The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
在分析了 216 条经验证的评价后,Direct™ 用户最看重其 ,而 eviivo 用户则强调 customer service, user friendly interface and ease of use, 沟通与融合。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
Customer Service
▾
|
|
|
+
User Friendly Interface and Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
沟通与融合
▾
|
|
|
+
培训和文档
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
聊天支持限制
▾
|
|
|
−
预订管理
▾
|
|
|
−
群组管理和自动化
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店管理软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #11 54 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #18 14 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #10 6 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #21 0 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #10 44 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #7 35 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #10 19 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #10 12 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #10 30 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #3 152 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #25 2 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #21 0 条评价 |
Choosing the right hotel management software can dramatically impact your operational efficiency, guest experience, and revenue. Both Direct™ by Direct™ and eviivo Suite™ HMS aim to streamline your hotel’s operations but differ significantly in their approach, features, and market presence. Your decision hinges on your hotel’s size, segment, and specific operational needs.
Direct™ is designed as a next-gen property management system for vacation rentals, B&Bs, and upcoming independent hotels. Conversely, eviivo Suite™ is a well-established platform favored by independent and small hotel operators for its extensive features and ease of use. Which one better aligns with your hotel’s goals?
eviivo Suite™ boasts 191 reviews, with 22 in the past six months, and an impressive 95% likelihood to recommend. Its high user ratings—4.48/5 for ease of use and 4.57/5 for support—highlight its reliability and user-friendliness. Direct™, on the other hand, has no reviews or ratings, providing no recent data to assess its performance. Given the quantity and recency of feedback, eviivo Suite™ is the stronger, more proven option.
Both products aim to simplify hotel operations, but their target markets and feature sets are distinct. Direct™ consolidates core functionalities into a single platform, promising automation and scalability for vacation rentals, B&Bs, and soon, independent hotels. It claims to reduce costs by replacing multiple systems with one integrated solution.
eviivo Suite™, by contrast, offers a comprehensive suite of features—54 in total—including channel management, booking engine, guest CRM, revenue management, and more. Its user reviews emphasize ease of use and excellent customer support. The key divergence lies in product maturity and market focus: eviivo has a proven track record with diverse independent properties, while Direct™ is newer and lacks recent user feedback.
Are you seeking a mature solution with extensive support and proven results, or a newer platform promising automation in the vacation rental niche? The lack of recent reviews for Direct™ makes eviivo Suite™ the more reliable choice.
If your hotel is an independent property, small inn, or B&B looking for an easy-to-navigate system that enhances booking, guest management, and channel distribution, eviivo Suite™ is the better pick. Its features are tailored for these segments, and its recent high ratings reflect strong user satisfaction.
If your team manages vacation rentals or mixed-use properties and requires a flexible, scalable platform that consolidates multiple functions for cost efficiency, Direct™ could be attractive. However, the absence of recent reviews and proven user success in the last six months makes its suitability uncertain.
For most hotels, especially those prioritizing robust support and proven performance, eviivo Suite™ is the safer, more dependable choice.
eviivo Suite™ enjoys an average ease of use rating of 4.48/5 based on 191 reviews, with many users praising its intuitive interface and straightforward onboarding process. Clients describe it as "well-designed" and "easy to navigate" for staff, saving time and reducing errors.
In contrast, Direct™ provides no recent user reviews or ratings, leaving its usability unverified. Its website and platform design are not publicly rated or discussed, which raises questions about how user-friendly it truly is.
Edge: eviivo Suite™.
eviivo Suite™ offers 54 features, including multi-currency support, native email marketing, channel management, guest feedback, revenue management, online check-in/out, and integrated payment processing. Many features are tailored for small and independent operations, providing a broad toolkit for revenue growth and operational control.
Direct™ only claims to have its core property management functionalities, with no specific features detailed or verified. Its platform simplifies certain tasks but lacks the extensive feature set that eviivo offers.
Edge: eviivo Suite™.
eviivo Suite™ has a high customer support rating of 4.57/5, with recent reviews highlighting its professionalism and responsiveness. Clients like "Mr. Guetif" are praised for quick resolution and helpful guidance, contributing to overall satisfaction.
Direct™ offers no recent reviews or support ratings, making it impossible to evaluate the quality or responsiveness of its customer service.
