The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 | Acantech |
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #39 11 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #38 12 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 | Acantech |
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #38 14 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 | — | #54 2 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | — | #52 2 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 | Acantech |
|
|---|---|---|
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #22 23 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #16 2 条评价 |
Choosing between Chr365 by Acantech and Noovy PMS comes down to your hotel’s operational needs and growth ambitions. Both products aim to streamline hotel management, but they diverge significantly in scope, usability, and market presence. Chr365 offers a largely unreviewed, minimal interface, while Noovy boasts a vibrant, highly-rated platform with extensive features and recent customer feedback. Do you prioritize a more established, feature-rich system or are you open to exploring less proven options?
If your hotel needs an intuitive, all-in-one platform that integrates with multiple OTAs and automates revenue management, Noovy is the clear choice. Conversely, if your operations require a custom, potentially more flexible solution and you're prepared for a less tested environment, Chr365 might be worth considering. But how do these differences impact your specific hotel?
Chr365, developed by Acantech, is virtually unreviewed with a rating of 0/5 and no recent customer feedback, making it difficult to gauge its effectiveness. Noovy, by comparison, has accumulated 19 recent reviews, with a 5/5 overall rating, and a customer support score of 4.89/5, indicating strong satisfaction.
Chr365’s lack of reviews and recent activity suggest limited market presence and uncertain usability, whereas Noovy’s active review base, recent positive feedback, and 99% likelihood to recommend make it a more reliable choice. For hoteliers seeking proven success, Noovy’s recent customer voices confirm its effectiveness. Are you comfortable adopting a system with minimal user feedback, or do you prefer a proven track record?
Your hotel should choose Chr365 if you are looking for a highly customizable or niche system tailored to specific operational needs, and if you're prepared to handle potential implementation challenges without extensive existing reviews.
However, Noovy is ideal for hotels that want a user-friendly, all-in-one property management platform with extensive automation, direct OTA integrations, and a cost-effective pricing model of €5 per room per month. Its recent reviews emphasize ease of use, strong support, and a broad feature set, making it suitable for hotels seeking quick deployment and reliable performance.
If rapid onboarding and proven customer satisfaction are your priorities, Noovy stands out. Would you prefer a system with a proven user base and ongoing support, or a customizable platform with less market validation?
Based on available data, Chr365’s UI and onboarding process are unreviewed, leaving its ease of use uncertain. In contrast, Noovy has a 4.84/5 rating for ease of use, with recent reviews praising its intuitive interface, quick setup, and minimal learning curve.
Noovy’s high ratings reflect a focus on simplicity for busy hotel teams, with comments like “connect with any distribution channels with few clicks” and “very good support,” ensuring staff adoption is smooth. Edge: Noovy.
Chr365 offers no publicly listed features, leaving its functional scope unknown. Noovy, by comparison, boasts 48 features covering channel management, booking engine, revenue tools, guest communication, housekeeping, and more.
Noovy’s features include a native booking engine, automated night audit, multi-lingual support, guest CRM, digital registration, and real-time reporting—features that Chr365 likely lacks or has not demonstrated. Its comprehensive feature set and recent customer praise for its automation and connectivity give it a clear advantage. Edge: Noovy.
Chr365 provides no data on customer support or onboarding experience, making evaluation impossible. Noovy, with a support rating of 4.89/5 and recent reviews stating “very good support” and “fast and friendly,” clearly leads here.
Recent reviews highlight round-the-clock support, quick responses, and effective issue resolution, critical for busy hoteliers. If support quality matters to your hotel’s stability, Noovy is the safer bet. Edge: Noovy.
Chr365 lacks verified integration data or listed partners, suggesting limited or unverified connectivity options. Noovy, with 40 verified partners, integrates with major OTAs, revenue management systems, and payment providers, including Otelier, SiteMinder, and GuestRevu.
This extensive partner network enhances operational flexibility, allowing your hotel to connect with the tools you already use. For seamless, reliable integrations that expand your capabilities, Noovy is the superior choice. Edge: Noovy.
Since Chr365 has no reviews, it cannot be rated by hoteliers. Noovy, with 19 recent reviews, holds a perfect 5/5 rating, especially among boutique, city center, and budget hotels.
Reviews consistently praise Noovy for ease of use, support, and automation, with comments like “connects with any distribution channel” and “saves time.” Its high scores across segments emphasize broad satisfaction. Clearly, hoteliers prefer Noovy. Edge: Noovy.
Chr365 provides no publicly available pricing details, leaving potential buyers in the dark. Noovy charges €5 per room per month, with no setup fee, making it highly affordable, especially for small to mid-sized hotels.
Given the lack of transparency around Chr365’s pricing, Noovy’s transparent, budget-friendly model makes it easier to evaluate value. If cost-efficiency and predictable expenses are priorities, Noovy wins here.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Chr365 appears as a highly untested option, with no reviews, features, or market presence to support its use. Its lack of recent customer feedback makes it a risky choice for hotels seeking reliability and proven functionality.
Noovy, by contrast, has a strong, recent review base, high customer satisfaction, and extensive features. Its €5/month pricing combined with proven integration, automation, and support makes it the clear option for most hotels today.
Choose Noovy if you want a platform with validated performance, extensive features, and ongoing support that adapts to your needs. Chr365 might be suitable only if you are prepared to explore a less proven, potentially customizable solution and invest in its development.
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
许多评论称赞该系统的易用性,指出其用户友好的设计和直观的界面可以快速培训新员工并减少操作错误。
优质的客户服务经常被提及,用户欣赏快速的响应和有效的解决方案,这有助于对产品的整体满意度。
该系统支持自动付款请求和处理,大大简化了计费流程并降低了错误率。此功能还因其在处理不可退款预订方面的效率而受到好评。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户很欣赏该软件的功能,但注意到其设计略显过时,但预计重新设计将解决这个问题。
该软件提供强大的报告工具,可以深入了解酒店运营的各个方面,帮助做出更好的管理决策。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Chr365 和 Noovy PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Chr365 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Noovy PMS 提供 40 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Noovy PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Chr365:否。Noovy PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Acantech 的 HT Score 为 0,Noovy 的为 71。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您的房产情况量身定制的推荐方案