The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 208 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES 表现出色 .
eviivo 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 Vacation Rentals & Villas 类型的物业 (0.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Revenue management module and Payment processing.
基于 HTR 上 208 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $700/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 0 | 208 |
在分析了 208 条经验证的评价后,BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES 用户最看重其 ,而 eviivo 用户则强调 响应式客户支持, 入职专业知识, 技术效率。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
| BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES |
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
响应式客户支持
▾
|
|
|
+
入职专业知识
▾
|
|
|
+
技术效率
▾
|
|
|
+
预订和预约效率
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
改进建议
▾
|
|
|
−
定制和功能开发
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 | BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES |
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #15 54 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #23 23 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #20 8 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #18 2 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 | BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES |
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #19 41 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #16 38 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #19 21 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #10 18 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 | BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES |
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #15 39 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #6 142 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #33 2 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #29 1 条评价 |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is vital for your hotel's operational success and guest experience. Both BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES and eviivo aim to streamline management and boost efficiency, but they approach this goal very differently. While BOCS specializes in real estate and property management with minimal online reviews, eviivo offers a robust, widely used hospitality platform with extensive features and a proven track record. Are you ready to focus on a system that’s trusted by thousands of hoteliers worldwide?
BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES presents itself as a comprehensive platform designed to optimize property and rental management, with features tailored for real estate firms. Conversely, eviivo is rooted in hospitality, offering a cloud-based PMS built for hotels, B&Bs, and vacation rentals with 191 recent reviews in the last six months, making it far more tested in the industry.
eviivo’s high review count and recent feedback give it a clear advantage in understanding user satisfaction and ongoing support. BOCS, with no recent reviews or extensive third-party validation, feels more like a specialized real estate tool than a hotel-centric PMS. Do you want a system proven to support your hotel’s daily operations and growth?
If your hotel needs a trusted platform with extensive integrations, automation, and a mobile app, go with eviivo. Its reputation for ease of use, large feature set, and recent positive reviews make it a safer choice for hoteliers aiming for operational efficiency and guest satisfaction.
If your focus is on managing rental properties or tenants rather than hospitality operations, BOCS might suit your needs better. However, for traditional hotels, BOCS's lack of recent hotel-specific reviews and limited online presence makes eviivo the more reliable option.
In short, if your hotel values proven technology and industry-specific features, eviivo is the clear choice.
eviivo scores 4.43 out of 5 for ease of use, with many reviewers praising its intuitive interface, straightforward onboarding, and mobile app. Users frequently mention how quickly staff adopt the system and how it simplifies daily management.
BOCS, with a 0/5 score in ease of use, offers a platform that appears complex and difficult to navigate based on limited available data, and no recent reviews suggest user satisfaction. The absence of positive feedback or support details indicates that eviivo’s user experience is significantly superior.
Edge: eviivo
eviivo offers 51 unique features, including channel management, revenue management, integrated booking engine, guest CRM, automated messaging, and mobile check-in. Its robust feature set caters to the full spectrum of hotel operational needs, supporting multi-channel distribution, online payment, and guest communications—all in one platform.
BOCS has no features listed, implying it may not offer the same comprehensive suite tailored for hospitality. Its focus appears more suited to property management in real estate rather than hotel-specific operations.
Edge: eviivo
eviivo’s support ratings are high at 4.42 out of 5, with many users highlighting prompt, helpful assistance that enhances their operational experience. Recent reviews praise the support team’s responsiveness during onboarding and ongoing use.
BOCS provides no recent support reviews or ratings, which raises concerns about its ability to assist hotels effectively. Given the importance of reliable support in hotel management, eviivo’s proven customer service is a significant advantage.
Edge: eviivo
eviivo integrates with 32 verified partners, including major OTAs like Expedia, Booking.com, and TripAdvisor, as well as channel managers and payment providers. These integrations facilitate seamless rate, availability, and reservation synchronization across platforms.
