Bookinglayer vs. ThinkReservations PMS: 哪个更适合您?

更新于 May 16, 2026  ·  已分析 395 条经验证的评价

摘要

我们分析了 395 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:

Bookinglayer 表现出色 ,拥有独特功能如 Payment Requests.

ThinkReservations 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (0.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Guest profiles and Mobile App.

查看下方完整分析 ↓

Bookinglayer 与 ThinkReservations PMS 相比如何?

基于 HTR 上 395 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。

HTScore
0
89
推荐可能性
0%
97%
易用性
0.0/5
4.8/5
客户支持
0.0/5
4.8/5
性价比
0.0/5
4.7/5
起始价格 From $600/mo From $500/mo
经验证的评价 0 395

Bookinglayer 与 ThinkReservations PMS 的优缺点是什么?

在分析了 395 条经验证的评价后,Bookinglayer 用户最看重其 ,而 ThinkReservations 用户则强调 客户支持, 运营效率, 数据和报告。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。

Bookinglayer Bookinglayer ThinkReservations ThinkReservations
优点
+ 客户支持
+ 运营效率
+ 数据和报告
+ 与 OTA 集成
缺点
定价和费用
安全功能

Bookinglayer 对比 ThinkReservations:按酒店细分市场排名

各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。

按酒店规模

细分市场 Bookinglayer Bookinglayer ThinkReservations ThinkReservations
小型(10-24 间客房) #4 145 条评价
中型(25-74 间客房) #9 25 条评价
大型(75-199 间客房) #6 3 条评价
超大型(200+ 间客房) #5 1 条评价

按物业类型

细分市场 Bookinglayer Bookinglayer ThinkReservations ThinkReservations
精品酒店 #7 100 条评价
豪华酒店 #7 70 条评价
品牌/连锁酒店 #7 24 条评价
长住酒店 #11 8 条评价

按区域

细分市场 Bookinglayer Bookinglayer ThinkReservations ThinkReservations
北美 #1 386 条评价
欧洲 #57 0 条评价
亚太 #32 0 条评价
中东 #32 0 条评价

The Decision

Choosing the right property management system (PMS) can dramatically influence your hotel's efficiency, revenue, and guest satisfaction. Bookinglayer and ThinkReservations both aim to streamline operations, but they serve different hotel types and operational needs. Your choice depends on your specific requirements—what features matter most and how each platform integrates into your current workflow. Which one aligns better with your hotel’s goals?

Is Bookinglayer or ThinkReservations Better for Hotels?

Bookinglayer and ThinkReservations both address reservation management, but they target different segments and operational styles. Bookinglayer specializes in combining activities and accommodation, making it ideal for adventure travel, wellness retreats, or enterprises offering customizable packages. ThinkReservations, however, is designed to serve primarily small to medium-sized hotels, B&Bs, and inns with a focus on intuitive reservation workflows and robust OTA integrations.

The key divergence is their user base and feature focus. Bookinglayer emphasizes selling fixed-date trips and packages, with features like custom add-ons and activity management, whereas ThinkReservations concentrates on simplifying day-to-day hotel operations, including guest messaging, automated night audits, and direct channel integrations. Do you need an all-in-one booking solution for activities and stays, or a straightforward hotel PMS with strong OTA connectivity?

Bookinglayer vs ThinkReservations: Which Should Your Hotel Choose?

If your hotel offers bundled experiences, activities, or customized packages—such as adventure tours, wellness retreats, or surf camps—Bookinglayer is the better fit. Its platform supports selling trip packages with add-ons, managing multiple activity types, and reducing admin overhead.

Conversely, if your focus is on a user-friendly PMS that enhances operational efficiency for inns, B&Bs, or boutique hotels, ThinkReservations is the ideal choice. Its features like automated night audits, guest messaging, and direct integrations with OTAs like Expedia and Airbnb help streamline reservations and boost revenue. For small to mid-sized properties seeking simplicity and reliability, ThinkReservations excels.

Is Bookinglayer or ThinkReservations Easier to Use?

ThinkReservations earns a near-perfect ease of use score (4.82/5) from over 350 recent reviews, with hotel teams praising its intuitive interface, quick onboarding, and helpful support. Users frequently mention how straightforward it is to learn and adopt, with reviews highlighting its "easy to navigate" design and minimal training time. Support staff are described as accessible and knowledgeable, further easing implementation.

Bookinglayer, on the other hand, has a rating of 0/5, indicating no recent or verified reviews for usability. Its complexity, especially for hotels without experience in activity-based bookings, may present a steeper learning curve. The absence of recent review data also makes it harder to evaluate its current user experience.

Edge: ThinkReservations.

Which Has Better Features: Bookinglayer or ThinkReservations?

ThinkReservations offers 20 features exclusive to its platform, including EPoS, group booking functionalities, real-time reports, mobile app access, and native email marketing—covering operational, marketing, and revenue management needs. Its extensive feature set supports dynamic pricing, guest profiles, shift planning, and integrated payment solutions.

