项目面板是一款免费工具,仅向已认证的酒店从业者开放。它通过简化调研流程和沟通环节,让采用新技术变得更轻松。
摘要
我们分析了 253 条经验证的酒店经营者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的酒店类型和优先事项:
Cendyn 在性价比方面表现出色,尤其适合民宿住宿设施(4.8/5)。
dailypoint™ 在支持、入职和培训方面表现出色,尤其适合机场与会议住宿设施(4.6/5),并拥有Trip Advisor 连接合作伙伴等独家功能。
基于 HTR 上 253 条经验证的酒店经营者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | 起价 $900/月 | 起价 $600/月 |
| 经验证的评价 | 22 | 231 |
在分析了 253 条经验证的评价后,Cendyn 用户最看重其 一体化平台 / 一站式服务, 全天候支持, 收益管理集成,而 dailypoint™ 用户则强调 支持、入职和培训, 分析、报告与可行的洞察, 宾客画像与数据丰富。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
一体化平台 / 一站式服务
▾
|
+
支持、入职和培训
▾
|
|
+
全天候支持
▾
|
+
分析、报告与可行的洞察
▾
|
|
+
收益管理集成
▾
|
+
宾客画像与数据丰富
▾
|
|
+
数字营销集成
▾
|
+
集成与一体化平台工作流程
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
直接访问GDS / 减少中间环节
▾
|
−
设计与编辑限制
▾
|
|
−
复杂性与学习曲线
▾
|
|
各产品在不同酒店规模、类型和区域的 酒店CRM与电子邮件营销 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店经营者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #18 1 条评价 | #5 27 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #17 5 条评价 | #2 138 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #6 9 条评价 | #3 41 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #4 5 条评价 | #3 18 条评价 |
按酒店类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #9 11 条评价 | #3 110 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #9 15 条评价 | #1 137 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #9 9 条评价 | #1 74 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #21 1 条评价 | #4 13 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #3 11 条评价 | #22 1 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #16 9 条评价 | #3 199 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #17 0 条评价 | #5 7 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | — | #2 15 条评价 |
Cendyn CRM and dailypoint™ both unify guest data into a single profile and enable personalized marketing automation, but they diverge sharply in scale, user base, and operational focus. Cendyn excels in luxury and resort segments, reflecting 34% and 18% of its users respectively, with an overall rating of 4.7/5 from 22 reviews. Dailypoint™, with 231 reviews and a 4.4/5 overall rating, serves a broader range of hotel types including branded hotels, airport/conference hotels, and city center hotels.
Both products solve the core problem of fragmented guest data and inefficient marketing. They aggregate data across systems, automate messaging, and personalize campaigns to drive direct bookings and loyalty. The difference lies in dailypoint’s larger market presence—22 countries versus Cendyn’s 8—and its extensive user base that spans more hotel segments, making it the choice for groups requiring broad integration and loyalty management. Cendyn’s strength is in detailed segmentation and AI insights tailored for premium properties with complex guest profiles.
If you operate a luxury or resort property focused on deep guest segmentation and AI-driven campaign optimization, Cendyn’s 4.7/5 rating across 22 reviews and 34% luxury hotel clientele make it a strong choice. Its 200+ hospitality-specific integrations support properties with complex tech environments. However, Cendyn lacks recent review activity, which limits insight into current product evolution.
Conversely, if you manage a multi-property branded group, airport, or city center hotel, or require integrated loyalty programs, dailypoint™ offers a modular, scalable platform rated 4.4/5 with 231 reviews, including 13 in the last six months averaging 4.8/5. Its advanced data cleansing and loyalty module have been validated in large portfolios like Rotana Hotels. These strengths come with a steeper learning curve and more complex UI, which may impact smaller teams or independents.
For boutique hotels or limited-service properties, data is thinner but both platforms have users; Cendyn’s boutique hotels rate it 4.8/5 from 11 reviews, whereas dailypoint™ has 113 boutique hotel reviews at 4.4/5. Choose Cendyn if you prioritize ease of use and AI insights; choose dailypoint™ if you want loyalty integration and a single platform for CRM and marketing.
