The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
OpenHotel
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #60 1 条评价 | #25 36 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #39 11 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | #52 0 条评价 | #50 0 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #21 2 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
OpenHotel
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #60 1 条评价 | #37 16 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 | — | #45 4 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #56 1 条评价 | #28 9 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 | — | #43 2 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
OpenHotel
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #40 1 条评价 | #14 54 条评价 |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is critical for your hotel’s operational efficiency, guest experience, and revenue management. Hilton OnQ by Hilton and OpenHotel PMS both aim to streamline hotel operations, but they approach this goal very differently. Hilton OnQ, being a proprietary system, is designed specifically for Hilton’s extensive network, while OpenHotel PMS offers a broad suite of features targeted at small to medium-sized properties across various segments. Which solution aligns better with your hotel’s needs?
The decision hinges on your hotel type, operational complexity, and growth plans. Does your hotel need a system built for large-scale, branded properties, or a flexible platform suited for independent hotels and boutique brands? Let’s compare both to help you make an informed choice.
Hilton OnQ is a proprietary PMS developed in-house, primarily serving Hilton-branded hotels with a focus on consistency across properties. It provides core reservation, check-in, and billing features, but lacks extensive third-party integrations and modern user experience compared to other systems.
OpenHotel PMS, on the other hand, is a cloud-based platform with a wide array of features—23 unique functionalities identified in the review data—such as revenue management, channel management, and automated night audits. It boasts a high overall rating of 4.81/5, with 57 reviews, mostly recent, indicating active user engagement.
Given the limited review data and outdated feedback for Hilton OnQ, it’s clear that OpenHotel’s more current, feature-rich platform is better suited for hotels seeking flexibility, ease of use, and ongoing support. Are you prepared to accept a system that is less modern and more limited in integrations?
If your hotel is an independent property, boutique hotel, or small chain seeking a highly rated, user-friendly PMS with a comprehensive feature set, go with OpenHotel PMS. Its high customer satisfaction rating, recent reviews, and extensive functionalities—like channel management, revenue tools, and guest communication—make it a strong fit.
If your hotel is part of Hilton’s extensive portfolio or a similar large-scale, branded operation requiring a proprietary, in-house system with minimal customization, Hilton OnQ might seem suitable. However, given the outdated reviews and minimal recent use, OpenHotel’s modern approach and positive feedback make it the more reliable choice for most hotels outside Hilton’s ecosystem.
In most cases, OpenHotel’s flexible, integrated, and well-supported platform will serve your hotel better, especially if you value ongoing innovation and a modern user experience.
Hilton OnQ scores a 1/5 for ease of use, with reviews indicating that the system feels obsolete, clunky, and difficult to navigate. Hoteliers report spending excessive time troubleshooting, and onboarding is reportedly challenging. Users also mention that the interface is outdated, which hampers staff adoption and daily operations.
OpenHotel PMS, however, scores a 4.71/5, with reviews praising its intuitive layout, ease of navigation, and straightforward onboarding process. Users highlight that the system is “very user-friendly,” and support staff are highly responsive, making staff adoption smooth even for those less tech-savvy.
Edge: OpenHotel PMS.
Hilton OnQ offers limited features, primarily core reservation, billing, and check-in functionalities, with no third-party integrations or advanced modules. Its feature set is minimal, reflecting its design as a proprietary system meant for Hilton properties.
OpenHotel PMS boasts 23 unique features, including a channel manager, revenue management, booking engine, guest communication tools, online support, multi-currency, and digital registration. Its extensive feature set supports many operational aspects, such as group bookings, automated night audits, and integrated payment processing.
Edge: OpenHotel PMS.
Hilton OnQ’s support reputation is poor, with reviews describing their tech support as “spent 10+ hours” troubleshooting issues, indicating a frustrating experience. The limited reviews show a lack of recent engagement, raising concerns about ongoing support quality.
OpenHotel PMS, by contrast, has a strong support score of 4.82/5, with reviewers citing “excellent customer service,” responsiveness, and helpful onboarding. Multiple reviews mention the support team’s personal, attentive approach, which has helped many hotels navigate system complexities smoothly.
Edge: OpenHotel PMS.
Hilton OnQ has verified integrations with only 6 partners, including some industry players like INTELITY and Canary Technologies. Its limited integrations reflect a closed, proprietary approach aligned with Hilton’s internal ecosystem.
OpenHotel PMS connects with 12 verified partners, including major OTAs like Booking.com, Expedia, and additional tools like SiteMinder, RateGain, and OpenKey. Its open architecture allows for more versatile connectivity, enhancing operational flexibility.
