The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 31 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Breezeway 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Customizable per room checklists and Cleaning checklists.
Three Angular 表现出色 .
基于 HTR 上 31 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 30 | 1 |
在分析了 31 条经验证的评价后,Breezeway 用户最看重其 任务管理与调度, 宾客沟通, 集成与灵活性,而 Three Angular 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
任务管理与调度
▾
|
|
|
+
宾客沟通
▾
|
|
|
+
集成与灵活性
▾
|
|
|
+
客户支持和响应能力
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
移动应用程序增强功能
▾
|
|
|
−
设置和实施挑战
▾
|
|
|
−
成本跟踪和自动化
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 清洁与操作 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #2 5 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #1 20 条评价 | #3 1 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #1 5 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #2 0 条评价 | #3 0 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #2 8 条评价 | #4 1 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #1 5 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #1 7 条评价 | #3 0 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 | #2 1 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #1 30 条评价 | #5 0 条评价 |
| 欧洲 | — | #2 1 条评价 |
Choosing between Breezeway by Breezeway and Three Angular by Three Angular for your hotel’s operations hinges on your priorities. Both aim to streamline property management, but Breezeway is a dedicated operations platform with a focus on task automation and communication, while Three Angular is a business intelligence tool centered on data analysis and customer feedback. Your decision depends on whether operational efficiency or data insights are more critical to your hotel.
Breezeway has a much stronger market presence, with a higher review count and more recent feedback, making it the more reliable choice for actionable insights. Three Angular, with only a single review and no recent feedback, offers limited guidance for hotel operators. So, which platform aligns better with your hotel’s current needs?
Breezeway’s core strength is its comprehensive property operations management tailored for short-term rentals, hotels, and resorts. It solves operational challenges like scheduling, maintenance, and guest communication, with an emphasis on automation and team coordination. Conversely, Three Angular’s primary function is to analyze customer feedback and generate data-driven insights, which are less directly relevant to hotel operations.
Breezeway’s reviews highlight its ease of scheduling, real-time task tracking, and communication tools that improve guest satisfaction. Three Angular’s single review emphasizes its slow system and API errors, with no specific hotel operations features. Do you need a platform that actively manages daily operations or one that offers insights from customer data?
If your hotel needs a dedicated property operations system that automates scheduling, maintenance, and guest communication, Breezeway is the clear choice. Its 30 reviews over recent months, with a 4.53/5 customer support rating and a 99% likelihood to recommend, show consistent user satisfaction.
If, however, your hotel’s focus is on analyzing guest feedback and extracting insights for strategic improvements—especially if you’re managing large volumes of reviews—Three Angular might seem appealing. But with only one outdated review and no recent data, Breezeway’s extensive, current feedback makes it the more trustworthy choice for operational needs.
Breezeway’s user interface scores 4.67/5, with most users praising its intuitive design and streamlined onboarding process rated at 4.61/5. Customer reviews often mention how quickly staff adopt the platform and how it simplifies daily tasks.
Three Angular’s UI scores 3/5, and its review indicates slow system performance and complexity, which hampers ease of use. The lack of recent reviews makes it difficult to gauge current usability, but Breezeway’s higher ratings and positive feedback suggest it is the easier platform for your team to learn and operate efficiently.
Edge: Breezeway.
Breezeway offers nine features exclusive to its platform, including customizable checklists, multi-lingual support, remote inspections, and Airbnb integrations. These functionalities directly enhance operational workflows, guest experience, and compliance tracking.
Three Angular provides no unique features tailored for property management but focuses on data summarization and predictive analytics. Its limited feature set and the absence of operational tools make Breezeway the more comprehensive choice for hotels seeking to improve daily management.
Edge: Breezeway.
Breezeway’s support scores 4.53/5, with reviews praising its responsiveness and proactive assistance. Users often mention that the support team promptly addresses issues and integrates user feedback into product updates, which is vital for smooth hotel operations.
Three Angular’s support rating is 1/5, with reviews describing the system as slow and error-prone, and no mention of dedicated customer support. Given the importance of reliable support in hotel management, Breezeway clearly offers a superior support experience.
