项目面板是一款免费工具,仅向已认证的酒店从业者开放。它通过简化调研流程和沟通环节,让采用新技术变得更轻松。
摘要
我们分析了 612 条经验证的酒店经营者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的酒店类型和优先事项:
CheckInn Systems 表现出色 .
Duve 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的住宿设施 (0.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Mobile Friendly and SMS text messaging.
基于 HTR 上 612 条经验证的酒店经营者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | 起价 $400/月 | 起价 $900/月 |
| 经验证的评价 | 0 | 612 |
在分析了 612 条经验证的评价后,CheckInn Systems 用户最看重其 ,而 Duve 用户则强调 客人消息和持续沟通, 无接触入住和到店前登记, 运营效率和员工时间节省。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
客人消息和持续沟通
▾
|
|
|
+
无接触入住和到店前登记
▾
|
|
|
+
运营效率和员工时间节省
▾
|
|
|
+
定制化、工作流程灵活性和语言处理
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
PMS同步与集成问题
▾
|
|
|
−
消息传递和平台稳定性
▾
|
|
|
−
客人资料采集与后续跟进再利用
▾
|
|
各产品在不同酒店规模、类型和区域的 非接触式办理入住 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店经营者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #1 132 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #2 204 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #2 164 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | — | #2 48 条评价 |
按酒店类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #2 231 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #2 262 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #2 188 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #2 92 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #3 54 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #1 240 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | — | #2 24 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | — | #1 237 条评价 |
Choosing between CheckIn Systems Kiosk Solutions by CheckInn Systems and Duve for contactless check-in hinges on your hotel’s specific needs. Both aim to streamline guest arrivals, but they approach this goal differently, with CheckInn Systems focusing on kiosk-based visitor management and Duve offering a comprehensive online and mobile check-in platform. Your decision should consider your hotel’s size, operational complexity, and guest experience goals.
While CheckInn Systems emphasizes security and quick management of visitor data through kiosks, Duve provides a multi-channel, profile-driven approach that enhances guest engagement well before arrival. Which solution aligns better with your operational priorities and guest expectations?
CheckIn Systems specializes in kiosk-based check-in solutions designed primarily for secure visitor management, with a focus on quick, manual check-ins at physical terminals. In contrast, Duve offers an online check-in platform that can be accessed via mobile devices, emails, or apps, and supports pre-arrival guest engagement across multiple channels.
CheckInn Systems boasts a very low rating and review count, with no recent reviews or user feedback, making it difficult to gauge usability or customer satisfaction. Conversely, Duve has over 468 reviews, with recent feedback indicating a 95% likelihood to recommend and a high overall rating of 4.83/5, backed by more than 25 reviews in the last six months—this is a significant indicator of current product performance and user trust.
Given the more recent reviews and higher user engagement, Duve’s platform is more confidently validated as a contactless check-in solution. Are you willing to rely on untested kiosk hardware or prefer a flexible, modern online check-in experience?
If your hotel needs a flexible, guest-centric, and scalable check-in process that integrates with your existing systems, Duve is the better fit. Its extensive feature set—including document scanning, e-signatures, pre-arrival messaging, and revenue-boosting upselling—makes it ideal for hotels focusing on enhancing guest satisfaction and operational efficiency.
On the other hand, if your hotel primarily requires a secure, in-person kiosk for managing visitor access—such as conference centers or restricted-access facilities—CheckIn Systems might be suitable, despite its lack of recent reviews and lower overall ratings. For most hoteliers seeking a modern, profile-driven approach, Duve’s proven track record and wide feature set make it the recommended choice.
In summary, for hotels aiming to modernize and personalize guest arrival, Duve should be your go-to. If your focus is strictly on secure, physical access control, CheckInn Systems might serve specific niche needs better.
Duve’s user interface scores a 4.74/5, with recent reviews praising its ease of use, quick onboarding, and intuitive guest journey automation. Guests and staff find Duve’s app and web interfaces straightforward, with many reviewers noting minimal training requirements—and many mention how guests appreciate the seamless pre-arrival communication.
