The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 43 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Bookinglayer 表现出色 .
Redforts 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Native Email Marketing and Guest profiles.
基于 HTR 上 43 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $600/mo | From $500/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 0 | 43 |
在分析了 43 条经验证的评价后,Bookinglayer 用户最看重其 ,而 Redforts 用户则强调 易于使用且直观的系统, 预订管理, 客户服务。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
易于使用且直观的系统
▾
|
|
|
+
预订管理
▾
|
|
|
+
客户服务
▾
|
|
|
+
持续改进和创新
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
集成功能
▾
|
|
|
−
界面和设计改进
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #31 21 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) | — | #49 3 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #30 18 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #39 5 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | — | #49 2 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 | — | #37 2 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | — | #32 4 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #14 39 条评价 |
Choosing between Bookinglayer and Redforts hinges on what your hotel needs most in a property management system. Bookinglayer specializes in combining activity and accommodation bookings, with a focus on adventure travel and experiential businesses, but it struggles with recent reviews and user feedback. Redforts, on the other hand, is a more established, highly-rated platform, with a wide suite of features and recent positive reviews, making it the more reliable choice for most hoteliers.
Both products aim to streamline reservations, improve operational efficiency, and reduce manual errors, but their strengths differ. Bookinglayer offers an all-in-one booking platform tailored for niche markets, while Redforts provides a comprehensive, modular PMS with robust integrations. Which one aligns better with your property's scale and focus?
Bookinglayer is designed to serve adventure travel companies, wellness retreats, and activity-based accommodations, focusing on selling packages, add-ons, and managing combined activities and lodging. Its core strength lies in handling complex bookings, but it has no recent reviews and zero ratings, indicating limited current user feedback.
Redforts presents a well-rounded PMS with features like a booking engine, channel management, revenue tools, and online check-in, making it suitable for a broader range of property types, especially hotels and hostels. It boasts 40 reviews in the past six months, with a high NPS score of 9.5/10 and a 72.8/100 overall rating, reflecting current user satisfaction. Given these metrics, Redforts is clearly more validated by recent user experiences.
Are you looking for a platform with a proven track record and recent feedback, or are you comfortable with a less-reviewed, niche solution? That decision shapes the right choice for your hotel.
If your hotel needs to manage activity and experience packages alongside accommodation bookings, or you operate in adventure travel or wellness markets, go with Bookinglayer. Its platform is tailored for selling fixed-date trips, customizable packages, and add-ons, helping you maximize revenue with less admin work.
If your priority is a user-friendly, all-in-one property management system with strong support, extensive features, and recent positive reviews, select Redforts. Its modular setup suits hotels, hostels, and serviced apartments looking for automation, integrated online payments, and efficient reservation management.
For hotels seeking a versatile PMS with a proven track record, Redforts is the safer bet. For niche operators focusing on activity bookings, Bookinglayer could be more aligned—though it lacks recent validation.
Redforts shines in usability, with a 4.68/5 ease of use rating backed by recent reviews praising its intuitive interface and straightforward workflows. Users consistently mention how quickly staff adapt and how the system reduces errors, with comments like “Very practical and easy to learn,” and “It makes daily management much simpler.”
Bookinglayer scores a 0/5 in ease of use, indicating no recent positive feedback. Its interface appears outdated and complex, with no recent reviews to demonstrate staff adoption or onboarding success.
Edge: Redforts.
Redforts offers 26 features exclusive to its platform, including RevPaR & ADR reports, guest CRM, integrated ID scanner, real-time reporting, online check-in, and revenue management modules—features that Bookinglayer does not provide. It also supports modules like automated space optimization and group functionality, broadening operational control.
Bookinglayer provides no features exclusive to its platform, with a total of 20 shared features. Its focus remains on booking management for combined activities, lacking the extensive modules that Redforts offers.
Edge: Redforts.
Redforts’ customer support receives a 4.53/5 rating, with recent reviews describing it as friendly, efficient, and responsive. Hoteliers mention quick query resolution and ongoing support, which bolsters confidence in its onboarding and daily operations.
Bookinglayer scores a 0/5, with no recent reviews or ratings, leaving its support quality unverified. The absence of feedback suggests a lack of recent customer interaction or support performance.
Edge: Redforts.
Redforts integrates with two verified partners, including Channel Manager Mr Winston and WuBook, providing seamless communication with booking engines and distribution platforms. Its flexible integration options facilitate efficient multi-channel management.
Bookinglayer has only one verified partner, Cloudbeds, limiting its integration scope. Since many hotels rely on multiple systems, the broader integration options in Redforts offer a significant advantage.
Edge: Redforts.
With zero reviews and ratings, Bookinglayer offers no recent feedback, making evaluation impossible. Conversely, Redforts’ 40 recent reviews with an average rating of 72.8/100 and an NPS of 9.5/10 indicate high overall satisfaction.
Hotels of all sizes, especially those seeking reliable, ongoing support and feature-rich systems, rate Redforts more favorably. Its recent positive reviews affirm its practical value for property management.
Edge: Redforts.
Bookinglayer charges a base price of $600 per month without a freemium option or trial. Its pricing model appears straightforward but lacks transparency on additional costs for modules or customizations.
Redforts costs $500 per month, also without a free tier or trial. Its lower price point and transparent pricing make it an attractive option for budget-conscious hotels seeking comprehensive features.
Both platforms lack detailed info on potential add-on costs, so your team should confirm specifics before committing.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Redforts is the more validated and feature-rich PMS, with recent reviews, a high NPS, and extensive functionalities. Its ease of use and support make it suitable for most hotels seeking reliable management tools.
Bookinglayer, while tailored for activity-based operators, has no recent reviews or ratings, making it less reliable at this point. It’s best suited for niche operators comfortable with limited validation and focusing on combining experiences with bookings.
If you need a proven, well-supported PMS, Redforts is the preferred choice. If your hotel operates in adventure travel or experiential markets and can accept limited recent validation, Bookinglayer may suffice—but proceed with caution.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $600/mo | From $500/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Bookinglayer 和 Redforts 共享 20 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 基于云 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 客户关系管理 | ||
| 集中消息传递 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 14 项功能存在差异。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
许多用户都喜欢 Redforts 的直观设计,它简化了培训并减少了人为错误。这简化了日常操作,让员工可以腾出时间处理其他任务。
该系统擅长管理预订、防止超额预订以及与多个平台集成。预订引擎和渠道管理的定制也是一大优势。
细心、响应迅速的客户服务经常受到称赞。用户提到个性化沟通和快速解决问题,为整体体验带来积极影响。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Redforts 可与预订引擎、渠道管理器和其他平台高效集成,提供无缝管理体验。此功能简化了不同系统和平台之间的协调。
虽然其功能受到称赞,但一些评论提到,界面似乎已经过时,可以通过现代化来增强视觉吸引力和效率。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Bookinglayer 和 Redforts 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Bookinglayer 提供 1 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Redforts 提供 2 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Redforts 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Bookinglayer:否。Redforts:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Bookinglayer 的 HT Score 为 0,Redforts 的为 73。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问