The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 36 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
EarthCheck 表现出色 .
Greenview 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 .
基于 HTR 上 36 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $100/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 0 | 36 |
在分析了 36 条经验证的评价后,EarthCheck 用户最看重其 ,而 Greenview 用户则强调 用户友好界面, 培训和支持, 可持续发展报告。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
用户友好界面
▾
|
|
|
+
培训和支持
▾
|
|
|
+
可持续发展报告
▾
|
|
|
+
数据集成
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
报告定制
▾
|
|
|
−
批量数据输入
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店可持续发展软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #1 7 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #1 9 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #1 14 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | — | #1 4 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #1 15 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #1 22 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #1 12 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 | — | #1 2 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | — | #1 2 条评价 |
| 欧洲 | — | #2 4 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | — | #1 21 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #1 4 条评价 |
Choosing between EarthCheck by EarthCheck and Greenview Portal by Greenview hinges on understanding their core strengths and limitations. Both aim to improve hotel sustainability, but EarthCheck’s limited recent review activity and minimal online presence contrast sharply with Greenview’s robust, 35-review dataset, which is recent and highly rated. Greenview's higher user ratings, especially in ease of use and customer support, make it the more attractive option for hotels seeking actionable sustainability management. Do you prioritize a proven, highly-rated platform, or one with limited data but strong regional presence?
EarthCheck, founded in 1987, has been a leader in certifying and advising tourism businesses globally, emphasizing scientific benchmarking and certification. However, with zero recent reviews and a current HTR Score of 0, it offers little recent validation of its platform’s performance. Conversely, Greenview, established in 2008, has amassed 35 recent reviews with a 4.66/5 customer support score and an 8.91 NPS, indicating high user satisfaction. The absence of recent EarthCheck reviews suggests limited current adoption or engagement, making Greenview a more data-backed choice today.
While EarthCheck positions itself as a comprehensive certification and consulting provider, Greenview’s platform focuses on data management, ESG tracking, and automation. Its focus on real-time insights and operational efficiency aligns more directly with hotel teams seeking straightforward, day-to-day sustainability tools. Do you need a certification-focused platform or one that emphasizes operational sustainability management? The answer largely depends on your immediate needs, but recent review volume favors Greenview.
If your hotel needs a tool primarily for certification, benchmarking, and advisory services rooted in scientific standards, EarthCheck might seem appropriate — but note the lack of recent user feedback. If your team prioritizes ease of use, quick data entry, and actionable insights, Greenview’s high ratings across ease of use (4.49/5), onboarding (4.33/5), and customer support (4.66/5) make it the better choice.
Greenview’s reviews highlight its intuitive dashboards, automated reporting, and ease of updating sustainability data—crucial for hotels that value operational efficiency. EarthCheck’s reputation is built on certification and consultancy, but with no recent validation, it’s harder to assess whether it meets modern hotel needs. If your hotel wants proven ease of use and a high user recommendation rate, Greenview is the clear pick.
Greenview’s interface earns a 4.49/5 rating, with reviews praising its user-friendly dashboards that simplify entering sustainability data and generating reports. Users find it straightforward to update energy, water, and waste information, and automated features reduce manual effort. On the other hand, EarthCheck’s user experience is rated 0/5, with no reviews supporting its ease of use, indicating either a lack of recent user engagement or an outdated interface.
Based on available data, Greenview’s onboarding process is rated 4.33/5, and users report high satisfaction with support. EarthCheck’s lack of recent reviews makes it impossible to assess its usability now.
Edge: Greenview.
Greenview offers a suite of features tailored for operational sustainability, including energy, water, waste management, automated reporting, and data visualization. Users appreciate its ability to consolidate ESG data and track progress easily, with 0 shared features with EarthCheck. EarthCheck, by contrast, provides certification, consulting, and advisory services but does not appear to include a comparable feature set or software modules based on available info.
Greenview’s platform supports strategic sustainability planning, real-time monitoring, and stakeholder communication—features that are highly valued in recent reviews. EarthCheck’s strengths lie more in certification and consultancy, with no evidence of comparable software capabilities.
Edge: Greenview.
Greenview’s review count of 35 with recent feedback makes it the more credible source for current performance. Its average ratings of 4.49/5 for ease of use and 4.66/5 for support reflect high user satisfaction. Reviews praise its dashboard, automation, and intuitive interface, with some noting its role in reducing operational complexity. Conversely, EarthCheck has no recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to gauge current hotel sentiment or satisfaction.
Greenview’s high recommendation score of 8.91/5 and 89% likelihood to recommend confirm its popularity among users. EarthCheck lacks recent data, so we cannot assess its current hotel ratings.
Edge: Greenview.
EarthCheck’s pricing details are not publicly available, and it does not offer a free trial or transparent pricing structure, suggesting a more customized or enterprise-level approach. Greenview charges a flat $100 monthly fee, with no free trial, but its transparent pricing makes budgeting easier for hotels. For budget-conscious teams, Greenview’s predictable costs and no ongoing implementation fees make it appealing.
If you seek straightforward, predictable pricing and a platform with proven value, Greenview’s model is favorable. EarthCheck’s unclear pricing could be a barrier unless you are negotiating directly for enterprise services.
Hotels that:
Not ideal if your team prefers a flexible, operational management tool with real-time data, or if you require user-friendly dashboards and automation.
Hotels that:
Not ideal if your hotel is seeking certification or strategic advisory services beyond operational monitoring, or if you require deep customization not supported by Greenview.
EarthCheck is rooted in certification and consultancy, emphasizing scientific validation of sustainable practices. While this makes it suitable for hotels seeking formal recognition, its lack of recent reviews and limited software features diminish its appeal for day-to-day operational management.
Greenview excels in real-time data management, automation, and user satisfaction, making it the smarter choice for hotels aiming to integrate sustainability into daily operations. Its recent reviews and high ratings provide confidence that it can meet modern hospitality needs effectively.
Choose EarthCheck if your hotel needs certification, community recognition, and advisory support, especially if regional recognition matters. Opt for Greenview if your goal is to streamline sustainability reporting, improve operational efficiency, and engage your team with an easy-to-use platform that’s rated highly by current users.
酒店可持续发展软件 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $100/mo |
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
虽然许多人认为该系统易于使用,但一些评论强调需要更直观、更现代化的界面来增强用户体验。简化用户界面将使各级员工更容易使用该软件。
Greenview 提供有效的培训和支持,这对于更好地理解和利用平台至关重要。然而,一些用户认为,额外的演示和面对面会议可以进一步增强员工的信心。
Greenview 擅长整合 ESG 数据以进行可持续发展报告,使酒店能够更轻松地管理和分析数据。用户赞赏它能够简化可持续发展报告流程,这对于绿色认证和法规合规性至... Greenview 擅长整合 ESG 数据以进行可持续发展报告,使酒店能够更轻松地管理和分析数据。用户赞赏它能够简化可持续发展报告流程,这对于绿色认证和法规合规性至关重要。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
评论者提到,虽然报告功能很强大,但进一步的定制功能将增强其灵活性。高级过滤器、图形可视化和安排自动报告的能力是更好地进行数据分析所需的一些功能。
批量输入数据功能虽然方便,但仍有改进空间。一些评论指出了分类问题,并建议使批量数据输入更加简化和高效。
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。EarthCheck 和 Greenview Portal 共享许多核心 Hotel Sustainability Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。EarthCheck 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Greenview Portal 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Greenview Portal 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.5/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
EarthCheck:否。Greenview Portal:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Sustainability Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。EarthCheck 的 HT Score 为 0,Greenview 的为 100。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问