The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 58 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Bookinglayer 表现出色 ,拥有独特功能如 Online Check-in and Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc).
OpenHotel 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Revenue management module and Ancillary revenue tracking.
基于 HTR 上 58 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $600/mo | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 0 | 58 |
在分析了 58 条经验证的评价后,Bookinglayer 用户最看重其 ,而 OpenHotel 用户则强调 客户支持, 用户友好的pms, 持续更新和改进。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
OpenHotel
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
|
|
+
用户友好的PMS
▾
|
|
|
+
持续更新和改进
▾
|
|
|
+
直接 OTA 连接
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
报告功能
▾
|
|
|
−
财务处理
▾
|
|
|
−
团体预订工具
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
OpenHotel
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #25 36 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #39 11 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | — | #50 0 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #21 2 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
OpenHotel
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #37 16 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 | — | #45 4 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #28 9 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 | — | #43 2 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
OpenHotel
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #14 54 条评价 |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is critical for your hotel’s operations, guest experience, and revenue management. Bookinglayer by Bookinglayer offers an all-in-one booking platform tailored for adventure travel brands, wellness retreats, and activity-based accommodations, but it lacks recent reviews and a high overall rating. OpenHotel PMS, with its strong review count, recent positive feedback, and comprehensive features, emerges as the more trusted option for hoteliers seeking a reliable PMS.
Both products aim to streamline reservations and improve operational efficiency, but they diverge significantly in user satisfaction and market presence. Does your hotel prioritize extensive features and proven support, or are you more focused on a specialized booking engine? The choice depends on your hotel’s needs, but recent data leans heavily toward OpenHotel.
Bookinglayer and OpenHotel both address the core problem of managing reservations, inventory, and guest communications, but their strengths differ. Bookinglayer emphasizes activity and adventure travel integration, offering features like gift vouchers, online check-in, and rate management tailored for complex packages. In contrast, OpenHotel covers broader hotel management functions, including yield management, revenue tracking, and native email marketing, making it suitable for a range of property types.
Given Bookinglayer’s lack of recent reviews and a notably low overall rating, it’s difficult to gauge ongoing user satisfaction or product stability. OpenHotel, on the other hand, has 57 reviews with no recent negative feedback, making it a more reliable choice. Do you want a software that’s proven in the field with recent praise? Or are you comfortable with a product that has limited recent data?
Edge: OpenHotel.
If your hotel needs a flexible booking platform tailored for activities, adventure trips, or custom packages, Bookinglayer might seem appealing. However, the lack of recent reviews and a 0/5 overall rating suggest it may not meet current industry standards or user expectations. OpenHotel is better suited for hotels needing a versatile PMS with strong revenue management, direct OTA integrations, and group booking tools.
For small to medium properties seeking a proven, well-supported system that can handle multiple operational aspects, OpenHotel’s extensive feature set and high user ratings make it the clear choice. If your property is more niche and your team is comfortable managing a less-reviewed platform, Bookinglayer could be considered, but caution is advised given the data.
Edge: OpenHotel.
Bookinglayer scores a 0/5 for ease of use, with reviews indicating it’s not intuitive and features can be cumbersome. Users report difficulties adjusting rates quickly, creating packages, and navigating the interface, which impacts staff adoption and daily operations. Onboarding experiences are not documented, but the lack of recent reviews suggests limited recent support or improvements.
OpenHotel earns a 4.71/5 for ease of use, with many users praising its intuitive interface, seamless onboarding, and straightforward navigation. Reviews highlight that staff can quickly learn and adapt to the system, with excellent support during transitions. This ease of use directly impacts operational efficiency and staff satisfaction.
Edge: OpenHotel.
Bookinglayer offers 10 unique features, including gift vouchers, online check-in, and GDPR compliance, primarily focused on activity-oriented bookings. OpenHotel provides 13 features, including revenue management, guest profiles, direct billing, and native email marketing, covering core hotel management needs more comprehensively.
While Bookinglayer caters to niche markets and activity-based businesses, OpenHotel’s broader feature set supports hotel operations more holistically. If your hotel needs advanced revenue tools and guest management, OpenHotel’s features give it a clear edge.
Edge: OpenHotel.
Bookinglayer’s support ratings are not available, and reviews on support are scarce, making it difficult to assess. The limited feedback suggests that support quality and responsiveness may be inconsistent or unproven in recent times.
OpenHotel’s support scores a 4.82/5, with recent reviews praising its responsiveness, helpfulness, and proactive communication. Guests frequently mention that support staff are knowledgeable and available, which is vital during onboarding or system issues.
Edge: OpenHotel.
Bookinglayer has a verified partnership with Cloudbeds but only one total verified partner, indicating limited integrations. OpenHotel boasts 12 verified integrations with major systems like SiteMinder, RateGain, and INTELITY, along with proprietary integrations such as its revenue management and guest profile modules.
This extensive integration network allows more seamless workflows, automation, and data sharing, making OpenHotel more adaptable to existing hotel ecosystems. If integrations matter for your operations, OpenHotel’s ecosystem is more mature.
Edge: OpenHotel.