Ease of use ratings are close: Cendyn scores 4.2/5 ease of use and 4.6/5 onboarding, while dailypoint™ scores 4.3/5 ease of use and 4.4/5 onboarding. Reviewers praise Cendyn’s intuitive segmentation and automation tools, calling it “easy to use” and “easy to connect with” third-party systems. However, some mention frequent updates that occasionally disrupt workflow and note that the CRM interface could be more intuitive when building campaigns.
Dailypoint™ users describe the platform as powerful but complex, with a steep learning curve requiring some technical or HTML knowledge, which can challenge front desk or marketing staff. Onboarding is thorough but time-consuming. The UI is less modern and flexible than some dedicated email marketing tools, but users appreciate the consolidated workflow connecting CRM, loyalty, and messaging.
Overall, both products require some training but have well-rated onboarding. Cendyn’s slightly higher onboarding rating reflects a smoother adoption for smaller teams; dailypoint’s complexity suits users needing advanced capabilities. Edge: Even.
Feature-wise, Cendyn and dailypoint™ share 27 hospitality-relevant features including segmentation, automation, and analytics. dailypoint™ alone offers Trip Advisor connectivity, which enables syncing guest reviews and reputation data directly into guest profiles to refine segmentation and marketing relevance—valuable for properties with significant TripAdvisor traffic.
Neither product offers features unique to Cendyn, despite its broad integration network. dailypoint’s loyalty module integrates CRM data with points management and member engagement—reviewers call this “a game-changer” for repeat business and guest retention. This loyalty functionality directly impacts marketing and revenue teams by automating reward delivery and personalized incentives across the guest journey.
Cendyn’s edge is its AI-powered insights and dynamic pricing rules, which help revenue managers optimize campaigns based on guest behavior patterns. These capabilities support hotels focusing on revenue maximization through data-driven marketing.
Edge: dailypoint™ due to its unique TripAdvisor connectivity and integrated loyalty program, which tangibly extend CRM functionality beyond Cendyn’s offering.
Customer support ratings for Cendyn and dailypoint™ are close: 4.5/5 and 4.6/5 respectively, with onboarding scores favoring Cendyn slightly (4.6/5 vs 4.4/5). Cendyn reviewers highlight responsive, knowledgeable teams, especially praising support staff like Ray Schum for proactive assistance and problem resolution.
dailypoint™ customers appreciate the responsive ticketing system and collaborative approach to change requests, with one CIO calling the engagement “remarkable” for ensuring needs are met efficiently. Both vendors demonstrate strong ongoing support, but dailypoint’s smaller team (45 employees vs Cendyn’s 570) has cultivated a reputation for personalized service in complex implementations.
Neither product shows gaps in support quality; user feedback emphasizes constructive relationships that improve product effectiveness.
Edge: Even.
Cendyn leads with 119 verified partners compared to dailypoint™’s 64, sharing 25 common integrations including major PMS and CRM platforms like apaleo, Oracle Hospitality, protel, and Stayntouch. Cendyn’s exclusive integrations include Priority Software, Visual Matrix PMS, RoomRaccoon, and HOTELTIME—important for hotels using niche or regional PMS systems.
dailypoint™ integrates uniquely with hotelkit, Customer Alliance, SuitePad, and D-Edge, platforms favored by European and global hotel groups for operations, guest feedback, and distribution. Its open API facilitates seamless connections that support its CDP and loyalty modules.
Hotels requiring broad PMS coverage and specialized third-party systems will find Cendyn’s wider integration network advantageous, especially for luxury and multi-property setups. dailypoint’s integrations are sufficient for large groups emphasizing loyalty and marketing automation but may limit properties reliant on less common PMS solutions.
Edge: Cendyn.
Cendyn has a higher overall rating at 4.7/5 from 22 reviews versus dailypoint™’s 4.4/5 from 231 reviews. However, dailypoint™’s last 6-month rating is 4.8/5, showing recent improvements, while Cendyn has no reviews in that period.