BOCS has no confirmed integrations, limiting its ability to connect with other hotel systems or booking channels. For hotels relying on multi-channel distribution, eviivo’s extensive partner network is a clear benefit.
Edge: eviivo
eviivo’s recent review count (20 reviews in the last six months) and a 95% likelihood to recommend score reflect strong, current customer satisfaction. Reviewers praise its ease of use, automation, and support across diverse property types, from B&Bs to large hotels.
BOCS has no recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to determine current hotel satisfaction. Given the overwhelming recent positive feedback for eviivo, hoteliers clearly rate it higher.
Edge: eviivo
BOCS offers no published pricing, suggesting its platform may be targeted at specific clients with custom quotes. eviivo’s straightforward pricing starts at $700 per month, with no additional implementation fees, providing transparency for hotels considering it as an investment.
The lack of public pricing for BOCS makes it challenging to evaluate value upfront, whereas eviivo’s clear subscription model allows for easier budgeting and comparison.
In summary, BOCS is better suited for property managers or real estate firms rather than traditional hotels.
eviivo’s extensive features and proven hospitality focus make it ideal for most hotel types aiming for growth and operational efficiency.
The core difference lies in their target audiences: BOCS specializes in real estate and property management, while eviivo is built for hospitality. For your hotel, eviivo’s industry-specific features, recent reviews, and extensive integrations position it as the safer, more reliable choice.
Choose eviivo if you want a system with proven hotel-specific functionalities, excellent support, and a large user base validating its effectiveness. BOCS might suit niche property managers but falls short for hotel operations needing cloud-based tools, integrations, and user satisfaction.
If operational efficiency, guest experience, and industry trust are priorities, eviivo should be your pick. For specialized real estate management, consider BOCS, but for hospitality growth and day-to-day management, eviivo stands out.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
| BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $700/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES 和 eviivo Suite™ PMS 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 | BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES |
|
|---|---|---|
| 交付过程 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 辅助收入跟踪 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 频道管理员 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 39 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Because of the automation from the eviivo Suite, it saves me a huge amount of time. This time I can use on growing the business; working on the business instead of in the business...."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Auf eviivo könnte ich heut gar nicht mehr drauf verzichten. Das Hotel ohne dieses Programm zu führen, scheint mir fast unmöglich, weil die Zeit, die ich jetzt erspart habe, die ich..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Aujourd’hui on a la possibilité de gérer l’ensemble de notre parc, que ce soit la tarification, le calendrier, la communication en un seul clic pour gérer plus de 50 appartements,..."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Eviivo 的客户支持因其响应速度和效率而备受赞誉。Guetif 先生、Joseph 和 Xavier 等支持人员提供了卓越的帮助,这在用户入职阶段以及出现问题时至关重要,从而... Eviivo 的客户支持因其响应速度和效率而备受赞誉。Guetif 先生、Joseph 和 Xavier 等支持人员提供了卓越的帮助,这在用户入职阶段以及出现问题时至关重要,从而提升了整体用户体验。
该平台在入职流程中提供专业知识,帮助酒店无缝集成系统。该指导确保信息集成的一致性和PMS功能的最佳利用,从而提高物业管理效率。
Eviivo 因其高效的技术而备受认可,它使用户能够更快、更少地完成任务。这减少了停机时间并改善了运营工作流程,确保了酒店管理的流畅体验。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
一些用户建议进行改进,特别是扩展移动应用程序开发等功能以及更具体的日常使用技巧,以进一步优化业务运营并利用平台的功能。
虽然用户总体上感到满意,但仍要求提供更多定制选项,包括网络和移动应用程序增强功能,以进一步满足特定的运营需求并提供额外的价值。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES 和 eviivo Suite™ PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 eviivo Suite™ PMS 提供 32 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。eviivo Suite™ PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.5/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES:否。eviivo Suite™ PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES 的 HT Score 为 0,eviivo 的为 87。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问