best bet. Its proven track record with large hotel brands and extensive partner network makes it suitable for properties aiming for a high degree of control and sophisticated functionality.
Conversely, if your hotel needs a clean, responsive website that is quick to set up, simple to maintain, and priced with minimal initial investment, Travel Media Group’s responsive websites are ideal. Smaller hotels or boutique properties that want a visually appealing presence without complex features will find this solution more aligned with their operational needs.
Based on recent reviews, Travel Media Group scores a perfect 5/5 for ease of use, with clients praising its straightforward content management and simple updates. The system is designed for hotel teams to easily adapt and refresh content without technical expertise.
SHR Group, with a rating of 4.69/5 for usability, offers a more complex platform with many features, which can require more training and onboarding. Some clients have noted usability challenges, especially with image uploads and certain CMS functionalities.
Edge: Travel Media Group.
SHR’s platform offers 14 unique features such as ADA compliance, SEO plugins, customizable themes, booking engine, and social media integrations—none of which are available in Travel Media Group’s websites. Travel Media Group focuses on delivering a streamlined, mobile-optimized website with ongoing content updates but lacks the extensive feature set.
For properties needing advanced customization, multi-lingual support, or integrated booking engines, SHR’s feature set is more comprehensive. If you prefer a simple, effective website with ongoing updates, Travel Media Group’s offering will suffice.
Edge: SHR Website Design.
SHR Group’s support scores 4.85/5, with reviews highlighting their proactive client management, quick responses, and knowledgeable team—especially praised during onboarding and troubleshooting. Clients consistently mention their support team’s responsiveness and dedication.
Travel Media Group scores slightly higher at 4.88/5, with reviews emphasizing personalized service, quick content updates, and a dedicated content management approach. Clients appreciate their hands-on support for website content.
Edge: Travel Media Group.
SHR’s platform supports 81 verified partners, including major integrations like OpenHotel, Stayntouch, Criton, and many others in PMS, booking, and revenue management systems. Travel Media Group, with only 3 verified partners, offers limited integration options, primarily focusing on website content and basic booking.
If your hotel relies on multiple integrations or complex system connections, SHR’s broader ecosystem support provides a significant advantage.
Edge: SHR Website Design.
SHR’s overall rating is 4.87/5 based on 169 reviews, with a 96% likelihood to recommend, mostly from hotels in North America, Europe, and Asia Pacific. The reviews praise the platform’s effectiveness in increasing bookings and its comprehensive feature set.
Travel Media Group, with only 4 reviews but a perfect 5/5 rating and 100% recommendation, is favored by small hotels and inns for easy management and strong support, although the limited review data makes it harder to generalize.
Edge: SHR Website Design.
SHR charges a flat base price of $900 with no setup or ongoing fees, making its costs transparent and predictable. Travel Media Group does not publicly list prices, but their model emphasizes no set-up fees and free content updates, implying a potentially lower upfront cost for small properties.
Your budget and value expectations should guide your choice: SHR offers a clear, upfront fee, while Travel Media Group’s flexible approach may be more appealing for budget-conscious hotels.
Not ideal if your hotel prefers a simple, low-cost site or lacks the internal resources to manage complex features.
Not ideal if your hotel needs extensive customization or integration with multiple back-end systems.
SHR Website Design offers a feature-rich, highly customizable platform suited for larger, multi-property, or international hotels. Its extensive integrations, regional support, and advanced features make it ideal for properties seeking control, sophistication, and scalability.
Travel Media Group’s websites are best for smaller hotels or inns that prioritize simplicity, ongoing content updates, and ease of use. Their solution provides a quick, mobile-optimized presence that enhances search visibility and guest engagement without the complexity.
If your hotel demands a flexible, comprehensive website with the ability to scale and integrate deeply, SHR is the recommended choice. For properties that need an attractive, easy-to-manage site with no hidden costs and ongoing content flexibility, Travel Media Group wins out.
In conclusion, SHR’s larger review base, recent positive feedback, and extensive feature set make it the stronger overall solution, especially for hotels with complex needs. Travel Media Group remains a solid choice for smaller hotels prioritizing ease and ongoing content management.
网站设计 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $900/mo | — |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,SHR Website Design 和 Travel Media Group (Responsive Websites) 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 可定制的景点地图 | ||
| 安全协议 (SSL/HTTPS) | ||
| 移动优化/响应式 | ||
| 符合 ADA 标准 | ||
| 谷歌分析连接 | ||
| 预订引擎 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 2 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 3 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"Our results and KPIs from booking engine to digital reinforce the effectiveness of our partnership and SHR Group's exceptional technology."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
客户对敬业的客户管理团队积极主动、响应迅速的支持表示赞赏。客户经理通常被描述为知识渊博、致力于客户成功,并随时提供见解和建议以推动业务增长。
SRH Group 因其现代、视觉冲击力强且用户友好的网站设计而备受赞誉,这些设计增强了客人的预订体验。客户指出,这些设计大大提高了可见度和转化率。然而,一些客... SRH Group 因其现代、视觉冲击力强且用户友好的网站设计而备受赞誉,这些设计增强了客人的预订体验。客户指出,这些设计大大提高了可见度和转化率。然而,一些客户表示需要更灵活的定制和更快的周转时间。
SRH Group 提供的广泛而深入的报告功能一直受到好评,它提供了清晰的绩效趋势洞察和可操作数据,帮助酒店经营者做出明智的决策。用户发现这些报告对于战略调整和... SRH Group 提供的广泛而深入的报告功能一直受到好评,它提供了清晰的绩效趋势洞察和可操作数据,帮助酒店经营者做出明智的决策。用户发现这些报告对于战略调整和绩效跟踪至关重要。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
SRH Group 实施的优惠券系统收到的评价褒贬不一。虽然评价认为该系统可以增加收入,但一些用户也指出了可以改进的地方,包括更简单的优惠券管理和部分兑换。
虽然 SRH Group 的模板通常因其视觉吸引力而受到称赞,但一些用户发现它们具有限制性,并希望有更多的定制选项来更好地反映其独特的品牌形象。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。SHR Website Design 和 Travel Media Group (Responsive Websites) 共享许多核心 Website Design 功能,但各有独特的能力。SHR Website Design 提供 81 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Travel Media Group (Responsive Websites) 提供 3 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Travel Media Group (Responsive Websites) 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 4.7/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
SHR Website Design:否。Travel Media Group (Responsive Websites):否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Website Design 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。SHR Group 的 HT Score 为 43,Travel Media Group 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问