The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 31 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
GoTab 表现出色 ,拥有独特功能如 Upselling and Discounts & Promotions.
Shiji Group 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Employee Reporting and Management and Server Level Reporting.
基于 HTR 上 31 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $600/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 0 | 31 |
在分析了 31 条经验证的评价后,GoTab 用户最看重其 ,而 Shiji Group 用户则强调 用户友好性, 运营效率, 系统集成。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
用户友好性
▾
|
|
|
+
运营效率
▾
|
|
|
+
系统集成
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
系统速度和性能
▾
|
|
|
−
综合报告
▾
|
|
|
−
本地化需求
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店POS系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) | — | #7 1 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #4 14 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #4 14 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #6 2 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #4 10 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #5 22 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #5 19 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 | — | #6 1 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #5 8 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #5 6 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | — | #4 6 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | — | #3 7 条评价 |
Choosing the right POS system for your hotel involves understanding the core differences between GoTab by GoTab and Shiji Infrasys POS by Shiji Group. Both aim to streamline operations and improve guest experiences but target different hotel types and operational needs. While GoTab emphasizes contactless ordering and guest engagement, Shiji Infrasys offers an enterprise-grade, fully integrated POS solution designed for scalability. Which of these suits your hotel best depends on your operational priorities and current tech infrastructure.
In terms of current reviews, Shiji Infrasys POS has a significant advantage with 29 reviews, all recent and highly positive, whereas GoTab has no recent reviews or ratings. This makes Shiji the more reliable choice for hoteliers seeking proven solutions and ongoing support. Are you ready to dive deeper into how these systems compare on key features, usability, and value?
Both GoTab and Shiji Infrasys POS resolve the challenge of managing F&B operations efficiently, but their approaches differ. GoTab focuses on contactless, mobile ordering to enhance guest convenience, ideal for properties prioritizing guest engagement and contactless services. Shiji Infrasys emphasizes comprehensive, enterprise-level management, integrating multiple hotel functions on a cloud platform to streamline daily operations.
Where GoTab offers features like delivery menu customization, upselling, and integrations with Uber Eats and DoorDash, Shiji provides extensive capabilities such as customer management, employee reporting, inventory, and kitchen display systems. The key question: do you need a guest-facing mobile order platform or a robust, integrated hotel management system?
If your hotel needs a scalable, enterprise-grade POS that integrates seamlessly with property management and supports multi-outlet management, Shiji Infrasys POS is the clear choice. It’s well-suited for mid-sized to large properties, chain hotels, or brands seeking detailed reporting, inventory control, and centralized management.
Conversely, if your hotel prioritizes contactless ordering, mobile guest engagement, and quick implementation without extensive hardware or contracts, GoTab is more fitting. It’s ideal for boutique, resort, or lifestyle hotels aiming to modernize F&B service and enhance guest touchpoints.
In summary, choose Shiji if you need a comprehensive, multi-functional platform with proven scalability. Opt for GoTab if your focus is on contactless ordering and guest experience innovation.
Shiji Infrasys earns a much higher usability rating, with 4.66 out of 5 based on recent reviews, and is praised for its user-friendly interface and smooth operation. Many users report that staff adoption is straightforward, and the onboarding process is efficient, averaging 4.46 out of 5. Some review comments highlight that the system simplifies daily operations and reduces errors.
GoTab, on the other hand, has no recent reviews or ratings, making it difficult to assess ease of use. Given the available data, your team will likely find Shiji more intuitive and easier to implement, especially with its dedicated support.
Edge: Shiji Infrasys POS.
Shiji Infrasys boasts 14 unique features, significantly more than GoTab’s 6. Its offerings include customer management, employee reporting, inventory, kitchen display systems, and PCI compliance—features critical for enterprise operations.
GoTab excels in guest-facing features like upselling, discounts, promotions, and integrations with delivery platforms like Uber Eats and DoorDash. However, it lacks many back-of-house management tools present in Shiji’s platform.
Ultimately, for broad operational control and data-driven management, Shiji has the edge. For enhancing guest engagement and delivery options, GoTab’s features are more tailored.
Edge: Shiji Infrasys POS.
Shiji Infrasys scores highly with a 4.52 out of 5 support rating, and reviewers frequently mention prompt, helpful assistance. One user reports, “Support is fast and effective, making daily management easier,” reflecting consistent positive feedback. Its onboarding process is rated 4.46, indicating a smooth transition for new users.