Segment ratings favor Cendyn in luxury hotels (4.7/5 from 15 reviews vs dailypoint™’s 4.4/5 from 139 reviews) and resorts (4.8/5 from 12 vs 4.5/5 from 97). Boutique hotels also rate Cendyn higher (4.8/5 from 11 vs 4.4/5 from 113). Branded hotels and airport/conference hotels rate dailypoint™ higher (4.5/5 from 76 and 4.6/5 from 83 vs Cendyn’s 4.6/5 from 9 and 4.6/5 from 7).
Dailypoint™’s large review volume across multiple segments provides a more representative rating for midscale, branded, and large-group properties. Cendyn’s higher rating but smaller, less recent review base provides a confident but narrower endorsement, particularly for upscale independent hotels.
Edge: Cendyn.
Cendyn charges a base price of $900 with no freemium, no monthly flat or per-room pricing, and no implementation fee. The lack of trial limits hands-on evaluation before purchase.
dailypoint™ lists a lower base price of $600, also without freemium or monthly fees, and no implementation fee. It similarly lacks trial options.
Both products require custom pricing beyond base fees depending on scope and modules, but dailypoint™’s published starting price is 33% lower. This cost difference may influence smaller properties or groups with tight budgets.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Cendyn CRM and dailypoint™ both address the crucial need for unified guest data and personalized marketing automation. Cendyn focuses on AI-driven insights, dynamic pricing rules, and a broad integration network, optimized for luxury and resort hotels with complex data needs. Dailypoint™ offers a modular, scalable platform with integrated loyalty, broad international presence, and robust data cleansing favored by branded and multi-property groups.
Choose Cendyn if your property is a luxury or resort hotel that benefits from advanced segmentation, AI-powered campaign optimization, and extensive PMS integrations. Its higher overall rating of 4.7/5 and strong onboarding support suit teams prioritizing ease of adoption and data-driven revenue management.
Choose dailypoint™ if your hotel is part of a branded group or operates multiple properties internationally, requiring integrated loyalty management and comprehensive guest lifecycle communication. Its 4.8/5 recent rating, combined CRM, email marketing, and loyalty modules, and scalable architecture make it ideal for groups seeking a unified platform despite a steeper learning curve.
In summary, Cendyn is the better fit for upscale independents and resorts focused on AI-driven marketing, while dailypoint™ excels with multi-property groups needing loyalty integration and wide regional coverage. The decision hinges on property type, team capacity, and the value placed on loyalty features versus AI insights.
酒店CRM与电子邮件营销 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的酒店规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 起始价格 | 起价 $900/月 | 起价 $600/月 |
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
营销自动化
|
|
|
| 个性化一对一沟通 | ||
| A/B 测试 | ||
| 营销自动化 | ||
| 电子邮件通讯 | ||
| 数据库健康监控 | ||
|
▾
模板生成器
|
|
|
| 模板编辑器 | ||
| 所见即所得 - HTML 编辑器 | ||
| 营销活动模板 | ||
| 事务模板 | ||
| 模板导入 | ||
|
▾
客人资料
|
|
|
| 客人资料 | ||
| 数据库健康监控 | ||
| 符合 GDPR 规定 | ||
| 符合CCPA | ||
| 自动重复数据删除 | ||
|
▾
分割
|
|
|
| 分割 | ||
| 数据库健康监控 | ||
| 标记 | ||
| 忠诚度细分 | ||
| 基于属性的细分 | ||
| 基于地理的细分 | ||
| 基于渠道/市场的细分 | ||
| 基于交付周期的细分 | ||
| 基于房间类型的细分 | ||
|
▾
隐私与合规
|
|
|
| 符合 GDPR 规定 | ||
| 符合CCPA | ||
| PCI 投诉 | ||
|
▾
数据管理
|
|
|
| 集中式数据仓库 | ||
| 数据库健康监控 | ||
| 开放式 API | ||
| 集中式多酒店/多品牌解决方案 | ||
|
▾
反馈和调查
|
|
|
| 客人反馈模块(评论卡/评论) | ||
| Trip Advisor 连接合作伙伴 |
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"So, as you think about investing in Digital Hospitality, don‘t forget to think about what it might cost not to!"