Edge: eviivo Suite™.
eviivo Suite™ integrates with 32 verified partners, including major OTAs like Booking.com and Tripadvisor, as well as experience platforms and channel managers. Its broad integration ecosystem simplifies distribution and revenue management for your hotel.
Direct™ reportedly has no verified integrations, limiting its connectivity and operational flexibility compared to eviivo.
Edge: eviivo Suite™.
eviivo Suite™ has a 95% likelihood to recommend among 191 recent reviews, with high ratings from small, independent, and boutique hotels. Its user base includes properties with up to 200+ rooms, and review comments emphasize ease of use, support, and automation.
Direct™’s lack of reviews prevents any meaningful comparison, but the absence of recent feedback indicates it’s not yet proven in the field.
Edge: eviivo Suite™.
eviivo Suite™ is priced at a flat monthly fee of $700, with no free tier or trial offered. Its cost includes access to a comprehensive suite of features and integrations, making it suitable for small to medium-sized properties seeking full functionality.
Direct™ does not list pricing publicly or specify any costs, which complicates budget planning and raises questions about its affordability or licensing model.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
eviivo Suite™ is a well-established platform with a proven track record, extensive features, and high user satisfaction. Its recent reviews confirm its reliability, ease of use, and support, making it suitable for most independent and small properties.
Direct™ offers a modern, consolidated approach but suffers from a lack of recent user feedback, making its effectiveness and user-friendliness uncertain. Its appeal might lie in its promise of automation and scalability, but without proven results, it’s a riskier choice.
For most hotels, especially those seeking certainty and support, eviivo Suite™ is the recommended solution. If your hotel is a vacation rental or a rapidly growing chain with specific automation needs, and you’re willing to take a chance on an untested platform, Direct™ might be worth exploring further.
Note: This analysis is based solely on publicly available data and recent reviews. Hotel owners should conduct personalized demos and assess their specific needs before making a final decision.
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Because of the automation from the eviivo Suite, it saves me a huge amount of time. This time I can use on growing the business; working on the business instead of in the business...."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Auf eviivo könnte ich heut gar nicht mehr drauf verzichten. Das Hotel ohne dieses Programm zu führen, scheint mir fast unmöglich, weil die Zeit, die ich jetzt erspart habe, die ich..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Managing The Historic Berkeley Place is a unique challenge given its historic significance and diverse suite offerings. With eviivo, every aspect, from booking to guest communicati..."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Users frequently commend Eviivo for its exceptional customer service, with advisors like Jilani, Gu7etif, and Sam noted for their professionalism and... Users frequently commend Eviivo for its exceptional customer service, with advisors like Jilani, Gu7etif, and Sam noted for their professionalism and responsiveness during support interactions. The support team's availability significantly aids users in troubleshooting and optimizing system use.
Eviivo's interface is consistently hailed as simple and intuitive, making it easy for newcomers to manage bookings, calendars, and hotel operations ef... Eviivo's interface is consistently hailed as simple and intuitive, making it easy for newcomers to manage bookings, calendars, and hotel operations effortlessly. This contributes to enhanced productivity by reducing the learning curve for users.
与短信和WhatsApp等通讯工具的集成是一项显著功能,许多用户都赞赏其简化客户互动的方式。这有助于提升客户体验的定制化和个性化程度。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
尽管Eviivo的在线聊天支持服务总体上广受好评,但一些用户反映其存在一些不足,例如客服人员在线时间有限、服务质量参差不齐等。改进这些方面有助于提升整体客户... 尽管Eviivo的在线聊天支持服务总体上广受好评,但一些用户反映其存在一些不足,例如客服人员在线时间有限、服务质量参差不齐等。改进这些方面有助于提升整体客户服务体验。
Eviivo高效的预订管理功能备受赞誉,可帮助酒店跨渠道无缝管理客房供应和预订情况。这通过确保有效的入住率管理,提升了收益优化。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Direct™ 和 eviivo Suite™ HMS 共享许多核心 Hotel Management Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。Direct™ 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 eviivo Suite™ HMS 提供 32 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。eviivo Suite™ HMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.5/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Direct™:否。eviivo Suite™ HMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Management Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Direct™ 的 HT Score 为 0,eviivo 的为 88。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问