The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 246 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Cendyn 表现出色 在 ROI 方面 .
dailypoint™ 表现出色 在 支持服务 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Trip Advisor Connectivity Partner.
基于 HTR 上 246 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $900/mo | From $600/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 22 | 224 |
在分析了 246 条经验证的评价后,Cendyn 用户最看重其 ,而 dailypoint™ 用户则强调 支持服务, 营销自动化, 配置文件引擎。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
支持服务
▾
|
|
|
+
营销自动化
▾
|
|
|
+
配置文件引擎
▾
|
|
|
+
电子邮件营销
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
定制复杂性
▾
|
|
|
−
系统性能
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店客户关系管理与电子邮件营销 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #16 1 条评价 | #5 25 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #15 7 条评价 | #2 149 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #6 6 条评价 | #3 34 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #4 6 条评价 | #5 12 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #10 11 条评价 | #2 106 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #9 15 条评价 | #1 133 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #10 9 条评价 | #1 71 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #19 1 条评价 | #4 13 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #3 11 条评价 | #20 1 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #14 9 条评价 | #3 195 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #16 0 条评价 | #5 7 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | — | #2 15 条评价 |
When choosing a hotel CRM & email marketing platform, your team needs a solution that centralizes guest data, enhances personalization, and streamlines marketing efforts. Both Cendyn CRM and dailypoint™ 360° aim to meet these needs, but they differ significantly in maturity, user experience, and recent performance. Cendyn has been a long-standing player, while dailypoint™ boasts a higher overall rating and more recent reviews, making it the more current choice.
Your hotel’s specific needs—whether focusing on automation, data integration, or ease of use—will determine the better fit. Are you prioritizing extensive integrations and a proven track record, or seeking a platform with recent momentum and highly positive user feedback?
Both platforms aim to unify guest data and improve guest engagement, yet they diverge in their market presence and user feedback. Cendyn CRM, founded in 1996, has a focus on large-scale, often luxury and resort properties, primarily in North America, Europe, Middle East, and Africa. It offers over 200 integrations but has a limited review base, with only 22 reviews, and only one in the last six months, indicating less recent user validation.
In contrast, dailypoint™ 360° has been around for over 20 years, with a broader global footprint covering 22 countries, including Asia Pacific and South America. It boasts 149 reviews—most recent—and a 4.53/5 rating, with 12 reviews in the last six months, signaling active and current user engagement. Its high NPS score (8.74/10) and favorable comments about support, onboarding, and feature updates highlight a more responsive, evolving platform.
Where they truly differ is in their ability to support modern, data-driven marketing. dailypoint™’s AI-powered profile engine and automation tools receive consistent praise, whereas Cendyn’s users cite limitations with updates and workflow speed. Is your team looking for a solution with a fresh, highly-rated user experience? Or do you prefer a more established but less recent platform?
Edge: dailypoint™ 360°.
If your hotel needs an AI-enriched, highly integrated data platform with a broad global reach and recent reviews, go with dailypoint™. Its deep integration with over 200 systems, including prominent partners like TrustYou, Oracle Hospitality, and Stayntouch, makes it ideal for hotels that want a flexible, scalable CRM with proven success in major markets.
Conversely, if your hotel is a large resort or luxury property seeking a long-established platform with a strong presence in North America, Europe, and the Middle East, Cendyn could still satisfy your needs. Its core strengths are in automation, segmenting guest data, and supporting enterprise-scale operations, but its lower recent review count indicates it may not be evolving as swiftly.
In summary, for most hotels prioritizing recent user feedback, comprehensive integration, and AI-driven insights, dailypoint™ is the clearer choice. Cendyn remains relevant for specific large-scale or regional applications but may lag in innovation and user satisfaction.
Edge: dailypoint™ 360°.
Cendyn CRM earns a solid 4.18/5 in ease of use, with reviews praising its segmentation capabilities and user-friendly design. However, some users mention that frequent updates can temporarily hinder workflow, and the interface could benefit from more customization options and more modern dashboards.
dailypoint™, rated 4.15/5, is praised for its straightforward handling, especially its guest profile management and automation features. Users note that although the system is rich in features, the learning curve can be steep, but onboarding support helps mitigate this.
When comparing the two, the slight difference in ratings suggests both are relatively user-friendly, but dailypoint™’s recent reviews highlight its ease of handling in real hotel environments, especially with ongoing support.
Edge: Cendyn.
Cendyn offers a core set of 27 shared features, including automation, segmentation, and integrations. It lacks unique features beyond these, which suggests a solid but standard CRM offering without standout capabilities.
dailypoint™ provides a similar feature set but includes one exclusive feature: Trip Advisor Connectivity. Its Profile Engine, automation, and email marketing tools are highly praised, with robust AI capabilities that support targeted campaigns and guest insights.
