The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
在分析了 166 条经验证的评价后,eviivo 用户最看重其 customer support experience, user-friendly interface, 注册和账户激活,而 Maxxton 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
Customer support experience
▾
|
|
|
+
User-friendly interface
▾
|
|
|
+
注册和账户激活
▾
|
|
|
+
Integration with third parties
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
高级功能文档
▾
|
|
|
−
宾客沟通自动化
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 度假租赁软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #1 40 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #2 17 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #1 5 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #2 2 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #1 16 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #1 23 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #1 13 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #1 7 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #2 19 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #1 110 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #2 1 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #2 2 条评价 | — |
Choosing between eviivo Suite™ VRS and Maxxton hinges on your specific needs and property portfolio. Both platforms aim to streamline vacation rental management, but they do so with different strengths. eviivo, backed by over 150 recent reviews and a high satisfaction score, is a well-established leader with a broad feature set. Maxxton, although less reviewed, offers an extensive solution tailor-made for larger operations like campsites and serviced apartments. How do these differences affect your property management?
eviivo is a highly-rated, user-friendly platform that excels in managing multiple property types and regions, especially for vacation rentals and boutique hotels. Maxxton, on the other hand, targets larger, complex operations with a customizable SaaS model, but it lacks recent user reviews, making eviivo’s proven track record more compelling. What will best serve your property portfolio?
eviivo is designed for small to medium-sized vacation rental portfolios, especially those needing an intuitive interface and quick setup. Its core strength lies in managing multiple properties within a single dashboard, automating guest communication, and connecting with numerous OTAs via 32 verified partners.
Maxxton, while not explicitly focused on hotels, offers a comprehensive solution for larger operations like holiday parks, campsites, and serviced apartments, emphasizing operational automation and integration. However, without recent reviews, its suitability for boutique or small hotel properties remains untested.
Given eviivo’s 150 reviews in the last six months and a 4.77 support rating, it’s more reliable for hoteliers seeking immediate, proven solutions. Maxxton’s lack of recent feedback makes its effectiveness less clear. Are you managing a small to medium vacation rental, or do your operations extend to large-scale resorts?
If your hotel primarily manages vacation rentals, B&Bs, or boutique hotels seeking a straightforward, highly reviewed platform, go with eviivo. Its strong user ratings and extensive property management features make it ideal for portfolios of any size within its target segment.
If your hotel operates at a large scale, such as a holiday park, campsite, or serviced apartment complex with over 100 units requiring tailored integrations and operational automation, Maxxton may fit better. Its SaaS architecture supports large, complex operations, but the absence of recent reviews makes it less certain.
For hoteliers prioritizing ease of use and proven customer support, eviivo’s extensive recent feedback confirms its position. Meanwhile, Maxxton’s flexibility and scope could appeal to large enterprises ready to invest in customized solutions. Which profile best reflects your property’s needs?
eviivo boasts a 4.65/5 rating for ease of use, with many users praising its intuitive interface and quick onboarding process. Clients mention that the platform’s simple navigation reduces the learning curve, allowing staff to adopt it rapidly and manage multiple properties efficiently.
Maxxton, lacking recent review data, does not publicly showcase user experience ratings. Its platform is described as user-friendly, but the absence of recent feedback makes it harder to gauge how easily your team could adapt.
Edge: eviivo.
eviivo offers 29 unique features, including trust accounting, owner statements, a booking engine, mobile check-in/out, review management, and advanced pricing automation. These features support comprehensive property, guest, and financial management within one platform.
Maxxton provides a broad operational suite tailored for large-scale operations, including reservation automation, connectivity with third-party partners like SiteMinder and Airbnb, and a centralized database. However, it lacks the extensive feature count of eviivo, with no detailed list of specific features.
Edge: eviivo, with its broader and more detailed feature set.
eviivo’s support is rated 4.77/5, with recent reviews highlighting highly responsive and knowledgeable staff. Clients appreciate the onboarding process, quick issue resolution, and the availability of support during critical phases of setup.
Maxxton’s support data is unavailable, making it difficult to assess its responsiveness or quality. The lack of recent reviews raises questions about the level of customer service and implementation assistance.
Edge: eviivo.
eviivo integrates with 32 verified partners, covering channel managers, payment gateways, review platforms, and more. Its extensive partner network includes Trust Accounting, Experience Hotel, Tripadvisor, and others, facilitating comprehensive operational connectivity.
