The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 20 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Big Fish Internet 表现出色 .
Neobookings 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 .
基于 HTR 上 20 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $700/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 0 | 20 |
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 网站设计 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 | Big Fish Internet |
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #12 6 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #13 10 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | — | #9 4 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #18 0 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 | Big Fish Internet |
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #14 11 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #13 7 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | — | #16 3 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 | — | #10 3 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 | Big Fish Internet |
|
|---|---|---|
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #14 5 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #17 0 条评价 |
Choosing the right website design platform for your hotel hinges on your priorities: ease of use, support, features, and overall value. Both Big Fish Internet and Neobookings aim to elevate your online presence, but they diverge significantly in their approach, user feedback, and market presence. Big Fish offers a comprehensive website management system, while Neobookings emphasizes beautiful, conversion-focused hotel websites paired with reservation tools.
Given that Neobookings has gathered more recent reviews and a larger number of favorable ratings, it currently provides a more reliable gauge of user satisfaction. This makes it the stronger choice for hoteliers seeking a user-friendly, well-supported website solution. But does the difference in focus and support justify a decision? Let’s examine each aspect closely.
Big Fish Internet presents itself as a broad website management platform designed to handle everything from hosting to content updates, with an emphasis on security and technical control. Its reviews are scarce, with no recent data or user feedback to substantiate its performance, reliability, or ease of use.
In contrast, Neobookings specializes in creating visually appealing, high-conversion hotel websites complemented by reservation management tools. It boasts 20 recent reviews, a high NPS score of 9.8, and a customer support rating of 5/5, indicating strong, recent user satisfaction.
While Big Fish touts its platform’s security and scalability, the lack of recent review data makes it tough to assess its current effectiveness. Neobookings’ recent positive feedback emphasizes its support, ease of use, and ongoing product improvements, making it a more dependable choice for hotels aiming to modernize their digital presence. Are you willing to base your decision on an untested, unreviewed platform?
If your hotel needs a website builder that prioritizes intuitive design, fast onboarding, and reliable support, go with Neobookings. It is especially suitable for properties that want an attractive, conversion-oriented site with integrated booking capabilities, supported by a team that actively improves their product.
If your team requires a comprehensive website management system focused on technical control, security, and extensive customization—possibly for larger or enterprise-level operations—Big Fish might initially seem appealing. However, the absence of recent reviews makes it difficult to confirm if it meets current industry standards.
For hoteliers seeking proven support, a user-friendly interface, and ongoing innovation, Neobookings clearly emerges as the better fit today. The platform's recent reviews and high recommendation rate solidify its standing as the more dependable solution.
Neobookings scores a near-perfect 4.85/5 for ease of use, backed by 20 recent reviews praising its intuitive interface, straightforward onboarding, and excellent customer support. Users frequently describe the platform as “very professional,” “easy to navigate,” and “a pleasure to work with,” emphasizing the seamless experience and rapid setup.
Big Fish Internet, on the other hand, has no reviews or ratings available, making it impossible to gauge its user experience. Its platform is designed for website management, but without recent feedback, its ease of use remains unverified.
Given the clear, recent positive feedback, Edge: Neobookings.
Neobookings offers a suite of features tailored to hotels: a visually appealing website builder, integrated reservation engine, digital campaigns, and 20 verified partners including SiteMinder, Stripe, and Hotelchamp. Its platform is designed to increase direct bookings and streamline operations.
Big Fish Internet claims to be a comprehensive website management platform but provides no specific features or integrations, and no verified partner data. Its feature set remains undefined, making it difficult to assess its capabilities or compare them meaningfully.
Edge: Neobookings, with its clear, targeted feature set and verified integrations.
Neobookings receives a perfect 5/5 support rating based on recent reviews praising its “super effective technical support” and “wonderful human team.” Customers highlight their satisfaction with ongoing communication, quick problem resolution, and proactive product updates.
Big Fish Internet has no available support ratings or recent reviews, leaving its support quality unverified. Its absence of feedback makes it impossible to determine if it offers the responsive service that hoteliers need.
Edge: Neobookings.