GoTab, with no recent reviews or ratings, provides no comparable data. Given the current support ratings and review recency, Shiji clearly leads in customer service.
Edge: Shiji Infrasys POS.
Shiji Infrasys integrates with 64 verified partners, including major names like SiteMinder, Revinate, IDeaS, and Amadeus, offering extensive property and revenue management integrations. It shares some partners with GoTab, such as Stayntouch and Actabl, but vastly outperforms in total integrations.
GoTab maintains only 4 verified partners, focusing on delivery and contactless platforms. If broad system connectivity and data unification are priorities, Shiji is the clear winner.
Edge: Shiji Infrasys POS.
Shiji Infrasys has a perfect NPS score of 9.03/10, reflecting high satisfaction among hotel users across multiple regions. Hoteliers from luxury and branded hotel segments praise its reliability, integration, and support.
GoTab has no recent reviews or ratings, so no current data exists to support hotel satisfaction. Given review recency and volume, Shiji’s higher ratings are a more trustworthy indicator of performance.
Edge: Shiji Infrasys POS.
GoTab does not publicly disclose its pricing, suggesting a customized quote based on hotel needs. Shiji Infrasys has a listed base price of $600, with no ongoing fees or contracts specified.
The lack of transparent pricing for GoTab makes direct comparison difficult, but the fixed price of Shiji offers clarity and predictability for budgeting.
Not ideal if you require comprehensive property management or back-of-house reporting, as GoTab’s focus remains on front-end ordering and promotional features.
Not ideal if your operation is small, boutique, or solely focused on contactless guest ordering without the need for backend management.
Shiji Infrasys POS stands out as the more complete and proven solution, especially given its volume of recent reviews, high support ratings, and extensive feature set. It is clearly better suited for larger, multi-property hotels or brands requiring robust management tools and integrations.
GoTab offers a niche solution for mobile guest ordering, ideal for properties seeking to enhance contactless dining and delivery services. However, its lack of recent reviews and limited features make it less reliable for hotel-wide operations.
If your hotel values proven scalability, integrations, and support, Shiji Infrasys POS is the safer, smarter investment. Conversely, if guest engagement through mobile ordering is your primary goal, GoTab can be a good supplement but with caution about its limited enterprise features.
酒店POS系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $600/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,GoTab 和 Shiji Infrasys POS 共享 9 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Uber Eats | ||
| 冲门 | ||
| 员工报告和管理 | ||
| 基于云 | ||
| 多平台整合 | ||
| 折扣和促销 | ||
| 服务器推荐 | ||
| 服务器级别报告 | ||
| 用户管理 | ||
| 追加销售 | ||
| 配送菜单定制 | ||
| 食品成本报告 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 8 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 4 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"All the big players don't offer the level of API connectivity we need, but Shiji does. From the early stages of our design process, we were confident that Shiji could provide us wi..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"We reduced check-in time by over 80%, from up to eight minutes to just about one minute with the new system."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
客户发现石基的POS和PMS系统界面友好,减少了培训时间,并简化了新用户的使用。其直观的界面深受员工欢迎,能够轻松管理各种任务。
石基因其菜单和桌位管理等功能而备受赞誉,这些功能简化了点餐流程,减少了错误,最终提升了日常运营效率。该系统因提升团队效率和顾客满意度而备受赞誉。
评论者称赞石基将POS系统与PMS系统无缝集成,通过连接会计、预订和库存等各项功能,简化了运营。这种集成有助于精准追踪数据,提升运营效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
虽然许多人对该系统表示赞赏,但也有一些人反映,该系统在高峰使用期间存在卡顿和性能下降的问题,这表明需要进行优化。这会影响结账流程等任务,并影响整体满意... 虽然许多人对该系统表示赞赏,但也有一些人反映,该系统在高峰使用期间存在卡顿和性能下降的问题,这表明需要进行优化。这会影响结账流程等任务,并影响整体满意度。
石基以其强大的报告功能而备受赞誉,能够帮助酒店提取详细的报告,从而辅助决策。然而,部分酒店希望获得更多定制选项,以便进行更深入的分析。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。GoTab 和 Shiji Infrasys POS 共享许多核心 Hotel POS Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。GoTab 提供 4 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Shiji Infrasys POS 提供 64 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Shiji Infrasys POS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
GoTab:否。Shiji Infrasys POS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel POS Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。GoTab 的 HT Score 为 0,Shiji Group 的为 79。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问