The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 | Campgest |
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #31 21 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) | — | #49 3 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 | Campgest |
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #30 18 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #39 5 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | — | #49 2 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 | — | #37 2 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 | Campgest |
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | — | #32 4 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #14 39 条评价 |
Choosing between Campgest by Campgest and Redforts by Redforts hinges on what your hotel needs most. Both platforms aim to streamline operations but approach it very differently. Campgest is a campground management tool with a focus on outdoor properties, while Redforts offers a comprehensive property management system tailored for a variety of hotel types. Where do your priorities lie?
Campgest appears to be more niche-focused, but it lacks recent reviews and a clear user community. Redforts, on the other hand, boasts a solid recent review count and high customer satisfaction. Are you prepared to invest in a broader platform with more proven support?
Campgest is designed specifically for outdoor hospitality businesses like campgrounds and RV parks, emphasizing reservation automation and operational planning for these niches. Redforts caters to a wider hotel audience, including boutique hotels, hostels, and apartments, with features that support diverse property types.
Campgest's main strength is its automation capabilities for outdoor property management and the integration of real-time availability, which is crucial for campgrounds. Conversely, Redforts offers a full suite of functionalities—reservation management, channel management, online check-in, and more—making it ideal for hotels seeking an all-in-one solution.
Given the limited review data for Campgest, especially recent feedback, its user base and support reputation are less certain. Redforts, with 40 reviews, including the most recent, shows a 95% likelihood of recommendation, indicating strong current user satisfaction.
In summary, if your hotel is in the outdoor or campground segment, Campgest might initially seem appealing but lacks recent validation. If you operate a traditional hotel, hostel, or apartment, Redforts' proven performance makes it the safer choice.
If your hotel requires a flexible, feature-rich platform for reservations, guest management, and revenue optimization, Redforts is the clear pick. Its suite includes a PMS, booking engine, channel manager, and revenue tools—features that suit hotels looking to streamline diverse operations.
On the other hand, if your property is a campground or outdoor hospitality site needing automated booking processes and real-time availability, Campgest might seem tailored. Still, its lack of recent reviews and limited regional presence make it riskier, especially if you seek reliable ongoing support.
For hotels prioritizing ease of management, automation, and extensive integrations, Redforts delivers a comprehensive experience. If your focus is outdoor leisure or niche management, Campgest’s specialized approach might work, but caution is advised given the sparse recent feedback.
Redforts scores 4.68 out of 5 on ease of use based on recent reviews, with users praising its intuitive interface and straightforward onboarding. Many reviewers mention how quickly staff learn the platform, reducing training time and errors.
Campgest, with a score of 0, offers no recent usability data, and its user experience remains unverified. Given its niche focus, it might be functional but lacks validation of user-friendliness at scale.
Edge: Redforts.
Redforts boasts 46 features, including a revenue management module, guest CRM, digital registration, automated reminders, and integration with POS systems. Many features are designed to automate tasks and minimize manual errors, making daily management smoother.
Campgest provides no additional features beyond core campground management, which limits its utility for hotels outside outdoor hospitality. Its narrow feature set is unlikely to support complex property needs.
The clear edge goes to Redforts, especially for properties that need comprehensive control over reservations, guest engagement, revenue, and channel management.
Redforts earns a 4.53 out of 5 rating for customer support, with recent reviews highlighting responsive and personalized service. Users mention quick resolution times and ongoing support, which is vital for hotel operations.
Campgest scores 0, indicating no recent or validated support reviews, raising concerns about ongoing assistance and reliability. Without recent customer feedback, support quality remains uncertain.
Edge: Redforts.
Redforts offers 2 verified integrations, including a channel manager (WuBook) and a booking engine (Mr Winston). These integrations facilitate seamless communication between platforms, essential for operational efficiency.
Campgest currently has no verified integrations, limiting its compatibility with other hotel systems. For hotels relying on multiple tools, this can be a significant drawback.
The advantage clearly goes to Redforts, with a broader ecosystem supporting diverse operational needs.
Redforts’ recent reviews, totaling 40, reflect high satisfaction, with a 95% likelihood to recommend and an NPS score of 9.5/10. Reviewers emphasize its ease of use, customer support, and feature set across various hotel types.
Campgest has no recent reviews, and its rating remains at 0, offering no current user insights. This lack of recent feedback diminishes confidence in its ongoing performance.
Therefore, Redforts’ review profile makes it the preferable option for hoteliers seeking proven satisfaction.
Campgest provides no pricing details, suggesting it may offer a free or custom pricing model tailored to niche clients. Its lack of pricing transparency makes budgeting difficult.
Redforts charges $500 per month, with no mention of tiered plans or additional fees. Its fixed pricing offers clarity, suitable for hotel budgets.
For predictable costs and clearer budgeting, Redforts’ transparent pricing structure is advantageous.
Campgest is best suited for niche outdoor hospitality providers that prioritize automation over complex management features. It’s not recommended for traditional hotels or those seeking a proven support network.
Redforts is suitable for properties of various sizes needing reliable, feature-rich management with proven user satisfaction.
Redforts and Campgest serve different niches, but only Redforts currently demonstrates a strong, validated track record. Its extensive features, support, and recent reviews make it the safer choice for most hotels today.
Choose Campgest if your property is a campground or outdoor hospitality business that values automation tailored specifically for outdoor sites. However, be aware of its limited recent validation and feature set.
For traditional hotels, hostels, and apartments seeking a comprehensive platform with ongoing support and proven user satisfaction, Redforts is the clear winner. Its higher ratings, recent reviews, and broader integration ecosystem make it the preferable solution.
In conclusion, if your hotel needs a reliable, well-supported management system with a broad feature set, go with Redforts. If outdoor camping is your main operation, consider Campgest but proceed with caution given the lack of recent validation.
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
许多用户都喜欢 Redforts 的直观设计,它简化了培训并减少了人为错误。这简化了日常操作,让员工可以腾出时间处理其他任务。
该系统擅长管理预订、防止超额预订以及与多个平台集成。预订引擎和渠道管理的定制也是一大优势。
细心、响应迅速的客户服务经常受到称赞。用户提到个性化沟通和快速解决问题,为整体体验带来积极影响。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Redforts 可与预订引擎、渠道管理器和其他平台高效集成,提供无缝管理体验。此功能简化了不同系统和平台之间的协调。
虽然其功能受到称赞,但一些评论提到,界面似乎已经过时,可以通过现代化来增强视觉吸引力和效率。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Campgest 和 Redforts 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Campgest 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Redforts 提供 2 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Redforts 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Campgest:否。Redforts:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Campgest 的 HT Score 为 0,Redforts 的为 73。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问