The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 224 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Crqlar 表现出色 .
dailypoint™ 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Guest Feedback Module (comment cards/reviews).
基于 HTR 上 224 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $800/mo | From $600/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 0 | 224 |
在分析了 224 条经验证的评价后,Crqlar 用户最看重其 ,而 dailypoint™ 用户则强调 支持服务, 营销自动化, 配置文件引擎。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
支持服务
▾
|
|
|
+
营销自动化
▾
|
|
|
+
配置文件引擎
▾
|
|
|
+
电子邮件营销
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
定制复杂性
▾
|
|
|
−
系统性能
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店客户关系管理与电子邮件营销 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #5 25 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #2 149 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #3 34 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | — | #5 12 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #2 106 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #1 133 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #1 71 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #4 13 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | — | #20 1 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #3 195 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | — | #5 7 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | — | #2 15 条评价 |
Choosing between Crqlar CRM by Crqlar and dailypoint™ 360° – Central Data Management depends on your hotel’s priorities. Both aim to optimize guest data and marketing, but they approach these goals differently. Crqlar focuses on an all-in-one guest data management solution, while dailypoint™ emphasizes a robust, AI-powered platform that centralizes data from over 200 sources. Which aligns better with your hotel’s needs?
Crqlar’s small user base and limited recent reviews contrast sharply with dailypoint’s extensive global presence and active user feedback. The more recent reviews and higher ratings for dailypoint™ make it the clearer option today.
Both products address guest data management and marketing automation, but their scope and maturity differ. Crqlar offers an integrated CRM that consolidates guest profiles, driven by AI to enhance personalization efforts. However, it has no recent reviews or high ratings, which raises questions about its current performance and support.
Conversely, dailypoint™ boasts a 4.53/5 overall rating from 149 recent reviews, with a customer support rating of 4.51/5. Its active user base across multiple regions continually praises its data integration, automation, and comprehensive guest insights. Given the recent feedback and high scores, dailypoint™ seems more reliable for hotels seeking a proven, scalable solution.
Crqlar’s zero recent reviews mean less confidence in its current capabilities, while dailypoint’s active, recent reviews reinforce its standing as a trusted platform. Are you comfortable with a lesser-known, unreviewed product, or do you prefer a market-tested leader?
If your hotel needs a highly scalable, AI-driven guest data platform with extensive integrations, go with dailypoint™. Its 59 verified partners and 20+ years of experience mean you’re adopting a mature system trusted globally by major brands.
If, instead, your team prefers an all-in-one guest profile management tool with simple AI enhancements, Crqlar might seem appealing. But keep in mind, it has no recent reviews, no ratings, and no demonstrated recent support or updates.
For hotels aiming to drive revenue through deep data insights and automation, dailypoint™ is the clear choice. Crqlar’s limited data and lack of recent user feedback make it less suitable for a competitive, modern hotel environment.
dailypoint™ scores 4.15/5 for ease of use, supported by recent reviews highlighting its intuitive interface and accessible onboarding. Users praise the platform for managing complex data effortlessly and value the ongoing support team.
In contrast, Crqlar has no recent ratings or reviews, making it impossible to assess its current usability or onboarding experience. Past feedback suggests it was seen as overly technical and opaque for end-users, which could hinder staff adoption.
Edge: dailypoint™. Its demonstrated ease of use and strong support network make it the better choice for hotels needing quick, effective staff onboarding and daily operations.
dailypoint™ offers 28 verified features, including a centralized data warehouse, guest feedback tools, a flexible loyalty module, and CCPA compliance, among others. It also has five features unique to its platform, such as TripAdvisor connectivity and extensive automation options.
Crqlar, by comparison, provides an all-in-one guest management solution but offers no distinct features beyond its core set. It lacks the advanced modules or integrations that make dailypoint™ stand out.
Edge: dailypoint™. Its broader feature set and specialized modules support sophisticated marketing, loyalty, and automation strategies that Crqlar cannot match.
dailypoint™ reviews consistently praise its customer support, rating it 4.51/5. with comments like "quick, responsive, and effective." Its onboarding process and ongoing assistance are highly valued, even amid some high support costs.
Crqlar has no recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to gauge its support quality today. Historically, the lack of feedback suggests a less transparent or responsive support system.
Edge: dailypoint™. Its proven high support ratings and active user engagement make it the safer bet for hotels requiring reliable assistance.
dailypoint™ connects with 59 verified partners, including hotel automation systems, PMS, POS, and marketing platforms like hotelkit, apaleo, and Customer Alliance. Its open API enables seamless integration with many third-party systems.
