The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 38 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
DIRS21 by TourOnline AG 表现出色 ,拥有独特功能如 Urgency messaging.
Neobookings 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Post-stay emails and Pre-stay emails.
基于 HTR 上 38 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $500/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 0 | 38 |
在分析了 38 条经验证的评价后,DIRS21 by TourOnline AG 用户最看重其 ,而 Neobookings 用户则强调 支持和专业精神, 持续改进, 预订引擎。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
支持和专业精神
▾
|
|
|
+
持续改进
▾
|
|
|
+
预订引擎
▾
|
|
|
+
定制和灵活性
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
可用性问题
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 预订引擎 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #24 9 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #24 17 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #16 6 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #24 1 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #26 14 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #30 10 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | — | #32 4 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #18 7 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #16 14 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #35 0 条评价 |
When evaluating booking engines for your hotel, your primary goal is to find a platform that boosts direct bookings, integrates smoothly with your existing operations, and provides reliable support. Both DIRS21 One and Neobookings aim to address these needs, but they diverge significantly in their market presence, user feedback, and feature sets. While DIRS21 has limited recent reviews and a smaller user base, Neobookings offers a wealth of recent feedback and a broader geographic reach. Which platform aligns better with your hotel's specific needs?
DIRS21 One by TourOnline AG is an older platform with no recent reviews and a rating of zero, indicating a lack of current user feedback or active support. Conversely, Neobookings boasts 37 reviews in the past six months, with a high overall rating of approximately 75 on the HTR Score and 98% likelihood to recommend, showing active use and strong satisfaction. The stark difference in recent review activity suggests Neobookings is more aligned with modern hotel needs and user expectations.
While DIRS21 emphasizes modularity and extensive feature options, its lack of recent user insights makes assessing its current performance difficult. Neobookings, however, is frequently praised for its ease of use, support, and continuous product updates, confirming its relevance in today’s market. Are you willing to choose a product with an unverified recent user base, or do you prefer a platform with proven, recent performance?
If your hotel prioritizes ease of use, support, and ongoing innovation, Neobookings is the clear choice. It caters well to mid-sized hotels, boutique properties, and those seeking a flexible, all-in-one platform with strong digital marketing capabilities. On the other hand, DIRS21 might be more suitable if your hotel requires niche features like ADA compliance, wedding modules, or urgency messaging—though verification of its current support and performance remains uncertain due to the lack of recent feedback.
For hotels that value customer-centric service, rapid support response, and a platform that evolves with your needs, Neobookings offers proven benefits. If your hotel’s operations demand specific, complex functionalities that only DIRS21’s modules provide, then DIRS21 could be considered—yet the absence of recent reviews makes this a riskier choice.
Neobookings earns a top-rated 4.85 out of 5 for ease of use, and users consistently praise its intuitive interface, straightforward setup, and clear digital campaigns. Reviewers describe the platform as "very professional," with "support always available" and "tools that simplify daily management," making onboarding smooth even for less tech-savvy teams.
DIRS21, with a zero rating, offers no recent usability feedback, raising concerns about its current user experience and onboarding process. Without recent reviews, it’s difficult to gauge whether DIRS21 has improved or simplified its interface. Based on available data, edge: Neobookings.
DIRS21 offers six unique features, including urgency messaging, room substitutions, and wedding modules, which can support specialized hotel operations. Neobookings, however, provides nine exclusive features like A/B testing, pre- and post-stay emails, and multiple payment integrations such as Apple Pay, Google Pay, and Stripe—adding significant marketing and operational flexibility.
Both platforms share 27 features, but Neobookings’ additional functionalities and recent updates make it more adaptable to modern digital strategies. When considering innovation and comprehensive feature sets, edge: Neobookings.
Neobookings scores a perfect 5/5 in customer support, with numerous reviews highlighting its "super effective technical support" and "dedicated, professional team." Clients mention fast responses and proactive communication, which translates into smoother implementation and ongoing operation.
DIRS21, with no recent reviews or support ratings available, leaves uncertainty around its current support quality. Without recent feedback, it’s challenging to trust that DIRS21 offers the same level of customer care. Based on recent reviews, edge: Neobookings.
