The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 233 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Demand Calendar AB 表现出色 ,拥有独特功能如 Financial Forecast Builder and Scheduled Reports.
Smartness 表现出色 在 onboarding 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Fully automated revenue management and Controlled Automation/Algorithm Customization.
基于 HTR 上 233 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $600/mo | From $300/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 7 | 226 |
在分析了 233 条经验证的评价后,Demand Calendar AB 用户最看重其 ,而 Smartness 用户则强调 time efficiency, 易用性, 客户支持。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
Time Efficiency
▾
|
|
|
+
易用性
▾
|
|
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
|
|
+
Dynamic Pricing Automation
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
可定制报告
▾
|
|
|
−
洞察力透明度
▾
|
|
|
−
与 PMS 集成
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 收益管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #36 2 条评价 | #4 93 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #34 5 条评价 | #12 32 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #16 5 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #20 1 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #36 5 条评价 | #8 62 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #38 2 条评价 | #10 33 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #33 2 条评价 | #12 24 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #6 29 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #15 7 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #27 5 条评价 | #5 199 条评价 |
| 亚太 | #13 2 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | — | #11 3 条评价 |
Choosing between Demand Calendar by Demand Calendar AB and Smartpricing by Smartness hinges on your hotel’s specific revenue management needs. Both aim to improve your profitability through data and automation, but they diverge significantly in scope, features, and user experience. Demand Calendar’s niche focus on business intelligence makes it suitable for hotels prioritizing detailed analytics, while Smartpricing’s broader automation appeals to those seeking simple, real-time rate adjustments. Which aligns better with your hotel’s operational style?
Demand Calendar offers extensive revenue analytics and forecasting tools, whereas Smartpricing emphasizes dynamic, AI-driven rate adjustments. Your decision depends on whether you want a deep business intelligence platform or an automated pricing engine. Are you ready to weigh their strengths against your hotel’s unique priorities?
Demand Calendar focuses on providing a comprehensive suite of analytics, forecasting, and profit management tools designed to give your team detailed insights and control over total revenue streams. Its three-tiered approach—room revenue, total revenue, and profit-focused management—is tailored for hotels that need granular data to inform strategic decisions.
In contrast, Smartpricing simplifies revenue management by automating daily price adjustments based on market demand, competitor pricing, and booking trends. It’s ideal for hotels that prefer a hands-off, automated approach to rate optimization, especially if you operate multiple properties or manage vacation rentals.
Demand Calendar’s strengths lie in its in-depth business intelligence, multi-source data integration, and profit-centric analytics, making it suited for hotels with dedicated revenue teams. Smartpricing excels in ease of use, automation, and real-time adjustments, appealing to hoteliers seeking a straightforward, effective revenue solution.
Would your hotel benefit more from detailed analytics or from automated, AI-driven pricing?
If your hotel needs to understand total revenue sources, forecast profitability, and analyze customer acquisition costs, Demand Calendar is the better choice. Its advanced forecasting tools and business intelligence features—like scheduled reports and loss business data—help you make data-driven decisions that maximize profitability.
On the other hand, if your team prioritizes quick, automated rate adjustments with minimal manual input, Smartpricing is the right fit. Its dynamic pricing engine, real-time price updates, and user-friendly interface help you boost occupancy and revenue without complex analysis.
For hotels with a dedicated revenue management team that requires strategic insights, Demand Calendar offers more comprehensive tools. Conversely, if your hotel prefers automation and ease, Smartpricing delivers effective rate management with less effort.
Demand Calendar boasts a high ease-of-use rating of 4.71/5, with an onboarding experience rated at 4.33/5. Its interface is designed for multi-property management, and reviews highlight how intuitive and interactive the platform is for revenue teams. However, some users mention connectivity issues with certain PMS integrations, which slightly impacts overall ease.
Smartpricing scores marginally higher at 4.77/5 and enjoys a stronger onboarding rating of 4.69/5. Its clean, simple interface makes setup and daily use straightforward, even for non-technical staff. Users appreciate how quickly they can implement strategies and see results.
Edge: Smartness.
Demand Calendar offers four exclusive features: Financial Forecast Builder, Scheduled Reports, Lost Business Data, and Business Intelligence, adding depth to its analytics suite. These tools enable detailed profit analysis, strategic planning, and multi-source revenue insights.
Smartness, however, provides a broader array of features—28 in total—including dynamic pricing, fully automated revenue management, real-time price optimization, price sensitivity modeling, and advanced automation controls. It also includes features like AI Optimization, "What-if" scenario analysis, and a channel manager for integrated distribution.
Given the sheer number of features, Smartness offers a more versatile toolset. But if your focus is on advanced financial forecasting and business intelligence, Demand Calendar’s niche features could be more beneficial.
Edge: Smartness.
Demand Calendar’s customer support is rated a perfect 5/5, with reviews emphasizing responsiveness and proactive assistance. One user notes, “Whenever I have a question, the support team is quick to respond and helpful,” reinforcing their reputation for excellent service.
Smartness also ranks highly at 4.83/5, with users praising their efficient communication and ongoing support during onboarding and beyond. A typical review states, “Their team is very attentive and always ready to assist with any issues,” which reflects their commitment to customer satisfaction.
