The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 | Flyhotel |
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #31 21 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) | — | #49 3 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 | Flyhotel |
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #30 18 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #39 5 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | — | #49 2 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 | — | #37 2 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 | Flyhotel |
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | — | #32 4 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #14 39 条评价 |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is vital to streamline your hotel’s daily operations, enhance guest experience, and maximize revenue. Both Flyhotel and Redforts aim to serve this purpose, but they diverge significantly in their market presence, features, and user feedback. Flyhotel’s complete lack of reviews and ratings indicates minimal adoption, whereas Redforts boasts over 40 reviews, recent feedback, and a high recommendation rate, making it the more tested and trusted option.
Are you prioritizing a tried-and-true, well-reviewed PMS? Or are you seeking a more niche, less proven solution? Let’s compare these two in detail.
Flyhotel advertises a comprehensive PMS designed to manage hotel operations, but it has no reviews, ratings, or recent user feedback available. Without user insights, it’s impossible to gauge its real-world performance, ease of use, or customer satisfaction. Conversely, Redforts has accumulated over 40 reviews, with recent feedback in the last six months, indicating active use and ongoing support.
Redforts’ reviews highlight ease of use, excellent support, and a high likelihood of recommendation, making it the safer choice for hoteliers. While Flyhotel might promise a full suite of features, the lack of review-backed evidence raises questions about its reliability and actual user experience.
In summary, if you want a PMS with proven results and current user satisfaction, Redforts clearly outperforms Flyhotel. The question is: are you prepared to bet on an unreviewed product, or do you prefer a verified solution?
Redforts is best suited for hotels, hostels, and apartments looking for a broad feature set, proven stability, and excellent support. Its extensive functionalities include a PMS, booking engine, channel manager, revenue management, and online payment—all highly rated by users. Its modular approach allows properties to activate only the features they need, making it adaptable for small boutique hotels or larger operations.
Flyhotel, on the other hand, claims to offer a complete hotel management system but provides no evidence of performance, no reviews, and no demonstrated customer satisfaction. If your hotel prioritizes a reliable, well-supported platform with a track record, Redforts is the clear choice.
For properties that want a trustworthy, actively supported system with recent positive feedback, go with Redforts. If you’re comfortable experimenting with an untested product, Flyhotel might be worth exploring, but the risks are higher.
Redforts scores a strong 4.68 out of 5 for ease of use, with reviews praising its intuitive design, quick onboarding, and straightforward navigation. Users report that staff training is simple, and the system’s modular setup reduces complexity. Customer support in this area is rated 4.53 out of 5, with many reviewers citing fast, friendly assistance.
Flyhotel, however, has a 0/5 rating for ease of use and no reviews to assess its interface or onboarding process. Without direct feedback, it’s impossible to determine if Flyhotel offers an intuitive experience, but the lack of reviews suggests it is unproven or not widely adopted.
Edge: Redforts.
Redforts offers 46 features, including RevPaR & ADR Reports, multi-currency, transactional emails, centralized user management, guest CRM, channel manager, booking engine, online check-in, digital registration, housekeeper modules, real-time reporting, employee messaging, and rate management. Many of these features are absent in Flyhotel, which provides no detailed feature list or supporting evidence.
Flyhotel’s lack of features or integrations makes it difficult to compare directly, but with no verified functionalities available, Redforts’ extensive feature set is the clear leader. Its modules support operational automation, better guest engagement, and revenue optimization.
Edge: Redforts.
Redforts’ support ratings are high—4.53 out of 5—with reviews praising quick, effective, and friendly assistance. Customers mention that the support team is attentive and helps resolve issues promptly, which is crucial for hotel operations.
Flyhotel has no customer support ratings or reviews, leaving its support quality unknown. This absence is a significant drawback, especially for hotels relying on dependable help to troubleshoot issues or onboard staff.
Edge: Redforts.
Redforts integrates with two verified partners—Mr Winston and WuBook—adding channel management functionality. Its ecosystem allows for seamless communication between booking engines, PMS, and other operational tools, reducing manual work and errors.
Flyhotel has no verified integrations or partner connections, limiting its ability to fit into existing hotel tech stacks. For operational efficiency, Redforts’ integrations give it a distinct advantage.
Edge: Redforts.
Redforts has a total of 40 reviews, with recent feedback indicating a 9.5/10 NPS score and a 95% likelihood to recommend. Reviews focus on its ease of use, support, and comprehensive feature set, especially among mid-sized and boutique hotels in North America, Europe, and Africa.
Flyhotel has no reviews or ratings, so its user satisfaction cannot be assessed. Given the active feedback for Redforts, it’s evident that most hoteliers trust and value this product.
Edge: Redforts.
Flyhotel’s pricing information is unavailable; it does not offer a free trial nor clear subscription rates. This lack of transparency complicates budgeting and decision-making.
Redforts costs $500 per month, with no implementation fee or trial info provided. Its fixed pricing makes it easier for hotels to assess return on investment.
In summary, Redforts offers transparent, predictable pricing—Flyhotel’s costs are unknown.
Not ideal if your hotel needs proven stability, robust support, and a feature-rich platform with verified user satisfaction.
Not ideal if your hotel operates in a region where Redforts has limited presence or if you prefer a minimalistic, less feature-intensive solution.
Redforts is a comprehensive, well-reviewed property management system with a proven track record of user satisfaction, ease of use, and strong support. Its extensive features and recent positive reviews make it the safer choice for hotels seeking reliable operational tools.
Flyhotel presents itself as a full PMS but offers no review data, making its performance and support unverified. If you are comfortable with experimental solutions and willing to take risks on unproven software, Flyhotel might be worth exploring.
However, for hotels that depend on stability, ongoing support, and validated customer experiences, Redforts is the clear choice. Its active user base, recent reviews, and feature set make it the more dependable solution to meet your operational needs effectively.
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
许多用户都喜欢 Redforts 的直观设计,它简化了培训并减少了人为错误。这简化了日常操作,让员工可以腾出时间处理其他任务。
该系统擅长管理预订、防止超额预订以及与多个平台集成。预订引擎和渠道管理的定制也是一大优势。
细心、响应迅速的客户服务经常受到称赞。用户提到个性化沟通和快速解决问题,为整体体验带来积极影响。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Redforts 可与预订引擎、渠道管理器和其他平台高效集成,提供无缝管理体验。此功能简化了不同系统和平台之间的协调。
虽然其功能受到称赞,但一些评论提到,界面似乎已经过时,可以通过现代化来增强视觉吸引力和效率。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Flyhotel 和 Redforts 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Flyhotel 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Redforts 提供 2 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Redforts 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Flyhotel:否。Redforts:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Flyhotel 的 HT Score 为 0,Redforts 的为 73。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问