The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 手机点餐和客房送餐服务 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) | #10 1 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #5 16 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #6 8 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #6 3 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #8 7 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 | #10 3 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #5 19 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | #8 2 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #2 23 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #7 1 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #5 2 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Dgstay by Dgstay and Olo Digital Ordering can significantly influence your hotel’s guest experience and operational efficiency. Both solutions aim to modernize ordering processes, but Dgstay focuses on guest communication and service management, while Olo emphasizes digitalizing phone orders for catering and takeout. Your decision depends on whether your priority is in-room services and guest engagement or streamlining food and beverage orders via digital channels.
Dgstay boasts a strong reputation backed by recent reviews and a higher volume of feedback, making it a more reliable choice based on current user satisfaction. Conversely, Olo’s niche focus on restaurant orders without recent reviews makes it less relevant for immediate hotel use. Should you prioritize a proven, highly-rated platform?
Dgstay and Olo serve different core needs—Dgstay enhances guest communication and service requests, while Olo modernizes phone-based food orders. Dgstay can handle multiple hotel services, including upselling, in-venue ordering, QR codes, and delivery logistics, which are designed to improve guest engagement and operational flow. Olo, on the other hand, concentrates on streamlining catering and takeout calls, with features like POS integration and credit card payments.
Dgstay’s reviews emphasize ease of use, rapid onboarding, and high support quality, with a 4.93/5 ease rating and a 4.96/5 support score. Olo lacks recent reviews, so its usability and support quality remain uncertain. Is your hotel looking to upgrade guest communication and in-house services? Or is your focus solely on improving food and beverage order accuracy and speed?
If your hotel needs a comprehensive guest communication platform that simplifies service requests, increases upselling opportunities, and supports green initiatives, Dgstay is the clear choice. It’s trusted by major hotel brands like Hilton, Marriott, and Radisson, with over 27 reviews in the past six months reflecting high satisfaction. Dgstay’s features like QR codes, multi-menu ordering, and delivery logistics are tailored for hotels aiming to elevate guest experiences and operational efficiency.
If, however, your hotel primarily seeks to digitize phone orders for catering and takeout without a need for broader guest engagement, Olo might be suitable. But given its zero recent reviews and limited feature exposure for hotel-specific applications, Dgstay’s proven track record makes it the more reliable option for hospitality professionals.
Dgstay scores a remarkable 4.93/5 for ease of use, backed by a high onboarding rating of 4.96/5 and numerous positive review comments praising its intuitive design. Users mention quick setup, straightforward updates, and minimal training requirements. The platform’s user-friendly interface supports hotel staff and guests alike, promoting swift adoption across departments.
Olo’s usability is unverified due to a lack of recent reviews, making it difficult to assess how easily your team or guests could adopt its digital ordering platform. Without current feedback, confidence in Olo’s user-friendliness is limited.
Edge: Dgstay.
Dgstay offers eight features exclusive to its platform, including upselling, in-venue ordering, QR codes, guest re-ordering, ordering scheduling, delivery logistics, curbside pickup, and multi-menu options. These features collectively empower hotels to provide a richer guest experience and improve operational control.
Olo provides four features unique to its platform, such as POS integration, credit card payments, loyalty program integrations, and a white-label app, primarily aimed at streamlining restaurant and catering orders. However, with only four exclusive features, it covers a narrower scope.
Given the hotel-focused features and broader suite, Dgstay has more comprehensive capabilities tailored for hospitality.
Edge: Dgstay.
Dgstay’s support scores are nearly perfect, with a 4.96/5 onboarding rating and a 4.96/5 customer support rating, accompanied by reviews praising quick responses and effective assistance. Hoteliers highlight the support team’s responsiveness, especially during updates and troubleshooting, which ensures smooth implementation.
Olo’s support and support ratings are unavailable due to the absence of recent reviews, leaving its support quality uncertain. Without recent feedback, it’s difficult to gauge their responsiveness or effectiveness in a hotel environment.
Edge: Dgstay.
Both platforms currently integrate with three verified partners. Dgstay’s integrations include Oracle Hospitality, hotelkit, and Mews, covering property management and operational tools relevant to hotels. Olo connects with Oracle Hospitality, Toast, and other hospitality solutions, mainly catering to restaurant operations.
Shared integrations include Oracle Hospitality, but Dgstay’s partnerships with hotel-specific platforms like hotelkit and Mews make it more aligned with hotel needs.
Edge: Dgstay.
Dgstay has accumulated 27 reviews in the last six months, with a perfect likelihood to recommend score of 100%. Hotels across segments like branded properties, city center hotels, and hostels rate it highly, praising its usability, support, and operational impact.
Olo’s review count is zero, and no recent ratings or user feedback are available. Without current hotel ratings, Dgstay’s high ratings and recent positive feedback make it the obvious choice.
Edge: Dgstay.
There are no publicly available prices for either platform, and both claim no implementation fees or monthly charges. Their pricing models are likely customized based on hotel size and needs, making direct comparisons difficult.
Since Olo’s pricing details are unavailable and Dgstay does not offer a freemium or trial, your hotel may need direct consultation to estimate costs.
Not ideal if your hotel primarily requires a simple, standalone ordering system for catering without guest communication features or a specific regional focus.
Not ideal if your hotel’s main goal is to enhance guest communication or manage multiple hotel services beyond catering and takeout.
Dgstay and Olo serve different needs within the hospitality industry. Dgstay centers on streamlining guest communication, enhancing service delivery, and supporting eco-friendly initiatives, with a proven track record backed by recent reviews. Olo specializes in digitizing phone orders for catering and takeout, mainly suited for restaurant-focused operations.
Choose Dgstay if your hotel seeks a comprehensive, hotel-centric platform with high user satisfaction, extensive features, and regional presence. Opt for Olo only if your hotel’s primary concern is restaurant order management without the need for broader guest engagement tools.
For hotels wanting a platform that has demonstrated success in improving guest services and operational workflows, Dgstay remains the clear leader. If your focus is exclusively on restaurant order digitization and your existing systems are compatible, Olo might be considered—but with limited recent hotel-specific feedback, caution is advised.
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
2ROOMZ 因其直观、用户友好的设计而受到赞誉,简化了酒店员工和客人的操作。它易于设置、培训流畅、即时更新,使其成为前台、客房部和餐厅等各个酒店部门的高效... 2ROOMZ 因其直观、用户友好的设计而受到赞誉,简化了酒店员工和客人的操作。它易于设置、培训流畅、即时更新,使其成为前台、客房部和餐厅等各个酒店部门的高效工具。
该工具因其在提高运营效率和促进品牌标准合规方面的作用而受到赞赏。通过减少对物理文档的需求并集中信息,它使员工能够专注于提供更好的客户体验。
用户对 2ROOMZ 团队的响应能力和快速实施更新和支持表示赞赏。此功能可确保立即解决酒店员工提出的任何问题或要求的变更,从而保持平稳运营和高服务标准。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Dgstay 和 Olo Digital Ordering 共享许多核心 Mobile Ordering & Room Service 功能,但各有独特的能力。Dgstay 提供 3 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Olo Digital Ordering 提供 3 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Dgstay 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Dgstay:否。Olo Digital Ordering:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Mobile Ordering & Room Service 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Dgstay 的 HT Score 为 24,Olo 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您的房产情况量身定制的推荐方案