Neobookings integrates with 20 verified partners, including industry leaders like SiteMinder, Stripe, and Hotelchamp, making it highly flexible for hotel operations and marketing. Its platform supports a variety of digital tools that directly enhance booking conversions and operational efficiency.
Big Fish Internet has no verified integrations or partner data, signaling limited or nonexistent connectivity with other hotel tech solutions. This restriction could hinder future growth or integration efforts.
Edge: Neobookings.
Neobookings’ recent reviews reveal an exceptionally high likelihood to recommend score of 98%, with users describing it as “delightful to work with” and “an example of how all companies should operate.” Its target segment includes a diverse range of properties, from luxury hotels to boutique and city center hotels, with positive feedback across segments.
Big Fish Internet lacks any recent reviews, ratings, or customer feedback, making it impossible to gauge user satisfaction or segment-specific performance. The absence of recent data favors Neobookings as the more trusted platform today.
Edge: Neobookings.
Big Fish Internet’s pricing details are unavailable, and it does not offer a free trial or transparent pricing model—raising questions about value and accessibility.
Neobookings charges a base price of $700 per month, with no free trial, but offers a clear, predictable fee structure. Its focus on transparency and recent reviews of value for money (ROI of 4.74/5) suggest it’s a good investment for hotels seeking a balance of performance and affordability.
Not ideal if your hotel values ease of use, quick setup, or support—since these are unverified or absent for Big Fish.
Not ideal if your hotel needs a highly customizable backend or operates in regions where Neobookings has limited presence.
Big Fish Internet offers a broad, potentially scalable website management solution, but its lack of recent reviews or detailed features makes it hard to recommend confidently. Its focus on technical control might appeal to larger, tech-savvy teams but leaves smaller hoteliers in the dark regarding support and ease of use.
Neobookings, meanwhile, excels in recent customer satisfaction, ease of use, and support, making it the more reliable choice for most hotels today. It provides a well-rounded package—beautiful design, integrated booking, and strong support—that can help your hotel attract and convert more guests.
If your priority is rapid deployment, support, and proven user satisfaction, go with Neobookings. If you need deep customization and have technical resources, and are willing to accept the risk of limited recent feedback, Big Fish might meet your needs. For now, the data clearly favors Neobookings as the safer, more effective choice.
网站设计 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
| Big Fish Internet |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $700/mo |
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 | Big Fish Internet |
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
Design & Content Management
|
|
|
| 拖放页面构建器 | ||
| 酒店网站模板 | ||
| 白标能力 | ||
| 完全可定制的主题 | ||
| 博客文章撰写器 | ||
| 可定制的景点地图 | ||
| 网站个性化 | ||
|
▾
Conversion
|
|
|
| 谷歌 AMP 标记 | ||
| 店面/优惠券功能 | ||
| 移动优化/响应式 | ||
| 审查小部件 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 弹出窗口和警报 | ||
| 可定制的景点地图 | ||
| 网站个性化 | ||
|
▾
Internationalization
|
|
|
| 多种语言 | ||
|
▾
Analytics
|
|
|
| 谷歌分析连接 | ||
|
▾
SEO & Traffic
|
|
|
| 社交媒体整合 | ||
| 谷歌 AMP 标记 | ||
| 移动优化/响应式 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| SEO插件 | ||
| 可定制的景点地图 | ||
|
▾
Security & Compliance
|
|
|
| 安全协议 (SSL/HTTPS) | ||
| 符合 ADA 标准 | ||
|
▾
Upselling
|
|
|
| 店面/优惠券功能 |
我们分析了 1 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Neobookings really cares about our business, and their 360 solutions are very convenient for us since we don't have to deal with many different people/vendors for the various servi..."
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Big Fish Internet 和 Neobookings Web Design 共享许多核心 Website Design 功能,但各有独特的能力。Big Fish Internet 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Neobookings Web Design 提供 20 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Neobookings Web Design 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Big Fish Internet:否。Neobookings Web Design:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Website Design 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Big Fish Internet 的 HT Score 为 0,Neobookings 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您的房产情况量身定制的推荐方案