The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 230 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Blastness 表现出色 在 客户支持 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Lost Business Data and Event Data.
Pricepoint 表现出色 在 入职和支持 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 "What-if" scenario analysis and Manage Sell-Outs & Cancellations.
基于 HTR 上 230 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $500/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 105 | 125 |
在分析了 230 条经验证的评价后,Blastness 用户最看重其 客户支持, revenue management efficiency, 用户界面和可用性,而 Pricepoint 用户则强调 入职和支持, ease of use, 动态定价。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
+
入职和支持
▾
|
|
+
Revenue Management Efficiency
▾
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
+
用户界面和可用性
▾
|
+
动态定价
▾
|
|
+
直接预订量增长
▾
|
+
Revenue Increase
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
集成和定制的局限性
▾
|
−
定制化和灵活性
▾
|
|
−
竞争对手追踪
▾
|
|
|
−
语言选项
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 收益管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #8 42 条评价 | #14 28 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #8 54 条评价 | #31 7 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | #22 2 条评价 | #36 0 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #10 40 条评价 | #18 22 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #7 48 条评价 | #28 7 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #9 24 条评价 | #36 2 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #20 3 条评价 | #24 3 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #21 2 条评价 | #10 22 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #10 99 条评价 | #22 12 条评价 |
| 亚太 | #15 1 条评价 | #18 1 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #15 1 条评价 |
Choosing the right revenue management system (RMS) is crucial for your hotel’s profitability and operational efficiency. Both Blastness Revenue Management System and Pricepoint aim to optimize your pricing strategies, but they approach this goal differently. Blastness offers a comprehensive platform with extensive integration and data-driven tools, while Pricepoint focuses on demand-based automation tailored for smaller properties. Which solution aligns better with your hotel’s size, needs, and growth plans?
Blastness and Pricepoint both help you set smarter room rates, but Blastness combines detailed forecasting, market positioning, and destination data for nuanced decisions. Pricepoint, by contrast, emphasizes automating demand-driven pricing based on real-time market signals, ideal for hotels seeking an easier, more automated approach. Both systems aim to boost revenue, yet Blastness’s broad feature set and extensive integrations may give it an edge for larger or more complex properties.
The core difference lies in their focus: Blastness aims for comprehensive control with manual and AI-driven tools, while Pricepoint automates much of the process based on demand signals. Do you prioritize detailed control or streamlined automation? That’s the key to choosing the best fit.
If your hotel needs a detailed, multi-faceted revenue management platform with robust integrations, Blastness is the clear pick. It supports independent and boutique hotels, with strong capabilities in forecasting, channel optimization, and digital marketing, making it suitable for properties looking to maximize total revenue and online presence.
On the other hand, if you prefer a straightforward, demand-focused pricing tool that automates updates with minimal manual input, Pricepoint is better. It’s especially suited for small teams or self-run properties aiming to boost ADR and occupancy without complex setup. Your choice hinges on whether you want depth and control or simplicity and automation.
Blastness scores a near-perfect 4.96/5 for ease of use, with users highlighting its intuitive interface and straightforward onboarding. Reviewers say it’s “very easy to understand, even for those without a revenue background,” and that support is “outstanding and quick to respond.”
Pricepoint earns a solid 4.75/5, with praise for its user-friendly design and quick setup, although some note it could improve with more detailed manuals or tutorials. Overall, Blastness’s more extensive features do not hinder usability, giving it a slight edge for ease of adoption.
Edge: Blastness.
Blastness offers 37 shared features with Pricepoint, plus 3 unique ones: Lost Business Data, Event Data, and Price Change Logs. These additions help with detailed tracking and strategic planning, especially valuable for properties with complex needs.
Pricepoint distinguishes itself with 8 exclusive features, including "What-if" scenario analysis, Business Mix Optimization, and Group Pricing. Its automation focus simplifies daily decisions, but it lacks some of Blastness’s in-depth analytics.
Edge: Blastness for a broader, more detailed feature set, especially in tracking and historical data.
Blastness’s support scores 4.92/5, with users describing the team as “outstanding,” “professional,” and “quick to assist.” Many reviews stress that Blastness’s human factor and ongoing support are key reasons for their satisfaction.
Pricepoint’s customer support is slightly higher at 4.95/5, with users praising responsiveness and ease of troubleshooting. However, some mention the need for more extensive documentation and better onboarding materials.
Edge: Pricepoint, slightly, due to its marginally higher support score, but Blastness remains highly rated.
Blastness integrates with 15 verified partners, including major channels like Mews, Oracle Hospitality, and Hoteliga. Its strength lies in seamless PMS and distribution system integration, facilitating operational flow across multiple platforms.
Pricepoint offers 18 verified partners, with notable integrations including RoomRaccoon, Guesty, and SiteMinder. While it has a slight edge in partner count, the core difference is in the depth of integration quality and compatibility with existing hotel systems.
Edge: Pricepoint, for slightly more integrations, but Blastness’s extensive existing integrations are also advantageous.
Blastness has more recent reviews (44 in last 6 months) and a higher overall rating in the review count (97 reviews). It boasts a “Likelihood to Recommend” of 99%, with many users praising its revenue gains and ease of use.
Pricepoint, with 83 reviews and a 96% recommendation rate, remains strong but has fewer recent reviews, making Blastness’s data more relevant and current.
Edge: Blastness due to more recent reviews and higher overall ratings.