CheckIn Systems, however, has no available usability ratings or recent reviews, leaving its ease of use uncertain. Historically, kiosk solutions can be more cumbersome for guests unfamiliar with self-service terminals, and without current feedback, it's risky to assume simplicity.
Edge: Duve.
Duve offers 32 features, including PMS integration, mobile-friendly check-in, WhatsApp messaging, automated replies, analytics dashboards, multi-channel delivery, digital acceptance, upselling, and guest profiling—features CheckInn Systems lacks entirely. Its extensive integrations with third-party systems and its ability to conduct profile enrichment, payment collection, and offer merchandising set Duve apart.
CheckIn Systems provides no additional features outside basic visitor check-in kiosks, making it a stark contrast to Duve’s comprehensive platform. If your goal is a feature-rich, profile-driven guest experience, Duve’s 32 features provide a clear edge.
Edge: Duve.
Duve’s support scores a 4.65/5, with recent reviews emphasizing quick response times, dedicated onboarding, and proactive customer service. Guests and hoteliers alike describe Duve’s support team as professional, responsive, and eager to resolve issues, adding confidence to system adoption.
CheckIn Systems, however, has no recent reviews or support ratings available, making its support quality impossible to assess. Given the importance of reliable support in technology deployment, Duve’s current positive feedback stands out.
Edge: Duve.
Duve integrates with 65 verified partners, including PMS systems like WebRezPro, RoomRaccoon, and HotelTime, as well as third-party services like guest messaging, digital locks, and revenue management tools. These integrations allow hotels to automate and customize their guest experience extensively.
CheckIn Systems offers no verified integrations, limiting its adaptability. For hotels seeking seamless automation and expanded functionalities, Duve’s robust integration network provides a significant advantage.
Edge: Duve.
Duve’s overall rating of 4.83/5 from over 468 reviews—many recent—reflects strong satisfaction across hotel segments, including luxury, boutique, and city center hotels. Reviewers highlight its ease of use, support, and revenue-boosting features as key strengths.
CheckIn Systems, with zero reviews, cannot be rated or compared meaningfully. This lack of recent feedback indicates it is not a trusted or proven solution for modern hoteliers.
Edge: Duve.
CheckIn Systems charges a flat, upfront fee of $400 with no mention of monthly or per-room charges, but details about ongoing costs or scalability are unavailable. Duve’s pricing is $900 upfront, with no monthly or per-room fees, but the higher initial investment reflects its broader feature set.
While both lack transparent subscription models, Duve’s higher price is justified by its extensive capabilities and proven success in diverse hotel segments.
Not ideal if your hotel aims to offer a seamless, profile-driven, contactless check-in experience or plans to scale digital guest services.
Not ideal if your hotel operates solely with physical check-in kiosks and has no desire for digital guest engagement.
The core difference lies in scope: Duve offers a comprehensive, profile-driven guest experience platform, while CheckIn Systems provides a simple kiosk-based check-in solution. If your hotel needs a flexible, digital, and revenue-enhancing platform, Duve’s extensive reviews, features, and recent positive feedback make it the clear choice.
Choose Duve if you prioritize operational efficiency, guest personalization, and scalability. Opt for CheckIn Systems only if your main concern is physical access control with minimal digital guest interaction.
For most hotels looking to stay competitive in the modern hospitality landscape, Duve’s proven track record and feature-rich platform make it the smarter, more reliable investment.
