The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 38 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Gastfreund | Hotelcore 表现出色 .
GuestSpace 表现出色 在 ease of use and ROI 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Guest Profiles.
基于 HTR 上 38 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $400/mo | From $600/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 11 | 27 |
在分析了 38 条经验证的评价后,Gastfreund | Hotelcore 用户最看重其 ,而 GuestSpace 用户则强调 user experience, 通信功能, 宾客自助服务功能。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
User Experience
▾
|
|
|
+
通信功能
▾
|
|
|
+
宾客自助服务功能
▾
|
|
|
+
Online Check-In Automation
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
与锁具和预订系统的集成
▾
|
|
|
−
定制化和灵活性
▾
|
|
|
−
分析与报告
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店客人应用程序 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) | #25 1 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #20 5 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | #24 1 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 | #23 3 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 | #30 1 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | #18 3 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 | #15 1 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 欧洲 ▾ | #14 9 条评价 | — |
Your hotel is considering two digital guest engagement tools: Gastfreund | Hotelcore and GuestSpace. Both aim to improve guest experiences and streamline operations, but they diverge significantly in capabilities, user reviews, and market presence. Gastfreund offers a modular system with a broad feature set, while GuestSpace emphasizes automation and guest self-service. So, which platform aligns better with your hotel's needs?
Gastfreund | Hotelcore has been in the market since 2013, boasting over 7,000 properties worldwide and a focus on comprehensive digital guest solutions, including guest directories, info channels, and hotel newspapers. Its recent reviews are scarce, with only 2 in the last six months, making its current data less reliable. In contrast, GuestSpace has accumulated 26 recent reviews, all within the last six months, indicating active user engagement and ongoing support. Given the volume and recency, GuestSpace’s ratings and feedback offer more trustworthy insights.
Gastfreund’s overall rating is 0/5, with a low score in the recent review period, while GuestSpace scores a 78.24 in the HotelTechReport score and is rated 0/5 overall. The newer reviews for GuestSpace highlight high satisfaction, especially around self-check-in and automation, making it appear more aligned with current hotel needs. Is your team more interested in a well-established, modular system or a rapidly evolving platform with recent positive reviews?
If your hotel needs a simple, intuitive platform with strong automation features—like self-check-in, digital keys, and guest engagement—GuestSpace is the clear choice. Its robust reviews emphasize its effectiveness in reducing front desk workload and increasing guest satisfaction. On the other hand, if your property values a broad suite of tools, including digital directories, info channels, and customizable modules, Gastfreund’s extensive feature list and market presence make it suitable. However, the lack of recent reviews and low ratings suggest it’s less aligned with current hotel technology trends.
For hoteliers prioritizing automation, guest control, and a modern interface, GuestSpace offers proven performance. If you seek a highly customizable, multi-feature platform with a long-standing reputation, Gastfreund might appeal, but its weak recent feedback diminishes confidence. Which approach best supports your property’s digital transformation goals?
Gastfreund’s ease-of-use rating is 4.27/5, with a high onboarding score of 4.44/5, and users praise its quick setup and friendly support. Yet, with only 11 reviews and minimal recent feedback, it’s unclear if its interface remains as intuitive as before. GuestSpace scores slightly higher at 4.58/5 for ease of use, with a 4.6/5 onboarding score, and recent reviews consistently highlight its user-friendly web app and smooth guest journey.
GuestSpace’s highly recent feedback underscores its modern, straightforward design, which many users find easier to navigate and manage. Edge: GuestSpace.
Gastfreund’s system offers 11 shared features, but has no exclusive features. It provides modules like digital guest directories, info channels, and hotel newspapers—covering core guest engagement. GuestSpace, however, offers only one unique feature: guest profiles, alongside its shared features, including digital check-in, mobile keys, and upsell tools.
Guests and hoteliers alike appreciate GuestSpace for its automation and guest profile management, which directly impact personalization and revenue. It’s clear that GuestSpace’s feature set is more targeted toward operational efficiency. Edge: GuestSpace.