While both excel, Demand Calendar’s slightly higher rating underscores its strong customer support reputation.
Edge: Demand Calendar.
Demand Calendar integrates with five verified partners, including Mews, Clock, and Oracle Hospitality. Its integrations are focused but limited, with some notable gaps such as IDeaS and HQ Revenue, which are only supported in Demand Calendar.
Smartness, by comparison, offers 30 verified integrations across a wide range of PMS, booking engines, and channel managers—including HotelRunner, WuBook, Beds24, and Casablanca. It shares partners like Mews and Oracle but covers a broader ecosystem, facilitating easier connectivity for diverse hotel setups.
Edge: Smartness.
Demand Calendar’s user base, although smaller with only 7 reviews, has not provided recent feedback, making it harder to gauge current satisfaction. Its ratings are generally positive but lack data to confirm recent hotel experiences.
Smartness, with 198 reviews and recent ratings, boasts a very high likelihood to recommend at 97%. Hotels across Europe, North America, and beyond praise its ease of use, automation, and ROI-focused features. Given the volume and recency of reviews, Smartness’s reputation appears stronger and more current.
Edge: Smartness.
Demand Calendar is priced at $600 per month, with no free trial or freemium options. Its pricing reflects its focus on detailed analytics and multi-property management, suitable for hotels with dedicated revenue teams.
Smartness, at $300 per month, offers a more affordable entry point with no trial or implementation fees. Its lower price, combined with automation features, makes it attractive for smaller hotels or those new to revenue management systems.
Both platforms lack free trials, so your decision should consider value relative to your hotel’s budget and needs.
Not ideal if your hotel:
Demand Calendar suits hotels that prioritize strategic revenue insights and profit maximization over day-to-day rate automation.
Not ideal if your hotel needs detailed forecasting, in-depth analytics, or profit-oriented management.
Smartpricing is perfect for hotels that want to boost bookings with less effort and a straightforward setup.
Demand Calendar excels when your hotel demands detailed, multi-stream revenue analytics, strategic forecasting, and profit management tools. Its focus on business intelligence makes it suitable for hotels with dedicated revenue teams or complex operations.
Smartpricing is the go-to if you need an easy-to-use, automated pricing engine that updates rates in real-time, maximizing occupancy and revenue without requiring intensive analysis. Its AI-driven approach suits hotels that want to reduce manual work and rely on smart automation.
If your hotel has a sizable revenue team, values detailed insights, and can invest in higher-priced software, Demand Calendar is the clear choice. Conversely, for hotels seeking quick wins, automation, and affordability, Smartpricing delivers the most value.
In summary, Demand Calendar is for strategic, analytics-driven hotels; Smartpricing is better for automated, operational rate management. Your hotel’s size, team structure, and revenue priorities should guide your decision.
收益管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $600/mo | From $300/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Demand Calendar 和 Smartpricing 共享 14 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 丢失的业务数据 | ||
| 价格敏感度建模 | ||
| 全自动收益管理 | ||
| 动态定价 | ||
| 商业智能 | ||
| 实时价格优化 | ||
| 自动房间类型定价 | ||
| 自定义报告 | ||
| 财务预测生成器 | ||
| 预定报告 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 20 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 1 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"In the past, I used to sit down every day and rack my brains over the prices. It was a burden. Because I knew if I made a mistake, I could lose €50,000. With Smartpricing, I have t..."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Many reviews highlight the platform's ability to save time by automating repetitive tasks such as pricing updates and inventory management. Users appr... Many reviews highlight the platform's ability to save time by automating repetitive tasks such as pricing updates and inventory management. Users appreciate the substantial time savings allowing focus on strategic tasks. However, some reviews suggest that real-time support could further enhance efficiency in handling quick queries.
该软件以其直观的设计而备受赞誉,即使对于非专业人士而言,也能轻松管理动态定价和数据分析等复杂流程,从而显著降低学习难度。部分用户建议改进新手引导流程,... 该软件以其直观的设计而备受赞誉,即使对于非专业人士而言,也能轻松管理动态定价和数据分析等复杂流程,从而显著降低学习难度。部分用户建议改进新手引导流程,以进一步提升初始用户体验。
虽然客服总体上被认为非常出色且响应迅速,但一些用户建议,实时聊天支持可以通过快速解决问题来提高客户满意度,特别是对于需要立即处理的小问题。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户呼吁增加更多可定制的报告功能,以便酒店管理层能够进行更深入的分析并获得更具针对性的见解。他们认为,这将有助于根据详细的报告加强战略规划和运营调整。
部分用户反映,软件提供的建议需要更透明的解释。更清晰的解释能够增强用户对系统建议的信任度,并有助于不熟悉复杂定价算法的用户学习。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Demand Calendar 和 Smartpricing 共享许多核心 Revenue Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Demand Calendar 提供 5 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Smartpricing 提供 35 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Smartpricing 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 4.7/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Demand Calendar:否。Smartpricing:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Revenue Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Demand Calendar AB 的 HT Score 为 0,Smartness 的为 89。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问