Bookinglayer provides only one unique feature—payment requests—focusing primarily on activity booking and trip management. Its other functionalities are shared with ThinkReservations, but it lacks the breadth of operational tools that many small hotels depend on.

Edge: ThinkReservations.

Which Has Better Customer Support: Bookinglayer or ThinkReservations?

ThinkReservations maintains a strong reputation for support, with an average rating of 4.82/5 from over 350 reviews, many praising its quick, helpful, and accessible customer service. Users describe their support team as knowledgeable and responsive, often citing support as a key reason for their satisfaction.

Bookinglayer, with no recent reviews, offers no current data on support quality. The lack of recent feedback makes it difficult to assess whether it provides comparable assistance, leaving ThinkReservations as the clearer leader in support.

Edge: ThinkReservations.

Which Has More Integrations: Bookinglayer or ThinkReservations?

ThinkReservations boasts 16 verified integrations, including major OTAs such as Airbnb, Expedia, Tripadvisor, and channel managers like Sojern and TrustYou. This extensive connectivity helps streamline distribution and guest communication.

Bookinglayer has only one verified partner—Cloudbeds—limiting its integration options significantly. Without broader OTA and third-party channel support, it may limit your ability to expand reach or automate workflows.

Edge: ThinkReservations.

Which Do Hoteliers Rate Higher: Bookinglayer or ThinkReservations?

With 356 recent reviews, ThinkReservations has a stellar overall rating of 4.88/5, with tiny segments like luxury hotels and inns giving consistently high marks. Hotels frequently mention how the platform simplifies their operations and increases revenue, with guest satisfaction ratings reflecting its effectiveness.

Bookinglayer, with no recent reviews or ratings, cannot be compared directly. The lack of current feedback indicates less confidence in its usability or support, making ThinkReservations the preferred choice based on recent user experiences.

Edge: ThinkReservations.

How Much Do Bookinglayer and ThinkReservations Cost?

Bookinglayer charges a flat fee of $600 monthly without any trial or freemium options, making its pricing straightforward but potentially costly for small hotels. ThinkReservations costs $500 per month, slightly less, with no trial or implementation fees, offering a competitive rate for its comprehensive features.

Neither platform offers a free tier, but ThinkReservations’ price point and feature set provide strong value, especially given its positive reviews and support.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Bookinglayer?

  • Hotels that actively sell activity packages, adventure trips, or excursions alongside accommodations.
  • Businesses that require customizable trip and activity booking experiences.
  • Enterprises looking to minimize admin time on complex packages.
  • Hotels with staff comfortable managing more complex booking scenarios and integrations.

Not ideal if your hotel prefers a straightforward property management tool without activity-based features or if you need extensive OTA integrations.

What Type of Hotel Should Use ThinkReservations?

  • Small to medium-sized hotels, inns, B&Bs, and boutique hotels prioritizing ease of use.
  • Properties seeking to automate night audits, guest messaging, and revenue reports.
  • Hotels wanting strong OTA integrations, especially with Airbnb, Expedia, and Tripadvisor.
  • Teams that value dedicated customer support and extensive operational features.

Not ideal if your hotel operates primarily as a vacation rental or needs a platform focused on activity and experience management.

The Bottom Line for Hotels

Bookinglayer is a niche-focused platform designed for businesses that combine activities and accommodation, offering unique trip management features. It excels if your hotel or enterprise regularly sells customized packages, but its lack of recent reviews and support data makes it hard to recommend confidently.

ThinkReservations stands out as the more established, highly-rated, and well-supported PMS for small to mid-sized hotels. With more recent reviews, a broader feature set, and extensive integrations, it’s better suited to hoteliers looking for an operational upgrade that boosts revenue and guest satisfaction.

If your hotel needs a straightforward, highly-rated PMS with strong OTA and guest communication features, go with ThinkReservations.

If your business is about adventure, activity packages, or custom experiences, and you’re prepared to navigate its complexity, Bookinglayer could fit your needs better.

Bookinglayer 和 ThinkReservations PMS 的价格是多少?

物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。

Bookinglayer Bookinglayer ThinkReservations ThinkReservations
Starting Price From $600/mo From $500/mo

Bookinglayer 有哪些 ThinkReservations PMS 没有的功能(反之亦然)?

根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Bookinglayer 和 ThinkReservations PMS 共享 19 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。

功能 Bookinglayer Bookinglayer ThinkReservations ThinkReservations
EPoS
RevPaR 和 ADR 报告
付款请求
在线 24/7 支持
日历视图
组功能
自动夜间审计

显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 9 项功能存在差异。

实际成果:Bookinglayer 对比 ThinkReservations(按业务目标)

我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。

增加收入和降低成本
Bookinglayer Bookinglayer

该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。

ThinkReservations Blue Tang Inn 中型
+ Blue Tang Inn was able to significantly increase its bottom line after implementing ThinkReservations, with 52% year on year increase during Q1.
+ The property capitalized on upsell opportunities, offering a wide variety of activities (snorkeling, scuba diving, sailing, fishing) as well as F&B packages. Upsell revenue increased 80% in Q1 2023 vs the previous year
+ Blue Tang Inn management was pleased to see the property booked more nights in Q1 2023, at a significant higher rate while the market maintained the previous year's numbers.