Edge: OpenHotel PMS.
Since Hilton OnQ has only one review, with a 0/5 rating, it offers no recent positive sentiment. Its review highlights ongoing issues with outdated technology and support challenges.
OpenHotel PMS, with 54 recent reviews averaging 4.8/5, is highly rated across hotel segments, especially for small to medium properties. Hoteliers praise its ease of use, feature set, and support, making it the current industry favorite.
Edge: OpenHotel PMS.
Pricing details for Hilton OnQ are unavailable, as it is a proprietary system exclusive to Hilton, often included as part of franchise agreements or corporate contracts.
OpenHotel PMS does not publish specific pricing but indicates a cloud-based, subscription model with no hidden fees or per-booking charges. The lack of public pricing suggests a tailored quote based on hotel size and needs.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Hilton OnQ is a proprietary, in-house PMS designed for Hilton-branded properties, with minimal features and outdated support. It’s best suited for large Hilton properties needing brand consistency and tight control but falls short in modern usability and integrations.
OpenHotel PMS is a cloud-based, flexible system with a 4.81/5 overall rating, 23 features, and active, recent reviews from diverse hotel segments. It supports revenue management, channel management, and guest engagement, making it a strong choice for independent and small chain properties.
For most hotels seeking a modern, well-supported, feature-rich PMS, OpenHotel is the clear winner. Hilton OnQ remains niche, best for Hilton affiliates or properties committed to a proprietary ecosystem.
If your hotel values ease of use, extensive features, and ongoing support, choose OpenHotel PMS. If your operation is part of Hilton or similar large chain, and you prefer a proprietary setup, Hilton OnQ may be suitable — but note its outdated reviews and limited recent activity.
In conclusion, for the majority of independent and small to mid-sized hotels, OpenHotel PMS offers the better combination of features, support, and modernity. Hilton OnQ’s legacy status and sparse recent reviews make it less appealing unless tied to Hilton’s corporate system.
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
客户支持团队的开放性和响应能力受到用户的高度赞赏。许多人特别提到了团队在紧急情况下的帮助以及无缝过渡到 OpenHotel PMS。这种支持有助于平稳运营,尤其是在... 客户支持团队的开放性和响应能力受到用户的高度赞赏。许多人特别提到了团队在紧急情况下的帮助以及无缝过渡到 OpenHotel PMS。这种支持有助于平稳运营,尤其是在旺季或系统转换期间。
许多用户都对 OpenHotel PMS 的导航和使用非常满意。该系统非常直观,即使是首次担任酒店服务员的人也能轻松上手,并且可以无缝地从其他系统过渡。用户指出,由... 许多用户都对 OpenHotel PMS 的导航和使用非常满意。该系统非常直观,即使是首次担任酒店服务员的人也能轻松上手,并且可以无缝地从其他系统过渡。用户指出,由于其灵活的预订网格和全面的布局,该系统对于中小型酒店尤其有效。
用户赞赏 OpenHotel 不断改进并根据用户反馈添加功能。这种奉献精神确保系统始终与行业标准和不断发展的酒店需求保持同步。有关这些更新的通知通过收件箱通知共... 用户赞赏 OpenHotel 不断改进并根据用户反馈添加功能。这种奉献精神确保系统始终与行业标准和不断发展的酒店需求保持同步。有关这些更新的通知通过收件箱通知共享,方便用户随时了解最新信息。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
虽然许多人都对 OpenHotel 提供的详细而全面的报告选项表示赞赏,但也有用户不断要求提供可自定义的报告和适合特定酒店的改进指标。一些用户发现当前的报告充斥... 虽然许多人都对 OpenHotel 提供的详细而全面的报告选项表示赞赏,但也有用户不断要求提供可自定义的报告和适合特定酒店的改进指标。一些用户发现当前的报告充斥着不必要的信息,并建议进行改进以更好地满足他们的需求。
用户指出,OpenHotel 拥有高效的财务处理模块,包括有序的财务视图、可自定义的财务报告以及与外部财务系统的集成。但是,建议进行改进,特别是在实时税务报告和... 用户指出,OpenHotel 拥有高效的财务处理模块,包括有序的财务视图、可自定义的财务报告以及与外部财务系统的集成。但是,建议进行改进,特别是在实时税务报告和信用卡支付干预方面。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Hilton OnQ 和 OpenHotel PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Hilton OnQ 提供 6 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 OpenHotel PMS 提供 12 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。OpenHotel PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 1.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Hilton OnQ:否。OpenHotel PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Hilton 的 HT Score 为 0,OpenHotel 的为 16。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问