DIRS21 integrates with 31 verified partners, including notable names like Profitroom, Hotelchamp, and SiteMinder. Neobookings has 20 verified partners, sharing some with DIRS21, such as Hotelchamp and SiteMinder, but also including integrations like Stripe, YieldPlanet, and Dingus—many of which enhance payment options and digital marketing.
While DIRS21’s extensive list suggests broad connectivity, Neobookings’ active partnership network and recent feature updates indicate a focus on relevant, modern integrations. When it comes to active, current integrations, edge: DIRS21.
Neobookings is highly rated by hoteliers, especially in Europe and Latin America, with recent reviews emphasizing its ease of use, support, and ability to increase direct bookings. Its recent review count and high NPS score of 9.84 further reinforce its strong hotel user satisfaction.
DIRS21’s lack of recent reviews means its current satisfaction levels are unknown. The absence of recent feedback suggests that Neobookings’ user ratings are more reliable and indicative of present-day performance. Therefore, edge: Neobookings.
DIRS21 does not publish a clear pricing model, and it appears there is no freemium or trial available, making it difficult to evaluate total costs upfront. Neobookings charges a straightforward base fee of $500 per month, with no implementation fees or hidden costs, offering transparency and predictability.
Given the transparent pricing and recent positive reviews, Neobookings provides better clarity on value for money. Edge: Neobookings.
Not ideal if your hotel seeks recent support, ease of use, or a broad digital marketing toolkit, as these aspects are unverified in DIRS21’s current state.
Not ideal if your hotel operates in a highly niche segment requiring very specific modules only offered by DIRS21, or if you prefer a platform with extensive regional reach beyond Europe and Latin America.
The core difference lies in their recent activity and user feedback. Neobookings is actively supported, highly rated, and offers a versatile suite of features that meet today’s hotel demands. DIRS21, with no recent reviews, presents potential but carries significant risk due to its unverified support and performance.
Choose Neobookings if your hotel values ongoing support, ease of use, and modern integrations, especially if you operate in Europe or Latin America. If your hotel requires niche functionalities like ADA compliance or wedding modules and you can verify DIRS21’s current support, it may be worth considering—but proceed cautiously.
In summary, for most hotels looking for a reliable, well-rated booking engine today, Neobookings stands out as the safer, more proven choice. Its recent reviews, comprehensive features, and support make it a practical solution for hotels aiming to boost direct bookings and streamline operations.
预订引擎 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $500/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,DIRS21 One 和 Neobookings 共享 27 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 人工智能优化 | ||
| 价格对比 | ||
| 入住前电子邮件 | ||
| 入住后电子邮件 | ||
| 可定制的退出意图模式 | ||
| 可用性块 | ||
| 婚礼和企业预订模块 | ||
| 房间替换 | ||
| 符合 ADA 标准 | ||
| 紧急信息 | ||
| 自动报告 | ||
| 苹果支付 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 3 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 2 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Neobookings really cares about our business, and their 360 solutions are very convenient for us since we don't have to deal with many different people/vendors for the various servi..."
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
用户多次称赞 Neobookings 的专业和敬业支持团队,指出他们的可用性、响应能力和及时解决问题的能力。这大大提高了用户体验和对产品的信任度。
持续改进是其主要优势。Neobookings 的频繁更新和对产品改进的承诺确保了该解决方案在酒店运营中保持竞争力和有效性。
用户强调 Neobookings 预订引擎功能强大、用途广泛且直观的特性。它有助于增加直接预订量并简化管理,并提到其显著的销售增长和积极的用户体验。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
一些用户指出了 CMS 和其他功能中的可用性问题,建议增强用户界面和附加功能(如全面的忠诚度计划和更容易的自动化)将会有所帮助。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。DIRS21 One 和 Neobookings 共享许多核心 Booking Engine 功能,但各有独特的能力。DIRS21 One 提供 31 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Neobookings 提供 20 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Neobookings 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
DIRS21 One:否。Neobookings:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Booking Engine 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。DIRS21 by TourOnline AG 的 HT Score 为 0,Neobookings 的为 75。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问