The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 | dihotel |
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #15 54 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #23 23 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #20 8 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #18 2 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 | dihotel |
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #19 41 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #16 38 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #19 21 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #10 18 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 | dihotel |
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #15 39 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #6 142 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #33 2 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #29 1 条评价 |
Choosing between dihotel by dihotel and eviivo Suite™ PMS hinges on your hotel’s size, operational complexity, and growth ambitions. Both aim to streamline property management but diverge significantly in features, user experience, and market presence. With dihotel’s lack of recent reviews and zero verified ratings, its viability as a solution is questionable. Conversely, eviivo’s vibrant, recent review activity and high user ratings position it as a more trustworthy choice. So, which platform better meets your hotel’s needs?
Dihotel claims to be a comprehensive PMS, but it has no recent reviews or ratings, raising doubts about ongoing support and development. eviivo, with over 191 reviews and a 4.43/5 ease-of-use score from recent feedback, offers a tested and reliable platform. The absence of recent data for dihotel suggests your team might face uncertainty in implementation and future updates. Do you want a solution with active reviews and ongoing support?
If your hotel needs a scalable, feature-rich platform with strong online booking integration, go with eviivo. It’s ideal for properties seeking to expand, manage multiple channels, and automate guest communication, especially given its 95% recommendation rate from recent users. If your hotel operates a single property with minimal tech needs and prefers simplicity, dihotel’s limited features might suffice, but beware of its lack of recent activity and support transparency.
eviivo scores 4.43/5 in ease of use, with recent reviews praising its intuitive interface and helpful onboarding, rated at 4.38/5. Users frequently mention how easy it is to manage bookings, communicate with guests, and handle operations from anywhere via the mobile app. dihotel, with a score of 0/5 across all categories and no recent reviews, offers no concrete evidence of usability or support. Edge: eviivo.
eviivo offers 51 features, including channel management, revenue tools, online booking engine, guest CRM, automated messaging, mobile app, and more—many of which dihotel simply does not provide. dihotel has no unique features listed, making it unsuitable for hotels that need a comprehensive management system. For feature depth and variety, eviivo’s platform is clearly superior. Edge: eviivo.
eviivo’s recent reviews consistently highlight its responsive, helpful customer support, with a 4.42/5 rating and recent feedback praising onboarding assistance. dihotel, with no recent reviews and a 0/5 score, provides no verifiable support experience. Given the importance of support in operational success, eviivo’s active reputation in this area is a decisive advantage. Edge: eviivo.
eviivo integrates with 32 verified partners, including major OTAs like Expedia, Booking.com, TripAdvisor, and channel managers like Experience Hotel. dihotel, with no verified integrations, limits your hotel’s connectivity options. If your goal is broad distribution and automation, eviivo’s integrations are essential. Edge: eviivo.
eviivo’s recent reviews and a high 8.87/5 NPS score indicate strong satisfaction among users, especially in the vacation rentals, B&Bs, and small hotels segments. There are no recent reviews or ratings for dihotel, making it impossible to gauge hoteliers’ current sentiment. Given the active user base and positive feedback, eviivo’s reputation is clearly superior. Edge: eviivo.
dihotel does not publish pricing, likely indicating a bespoke or unsupported business model. eviivo charges $700 monthly, providing an all-in-one solution with extensive features. While the price is significant, the value derived from eviivo’s comprehensive functionality and support justifies the cost. No pricing info for dihotel makes comparison impossible, but its lack of reviews suggests it may not be a cost-effective choice.
Dihotel presents as a basic PMS but offers no recent data or verified reviews, making it an unreliable choice for most hoteliers. eviivo’s extensive recent reviews, high satisfaction scores, and feature set make it the clear leader for scalable, multi-property management.
If your hotel needs a full-featured, well-supported system with proven online booking and guest communication tools, eviivo is the obvious choice. Its active community and ongoing development provide confidence that your investment will pay off over time.
Choose dihotel only if your hotel is very small, has minimal management needs, and you prefer a simple, low-cost solution without the expectation of growth or integration. For hotels of any size seeking to grow or improve operational efficiency, eviivo’s platform will serve your team best.
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Because of the automation from the eviivo Suite, it saves me a huge amount of time. This time I can use on growing the business; working on the business instead of in the business...."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Auf eviivo könnte ich heut gar nicht mehr drauf verzichten. Das Hotel ohne dieses Programm zu führen, scheint mir fast unmöglich, weil die Zeit, die ich jetzt erspart habe, die ich..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Aujourd’hui on a la possibilité de gérer l’ensemble de notre parc, que ce soit la tarification, le calendrier, la communication en un seul clic pour gérer plus de 50 appartements,..."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Eviivo 的客户支持因其响应速度和效率而备受赞誉。Guetif 先生、Joseph 和 Xavier 等支持人员提供了卓越的帮助,这在用户入职阶段以及出现问题时至关重要,从而... Eviivo 的客户支持因其响应速度和效率而备受赞誉。Guetif 先生、Joseph 和 Xavier 等支持人员提供了卓越的帮助,这在用户入职阶段以及出现问题时至关重要,从而提升了整体用户体验。
该平台在入职流程中提供专业知识,帮助酒店无缝集成系统。该指导确保信息集成的一致性和PMS功能的最佳利用,从而提高物业管理效率。
Eviivo 因其高效的技术而备受认可,它使用户能够更快、更少地完成任务。这减少了停机时间并改善了运营工作流程,确保了酒店管理的流畅体验。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
一些用户建议进行改进,特别是扩展移动应用程序开发等功能以及更具体的日常使用技巧,以进一步优化业务运营并利用平台的功能。
虽然用户总体上感到满意,但仍要求提供更多定制选项,包括网络和移动应用程序增强功能,以进一步满足特定的运营需求并提供额外的价值。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。dihotel 和 eviivo Suite™ PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。dihotel 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 eviivo Suite™ PMS 提供 32 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。eviivo Suite™ PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.5/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
dihotel:否。eviivo Suite™ PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。dihotel 的 HT Score 为 0,eviivo 的为 87。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问