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"We work with dailypoint because the integration between the Booking Manager module and our PMS works really well."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"The decisive factor for selecting dailypoint was their wide experience in customer loyalty programs, their high standards in GDPR as well as their ability to connect partner system..."
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
用户多次强调Cendyn能够将多个酒店系统整合到一个平台,包括收益管理、数字营销和中央预订系统(CRS)。这种整合被视为一项重要的运营优势,因为它减少了工具的... 用户多次强调Cendyn能够将多个酒店系统整合到一个平台,包括收益管理、数字营销和中央预订系统(CRS)。这种整合被视为一项重要的运营优势,因为它减少了工具的分散,帮助团队从单一平台管理更多的客人和分销工作流程。
支持被评价为卓越,评论者称赞团队无可挑剔,愿意全天候提供帮助。对于酒店来说,这种支持非常宝贵,因为客人沟通、分销或活动执行的问题可能在任何时间影响预订... 支持被评价为卓越,评论者称赞团队无可挑剔,愿意全天候提供帮助。对于酒店来说,这种支持非常宝贵,因为客人沟通、分销或活动执行的问题可能在任何时间影响预订和服务的连续性。
Cendyn以将收益管理与其他酒店工具集成而著称。这表明该平台能够帮助酒店将营销和分销决策与定价及收益目标相协调,这对于推动预订和提升盈利能力非常重要。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
评论者质疑该平台是否可以被直接解决方案取代,而不是充当中间人,并特别提到为酒店提供访问GDS渠道的权限。这表明他们担心Cendyn可能在酒店与分销渠道之间增加... 评论者质疑该平台是否可以被直接解决方案取代,而不是充当中间人,并特别提到为酒店提供访问GDS渠道的权限。这表明他们担心Cendyn可能在酒店与分销渠道之间增加额外层级,可能限制控制权或效率。
排名更高的方面
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
支持在设置和日常使用过程中被反复描述为响应迅速、知识丰富且乐于助人。同时,也有用户指出平台较为复杂,入职培训和员工培训可能会耗费较多时间。
许多用户依赖Dailypoint的报告和分析来了解客人情绪、营销活动效果和战略机会。每周报告、准确的实时结果以及可衡量的互动被视为数据驱动决策和提升营销表现的重... 许多用户依赖Dailypoint的报告和分析来了解客人情绪、营销活动效果和战略机会。每周报告、准确的实时结果以及可衡量的互动被视为数据驱动决策和提升营销表现的重要因素。
评论者一致称赞 Dailypoint 通过集中管理宾客数据并从多个渠道丰富宾客兴趣、偏好和行为档案,建立了更坚实的个性化基础。酒店表示,这有助于提升宾客识别的准确... 评论者一致称赞 Dailypoint 通过集中管理宾客数据并从多个渠道丰富宾客兴趣、偏好和行为档案,建立了更坚实的个性化基础。酒店表示,这有助于提升宾客识别的准确性和相关性营销效果。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
反复被提及的批评是,新闻通讯和活动设计工具相比专业营销软件功能有限。用户希望拥有更现代、直观且灵活的布局控制,包括更好的视觉编辑和更便捷的排版方式。
多篇评论指出,Dailypoint 功能强大但不易上手,新用户需要较长的学习时间。客户提到需要HTML知识、复杂的定制,以及由于功能繁多可能让系统显得难以应对。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Cendyn CRM 和 dailypoint™ CRM, CDM & Marketing 共享许多核心 Hotel CRM & Email Marketing 功能,但各有独特的能力。Cendyn CRM 提供 119 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 dailypoint™ CRM, CDM & Marketing 提供 65 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速上手。dailypoint™ CRM, CDM & Marketing 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.3/5 对比 4.2/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按酒店规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Cendyn CRM:否。dailypoint™ CRM, CDM & Marketing:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel CRM & Email Marketing 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店经营者客观比较酒店科技产品。Cendyn 的 HT Score 为 0,dailypoint™ 的为 98。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您酒店的情况量身定制的推荐