The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 43 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Backing the packers 表现出色 .
Redforts 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) and Guest Communication (SMS Messaging).
基于 HTR 上 43 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $500/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 0 | 43 |
在分析了 43 条经验证的评价后,Backing the packers 用户最看重其 ,而 Redforts 用户则强调 易于使用且直观的系统, 预订管理, 客户服务。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
| Backing the packers |
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
易于使用且直观的系统
▾
|
|
|
+
预订管理
▾
|
|
|
+
客户服务
▾
|
|
|
+
持续改进和创新
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
集成功能
▾
|
|
|
−
界面和设计改进
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 | Backing the packers |
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #31 21 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) | — | #49 3 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 | Backing the packers |
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #30 18 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #39 5 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | — | #49 2 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 | — | #37 2 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 | Backing the packers |
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | — | #32 4 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #14 39 条评价 |
Choosing the right Property Management System (PMS) can determine how smoothly your hotel operations run and how well you serve your guests. Both Backing the packers and Redforts aim to streamline hotel management, but they diverge significantly in their current market presence, feature sets, and user feedback. While Backing the packers appears virtually unavailable and unreviewed, Redforts offers a well-rated, feature-rich platform with a sizable and recent review base. So, which product truly fits your hotel’s needs?
Backing the packers and Redforts are designed to address core hotel management problems—reservation handling, guest communications, and operational efficiency. However, Backing the packers lacks a review footprint, ratings, and recent user feedback, making it impossible to assess its current reliability or user satisfaction. Conversely, Redforts boasts 40 reviews, with recent feedback from the last six months, giving you a clearer picture of its performance and support.
Redforts scores an impressive 72.84 in the Hospitality Technology Rating (HTR Score), a stark contrast to Backing the packers’ zero. This indicates Redforts’ strong market presence and ongoing user engagement, suggesting that your team would benefit from its proven track record. Given the absence of recent data or reviews for Backing the packers, it’s safe to say Redforts is the more reliable choice today. Are you prepared to rely on a platform with verified recent feedback?
If your hotel needs a proven, widely used PMS with extensive features like integrated booking engine, channel management, revenue optimization, and customer communication tools, Redforts is the clear choice. Its user base of hotels, hostels, and apartments, along with a 95% likelihood to recommend, demonstrates strong satisfaction among similar properties.
If, however, your hotel is looking for a solution with zero reviews, uncertain support, or unclear feature depth, Backing the packers might seem appealing. But without recent reviews or verified features, it’s risky to bet on untested technology. For most hotels seeking a reliable, feature-rich PMS supported by current user feedback, Redforts stands out as the safer investment.
Redforts scores 4.68 out of 5 for ease of use, based on current user reviews, with feedback highlighting its intuitive, user-friendly design and straightforward onboarding. Users mention that staff can learn the system quickly, reducing training time and errors, which is critical for busy hotel teams.
Backing the packers, on the other hand, ranks a zero in ease of use, with no recent reviews or ratings available. Its user interface and onboarding experience are unverified, and the lack of feedback raises concerns about how easily your team could adopt it. Edge: Redforts.
Redforts offers 46 distinct features, including RevPaR & ADR reports, multi-currency support, guest CRM, online check-in, digital registration, automated reminders, and more. These functionalities support a comprehensive management experience, reducing manual effort and increasing operational accuracy.
Backing the packers provides no verified features, and its feature set remains unknown. Without concrete data or reviews, you cannot assess its capabilities or how well it would meet your property’s needs. Clearly, Redforts’ feature depth and recent user validation give it the edge.
Redforts is rated 4.53 out of 5 for customer support, with reviews praising its responsiveness and knowledgeable team. Customers say, “They respond almost immediately and resolve issues promptly,” reflecting a high level of service.
Backing the packers has no recent reviews or support ratings, so its support quality remains unverified. Without concrete feedback, you risk being unsupported when issues arise. Edge: Redforts.
Redforts offers two verified integrations, including a channel manager and a booking engine, with additional unverified partners like Mr Winston and WuBook. Its integration capabilities facilitate seamless management across platforms, reducing manual data entry and errors.
Backing the packers reports zero verified partners, making its integration options unknown. If your hotel relies on connected systems, Redforts’ proven integrations give it a clear advantage. Edge: Redforts.
Redforts enjoys a 9.5 out of 10 NPS score and a 95% likelihood to recommend, based on recent reviews from diverse property types like hostels and boutique hotels. Hotels with modern, active feedback express satisfaction with its ease of use and support.
Backing the packers has no recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to gauge user sentiment or satisfaction. Given current data, Redforts is the higher-rated, more trusted solution among hoteliers today. Edge: Redforts.
Backing the packers does not publish pricing details, which could indicate a customized or unavailable quote. Redforts charges a $500 monthly base price without a free trial, offering transparent costs for the full suite of features.
Given the absence of pricing info for Backing the packers, it’s difficult to evaluate its value proposition. Redforts presents a clear, predictable price point aligned with its feature set. Edge: Redforts.
Given its lack of verified data, Backing the packers is best suited for experimental or very small operations willing to accept uncertainty.
Redforts suits properties looking for a reliable, feature-rich PMS backed by current user satisfaction.
The core difference between the two products is the level of verified market presence and recent user feedback. Redforts, with 40 recent reviews and high ratings, clearly demonstrates its value and reliability for your hotel.
If your priority is a proven, feature-rich PMS supported by current users, go with Redforts. It offers an intuitive interface, extensive features, and dependable support—crucial for smooth operations.
However, if your hotel is open to untested solutions and wants to avoid upfront costs, Backing the packers might seem appealing. But without recent reviews, support, or clear feature validation, it’s a gamble. Redforts is the safer, smarter choice for most hotels today.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
| Backing the packers |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $500/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Backing the packers 和 Redforts 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 | Backing the packers |
|
|---|---|---|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 基于云 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 集中的用户和角色管理 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 34 项功能存在差异。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
许多用户都喜欢 Redforts 的直观设计,它简化了培训并减少了人为错误。这简化了日常操作,让员工可以腾出时间处理其他任务。
该系统擅长管理预订、防止超额预订以及与多个平台集成。预订引擎和渠道管理的定制也是一大优势。
细心、响应迅速的客户服务经常受到称赞。用户提到个性化沟通和快速解决问题,为整体体验带来积极影响。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Redforts 可与预订引擎、渠道管理器和其他平台高效集成,提供无缝管理体验。此功能简化了不同系统和平台之间的协调。
虽然其功能受到称赞,但一些评论提到,界面似乎已经过时,可以通过现代化来增强视觉吸引力和效率。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Backing the packers 和 Redforts 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Backing the packers 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Redforts 提供 2 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Redforts 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Backing the packers:否。Redforts:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Backing the packers 的 HT Score 为 0,Redforts 的为 73。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问