Blastness does not publicly list its pricing, suggesting a customized quote based on the hotel’s needs. Pricepoint charges a flat $500 monthly fee, with no free tier or trial available.
For hotels seeking transparency and predictable costs, Pricepoint offers clarity. For larger or more complex operations, Blastness’s custom pricing may be more appropriate, reflecting its broader feature set.
Not ideal if you prefer simple automation or have limited budgets, as Blastness’s extensive features come with a steeper learning curve and higher investment.
Not ideal if you require deep analytics, extensive customization, or multi-property management features.
Blastness provides a broad, data-rich platform that suits hotels seeking control, detailed analytics, and extensive integration. Its focus on forecasting, market data, and marketing support makes it ideal for independent or boutique hotels aiming for strategic revenue growth.
Pricepoint excels in automating demand-based pricing for smaller hotels or properties with limited teams. Its simplicity, affordability, and focus on real demand make it an excellent choice for budget-conscious hoteliers prioritizing ease of use and quick results.
If your property needs nuanced control and a comprehensive suite, Blastness is the superior choice. If automation, simplicity, and demand-driven pricing are your priorities, Pricepoint will serve you well.
In summary: For hotels demanding depth and extensive features, Blastness wins. For straightforward, demand-based pricing with ease of use, Pricepoint is the smarter pick.
收益管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $500/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Blastness Revenue Management System 和 Pricepoint 共享 37 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| “假设”情景分析 | ||
| 业务组合优化 | ||
| 丢失的业务数据 | ||
| 事件数据 | ||
| 价格变动日志 | ||
| 团体定价 | ||
| 多物业管理 | ||
| 物业管理系统 | ||
| 管理售罄和取消 |
我们分析了 5 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"The constant evolution of tools such as Business Intelligence and RMS, which my team and I use on a daily basis, has led to very interesting results."
"For sure our revenue wouldn't be what it was if it wasn't for Pricepoint. That's the super easy thing to say."
"Thanks to Blastness, we not only increased our direct bookings and RevPAR, but also gained the confidence to make smarter, data-driven decisions that shape the future of our resort..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
客户对支持团队的专业性和响应速度表示赞赏,并称赞其服务快捷高效。然而,客户也表达了对全天候支持的需求,尤其是在周末,这反映出在处理紧急情况和保障酒店持... 客户对支持团队的专业性和响应速度表示赞赏,并称赞其服务快捷高效。然而,客户也表达了对全天候支持的需求,尤其是在周末,这反映出在处理紧急情况和保障酒店持续运营方面,需要始终保持服务可用性。
Blastness is praised for its effective revenue management system, with users highlighting improved forecasting, pricing strategy optimization, and syn... Blastness is praised for its effective revenue management system, with users highlighting improved forecasting, pricing strategy optimization, and synchronization across distribution channels. Its AI solutions streamline decision-making processes, aiding in maximizing revenue through precise adjustments and comprehensive analysis.
用户体验总体良好,平台的用户友好设计和清晰的导航备受好评。然而,部分用户认为界面可以更加直观,建议简化流程并提供更多自定义选项,以进一步提升易用性。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
部分用户指出,该系统在更广泛的集成和定制功能方面存在局限性。他们反馈,需要提供与其他系统更广泛的集成选项以及更灵活的定制功能,以满足现代酒店管理多样化... 部分用户指出,该系统在更广泛的集成和定制功能方面存在局限性。他们反馈,需要提供与其他系统更广泛的集成选项以及更灵活的定制功能,以满足现代酒店管理多样化的需求。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
用户普遍对新用户引导流程和支持团队感到满意,并称赞他们能够提供响应迅速且高效的帮助。然而,部分用户建议改进,例如提供更完善的初始设置指导和更具针对性的... 用户普遍对新用户引导流程和支持团队感到满意,并称赞他们能够提供响应迅速且高效的帮助。然而,部分用户建议改进,例如提供更完善的初始设置指导和更具针对性的用户培训。
The platform is generally regarded as intuitive and easy to navigate, with users highlighting the simplicity of setup and daily use. This ease allows... The platform is generally regarded as intuitive and easy to navigate, with users highlighting the simplicity of setup and daily use. This ease allows hotel staff to quickly adapt and leverage the system for more effective revenue management.
Pricepoint 的动态定价功能因其实时更新和对市场变化的快速响应而备受赞誉,使酒店能够优化价格并最大限度地提高入住率。用户赞赏该平台能够根据需求信号自动调... Pricepoint 的动态定价功能因其实时更新和对市场变化的快速响应而备受赞誉,使酒店能够优化价格并最大限度地提高入住率。用户赞赏该平台能够根据需求信号自动调整价格并简化流程。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
虽然 Pricepoint 功能有效,但一些用户希望有更大的自由度来调整价格上限和竞争对手设置等参数,以及其他配置选项,以便更好地根据独特的业务需求定制系统。
多份评论指出,Pricepoint 需要改进竞争对手追踪工具。用户希望获得更详细的分析和更强大的功能,以便更好地将自身业绩与业内同行进行比较。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
这取决于您的需求。Blastness Revenue Management System 和 Pricepoint 共享许多核心 Revenue Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Blastness Revenue Management System 提供 15 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Pricepoint 提供 18 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Blastness Revenue Management System 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 4.8/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Blastness Revenue Management System:否。Pricepoint:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Revenue Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Blastness 的 HT Score 为 85,Pricepoint 的为 90。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问