The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 208 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Bookinglayer 表现出色 .
eviivo 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 Vacation Rentals & Villas 类型的物业 (0.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Revenue management module and Ancillary revenue tracking.
基于 HTR 上 208 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $600/mo | From $700/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 0 | 208 |
在分析了 208 条经验证的评价后,Bookinglayer 用户最看重其 ,而 eviivo 用户则强调 响应式客户支持, 入职专业知识, 技术效率。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
响应式客户支持
▾
|
|
|
+
入职专业知识
▾
|
|
|
+
技术效率
▾
|
|
|
+
预订和预约效率
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
改进建议
▾
|
|
|
−
定制和功能开发
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #15 54 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #23 23 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #20 8 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #18 2 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #19 41 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #16 38 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #19 21 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #10 18 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #15 39 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #6 142 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #33 2 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #29 1 条评价 |
Choosing between Bookinglayer and eviivo Suite™ PMS involves evaluating their core functionalities, user experiences, and support. Both aim to manage reservations and streamline operations, but they serve different segments and sophistication levels. Your decision hinges on whether you prioritize recent reviews, broader integrations, or specific features suited to your property's size and type.
Bookinglayer offers an all-in-one booking platform for activity-based and packaged travel, while eviivo Suite™ is a larger, more established PMS with extensive online travel agency (OTA) integrations. Which aligns best with your hotel’s needs?
Bookinglayer and eviivo both simplify booking management but target different operational scopes. Bookinglayer excels in handling activity and experience bookings alongside accommodation, aiming to reduce admin time for adventure or wellness brands. Conversely, eviivo, with a notable 191 reviews and recent activity, dominates the multi-property and diverse accommodation segment, with a solid reputation for managing large portfolios efficiently.
Given eviivo’s higher review count, broader regional presence, and simpler interface, it’s clearer that this platform has more recent validation from users. Does your hotel lean towards a specialized experience or a wide-ranging property portfolio?
If your hotel needs a flexible, activity-oriented booking system with a focus on packages and add-ons, Bookinglayer is the better fit. Its strength lies in handling combined activity and accommodation bookings, ideal for adventure operators, wellness retreats, or surf camps.
If your hotel requires robust multi-property management, extensive OTA integrations, and a highly-rated support system, eviivo Suite™ is the clear winner. It’s better suited for boutique hotels, B&Bs, and vacation rentals seeking a scalable, well-integrated PMS. For larger portfolios, eviivo’s proven track record and recent positive reviews make it the safer choice.
eviivo Suite™ boasts a 4.43/5 ease-of-use rating backed by 20 recent reviews, with many users praising its intuitive interface and smooth onboarding. Reviewers appreciate how it simplifies complex multi-property management, with one stating, “eviivo’s platform is straightforward and efficient, making daily operations easier.”
Bookinglayer, on the other hand, has a 0/5 rating, indicating no recent or verified user feedback, which raises questions about its current usability. Given the recent reviews and high ratings, edge: eviivo Suite™.
eviivo offers 31 unique features, including revenue management, guest CRM, native email marketing, real-time reporting, automated night audits, and a guest app—all absent in Bookinglayer. This extensive feature set caters to multi-property management and complex operations.
Bookinglayer provides only 20 shared features, lacking key functionalities such as group management, online checkout, or automated assignments. The clear edge goes to eviivo for its richer feature list, especially for multi-property operators.
eviivo scores 4.42/5 in customer support, with recent reviews highlighting its responsiveness and helpful onboarding. One user noted, “Their support team is excellent, guiding us through setup and resolving issues quickly,” reflecting a well-supported experience.
Bookinglayer scores 0/5, with no recent reviews or support ratings available, suggesting limited or unverified support quality. Based on recent, detailed user feedback, edge: eviivo Suite™.
eviivo boasts 32 verified integrations, including Expedia, Booking.com, TripAdvisor, and Google Hotel Ads, allowing seamless distribution and rate synchronization. In comparison, Bookinglayer has only 1 verified partner, Cloudbeds, which is not even a direct integration with Bookinglayer but a shared partner.