非接触式办理入住 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的酒店规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 起始价格 | 起价 $400/月 | 起价 $900/月 |
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
到达前和登记入住
|
|
|
| 酒店网站入住门户 | ||
| 大堂售货亭 | ||
| 自助结账 | ||
| 自助值机 | ||
| 设备无关 | ||
| 轻松选择房间 | ||
|
▾
信息收集
|
|
|
| 自定义问题 | ||
| 条款和条件签署 | ||
| 营销传播选择加入 | ||
| 预注册信息收集 | ||
| 文件和护照扫描 | ||
| 身份验证 | ||
|
▾
翻译
|
|
|
| 自动翻译 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
|
▾
付款与授权
|
|
|
| 登记卡电子签名 | ||
| 收取押金 | ||
| 付款和授权 | ||
| 身份验证 | ||
| 符合 PCI 标准 | ||
|
▾
手机钥匙
|
|
|
| 门锁集成 | ||
|
▾
升级和追加销售
|
|
|
| 到货前追加销售和升级 | ||
| 轻松选择房间 | ||
|
▾
Other
|
|
|
| 经前管理系统整合 |
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Duve was a game changer for our customer service. I knew the platform would help us connect with guests but I was amazed at how cleverly simple it all is, even guests who are not v..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"While scaling up and growing in terms of more hotel rooms and more hotels in different countries we found it difficult to communicate with our guests in a very personal way. Duve f..."
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
用户一致认为 Duve 是一个强大的消息平台,便于在入住前、入住中和退房后保持联系。他们喜欢将客人沟通集中在一个平台上,减少遗漏请求或依赖 WhatsApp 和其他外... 用户一致认为 Duve 是一个强大的消息平台,便于在入住前、入住中和退房后保持联系。他们喜欢将客人沟通集中在一个平台上,减少遗漏请求或依赖 WhatsApp 和其他外部渠道。
评论者常说,Duve 通过让客人在到达酒店前完成登记,缩短了入住时间,减少了前台拥堵和手动录入数据的工作。酒店在高峰到店时尤为看重这一功能,因为它使入住流... 评论者常说,Duve 通过让客人在到达酒店前完成登记,缩短了入住时间,减少了前台拥堵和手动录入数据的工作。酒店在高峰到店时尤为看重这一功能,因为它使入住流程更快、更顺畅,且对员工和客人来说都更省力。
评论者常提到,Duve 通过减少重复性问题、手动验证和前台工作量,为接待和运营团队节省了时间。这种效率对于繁忙的酒店尤为重要,能够让员工少花时间在行政事务... 评论者常提到,Duve 通过减少重复性问题、手动验证和前台工作量,为接待和运营团队节省了时间。这种效率对于繁忙的酒店尤为重要,能够让员工少花时间在行政事务上,更多专注于高价值的宾客服务。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
一个反复出现的问题是,Duve 并不总是与PMS或其他酒店系统顺畅同步,导致需要手动审核或重复工作。评审者希望实现更紧密、更可靠的集成,以便预检入住前的数据、... 一个反复出现的问题是,Duve 并不总是与PMS或其他酒店系统顺畅同步,导致需要手动审核或重复工作。评审者希望实现更紧密、更可靠的集成,以便预检入住前的数据、客人资料和运营信息能够无延迟、无错误地流通。
一些用户反映偶尔出现故障,例如消息未发送、更新延迟、需要刷新浏览器或在不同设备上的表现不一致。虽然产品整体受到好评,但这些稳定性问题被视为运营风险,因... 一些用户反映偶尔出现故障,例如消息未发送、更新延迟、需要刷新浏览器或在不同设备上的表现不一致。虽然产品整体受到好评,但这些稳定性问题被视为运营风险,因为它们可能中断客人沟通并带来额外的手动跟进。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。CheckIn Systems Kiosk Solutions 和 Duve - Online Check-in 共享许多核心 Contactless Check-in 功能,但各有独特的能力。CheckIn Systems Kiosk Solutions 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Duve - Online Check-in 提供 72 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速上手。Duve - Online Check-in 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按酒店规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
CheckIn Systems Kiosk Solutions:否。Duve - Online Check-in:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Contactless Check-in 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店经营者客观比较酒店科技产品。CheckInn Systems 的 HT Score 为 0,Duve 的为 95。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您酒店的情况量身定制的推荐