The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 45 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Bnovo (Биново) 表现出色 ,拥有独特功能如 Integrated CRS.
Redforts 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) and Guest Communication (SMS Messaging).
基于 HTR 上 45 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $500/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 2 | 43 |
在分析了 45 条经验证的评价后,Bnovo (Биново) 用户最看重其 ,而 Redforts 用户则强调 易于使用且直观的系统, 预订管理, 客户服务。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
易于使用且直观的系统
▾
|
|
|
+
预订管理
▾
|
|
|
+
客户服务
▾
|
|
|
+
持续改进和创新
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
集成功能
▾
|
|
|
−
界面和设计改进
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #55 1 条评价 | #31 21 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) | — | #49 3 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | #51 0 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #70 1 条评价 | #30 18 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #70 0 条评价 | #39 5 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | — | #49 2 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 | — | #37 2 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | — | #32 4 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #39 2 条评价 | #14 39 条评价 |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is crucial for streamlining your hotel operations and enhancing guest experiences. Both Bnovo PMS by Bnovo and Redforts aim to automate and centralize hotel management, but they diverge significantly in support, features, and market presence. Bnovo offers a smaller number of reviews and less recent feedback, whereas Redforts boasts a more extensive, more recent review base, giving you clearer insights into current performance. Which one better aligns with your property’s needs?
Both Bnovo PMS and Redforts address the core challenge of managing reservations, guest data, and operational tasks. Bnovo’s strengths lie in its integration with sales channels and capacity management, which can simplify multi-channel booking coordination. Meanwhile, Redforts provides a comprehensive suite including PMS, channel management, booking engine, and revenue tools, making it more suitable for properties seeking an all-in-one solution.
However, Bnovo’s limited review count and the absence of recent evaluations weaken confidence in its current performance. Redforts, with over 40 reviews in the last six months and a much higher overall rating, signals active user engagement and ongoing development. Do you prefer a system with a broader, more current user base, or one that focuses on specific integrations?
If your hotel needs an all-encompassing, integrated management platform with high user satisfaction and recent support, Redforts is the clear choice. It is especially suitable if you prioritize ease of use, automation, and a broad feature set—evident from its 28 unique features that Bnovo doesn’t offer, including guest messaging, online check-in, and digital registration.
Conversely, if your hotel operates primarily in Russia or Eastern Europe and values connectors to local sales channels, Bnovo might seem attractive. But considering the limited reviews and the lack of recent feedback, Redforts provides a more reliable, well-supported option for hotels aiming for operational efficiency and modern management.
Redforts scores an impressive 4.68/5 for ease of use based on recent reviews, with users praising its intuitive interface and straightforward management features. Bnovo, with a rating of 3/5, receives mixed feedback; while some find its implementation manageable, others point out issues like crashes and poor support, especially during system updates or troubleshooting.
In terms of onboarding, Redforts’ customers mention a smooth process and continuous improvements, whereas Bnovo’s onboarding experience is described as adequate but inconsistent. Given the recent feedback and higher ratings, Edge: Redforts.
Redforts offers a significantly broader feature set—28 features exclusive to it—covering guest communication, digital registration, online check-in, and more. Bnovo’s unique feature is its integrated CRS, which may appeal to properties focused on distribution and sales but lacks the extensive guest engagement tools found in Redforts.
Bnovo’s limited features suggest it’s more narrowly focused, while Redforts’ comprehensive suite supports daily management, revenue, and guest interaction. For modern hotel operations, the edge goes to Redforts.
Support ratings highlight a stark contrast: Bnovo’s customer support scores just 1.25/5, with reviews citing poor responsiveness and technical issues, including server crashes and bugs. Users report support that often fails to resolve problems promptly, creating frustration and operational risks.
In contrast, Redforts enjoys a 4.53/5 support rating, with reviews emphasizing quick, friendly, and effective assistance. Customers appreciate their proactive communication and continuous development. Edge: Redforts.
Both products have two verified integration partners; Bnovo connects with compare.me and Aiosell Technologies, while Redforts links with Mr. Winston and WuBook. However, Redforts offers a more extensive ecosystem through its broader feature set and flexible modules, supporting integrations with POS systems, self-check-in kiosks, and digital ID scanners—many of which Bnovo lacks.
Given the importance of seamless platform connectivity, especially for larger properties and multiple channels, Redforts’ flexible integrations provide a distinct advantage. Edge: Redforts.
Redforts leads significantly in recent reviews, with a rating of 9.5/10 and 95% likelihood to recommend, reflecting high user satisfaction across diverse property types. Bnovo, with a score of 2.5/5 and only two reviews, offers limited insights, and its older, less positive feedback diminishes confidence.
Hotels, hostels, and small properties that value ease and support tend to rate Redforts higher, especially given its recent positive feedback. Edge: Redforts.
Bnovo does not publicly list pricing, indicating a customized quote approach, typical of many PMS providers. Redforts charges a flat fee of $500, with no mention of additional implementation costs, making its pricing transparent and predictable.
For budget-conscious properties, Redforts’ straightforward pricing model may be more appealing. If your hotel prefers tailored quotes, Bnovo might be flexible, but the lack of clear pricing complicates comparisons.
Not ideal if you need extensive guest engagement features, modern interfaces, or reliable 24/7 support. Bnovo suits properties with limited budgets and localized needs but falls short for those seeking advanced automation.
Not ideal if your property is very small, highly customized, or operates in a region where Redforts has limited regional support. Redforts is best for properties that value automation, integration, and high support quality.
Redforts is a more comprehensive, well-supported PMS with a broad feature set, active recent reviews, and high user satisfaction. It caters to properties seeking an integrated management solution with reliable support and modern tools, making it suitable for diverse hotel types worldwide.
Bnovo offers basic functionalities, primarily for local markets, and may serve small properties with limited budgets. However, its poor support and outdated feedback make it a less compelling choice in today’s competitive hospitality landscape.
If your hotel prioritizes ease of use, support, and features, Redforts is the better option. Choose Bnovo if you need a localized, budget-friendly tool, but be aware of its limitations and support issues.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $500/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Bnovo PMS 和 Redforts 共享 18 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 移动应用 | ||
| 综合 CRS | ||
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 集中消息传递 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 17 项功能存在差异。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
许多用户都喜欢 Redforts 的直观设计,它简化了培训并减少了人为错误。这简化了日常操作,让员工可以腾出时间处理其他任务。
该系统擅长管理预订、防止超额预订以及与多个平台集成。预订引擎和渠道管理的定制也是一大优势。
细心、响应迅速的客户服务经常受到称赞。用户提到个性化沟通和快速解决问题,为整体体验带来积极影响。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Redforts 可与预订引擎、渠道管理器和其他平台高效集成,提供无缝管理体验。此功能简化了不同系统和平台之间的协调。
虽然其功能受到称赞,但一些评论提到,界面似乎已经过时,可以通过现代化来增强视觉吸引力和效率。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Bnovo PMS 和 Redforts 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Bnovo PMS 提供 2 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Redforts 提供 2 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Redforts 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 3.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Bnovo PMS:否。Redforts:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Bnovo (Биново) 的 HT Score 为 0,Redforts 的为 73。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问