Maxxton connects with 12 verified partners, including industry giants like SiteMinder, Airbnb, and Revinate. While still robust, its fewer integrations might limit your options for expanding or customizing your tech stack.
Edge: eviivo.
eviivo’s 150 recent reviews with a 4.77/5 support score and a 97% likelihood to recommend indicate strong satisfaction among vacation rental managers and boutique hoteliers. Hotels and B&Bs particularly praise its ease of use and support quality.
Maxxton has no recent reviews or ratings, making it difficult to gauge user satisfaction. Its target market suggests high ratings for larger, complex operations, but without current data, eviivo’s positive recent feedback makes it the safer choice.
Edge: eviivo.
eviivo charges a $700 monthly flat fee with no free tier or trial. Pricing details for Maxxton are not publicly available, but its SaaS solution typically involves customized implementation and pricing based on property count and complexity.
Given the transparent cost structure, eviivo’s predictable pricing may suit small to medium portfolios, while Maxxton’s custom pricing can accommodate larger, more complex operations.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
eviivo is a proven, highly-rated vacation rental management platform with extensive recent reviews, offering 29 features, a user-friendly interface, and a broad integration network. Its support and onboarding are highly praised, making it ideal for small to medium-sized properties.
Maxxton delivers a comprehensive, customizable SaaS solution designed for large-scale hospitality operations, like parks or serviced apartments, but lacks recent user feedback. Its strengths lie in automation and connectivity for complex, expanding portfolios.
For most hoteliers, especially those managing vacation rentals or boutique hotels, eviivo remains the stronger choice. Meanwhile, large operators with complex needs and a willingness to invest in tailored solutions may find Maxxton better suited, despite limited recent review data.
In summary, if your property management needs are aligned with eviivo’s strengths—ease of use, proven support, and extensive features—you're likely to see quicker benefits and higher satisfaction. If you operate a large, multi-property enterprise seeking a flexible, integrated platform, Maxxton’s offering could be a fit, but caution is advised given the lack of recent user feedback.
我们分析了 7 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"Grâce à eviivo, j'ai l'ensemble des hébergements que je propose, centralisés au même endroit avec une visibilité facilitée pour connaître la situation de mes locations."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Building the business with eviivo Suite was extremely easy I have to say, because of the simplicity of using the system…For us, as a property management company, it’s impossible to..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Aujourd’hui on a la possibilité de gérer l’ensemble de notre parc, que ce soit la tarification, le calendrier, la communication en un seul clic pour gérer plus de 50 appartements,..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
While most reviews positively note the expertise and responsiveness of eviivo's support team, a few mention the need for better training of chat repre... While most reviews positively note the expertise and responsiveness of eviivo's support team, a few mention the need for better training of chat representatives and more robust resources or tutorials for advanced features.
Users consistently commend eviivo for its simple and intuitive interface, which simplifies daily management tasks and reduces the learning curve for n... Users consistently commend eviivo for its simple and intuitive interface, which simplifies daily management tasks and reduces the learning curve for new users or those transitioning from other platforms.
用户普遍对注册流程给予了积极评价,他们注意到快速高效的账户激活使他们能够迅速将 eviivo 集成到他们的运营中,此外还有工作人员的支持性指导。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户呼吁提供更全面的高级功能指南,他们希望直接从平台获得更深入的见解或教程,以便更好地利用这些功能来优化销售。
该软件的自动化沟通工具可帮助用户在入住的不同阶段与客人进行顺畅的互动,用户对节省处理日常沟通任务的时间表示赞赏,尽管有些人希望获得更多个性化的电子邮件... 该软件的自动化沟通工具可帮助用户在入住的不同阶段与客人进行顺畅的互动,用户对节省处理日常沟通任务的时间表示赞赏,尽管有些人希望获得更多个性化的电子邮件定制选项。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。eviivo Suite™ VRS 和 Maxxton 共享许多核心 Vacation Rental Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。eviivo Suite™ VRS 提供 32 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Maxxton 提供 12 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。eviivo Suite™ VRS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
eviivo Suite™ VRS:否。Maxxton:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Vacation Rental Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。eviivo 的 HT Score 为 100,Maxxton 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问