The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店管理软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 | Fidelity |
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #12 52 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #13 28 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 | Fidelity |
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #15 39 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #14 25 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #16 13 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #8 22 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 | Fidelity |
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | — | #21 4 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #7 82 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #13 4 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | — | #1 18 条评价 |
Choosing the right hotel management software can dramatically impact your daily operations, guest satisfaction, and revenue management. Fidelity by Fidelity and SabeeApp by SabeeApp both aim to streamline hotel workflows, but they cater to different needs and hotel profiles. Fidelity's lack of recent reviews and overall absence of ratings make it difficult to assess, whereas SabeeApp’s strong recent review count and high user satisfaction suggest a clearer winner. Do you need a proven, highly-rated platform, or are you exploring options?
Fidelity’s platform appears to be a placeholder, with no reviews, ratings, or user feedback available. SabeeApp, however, is actively used by thousands of properties worldwide, with 105 reviews and a recent review count of 29 in the last six months, indicating ongoing customer engagement. SabeeApp’s high NPS score of 9.5/10 and 95% likelihood to recommend demonstrate strong user confidence, contrasting sharply with Fidelity’s absent review data. Is a product with proven, recent feedback the safer choice for your hotel?
If your hotel needs an established, well-supported property management system with a comprehensive feature set, go with SabeeApp. Its wide range of tools—including channel management, booking engine, housekeeping, guest CRM, and mobile app—suits small to medium-sized hotels seeking automation and operational efficiency. Conversely, if your hotel requires a specialized or bespoke platform with minimal reviews and unclear support, Fidelity might seem tempting but lacks recent user validation. For reliable, proven performance, SabeeApp is the clear choice.
SabeeApp scores 4.78 out of 5 for ease of use, reflecting an intuitive interface, straightforward onboarding, and strong user feedback about minimal training needs. Reviewers mention that SabeeApp’s simple design allows staff to manage reservations, check-ins, and daily operations faster, with some noting a smoother learning curve. Fidelity’s rating is 0/5, with no reviews available, making it impossible to evaluate its usability. Edge: SabeeApp.
SabeeApp offers 61 features, including a channel manager, booking engine, housekeeper module, guest CRM, multi-lingual support, online check-in/out, guest app, real-time reporting, and more—tailored for hospitality needs. Fidelity provides no publicly listed features or details, making it impossible to compare. SabeeApp’s broad and specialized feature set, especially in automation and integrations, clearly outperforms Fidelity’s nonexistent offerings. Edge: SabeeApp.
SabeeApp’s support ratings are high at 4.73 out of 5, with reviews praising its quick, responsive, and helpful team. Users like Hammamhane highlight its rapid problem resolution and friendly staff, making support a notable strength. Fidelity’s support data is unavailable, so its support quality cannot be judged. Given SabeeApp’s recent high support ratings and user praise, it’s the evident leader here. Edge: SabeeApp.
SabeeApp connects with 17 verified partners, including Tripadvisor, Stripe, PriceLabs, and access to various PMS, channel managers, and payment gateways, ensuring smooth data exchange. Fidelity has no listed or verified integrations, limiting its compatibility and flexibility. For hotels relying on diverse tools, SabeeApp’s integrations streamline operations and expand capabilities. Edge: SabeeApp.
SabeeApp’s recent reviews show high satisfaction across segments, with a 95% likelihood to recommend, especially from boutique hotels, resorts, and city center hotels. Fidelity’s overall rating is 0/5 with no reviews, making it impossible to gauge hotel sentiment. The recent, positive feedback for SabeeApp indicates higher user approval. Edge: SabeeApp.
Fidelity’s pricing details are unavailable, suggesting it may lack a transparent or standard pricing model. SabeeApp charges a flat rate of $200 per month, with no implementation fees, offering a predictable cost structure. For hotels seeking clarity and budget planning, SabeeApp provides transparent pricing. Fidelity’s lack of pricing info makes evaluation difficult, but SabeeApp’s straightforward model is preferable.
SabeeApp offers a clear, modern, and well-supported platform for hotels looking for a comprehensive PMS with automation, integrations, and excellent user feedback. Fidelity appears as an unreviewed, unsupported option, making it risky for hoteliers who value proven, recent customer validation. If you want a reliable, feature-rich system with positive reviews, SabeeApp is the smart choice. Fidelity might only suit experimental or financial-specific use cases, not daily hotel management.
In summary, SabeeApp’s recent reviews, high ratings, and extensive features make it the recommended choice for most hotels today. Fidelity’s lack of data and support history place it at a significant disadvantage. Your team should prioritize proven, user-rated solutions to ensure smooth operations and guest satisfaction.
我们分析了 4 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Since implementing SabeeApp, we've seen a remarkable improvement in our daily operations. Our check-in times have dropped significantly, and the automated reporting has saved us ho..."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
该软件因其直观易用的界面而备受赞誉,无需大量培训即可适用于各种酒店运营。这种简便性有助于酒店更高效地完成日常工作。
客户服务以其忠诚度和响应速度而著称,对用户体验做出了积极贡献,尽管通过电话联系支持人员存在一些挑战。
SabeeApp的渠道管理器能够高效地实时同步预订渠道,减少人工操作和超额预订。它提高了管理多个平台的可靠性,这对于最大限度地提高OTA平台上的客房分配至关重要... SabeeApp的渠道管理器能够高效地实时同步预订渠道,减少人工操作和超额预订。它提高了管理多个平台的可靠性,这对于最大限度地提高OTA平台上的客房分配至关重要。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户表示需要一款更适合移动设备的应用程序,强调了随时随地管理预订和运营以提高灵活性的重要性。
虽然该系统总体上有效,但用户建议改进报告功能,希望获得更大的灵活性和可定制性,以满足不同的运营需求。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Fidelity 和 SabeeApp 共享许多核心 Hotel Management Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。Fidelity 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 SabeeApp 提供 17 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。SabeeApp 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Fidelity:否。SabeeApp:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Management Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Fidelity 的 HT Score 为 0,SabeeApp 的为 85。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问