The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 48 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Guest Service 表现出色 ,拥有独特功能如 Hotel Website Check-in Portal and Payment & Authorizations.
MyStay 表现出色 在 ease of use 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Guest Segmentation & Targeting and Multi-Channel Delivery (Email, SMS, WhatsApp, Chat).
基于 HTR 上 48 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $100/mo | From $400/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 5 | 43 |
在分析了 48 条经验证的评价后,Guest Service 用户最看重其 ,而 MyStay 用户则强调 无接触办理入住, 宾客体验, 宾客沟通。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
无接触办理入住
▾
|
|
|
+
宾客体验
▾
|
|
|
+
宾客沟通
▾
|
|
|
+
支持与持续改进
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
定制选项
▾
|
|
|
−
与 PMS 集成
▾
|
|
|
−
系统速度和性能
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 非接触式办理入住 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #24 0 条评价 | #5 15 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #20 1 条评价 | #6 10 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #9 3 条评价 | #4 7 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #14 1 条评价 | #8 3 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #20 2 条评价 | #5 12 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #16 2 条评价 | #4 11 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #13 3 条评价 | #5 12 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #14 1 条评价 | #6 9 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | #14 0 条评价 | #7 3 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #4 32 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #6 2 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | #3 5 条评价 | #4 2 条评价 |
Your hotel is evaluating two contactless check-in solutions: GuestService’s Online Check-in and MyStay Check in. Both promise to streamline arrivals, reduce queue times, and improve guest satisfaction. However, they diverge significantly in reviews, features, and market presence, making your choice clearer. GuestService’s platform has minimal recent reviews and a lower overall rating, while MyStay has more recent feedback, more reviews, and a higher score. Which one truly fits your operational needs?
GuestService offers a broad set of features with 13 unique capabilities, including hotel website portals, document scanning, multi-lingual support, and PCI compliance. MyStay, on the other hand, provides 10 features, notably PMS integration, guest segmentation, multi-channel messaging, and upselling, with a focus on automation and operational efficiency. Despite GuestService’s larger feature list, its lack of recent reviews and a zero-star overall rating suggest it may not meet current hotel demands.
GuestService has an overall score of 0/5 based on only 4 reviews, with none in the last six months, indicating outdated user feedback. Meanwhile, MyStay has a perfect 5/5 rating from 40 reviews, all within the last six months, illustrating consistent, recent user satisfaction. The stronger recent review activity makes MyStay the more reliable choice for modern hoteliers seeking proven solutions. Are you ready to prioritize current user feedback over dated claims?
If your hotel needs a contactless check-in system that emphasizes extensive feature options like document scanning, multi-lingual support, and pre-arrival upselling, GuestService may seem appealing. However, with only 4 reviews and a score of 0/5, its real-world performance and user satisfaction are questionable today.
If your hotel prioritizes ease of use, rapid deployment, and reliable support—especially if you operate in Europe, North America, or emerging markets—MyStay is the clear winner. Its 40 recent reviews, 5-star rating, and high customer support scores make it the safer, more effective choice. For hotels seeking proven performance with automation, upselling, and seamless integrations, MyStay is the better pick.
GuestService scores 4.5/5 for ease of use, with positive comments on its mobile app and straightforward check-in process, but the lack of recent reviews raises questions about ongoing user experience. In contrast, MyStay boasts a 4.91/5 rating with extensive positive feedback emphasizing its intuitive interface, quick setup, and helpful onboarding experience. Reviewers frequently mention how simple it is to implement and operate, even for staff with limited technical skills.
Given the latest reviews and higher user ratings, the edge goes to MyStay as the more user-friendly platform that minimizes staff training and maximizes guest convenience.
GuestService offers 13 features exclusive to its platform, including hotel website portals, document e-signatures, multi-lingual support, and deposit collections—great for hotels that need comprehensive, localized solutions. MyStay has 10 unique features emphasizing automation, guest segmentation, multi-channel messaging, and upselling, designed to streamline operations and boost revenues.
While GuestService provides a richer set of features, many are specialized or region-specific, and the lack of recent reviews diminishes confidence in their current effectiveness. Conversely, MyStay’s features focus on automation, integration, and guest targeting, which are highly valued by modern hotels. The edge in feature relevance and recent performance goes to MyStay.
GuestService’s support rating is 4.75/5, based on just four reviews, with comments noting satisfactory but somewhat outdated support experiences. MyStay scores slightly higher at 4.93/5 from 40 reviews, with reviewers praising prompt, helpful support and ongoing updates.
Given the volume of recent feedback, MyStay’s customer support appears more responsive and reliable—a crucial factor when implementing mission-critical systems. The edge clearly favors MyStay for hotel teams that require dependable, quick assistance.
GuestService integrates with five verified partners, including major names like Oracle Hospitality and Mews, but only three are shared with MyStay. MyStay boasts 30 verified integrations, including prominent property management and channel management solutions such as Priority Software, Kwentra, and WuBook, offering broader connectivity.
The larger number of integrations makes MyStay more adaptable to diverse hotel tech stacks and future expansion. If seamless integration with multiple systems is paramount, MyStay holds the advantage.