Bookinglayer has no reviews or recent ratings, leaving its user satisfaction unknown. Conversely, OpenHotel enjoys a high overall rating of 4.81/5 based on 57 reviews, with recent feedback confirming a strong likelihood to recommend (95%) and high satisfaction across hotel segments.
Property types like boutique hotels, resorts, and motels consistently rate OpenHotel highly, particularly praising its ease of use and support. The absence of recent Bookinglayer reviews makes it impossible to evaluate current user sentiment.
Edge: OpenHotel.
Bookinglayer charges a $600 monthly base fee without a freemium option, making it a predictable but potentially costly investment. Pricing details for OpenHotel are not publicly disclosed, but the lack of published prices suggests that it may offer customized quotes depending on property size and needs.
Given the known cost for Bookinglayer and the absence of transparent pricing for OpenHotel, your team should request a quote to determine value. However, the overall rating and support quality favor OpenHotel, making its potential higher ROI worth considering.
Not ideal if your hotel:
While Bookinglayer excels for activity-based businesses, it may fall short for traditional hotels needing a reliable, well-supported PMS.
Not ideal if your hotel:
OpenHotel suits hotels that want a reliable, feature-rich system with a strong support network and extensive integrations.
The core difference lies in their market focus: Bookinglayer is tailored for activity-based, adventure, or wellness travel businesses, while OpenHotel targets traditional hotels seeking an all-in-one management solution. OpenHotel’s superior user reviews, recent positive feedback, and extensive features make it the more trustworthy choice for most hoteliers.
Choose Bookinglayer if your hotel operates primarily in the adventure or experience market and your operational needs are relatively simple. For hotels seeking a scalable, feature-rich PMS with proven support and integrations, OpenHotel offers a more consistent, reliable solution.
If you want a system with high recent ratings, a broad feature set, and strong support, go with OpenHotel. For niche activity businesses willing to accept limited recent review data, Bookinglayer might be suitable but with caution.
In summary, OpenHotel stands out as the more established, well-supported option backed by numerous recent reviews and high ratings. Bookinglayer’s niche appeal is overshadowed by its lack of recent performance data and lower overall score, making it a less reliable choice for most hotels today.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
OpenHotel
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $600/mo | — |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Bookinglayer 和 OpenHotel PMS 共享 10 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
OpenHotel
|
|---|---|---|
| EPoS | ||
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
| 拖放磁带图 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 直接计费 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 网上值机 | ||
| 费率管理 | ||
| 辅助收入跟踪 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 11 项功能存在差异。
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
客户支持团队的开放性和响应能力受到用户的高度赞赏。许多人特别提到了团队在紧急情况下的帮助以及无缝过渡到 OpenHotel PMS。这种支持有助于平稳运营,尤其是在... 客户支持团队的开放性和响应能力受到用户的高度赞赏。许多人特别提到了团队在紧急情况下的帮助以及无缝过渡到 OpenHotel PMS。这种支持有助于平稳运营,尤其是在旺季或系统转换期间。
许多用户都对 OpenHotel PMS 的导航和使用非常满意。该系统非常直观,即使是首次担任酒店服务员的人也能轻松上手,并且可以无缝地从其他系统过渡。用户指出,由... 许多用户都对 OpenHotel PMS 的导航和使用非常满意。该系统非常直观,即使是首次担任酒店服务员的人也能轻松上手,并且可以无缝地从其他系统过渡。用户指出,由于其灵活的预订网格和全面的布局,该系统对于中小型酒店尤其有效。
用户赞赏 OpenHotel 不断改进并根据用户反馈添加功能。这种奉献精神确保系统始终与行业标准和不断发展的酒店需求保持同步。有关这些更新的通知通过收件箱通知共... 用户赞赏 OpenHotel 不断改进并根据用户反馈添加功能。这种奉献精神确保系统始终与行业标准和不断发展的酒店需求保持同步。有关这些更新的通知通过收件箱通知共享,方便用户随时了解最新信息。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
虽然许多人都对 OpenHotel 提供的详细而全面的报告选项表示赞赏,但也有用户不断要求提供可自定义的报告和适合特定酒店的改进指标。一些用户发现当前的报告充斥... 虽然许多人都对 OpenHotel 提供的详细而全面的报告选项表示赞赏,但也有用户不断要求提供可自定义的报告和适合特定酒店的改进指标。一些用户发现当前的报告充斥着不必要的信息,并建议进行改进以更好地满足他们的需求。
用户指出,OpenHotel 拥有高效的财务处理模块,包括有序的财务视图、可自定义的财务报告以及与外部财务系统的集成。但是,建议进行改进,特别是在实时税务报告和... 用户指出,OpenHotel 拥有高效的财务处理模块,包括有序的财务视图、可自定义的财务报告以及与外部财务系统的集成。但是,建议进行改进,特别是在实时税务报告和信用卡支付干预方面。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Bookinglayer 和 OpenHotel PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Bookinglayer 提供 1 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 OpenHotel PMS 提供 12 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。OpenHotel PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Bookinglayer:否。OpenHotel PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Bookinglayer 的 HT Score 为 0,OpenHotel 的为 16。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问