The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 270 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
FirstView 表现出色 在 团队的专业精神和同理心 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Diagramming & Floorplanning.
Visiting Media 表现出色 在 销售和市场营销提升 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (0.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Clickable Hotspots and Dollhouse View.
基于 HTR 上 270 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $700/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 45 | 225 |
在分析了 270 条经验证的评价后,FirstView 用户最看重其 团队的专业精神和同理心, 用户体验, 3d 虚拟游览和图表,而 Visiting Media 用户则强调 销售和市场营销提升, immersive tour quality, 效率高,省时省力。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
团队的专业精神和同理心
▾
|
+
销售和市场营销提升
▾
|
|
+
用户体验
▾
|
+
Immersive Tour Quality
▾
|
|
+
3D 虚拟游览和图表
▾
|
+
效率高,省时省力
▾
|
|
+
营销和销售工具
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
技术改进
▾
|
−
导航复杂度
▾
|
|
−
系统集成挑战
▾
|
|
|
−
加载速度和性能问题
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 3D 虚拟游览 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) | #2 2 条评价 | #1 2 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #2 16 条评价 | #1 62 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #2 12 条评价 | #1 76 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #2 15 条评价 | #1 76 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #2 24 条评价 | #1 61 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #2 22 条评价 | #1 104 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #2 21 条评价 | #1 130 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #2 1 条评价 | #1 10 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #2 9 条评价 | #1 208 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #1 28 条评价 | #3 2 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #2 1 条评价 |
| 中东 | #2 0 条评价 | — |
Choosing between FirstView and Visiting Media for your hotel’s virtual tour needs hinges on several factors, including review volume, feature set, and regional presence. Both products aim to showcase your property remotely, but they differ sharply in maturity, user feedback, and integration capabilities. Your decision should align with your hotel’s size, location, and marketing goals.
FirstView offers a more established reputation with a smaller but highly satisfied user base, while Visiting Media boasts a larger, more active community and a broader range of features. Which platform will elevate your property more effectively?
Both FirstView and Visiting Media provide 3D virtual tours to help your property stand out online. FirstView’s primary strength is its high-quality content creation, focusing on immersive visual storytelling, while Visiting Media emphasizes interactivity and extensive feature options.
However, Visiting Media’s larger review count (207 reviews versus 44 for FirstView) and recent review activity suggest it’s more current and trusted by hoteliers. Visiting Media also has a higher overall rating (100/100) compared to FirstView’s 86.96/100, reinforcing its market presence.
While FirstView’s reviews praise its visual quality and professional support, Visiting Media’s customers highlight its immersive storytelling and sales enablement features. Your choice depends on whether you prioritize visual fidelity or interactive sales tools.
If your hotel needs a proven solution with a focus on high-end visual quality and detailed diagrams, FirstView is the better fit. It’s ideal for luxury hotels and properties aiming to showcase their spaces with HD images and precise floorplans.
If your hotel requires a broader feature set, including clickable hotspots, embedding options, and content personalization, Visiting Media is the better choice. Its extensive tools support engaged remote sales, making it suitable for mid-market and branded hotels prioritizing comprehensive digital marketing.
For hotels emphasizing visual storytelling and property marketing, Visiting Media’s larger, more recent review base and higher ratings make it the safer, more current option. Conversely, FirstView’s detailed diagrams and consistent positive feedback suit hotels focused on accurate space planning and high-fidelity visuals.
Both products are rated highly for ease of use, with FirstView scoring 4.7/5 and Visiting Media 4.68/5. User reviews commend FirstView’s intuitive interface and straightforward content sharing, which simplifies onboarding and staff adoption.
Visiting Media’s interface is similarly praised for its clarity and helpful features, with users noting that both platforms require minimal training to operate effectively. However, some users mention that navigating complex features can be slightly challenging in Visiting Media, especially when managing large content libraries.
Edge: FirstView.
Visiting Media offers significantly more features, with 11 unique capabilities such as clickable hotspots, dollhouse views, iFrame and booking engine embedding, tagging, guided tours, and content personalization. These tools empower your sales team to craft highly interactive and engaging virtual experiences.
FirstView provides four shared features with Visiting Media, along with one exclusive: diagramming and floorplanning. While high-quality visuals are its focus, it lacks the interactivity and embedding options that Visiting Media offers.
Given the broader feature set and flexibility, Visiting Media holds the edge for hotels seeking immersive, customizable virtual tours that integrate with your digital marketing channels.
FirstView receives slightly higher ratings for customer support (4.91/5) versus Visiting Media (4.76/5). Multiple reviews praise FirstView’s team for dedicated assistance, quick responses, and proactive communication.
Visiting Media’s support is also well-rated, with users appreciating their helpfulness and responsiveness, but some mention that load speeds and system integration could be improved. If exceptional support is a priority, FirstView’s reputation makes it the more reliable choice.
Edge: FirstView.
FirstView has only one verified integration partner, limiting its connectivity with other hotel systems. Visiting Media, on the other hand, currently has no verified integrations but offers extensive embedding and sharing capabilities, allowing content to be integrated into your website or booking engines manually.
Despite fewer formal integrations, FirstView’s diagramming and floorplanning features are unique, giving it an edge in property planning. Visiting Media’s rich embedding options support broader digital marketing efforts.
