The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 40 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
DIRS21 by TourOnline AG 表现出色 ,拥有独特功能如 Mobile optimized/responsive and Urgency messaging.
Vertical Booking 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 .
基于 HTR 上 40 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 0 | 40 |
在分析了 40 条经验证的评价后,DIRS21 by TourOnline AG 用户最看重其 ,而 Vertical Booking 用户则强调 客户服务, 渠道管理, 易于使用。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
客户服务
▾
|
|
|
+
渠道管理
▾
|
|
|
+
易于使用
▾
|
|
|
+
集成和连接
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
定制
▾
|
|
|
−
同步问题
▾
|
|
|
−
数据库搜索功能
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 预订引擎 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #23 11 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #28 14 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #18 7 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #28 1 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #22 20 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #25 15 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #30 6 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #20 5 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #12 23 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #27 7 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #28 1 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | — | #8 8 条评价 |
When choosing a booking engine, your hotel needs a platform that increases direct bookings, streamlines operations, and integrates well with your existing systems. DIRS21 by TourOnline AG and Vertical Booking aim to serve these needs but differ significantly in their approach, features, and market presence. While DIRS21 offers extensive customization and is primarily used in Europe, Vertical Booking has a broader global reach with more recent reviews and a higher user satisfaction score.
The critical question is which platform can best support your hotel’s growth and operational needs. Do you prioritize a highly customizable system deeply embedded in European markets, or does a proven, user-friendly platform with extensive integrations and recent positive reviews better fit your hotel?
DIRS21 and Vertical Booking both address online reservation management, but their core strengths vary. DIRS21 emphasizes modularity, customization, and a wide array of features specifically tailored to European hotels, with 33 unique features but a lack of recent reviews and a zero star rating, raising questions about current support and user feedback. Conversely, Vertical Booking has a well-established global presence, with 37 recent reviews, a 4.64/5 overall rating, and a 92% likelihood to recommend, indicating strong recent user satisfaction.
Vertical Booking’s recent reviews highlight its user-friendly interface, excellent support, and high conversion rates, whereas DIRS21’s lack of recent feedback limits confidence. Do you want a platform with proven recent performance or one still establishing its reputation?
If your hotel needs a straightforward, intuitive booking engine with proven results, go with Vertical Booking. Its high customer satisfaction, recent reviews emphasizing support and usability, and extensive integrations make it ideal for hotels seeking reliable, scalable online reservation management.
If your hotel prefers a highly customizable, European-focused system capable of supporting complex offerings through numerous features and multi-lingual options, DIRS21 might suit your needs. However, its lack of recent reviews and a zero-star rating indicate uncertain ongoing support and performance.
For most hotels looking for current, positive feedback, Vertical Booking is the safer, more proven choice.
Vertical Booking receives a 4.49/5 ease of use rating, with reviews praising its intuitive interface and quick setup. Customers describe it as "very user-friendly" and appreciate its support, calling the system "easy to carry out work in a short time."
DIRS21, on the other hand, has a 0/5 rating for ease of use, with no recent feedback to assess its current usability or onboarding experience. The lack of recent reviews makes it impossible to determine if DIRS21 has improved in this area.
Edge: Vertical Booking.
DIRS21 offers 33 features, including multi-lingual support, special offers, multi-currency, Google Hotel Ads bookings, loyalty programs, and more. Its feature set caters to hotels requiring extensive customization and integration capabilities.
Vertical Booking’s platform, by contrast, does not list specific features but emphasizes its comprehensive booking engine, upselling tools, and dynamic packaging, with a focus on high conversion rates. It lacks the depth of feature customization seen in DIRS21 but provides essential tools proven to increase direct bookings.
Edge: DIRS21, for its extensive feature set.
Vertical Booking has a 4.57/5 customer support rating, with recent reviews praising its quick responses, helpfulness, and local support. Users describe support as "responsive" and "immediate," citing high satisfaction with support staff.
DIRS21’s support rating is not available, and no recent reviews impede assessment. Its zero-star rating suggests support quality may be uncertain or diminished.
Edge: Vertical Booking.
Vertical Booking boasts 69 verified integrations, including major partners like OTAs, GDS, and PMS systems, with 10 shared partners with DIRS21 such as Mews and Oracle Hospitality. Its broader partner network supports seamless multi-platform management.
DIRS21 has 31 verified partners, primarily in Europe, with some overlap. While its integrations are substantial, the more extensive network of Vertical Booking enhances its flexibility for hotels operating across multiple channels.