Edge: Breezeway.
Breezeway integrates with 15 verified partners, including WebRezPro, Guesty, SiteMinder, Mews, and Airbnb. These integrations enable your hotel to connect operations with booking platforms, PMS, and access real-time data for better management.
Three Angular lacks verified integrations and does not specify any partner systems. For a hotel looking to streamline workflows across multiple platforms, Breezeway’s extensive integration options are a major advantage.
Edge: Breezeway.
Breezeway’s recent reviews and high NPS score of 9.53/10, along with a 99% likelihood to recommend, reflect very strong satisfaction. Its review count of 30 over the past six months indicates ongoing, active use by hotels, predominantly in vacation rentals and resorts.
Three Angular’s single review, dated and negative, doesn’t provide a reliable basis for comparison. Therefore, Breezeway’s higher ratings and recent feedback make it the preferred choice for hotel operators.
Edge: Breezeway.
Both Breezeway and Three Angular do not disclose specific pricing details, typically requiring direct contact for quotes. Breezeway’s subscription model often involves a monthly fee based on property count, while Three Angular’s pricing is unclear, limiting transparent comparison.
Given the lack of detailed pricing data, your hotel should request customized quotes to evaluate ROI based on your property volume and operational needs.
Not ideal if your hotel relies on simple manual processes or is very small-scale with minimal operational complexity.
Not ideal if your goal is day-to-day operational management, scheduling, or guest communication, especially given the limited support and feature set.
Breezeway is the clear choice for hotels seeking a full-featured, proven operations platform. Its extensive recent reviews, high support ratings, and broad integrations make it well-suited for managing day-to-day tasks efficiently.
Three Angular, while powerful in data analysis, does not currently provide the operational tools or recent feedback necessary for hotel management. If your goal is to streamline operations and enhance guest experiences, Breezeway stands out as the more reliable, user-friendly option.
In summary, choose Breezeway if your hotel needs a dedicated, well-supported management platform to improve operational efficiency. Opt for Three Angular only if your focus is on leveraging customer feedback analysis for strategic decisions, and only if you’re prepared to handle its current limitations.
清洁与操作 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|---|
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Breezeway 和 Three Angular 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| iOS 兼容 | ||
| 可定制的每个房间清单 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 安卓兼容 | ||
| 清洁清单 | ||
| 远程检测服务 |
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
用户对 Breezeway 的任务管理和调度功能非常满意。他们强调该系统如何通过自动调度、自定义任务模板和实时跟踪等功能使操作更加顺畅。这些功能可确保高效完成任... 用户对 Breezeway 的任务管理和调度功能非常满意。他们强调该系统如何通过自动调度、自定义任务模板和实时跟踪等功能使操作更加顺畅。这些功能可确保高效完成任务,从而节省时间并减少人为错误。
Breezeway 中的宾客沟通工具,尤其是短信功能,深受用户青睐。这些工具可以及时有效地与宾客沟通,大大提高了宾客满意度。用户还喜欢自动回复和可自定义的文本模... Breezeway 中的宾客沟通工具,尤其是短信功能,深受用户青睐。这些工具可以及时有效地与宾客沟通,大大提高了宾客满意度。用户还喜欢自动回复和可自定义的文本模板等功能。
Breezeway 与 Airbnb 和物业管理系统等其他系统的集成让许多用户受益匪浅。它还具有适应不同业务模式和要求的灵活性,使其成为满足各种运营需求的多功能工具。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
移动应用程序的反馈包括对附加功能和用户界面改进的建议。用户建议将桌面版的功能添加到移动应用程序中,以提高现场工作人员的整体可用性。
尽管 Breezeway 的功能广受好评,但一些用户提到了初始设置和实施阶段的挑战。他们建议为这一过程分配足够的资源和时间,以确保顺利过渡并全面部署软件的功能。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Breezeway 和 Three Angular 共享许多核心 Cleaning & Operations 功能,但各有独特的能力。Breezeway 提供 15 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Three Angular 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Breezeway 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 3.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Breezeway:否。Three Angular:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Cleaning & Operations 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Breezeway 的 HT Score 为 100,Three Angular 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问