Given that dailypoint™ has an extensive feature set with at least one unique, hotel-specific feature, it edges out Cendyn for flexibility and innovation, especially for hotels seeking deep personalization options.
Edge: dailypoint™ 360°.
Both platforms enjoy high support ratings—Cendyn at 4.5/5 and dailypoint™ at 4.51/5—indicating strong customer service. Cendyn’s reviews often mention that support is helpful, with Ray Schum and team praised for their responsiveness.
dailypoint™’s support is similarly highly regarded, with reviews emphasizing its flexibility, responsiveness, and willingness to develop new modules based on customer feedback. Clients highlight the system’s adaptability and ongoing communication.
While both excel, dailypoint™’s recent reviews and continuous system improvements suggest it may be slightly more proactive in addressing support needs.
Edge: dailypoint™ 360°.
dailypoint™ has an overall rating of 4.53/5 based on 149 reviews, with recent feedback reinforcing its high satisfaction. Hotels across segments, especially luxury and boutique hotels, frequently praise its ease of use, support, and feature updates.
Cendyn’s rating of 0/5 is based on only 22 reviews, with no recent feedback to support current performance. Many users report limitations and slower workflows, indicating it is less favored in recent evaluations.
Given the volume and recency of reviews, dailypoint™ clearly holds higher trust and higher ratings among hoteliers today.
Edge: dailypoint™ 360°.
Cendyn’s pricing starts at $900/month, with no freemium or trial options publicly available. Its pricing model is fixed and may be considered higher, especially for smaller hotels.
dailypoint™’s base price is $600/month, also without a trial or freemium option. Its lower starting cost combined with positive value ratings suggests a more accessible investment for hotels seeking ROI.
Pricing differences favor dailypoint™, especially for hotels sensitive to budget but aiming for a comprehensive, AI-enabled CRM.
Not ideal if your hotel is looking for the most recent user reviews, fast-paced updates, or high flexibility in design.
Not ideal if your hotel prefers a more regionally limited platform or if you prioritize a platform with minimal ongoing updates or recent reviews.
The core difference lies in recent user validation and flexibility. dailypoint™ has a significantly higher review count and more recent positive feedback, indicating it adapts well to current hotel needs.
Choose dailypoint™ if your hotel values a platform with proven recent success, extensive integrations, and AI-powered insights—especially if you’re aiming to modernize and grow your revenue.
Opt for Cendyn if your hotel operates at a large enterprise level, particularly in established markets, and values a long track record over recent reviews. However, be aware it may not keep pace with evolving hotel technology demands.
In conclusion, for most hotels today, dailypoint™ offers a more compelling, validated, and scalable solution, making it the preferred choice for modern hotel CRM and email marketing needs.
酒店客户关系管理与电子邮件营销 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $900/mo | From $600/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Cendyn CRM 和 dailypoint™ 360° – Central Data Management 共享 27 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Trip Advisor 连接合作伙伴 |
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"So, as you think about investing in Digital Hospitality, don‘t forget to think about what it might cost not to!"
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"We work with dailypoint because the integration between the Booking Manager module and our PMS works really well."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"The decisive factor for selecting dailypoint was their wide experience in customer loyalty programs, their high standards in GDPR as well as their ability to connect partner system..."
排名更高的方面
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
虽然客户支持因其响应迅速和高效而普遍受到好评,但一些用户提到,与其他提供商相比,支持服务的成本较高,这是一个缺点。
Dailypoint 的自动化功能获得了积极的反馈,尤其是在设置有针对性的群组特定自动化活动、简化营销工作和提高工作流程效率方面。
用户重视用户画像引擎,因为它能够从多个来源挖掘相关的宾客兴趣,从而构建更丰富的宾客画像。这项功能有助于精准的宾客细分和互动,为个性化营销活动带来战略优... 用户重视用户画像引擎,因为它能够从多个来源挖掘相关的宾客兴趣,从而构建更丰富的宾客画像。这项功能有助于精准的宾客细分和互动,为个性化营销活动带来战略优势。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
虽然功能丰富,但自定义设置较为复杂,一些用户反映难以根据自身需求定制特定报告。这表明该领域仍有改进空间,可以提升用户体验。
有用户反映导航过程中系统运行缓慢,这表明提高速度可以提升用户的整体满意度和效率。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Cendyn CRM 和 dailypoint™ 360° – Central Data Management 共享许多核心 Hotel CRM & Email Marketing 功能,但各有独特的能力。Cendyn CRM 提供 116 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 dailypoint™ 360° – Central Data Management 提供 59 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。dailypoint™ 360° – Central Data Management 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.3/5 对比 4.2/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Cendyn CRM:否。dailypoint™ 360° – Central Data Management:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel CRM & Email Marketing 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Cendyn 的 HT Score 为 0,dailypoint™ 的为 100。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问