The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 25 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
CustomerCount 表现出色 .
Loopon 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Flexible role based reporting and Mobile Access.
基于 HTR 上 25 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $100/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 0 | 25 |
在分析了 25 条经验证的评价后,CustomerCount 用户最看重其 ,而 Loopon 用户则强调 易于使用, 反馈收集与分析, 客户支持。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
易于使用
▾
|
|
|
+
反馈收集与分析
▾
|
|
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
|
|
+
通知和警报
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
报告定制
▾
|
|
|
−
用户管理
▾
|
|
|
−
比较指标
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 客户调查软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) | — | #4 3 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #4 10 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #3 7 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #4 3 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #4 10 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #4 6 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #4 7 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 | — | #6 0 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | — | #5 3 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #4 19 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #3 0 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #4 0 条评价 |
Choosing guest feedback software is critical to understanding your hotel's service quality and customer loyalty. CustomerCount Surveys aims to measure customer loyalty through Net Promoter Score (NPS), while Loopon Post Stay emphasizes rapid, actionable guest feedback with detailed department and property reports. Both platforms aim to improve guest experience, but they diverge significantly in features, user experience, and market presence.
Given the current data, which platform aligns better with your hotel’s needs for detailed insights and operational improvements?
CustomerCount Surveys has a very limited review footprint, with no reviews in the last six months and a zero overall rating, making its current market validation weak. In contrast, Loopon Post Stay boasts 25 recent reviews and an impressive 4.46/5 overall rating, indicating strong user satisfaction and ongoing support.
CustomerCount focuses primarily on measuring customer loyalty via NPS, offering customizable surveys but lacking recent reviews or active user feedback. Loopon, however, provides a broad suite of features, including in-app communication, social review tracking, and real-time alerts, making it a more versatile tool.
Are you looking for a proven, feature-rich platform with recent user validation? Or are you willing to consider a less-tried option that may need development?
If your hotel needs a comprehensive guest feedback system that improves operational efficiency and offers real-time insights, Loopon is the clear choice. Its extensive feature set (24 unique features) and high user ratings suggest it will support your team in making data-driven decisions.
If your primary focus is on measuring and improving customer loyalty through simple, standardized NPS surveys, CustomerCount might seem appealing. However, its lack of recent reviews and active user base makes it less reliable at this stage.
For most hotels, especially those that prioritize actionable guest insights, Loopon provides a more complete, well-supported solution.
Loopon scores highly with a 4.38/5 ease-of-use rating, with reviews praising its user-friendly, intuitive interface that simplifies survey deployment and analysis. Users highlight its straightforward setup process and clear reports, which facilitate staff adoption across departments.
CustomerCount, by contrast, scores a 0/5 in ease of use, with no recent feedback to suggest its interface is accessible or well-supported. Its lack of recent reviews also indicates limited active engagement or updates.
Edge: Loopon.
Loopon offers 24 unique features, including mobile access, in-app email response, social review tracking, customizable questions, segmented surveys, conditional logic, real-time alerts, and integration with multiple PMS providers. These tools enable detailed, flexible, and timely guest feedback management.
CustomerCount provides only basic NPS survey functionality, with no additional features documented. Its simplicity may be enough for basic loyalty measurement but lacks the depth needed for operational improvements.
Edge: Loopon.
Loopon’s support ratings (4.34/5) are consistently praised for speed and effectiveness, with reviews emphasizing quick responses and helpful guidance. Users appreciate the timely assistance that helps maximize the system’s value.
CustomerCount offers no recent reviews or support ratings, leaving its support quality unverified. The absence of active feedback suggests limited or no recent customer support engagement.
Edge: Loopon.
Loopon integrates with 11 verified PMS and hotel systems, including Mews, Oracle Hospitality, Sirvoy, and others, allowing for streamlined deployment across various properties. CustomerCount, however, has no verified integrations, limiting its adaptability.
For hotels with existing PMS or other operational systems, Loopon’s integrations facilitate smoother implementation and data synchronization. CustomerCount’s lack of integrations makes it less flexible.
Edge: Loopon.
Loopon’s recent reviews reflect an overall 4.46/5 rating, with particular praise from hotels across different segments, including independent and brand hotels. Its recent feedback highlights satisfaction with usability, features, and support.
CustomerCount’s review score is zero, with no recent feedback. Its lack of user validation makes it impossible to assess quality or satisfaction.
Edge: Loopon.
CustomerCount’s pricing is not publicly available or clearly stated, which complicates cost comparison. Loopon, on the other hand, charges a straightforward $100 per month, with no mention of additional fees or implementation costs.
This transparent pricing model makes Loopon easier to evaluate financially and plan for, particularly for hotels seeking predictable costs.
Not ideal if...
Not ideal if...
The core difference is that Loopon is a well-established, feature-rich platform with recent reviews and active user validation, whereas CustomerCount remains largely unreviewed and untested recently. Loopon’s extensive features, integrations, and high user ratings make it a more reliable choice for hotels seeking actionable insights and operational improvements.
If your hotel needs a comprehensive guest feedback system with flexible tools and proven performance, go with Loopon. Its ability to provide detailed reports, real-time alerts, and strong support justifies its higher value.
Choose CustomerCount only if your needs are very basic, centered on simple loyalty measurement, and you can accept the risk of limited recent validation. For most hotels, Loopon offers a safer, more complete solution that will grow with your needs.
This comprehensive comparison should help you make an informed decision aligned with your hotel’s strategic goals. The recent reviews, feature set, and support quality favor Loopon, making it the more reliable and versatile tool at this time.
客户调查软件 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $100/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,CustomerCount Surveys 和 Loopon Post Stay 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| TripAdvisor 评论收集认证合作伙伴 | ||
| 应用内回调 | ||
| 应用内电子邮件回复 | ||
| 灵活的基于角色的报告 | ||
| 社会评论跟踪 | ||
| 移动访问 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 12 项功能存在差异。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
用户一致称赞 Loopon 的直观设计和易用性,简化了用户管理,让新用户可以轻松上手。这种易用性既适用于台式机,也适用于移动设备,不过有些人希望进一步改进移动... 用户一致称赞 Loopon 的直观设计和易用性,简化了用户管理,让新用户可以轻松上手。这种易用性既适用于台式机,也适用于移动设备,不过有些人希望进一步改进移动可用性。
酒店发现该系统非常适合从多个渠道收集和分析客人反馈。Loopon 能够提供详细的报告和相关统计数据,有助于确定优势和劣势、提高服务质量并做出明智的决策。
Loopon 的客户支持因其速度和效率而备受赞誉。用户非常欣赏其快速而有用的响应,这使得解决问题和实施更改变得更加容易。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户注意到报告创建需要更多的灵活性。目前,他们严重依赖客户支持来生成自定义报告和统计数据,这可能会造成阻碍。
该系统的用户管理功能因其简单性而受到重视。然而,有人要求提供更好的自助服务功能,以便无需支持人员干预即可进行小的更改。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。CustomerCount Surveys 和 Loopon Post Stay 共享许多核心 Guest Survey Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。CustomerCount Surveys 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Loopon Post Stay 提供 11 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Loopon Post Stay 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.4/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
CustomerCount Surveys:否。Loopon Post Stay:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Guest Survey Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。CustomerCount 的 HT Score 为 0,Loopon 的为 23。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您的房产情况量身定制的推荐方案