Gastfreund’s support rating is 4.27/5, with users praising its quick, friendly responses. However, with just 11 reviews and limited recent feedback, its support quality remains uncertain. GuestSpace scores higher at 4.46/5, with recent reviews emphasizing prompt responses and consistent assistance, especially during pre-opening phases.
Many users describe GuestSpace’s support as proactive and helpful, contributing to smoother onboarding and ongoing use. Edge: GuestSpace.
Gastfreund boasts 13 verified integration partners, including major PMS providers like Winhotel, SiteMinder, and Little Hotelier, along with several niche partners. GuestSpace has only 4 verified partners—FLEXIPASS, Stayntouch, Goki, and a shared integration with Mews—limiting its connectivity options.
For hotels relying on a broad ecosystem of integrations, Gastfreund provides more flexibility and options. GuestSpace’s limited integrations could be a drawback if your property depends on specific third-party systems. Edge: Gastfreund.
Considering the review data, GuestSpace’s recent ratings and reviews are more positive and detailed, highlighting its user-friendliness and automation benefits. Gastfreund’s reviews are sparse and outdated, with no recent ratings, making it difficult to assess current user sentiment.
GuestSpace’s high recent ratings and overall positive feedback suggest it’s the favored platform among hoteliers actively using and recommending it. Edge: GuestSpace.
Gastfreund’s pricing starts at $400 per month, with no freemium or trial options documented. GuestSpace charges $600 monthly, also without a trial or freemium tier. The higher price for GuestSpace reflects its modern features and recent support ratings, but the lack of trial periods limits direct comparison.
If budget is a primary concern, Gastfreund offers a lower entry point, but with less recent validation of its value. Conversely, GuestSpace’s higher cost aligns with its recent positive reviews and feature set.
Not ideal if you need rapid deployment, modern automation, or recent positive feedback— Gastfreund’s recent review history is limited.
Not ideal if your hotel depends heavily on extensive third-party integrations or complex customization options, as GuestSpace has limited integration partners.
GuestSpace offers a fresh, automation-focused approach with current, positive reviews, making it ideal for hotels emphasizing guest self-service and digital engagement. Its quick deployment, high user satisfaction, and targeted features support modern, tech-savvy properties.
Gastfreund provides a broader range of modules and a longer market presence but suffers from outdated reviews and limited recent user feedback. It’s suited for larger properties or those requiring extensive integrations and customization and less for hotels seeking quick, proven automation.
For hotels wanting immediate value with strong automation and recent positive feedback, GuestSpace is the safer choice. If your property needs a modular platform with a wide ecosystem and you can tolerate less recent validation, Gastfreund may still be viable. Ultimately, your decision hinges on your hotel’s focus on automation versus customization and integration.
酒店客人应用程序 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $400/mo | From $600/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Gastfreund | Hotelcore 和 GuestSpace 共享 11 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 客人资料 |
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
The overall user experience of both guests and staff with DropIn is favorable due to its intuitive interface. This ease of use contributes to smooth a... The overall user experience of both guests and staff with DropIn is favorable due to its intuitive interface. This ease of use contributes to smooth adoption and effective utilization of its features.
DropIn 的通讯功能得到了积极的评价;然而,一些用户认为其对外通讯能力还有提升空间,以进一步增强与客人的互动。
自助服务功能让宾客对自己的住宿体验拥有更多掌控权,DropIn 平台为此提供了便利,显著提升了宾客的入住体验。用户也认为这提高了运营效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
DropIn 与 Mews 等预订系统的集成及其生成电子门禁码的功能备受好评。这项功能减少了人工办理入住的需要,提高了客房出入的便捷性和安全性。
尽管总体上广受好评,但一些用户提到希望DropIn平台能提供更多自定义选项,尤其是在访客沟通和菜单设置方面。这方面的改进可以进一步提升其实用性。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Gastfreund | Hotelcore 和 GuestSpace 共享许多核心 Hotel Guest Apps 功能,但各有独特的能力。Gastfreund | Hotelcore 提供 13 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 GuestSpace 提供 4 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。GuestSpace 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 4.3/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Gastfreund | Hotelcore:否。GuestSpace:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Guest Apps 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Gastfreund | Hotelcore 的 HT Score 为 0,GuestSpace 的为 78。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问