Crqlar provides only 7 verified partners, with limited integration options. Its partnerships include some niche providers, but it lacks the extensive ecosystem dailypoint™ offers.
Edge: dailypoint™. Its broad integration network ensures your hotel can connect all essential systems for a streamlined data flow.
With 149 recent reviews and a 4.53/5 rating, dailypoint™ receives strong endorsements from hotels across segments, especially luxury and resort properties. Hoteliers highlight its powerful insights, automation, and support as key strengths.
Crqlar’s lack of recent reviews and ratings means there’s no current hotel feedback to compare. Its unknown standing makes dailypoint™ the more trusted choice among active users.
Edge: dailypoint™. Its high, recent ratings and positive reviews confirm its value to hotel teams today.
Crqlar charges a base price of $800 with no trial, freemium, or flexible monthly options. Details on ongoing costs or scaling are unavailable, which complicates budget planning.
dailypoint™ offers a lower base price of $600 per month, with no trial or freemium, but detailed pricing varies based on implementation and scale. Its transparent pricing model makes it easier to evaluate ROI.
In absence of comprehensive info for Crqlar, dailypoint™ provides clearer value expectations, especially given its proven performance.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
dailypoint™ is a mature, AI-enhanced platform that centralizes guest data from hundreds of sources, helping hotels personalize guest experiences and automate marketing efforts. Its extensive integrations and proven support make it suitable for hotels of all sizes aiming for growth.
Crqlar offers a simpler, all-in-one guest profile system but lacks recent reviews, advanced features, and broad integration. Its limited feedback and no recent updates suggest it may struggle to meet modern hotel needs.
If your hotel prioritizes reliability, proven performance, and expansive features, dailypoint™ is the clear choice. Crqlar might appeal to smaller properties with basic needs, but without recent evidence of support or innovation, it carries more risk.
In summary, dailypoint™’s active user base, high ratings, and extensive features position it as the better investment for your hotel’s data-driven marketing and guest experience goals today. Crqlar’s minimal recent feedback makes it a less attractive option unless your hotel has very specific, simple needs and limited growth ambitions.
酒店客户关系管理与电子邮件营销 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $800/mo | From $600/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Crqlar CRM 和 dailypoint™ 360° – Central Data Management 共享 23 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Trip Advisor 连接合作伙伴 | ||
| 个性化一对一沟通 | ||
| 客人反馈模块(评论卡/评论) | ||
| 符合CCPA | ||
| 集中式数据仓库 |
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"So, as you think about investing in Digital Hospitality, don‘t forget to think about what it might cost not to!"
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"We work with dailypoint because the integration between the Booking Manager module and our PMS works really well."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"The decisive factor for selecting dailypoint was their wide experience in customer loyalty programs, their high standards in GDPR as well as their ability to connect partner system..."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
虽然客户支持因其响应迅速和高效而普遍受到好评,但一些用户提到,与其他提供商相比,支持服务的成本较高,这是一个缺点。
Dailypoint 的自动化功能获得了积极的反馈,尤其是在设置有针对性的群组特定自动化活动、简化营销工作和提高工作流程效率方面。
用户重视用户画像引擎,因为它能够从多个来源挖掘相关的宾客兴趣,从而构建更丰富的宾客画像。这项功能有助于精准的宾客细分和互动,为个性化营销活动带来战略优... 用户重视用户画像引擎,因为它能够从多个来源挖掘相关的宾客兴趣,从而构建更丰富的宾客画像。这项功能有助于精准的宾客细分和互动,为个性化营销活动带来战略优势。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
虽然功能丰富,但自定义设置较为复杂,一些用户反映难以根据自身需求定制特定报告。这表明该领域仍有改进空间,可以提升用户体验。
有用户反映导航过程中系统运行缓慢,这表明提高速度可以提升用户的整体满意度和效率。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Crqlar CRM 和 dailypoint™ 360° – Central Data Management 共享许多核心 Hotel CRM & Email Marketing 功能,但各有独特的能力。Crqlar CRM 提供 7 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 dailypoint™ 360° – Central Data Management 提供 59 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。dailypoint™ 360° – Central Data Management 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.3/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Crqlar CRM:否。dailypoint™ 360° – Central Data Management:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel CRM & Email Marketing 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Crqlar 的 HT Score 为 0,dailypoint™ 的为 100。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问