GuestService’s ratings are essentially nonexistent in recent reviews, with a 0/5 score and no feedback in the last six months. Meanwhile, MyStay enjoys a perfect 5/5 rating from 40 recent reviews, with consistent praise across various hotel segments, including serviced apartments and boutique hotels.
Hotels that have used MyStay recently express high satisfaction, noting its ease and operational impact. The clear winner in current hotelier ratings is MyStay, reflecting ongoing performance and trust.
GuestService charges $100 monthly per property with no free tier, trial, or flexible pricing options. MyStay’s pricing is $400 monthly, also without a free trial or tier, indicating a higher upfront cost.
While GuestService appears more affordable, the inferior ratings and lack of recent feedback diminish its value proposition. MyStay’s higher price is justified by its proven results, recent reviews, and extensive features.
Not ideal if your hotel operates primarily in regions where GuestService’s support is untested, or if you require ongoing recent user feedback to validate performance.
Not ideal if your hotel requires highly localized features or specialized integrations not covered by MyStay’s current partners, or if your property is very small and needs a simpler, less expensive solution.
GuestService aims to be a comprehensive property management platform for contactless check-in but suffers from outdated reviews and zero recent feedback, lowering confidence in its current performance. Its rich feature set may appeal initially, but without recent validation, it’s risky for hotels prioritizing current user experience.
MyStay, with more recent reviews, a higher score, and extensive integrations, offers a reliable, user-friendly system that aligns with modern hotel needs. The platform’s focus on automation, communication, and operational efficiency makes it the better choice for most hoteliers today.
Choose GuestService if your hotel operates in regions with specific needs that align with its features, and you’re prepared to test a less-reviewed platform. Opt for MyStay if you want a trusted, well-rated solution proven by recent hotelier feedback and supported by a broad network of integrations.
In conclusion, for immediate reliability, user satisfaction, and ongoing support, MyStay stands out as the recommended contactless check-in platform for your hotel.
非接触式办理入住 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $100/mo | From $400/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,GuestService - Online Check-in 和 MyStay Check in 共享 4 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 分割 | ||
| 多渠道推送(电子邮件、短信、WhatsApp、聊天) | ||
| 客户细分与定向 | ||
| 客房升级商品 | ||
| 文件和护照扫描 | ||
| 条款和条件签署 | ||
| 经前管理系统整合 | ||
| 营销传播选择加入 | ||
| 设备无关 | ||
| 辅助产品营销 | ||
| 酒店网站入住门户 | ||
| 预注册信息收集 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 11 项功能存在差异。
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
评论者经常提到 MyStay 的非接触式入住功能是一个至关重要的工具,尤其是在疫情期间。它简化并加快了入住流程,让客人在抵达前完成入住,并减少了身体接触。用户... 评论者经常提到 MyStay 的非接触式入住功能是一个至关重要的工具,尤其是在疫情期间。它简化并加快了入住流程,让客人在抵达前完成入住,并减少了身体接触。用户欣赏它为他们的操作带来的易用性和效率。
评论者经常评论 MyStay 如何显著提升宾客体验。该平台允许在抵达前进行沟通,并在抵达时提供便利,给人一种个性化和周到服务的感觉。酒店经营者注意到直接结果是... 评论者经常评论 MyStay 如何显著提升宾客体验。该平台允许在抵达前进行沟通,并在抵达时提供便利,给人一种个性化和周到服务的感觉。酒店经营者注意到直接结果是宾客满意度更高。
许多评论都强调了 MyStay 如何改善客人沟通。该平台允许酒店经营者通过自动消息在客人入住前、入住期间和入住后与客人进行有效沟通。此功能通过提供及时的信息和... 许多评论都强调了 MyStay 如何改善客人沟通。该平台允许酒店经营者通过自动消息在客人入住前、入住期间和入住后与客人进行有效沟通。此功能通过提供及时的信息和及时解决疑问来提高客人满意度。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户经常建议需要更多自定义选项,特别是在自动消息传递和客户沟通模板方面。他们希望能够更灵活地调整文本、图形和自动消息传递格式,以更好地满足他们的特定需... 用户经常建议需要更多自定义选项,特别是在自动消息传递和客户沟通模板方面。他们希望能够更灵活地调整文本、图形和自动消息传递格式,以更好地满足他们的特定需求。
MyStay 与物业管理系统 (PMS) 的集成是一项有价值的功能,在多篇评论中都得到了积极的评价。这种无缝集成有助于酒店经营者更有效地管理客人数据和运营。然而,一... MyStay 与物业管理系统 (PMS) 的集成是一项有价值的功能,在多篇评论中都得到了积极的评价。这种无缝集成有助于酒店经营者更有效地管理客人数据和运营。然而,一些用户确实偶尔会遇到 MyStay 和 PMS 之间的同步问题。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。GuestService - Online Check-in 和 MyStay Check in 共享许多核心 Contactless Check-in 功能,但各有独特的能力。GuestService - Online Check-in 提供 5 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 MyStay Check in 提供 30 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。MyStay Check in 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 4.6/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
GuestService - Online Check-in:否。MyStay Check in:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Contactless Check-in 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Guest Service 的 HT Score 为 0,MyStay 的为 22。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问