This extensive integration network makes eviivo the superior choice for hotels relying on multiple OTAs and distribution channels. Edge: eviivo Suite™ PMS.
With 191 recent reviews and a NPS score of 8.87/5, eviivo is widely favored among hoteliers, especially in North America and Europe. Hotels of various sizes, including vacation rentals and small inns, consistently report improved efficiency and user satisfaction.
Bookinglayer, with no recent reviews or high ratings, lacks credible recent user feedback. For a trusted, validated rating, eviivo’s recent review volume and high scores clearly make it the preferred choice.
Bookinglayer’s base price is $600, while eviivo costs $700. Both are subscription-based with no trial offers or implementation fees disclosed, indicating comparable entry costs but differing in value based on features and support.
Given eviivo’s larger feature set and support infrastructure, its price is justified for hotels needing comprehensive management and integrations.
Not ideal if your hotel needs extensive multi-property management or OTA integrations.
Not ideal if you run a single property with minimal online distribution or prefer a specialized activity booking system.
Bookinglayer offers a niche solution for activity and experience-based businesses, with a focus on selling packages and reducing admin. Its limited recent reviews and features suggest it’s less suitable for multi-property or high-volume hotels needing broad integrations.
eviivo Suite™ PMS is a larger, more established platform with a proven track record, extensive integrations, and a high level of recent user satisfaction. Its support and feature richness make it the better choice for hotels with multiple properties or diverse online channels.
If your hotel manages multiple properties, needs extensive OTA connections, and values reliable support, eviivo Suite™ is the clear winner. Conversely, if your core focus is on experience bookings and simple packages, Bookinglayer might serve your niche — but its lack of recent validation makes it less compelling.
In conclusion, for most hotels evaluating a property management system today, eviivo's recent reviews and comprehensive feature set give it the edge.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $600/mo | From $700/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Bookinglayer 和 eviivo Suite™ PMS 共享 20 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 在线 24/7 支持 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 组功能 | ||
| 辅助收入跟踪 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 19 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Because of the automation from the eviivo Suite, it saves me a huge amount of time. This time I can use on growing the business; working on the business instead of in the business...."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Auf eviivo könnte ich heut gar nicht mehr drauf verzichten. Das Hotel ohne dieses Programm zu führen, scheint mir fast unmöglich, weil die Zeit, die ich jetzt erspart habe, die ich..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Aujourd’hui on a la possibilité de gérer l’ensemble de notre parc, que ce soit la tarification, le calendrier, la communication en un seul clic pour gérer plus de 50 appartements,..."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Eviivo 的客户支持因其响应速度和效率而备受赞誉。Guetif 先生、Joseph 和 Xavier 等支持人员提供了卓越的帮助,这在用户入职阶段以及出现问题时至关重要,从而... Eviivo 的客户支持因其响应速度和效率而备受赞誉。Guetif 先生、Joseph 和 Xavier 等支持人员提供了卓越的帮助,这在用户入职阶段以及出现问题时至关重要,从而提升了整体用户体验。
该平台在入职流程中提供专业知识,帮助酒店无缝集成系统。该指导确保信息集成的一致性和PMS功能的最佳利用,从而提高物业管理效率。
Eviivo 因其高效的技术而备受认可,它使用户能够更快、更少地完成任务。这减少了停机时间并改善了运营工作流程,确保了酒店管理的流畅体验。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
一些用户建议进行改进,特别是扩展移动应用程序开发等功能以及更具体的日常使用技巧,以进一步优化业务运营并利用平台的功能。
虽然用户总体上感到满意,但仍要求提供更多定制选项,包括网络和移动应用程序增强功能,以进一步满足特定的运营需求并提供额外的价值。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Bookinglayer 和 eviivo Suite™ PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Bookinglayer 提供 1 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 eviivo Suite™ PMS 提供 32 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。eviivo Suite™ PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.5/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Bookinglayer:否。eviivo Suite™ PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Bookinglayer 的 HT Score 为 0,eviivo 的为 87。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问