Edge: FirstView.
FirstView’s reviews reveal a consistent 5/5 rating from 40 property owners, mainly in luxury and branded hotel segments, with recent feedback emphasizing ease of use and quality. Visiting Media, however, has a perfect 100/100 rating from 207 reviews, with more recent feedback (13 reviews in the last 6 months), primarily praising immersive storytelling and sales effectiveness.
Given its larger, more recent review set, Visiting Media’s ratings are more reflective of current customer satisfaction. Hoteliers seeking proven, highly recommended solutions should favor Visiting Media.
Edge: Visiting Media.
FirstView does not publicly disclose pricing, indicating it may be customized or higher-end. Visiting Media’s base price is $700 per month, with no freemium or trial options, which makes it transparent and straightforward.
Your choice may depend on your budget and the value perceived, but Visiting Media’s clear pricing allows easier budget planning. FirstView’s undisclosed costs could include premium features, so confirm directly with the vendor.
Not ideal if you need extensive interactive features or easy website embedding.
Not ideal if your hotel’s priority is solely high-fidelity visual quality without interactive or embedding capabilities.
FirstView excels in delivering high-quality visuals and diagrams, making it suitable for luxury properties or those needing detailed floor plans. Its dedicated support and high customer satisfaction ratings reinforce its reliability, especially for hotels emphasizing visual branding.
Visiting Media stands out with a broader feature set, larger review base, and recent positive feedback. It’s better suited for hotels that want highly interactive virtual tours, multiple embedding options, and a strong sales enablement toolset.
For hotels focused on immersive storytelling and engagement, Visiting Media is the safer, more adaptable choice. If your priority is precise visual accuracy with professional support, FirstView remains a solid option.
In conclusion, if you’re seeking a current, highly-rated platform with extensive features and a large recent review base, Visiting Media is the recommended pick. However, if your hotel’s strategy hinges on high-quality visuals and detailed diagrams with excellent support, FirstView may better serve your needs.
3D 虚拟游览 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $700/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,FirstView 和 Visiting Media 共享 4 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| iFrame 嵌入 | ||
| 可点击热点 | ||
| 娃娃屋景观 | ||
| 标记 | ||
| 绘图和平面图 | ||
| 网站嵌入 | ||
| 预订引擎嵌入 |
我们分析了 2 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"One thing we know is that once we’ve had someone come through our hotel, the conversion to win that group multiplies by at least 50%. This tool is definitely useful for being able..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"When we are putting pressure on our clients to commit quickly, it's our responsibility to ensure we are supplying them with all of the resources they need in order to make a confid..."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
几篇评论都称赞了 FirstView 团队的专业素养和同理心。他们积极参与流程,注重细节,并具有合作精神,为各个项目带来了令人满意的结果。
客户发现 FirstView 易于使用且直观,其用户友好界面只需进行少量调整。该工具的效率和通过链接共享内容的便捷性对于房产展示和虚拟现场检查特别有帮助。
用户对 FirstView 的高品质 3D 虚拟游览非常满意,该游览提供了沉浸式的详细物业视图,包括公共区域、房间和活动空间。这些游览被视为营销和销售团队的宝贵工具... 用户对 FirstView 的高品质 3D 虚拟游览非常满意,该游览提供了沉浸式的详细物业视图,包括公共区域、房间和活动空间。这些游览被视为营销和销售团队的宝贵工具,可增强客户参与度并提供物业的真实预览。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户认为有些技术方面可以改进。这些包括虚拟游览中的移动、离线模式或精简版的潜力,以及对最终内容编辑的更多控制。此外,一些用户提到需要改进虚拟现实。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
许多评论都强调了Visiting Media的工具如何提升销售演示的效果,使其更具吸引力和可信度。其互动功能提供了全面的视图,有助于赢得客户信任并提高预订转化率。
Users appreciate the high-quality, realistic virtual tours provided by Visiting Media. These tours allow for an immersive experience that helps potent... Users appreciate the high-quality, realistic virtual tours provided by Visiting Media. These tours allow for an immersive experience that helps potential clients feel like they are on property, which aids in the decision-making process and sets the hotel apart in a competitive market.
该平台因简化沟通流程、减少实地考察需求而备受赞誉,从而节省了酒店员工和客户的时间和精力。这种高效性是一项重要的卖点,能够帮助销售团队更快地达成交易。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
一些用户觉得界面和导航有点杂乱和令人困惑,这表明更直观的设计将简化培训过程,并使平台更容易被新用户使用。
反馈表明,客户希望Visiting Media的平台能够更好地与客户关系管理(CRM)和活动管理系统集成,以减少重复工作。全面集成将简化工作流程,使该平台成为酒店技术... 反馈表明,客户希望Visiting Media的平台能够更好地与客户关系管理(CRM)和活动管理系统集成,以减少重复工作。全面集成将简化工作流程,使该平台成为酒店技术体系中更强大的组成部分。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。FirstView 和 Visiting Media 共享许多核心 3D Virtual Tours 功能,但各有独特的能力。FirstView 提供 1 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Visiting Media 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。FirstView 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 4.7/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
FirstView:否。Visiting Media:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 3D Virtual Tours 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。FirstView 的 HT Score 为 87,Visiting Media 的为 100。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问