"I became aware of ThinkReservations at a trade show in the US, and I could see right away that it would help Blue Tang Inn streamline our operations, increase our booking and upsel..."

Kristin Fisher
Kristin Fisher
Sales and Marketing Director
提高运营效率
Bookinglayer Bookinglayer

该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。

ThinkReservations Yara Palm Springs 小型
+ 17.3% of revenue in 2024 came from items and packages, growing their revenue without additional capital investments.
+ Yara Palm Springs consistently has 62% of their bookings through their direct channels, saving thousands of dollars that would otherwise go to OTA commisions.
+ Yara Palm Springs has automated their guest journey and made it easy for guests to enjoy a personalized stay through technology, making it easier for the owners to operate their propertyremotely. "Living in another city from my hotel, working remotely on my hotel, being a mother, trying to have a social life...ThinkReservations makes it so I can still do all those things and be a hotel operator from wherever I am" said Kate.

"ThinkReservations Digital Registration has streamlined our check in process, making my job so much easier. Being able to ask guests for their ID and credit card ahead of time, agre..."

改善宾客体验
Bookinglayer Bookinglayer

该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。

ThinkReservations Inn on Main 小型
+ Increased Repeat Guests - The inn has seen a notable rise in repeat bookings, including guests who have stayed over 20 times since implementing ThinkReservations.
+ Boosted Upsell Revenue - Upselling opportunities through the booking engine have resulted in a 15% increase in additional revenue from services like late check-ins and special packages.
+ Improved Efficiency - Administrative tasks have been reduced by 30%, allowing staff to dedicate more time to creating memorable guest experiences.

"We try to take care of all the needs of our guests so that they have an experience rather than just a stay"

Chris Kennedy
Chris Kennedy
Co-Owner

Bookinglayer 对比 ThinkReservations:总结

Bookinglayer
Bookinglayer
0.0/5 来自 0 条评价

独特功能

付款请求
0.0/5 易用性 0.0/5 客户支持 1 个集成
查看资料
ThinkReservations
ThinkReservations
4.9/5 来自 395 条评价

酒店从业者喜爱的方面

客户支持 89% 正面

尽管许多人已经认为它很优秀,但一些评论表示希望在周末提供额外支持,以便更好地处理紧急询问。

运营效率 86% 正面

ThinkReservations 通过数字注册、夜间审计以及轻松管理预订和入住流程来帮助简化运营,使员工能够更加专注于与客人的互动。

数据和报告 75% 正面

该系统提供全面的数据和报告功能,使酒店经营者能够就定价、客人满意度和战略规划做出明智的决策。

酒店从业者提出异议的方面

定价和费用 100% 负面

一些评论强调了定价结构的问题,包括对渠道经理费用的不满以及 ThinkMessenger 等功能的高价格。

安全功能 67% 负面

强制的两步验证对于一些用户来说是一个令人沮丧的地方,他们觉得它很麻烦并且希望降低安全设置。

独特功能

EPoS 日历视图 RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 组功能 在线 24/7 支持
4.8/5 易用性 4.8/5 客户支持 16 个集成
查看资料

评分差异最大的方面

综合评分 ThinkReservations 4.9 vs 0.0 (+4.9)
易用性 ThinkReservations 4.8 vs 0.0 (+4.8)
客户支持 ThinkReservations 4.8 vs 0.0 (+4.8)
性价比 ThinkReservations 4.7 vs 0.0 (+4.7)
入职培训 ThinkReservations 4.7 vs 0.0 (+4.7)

关于 Bookinglayer 与 ThinkReservations PMS 的常见问题

Bookinglayer 能否替代 ThinkReservations PMS?

这取决于您的需求。Bookinglayer 和 ThinkReservations PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Bookinglayer 提供 1 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 ThinkReservations PMS 提供 16 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。

哪个更适合小型或独立酒店?

小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。ThinkReservations PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。

Bookinglayer 或 ThinkReservations PMS 是否提供免费方案?

Bookinglayer:否。ThinkReservations PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。

HTR 如何评估和排名 Bookinglayer 和 ThinkReservations PMS?

HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Bookinglayer 的 HT Score 为 0,ThinkReservations 的为 89。以下是评分的计算方式。

标准组 权重 衡量内容
客户评分与评价

用户对该产品的推荐度如何?

评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例

权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。

合作伙伴生态系统

技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何?

合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量

评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。

以客户为中心

该组织以客户为中心的程度如何?

认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性

评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。

覆盖范围、持久力与资源

该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛?

地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分

衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。

客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →

获取个性化的产品推荐

产品推荐顾问

Ghostel icon

让我们查找您的酒店信息