Edge: Vertical Booking.
Vertical Booking’s recent reviews and high overall rating of 4.64/5 make it clearly favored by hoteliers, especially in North America and Europe. Hotels in various segments, including boutique and resort hotels, praise its usability and support.
DIRS21’s reviews are unavailable, and its zero-star rating indicates it’s not currently rated or actively used by hoteliers. The recent positive feedback for Vertical Booking strongly suggests it’s the preferred choice now.
Edge: Vertical Booking.
Both products do not publish explicit pricing details publicly. They likely offer custom quotes based on hotel size and needs, which is typical for enterprise booking solutions.
Your team should contact sales for tailored pricing, but given Vertical Booking’s overall value score and proven recent performance, it may offer more cost-effective options for hotels seeking ROI.
Not ideal if your hotel values recent support feedback or operates outside Europe, given the lack of recent reviews and support data.
Not ideal if your hotel requires highly specialized features not covered in typical booking engines or prefers a system with deep European customization.
Vertical Booking and DIRS21 serve distinct hotel needs. Vertical Booking excels in ease of use, recent positive reviews, and a broad integration network, making it the clear choice for most hotels today.
DIRS21’s extensive feature list and Europe-centric design may appeal to hotels with complex requirements but lack recent user feedback, making it a less reliable option at this moment.
If your priority is proven performance, support, and user satisfaction, Vertical Booking should be your choice. If your hotel requires a highly customizable, feature-rich system tailored to European markets and you have the technical capacity to manage it, DIRS21 might still be relevant.
In conclusion, for current, satisfied users and a platform that actively supports hotel growth, Vertical Booking stands out as the stronger option.
预订引擎 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|---|
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,DIRS21 One 和 Vertical Booking (Booking Engine) 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 价格对比 | ||
| 多房间和多费率计划预订 | ||
| 房间替换 | ||
| 特别优惠和折扣 | ||
| 移动优化/响应式 | ||
| 紧急信息 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 21 项功能存在差异。
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
虽然客户服务因其响应能力和以解决方案为导向的方法而广受好评,但一些评论指出,在解决时间和响应准确性等方面还有改进空间。总体而言,用户认为支持团队友好且... 虽然客户服务因其响应能力和以解决方案为导向的方法而广受好评,但一些评论指出,在解决时间和响应准确性等方面还有改进空间。总体而言,用户认为支持团队友好且乐于助人。
Vertical Booking 的渠道管理功能广受好评,它允许酒店经营者通过一个平台控制多个在线销售渠道,从而减少混乱并节省时间。用户还赞赏它能够平衡不同渠道的价格... Vertical Booking 的渠道管理功能广受好评,它允许酒店经营者通过一个平台控制多个在线销售渠道,从而减少混乱并节省时间。用户还赞赏它能够平衡不同渠道的价格并轻松管理优惠价格。
许多评论都提到了 Vertical Booking 系统的易用性和直观性。酒店经营者认为界面非常友好,并且喜欢在一个平台上拥有所有功能。然而,一些人认为在某些技术领域需... 许多评论都提到了 Vertical Booking 系统的易用性和直观性。酒店经营者认为界面非常友好,并且喜欢在一个平台上拥有所有功能。然而,一些人认为在某些技术领域需要更好的文档和更直观的设计。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户对 Vertical Booking 的预订引擎和渠道管理器中的自定义选项非常满意,这些选项使他们能够根据自己的特定需求定制解决方案。但是,一些评论表明,需要更强大... 用户对 Vertical Booking 的预订引擎和渠道管理器中的自定义选项非常满意,这些选项使他们能够根据自己的特定需求定制解决方案。但是,一些评论表明,需要更强大的设计自定义选项和用户更改界面元素(如颜色和字体)的权限。
一些评论指出,Vertical Booking 的渠道管理器与其 PMS 之间存在同步延迟,影响了房源和价格的实时更新。建议加快同步速度以提高整体效率。
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。DIRS21 One 和 Vertical Booking (Booking Engine) 共享许多核心 Booking Engine 功能,但各有独特的能力。DIRS21 One 提供 31 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Vertical Booking (Booking Engine) 提供 69 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Vertical Booking (Booking Engine) 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.5/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
DIRS21 One:否。Vertical Booking (Booking Engine):否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Booking Engine 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。DIRS21 by TourOnline AG 的 HT Score 为 0,Vertical Booking 的为 17。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问